Fuzzy AHP (Triangular and Spherical)

28 views
Skip to first unread message

Neeraj Kaushik

unread,
Oct 26, 2025, 7:23:24 PM (11 days ago) Oct 26
to dataanalysistraining
Dear Friends,

Are you a user of MCDM techniques? If so, then at some stage of your learning, you must have encountered the Fuzzy variants of MCDM techniques.

Fuzzy set theory provides a framework to represent and process imprecise information. By allowing elements to have partial membership in sets, fuzzy logic enables a more nuanced and realistic modeling of human thought and linguistic expressions, such as "slightly important" or "moderately preferred." This approach becomes crucial when decision-makers face situations where clear-cut data is unavailable or when the criteria themselves are subjective and difficult to quantify precisely. Employing fuzzy numbers allows for the capture of this inherent vagueness, leading to more robust and reflective decision outcomes.

In the realm of Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) techniques, the integration of fuzzy logic significantly enhances their capability to handle complex problems. MCDM methods are designed to evaluate multiple conflicting criteria to arrive at an optimal decision. When these criteria involve qualitative assessments or human perceptions, traditional MCDM techniques can fall short. Fuzzy MCDM methods, such as Fuzzy AHP, address this by incorporating fuzzy numbers into the evaluation process.

I've explained the concept and working of Fuzzy Numbers (in the context of Fuzzy AHP). I've demonstrated the application of Triangular Fuzzy Numbers (TFNs) and Spherical Fuzzy Numbers (SFNs) within the AHP framework. TFNs are a common choice for representing fuzzy values due to their simplicity and ease of computation, effectively capturing the lower, most probable, and upper bounds of an uncertain value. 

SFNs, a more recent development, offer an even greater degree of flexibility by allowing decision-makers to express their opinions not only on membership but also on non-membership and hesitancy. This additional dimension makes SFNs particularly powerful in situations with high uncertainty or divided opinions. It provides a richer representation of decision-makers' preferences and their confidence levels. 


Fuzzy Set Introduction: https://youtu.be/WJA4YxeGElo

Happy Learning
Neeraj

Neeraj Kaushik

unread,
Oct 27, 2025, 6:30:23 PM (10 days ago) Oct 27
to dataanalysistraining
Dear Friends,

Building on our previous discussion about Fuzzy AHP, I've created a new video specifically detailing the practical application and calculation of Triangular Fuzzy Numbers (TFNs). 

TFNs are fundamental to fuzzy MCDM techniques, providing a straightforward yet powerful way to quantify imprecise linguistic assessments. In this video, I walk through the step-by-step process of how TFNs are constructed and utilized within the AHP framework, demonstrating their role in converting subjective human judgments into a measurable format. This approach is invaluable for tackling decision-making scenarios where exact numerical data is scarce, and expert opinions need to be accurately integrated.

AHP Triangular Fuzzy Weight Calculations: https://youtu.be/6SmHi0CHZgc

Happy Learning
Neeraj

Neeraj Kaushik

unread,
Oct 28, 2025, 7:57:31 PM (9 days ago) Oct 28
to dataanalysistraining
Dear Friends,

Building on our discussions about Fuzzy AHP, let's continue our discussion on the practical application and calculation of Spherical Fuzzy Numbers (SFNs) within the AHP framework. SFNs offer enhanced flexibility by allowing decision-makers to express not only membership but also non-membership and hesitancy, making them particularly powerful in situations with high uncertainty. 

I've explained all this in a video that provides a step-by-step guide on constructing and utilizing SFNs, converting subjective judgments into a measurable format for more robust decision outcomes.

AHP Spherical  Fuzzy Weight Calculations: https://youtu.be/SV2e90x0YpA

Happy learning
Neeraj

John Kevin Padro

unread,
Nov 4, 2025, 6:30:01 AM (2 days ago) Nov 4
to DataAnalysis
Hi Dr. Neeraj,

Can you elaborate in calculating consistency ratio (CR), refer to this picture the value for CR is  0.057. I try to solve on my own, however I didn't get it.

Hoping for your positive response
tt1.png

Neeraj Kaushik

unread,
Nov 4, 2025, 8:57:44 PM (2 days ago) Nov 4
to dataanalys...@googlegroups.com
Dear John
Thanks for reminding me the missing link in the previous email regarding the consistency ratio calculation.
I've explained the same in this video:
Consistency Ratio (CR) in AHP: https://youtu.be/tWu3CCUQxHk 
Happy Learning 
Neeraj

--
The members of this group are expected to follow the following Protocols:
1. Please search previous posts in the group before posting the question.
2. Don't write the query in someone's post. Always use the option of New topic for the new question. You can do this by writing to dataanaly...@googlegroups.com
3. It’s better to give a proper subject to your post/query. It'll help others while searching.
4. Never write Open-ended queries. This group intends to help research scholars, NOT TO WORK FOR THEM.
5. Never write words like URGENT in your posts. People will help when they are free.
6. Never upload any information about National Seminars/Conferences. Send such information
in personal emails and feel free to share any RESEARCH-related information.
7. No Happy New Year, Happy Diwali, Happy Holi, Happy Birthday, Happy Anniversary, etc. allowed in this group.
8. Asking or sharing Research Papers is NOT ALLOWED.
9. You can share your questionnaire only once.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DataAnalysis" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dataanalysistrai...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dataanalysistraining/59b4e9c5-0965-41fb-9703-2a74ee9a57bbn%40googlegroups.com.
CR in AHP.xlsx

John Kevin Padro

unread,
3:00 AM (5 hours ago) 3:00 AM
to DataAnalysis
Hello I have some questions with this one

Do you have a reference that the given score index are 8, 6, 4, and 2, then the spherical fuzzy set are (0.85, 0.15, 0.05), (0.75, 0.25, 0.15), (0.65, 0.35, 0.25), and (0.55, 0.45, 0.35), respectively?




tt1.png

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages