Energy changes abnormally in OT method during the GEO_OPT

140 views
Skip to first unread message

Xiaokun

unread,
Nov 8, 2019, 11:40:34 AM11/8/19
to cp2k
Hi,everyone!

I am new one to CP2K and I am doing a Geo-optimization in a MOF. In the input file, I use the OT method, constrain the most atomes obtained from the experiment and relax the NO3- in the MOF cell. I want to find the resonable positions of the NO3- , cause the experiment cannot sure where NO3- it is.  And there seems to some errors in my output file. The energy changes abnomally in a scf. Did I set some keywords wrong?Can anyone give me some suggestions about my claculation? Attached are my input and output files. Thank you.

Best wishes.

Xiao-kun
 
cp2k.inp
cp2k.out
restart.xyz

Patrick Gono

unread,
Nov 9, 2019, 12:52:13 PM11/9/19
to cp...@googlegroups.com
Dear Xiao-kun,

Looking at your output, I noticed the value of the convergence parameter to be "stuck" in some of the SCF loops. I have encountered this issue while using the FULL_ALL preconditioner. Switching to FULL_SINGLE or FULL_SINGLE_INVERSE solved the problem for me, although I did not dig deeper to understand what the actual underlying issue was that caused this behaviour.

In my case, the system was semi-metallic under PBE, with a very low band gap. Even though I used a tiny value for ENERGY_GAP, and a near-optimized starting geometry, some SCF loops turned pathological very much like in your case. Switching to FULL_SINGLE apparently resolved the issue.

I am also open to any further suggestions or explanations by other experts in the community, though.

Yours sincerely,
Patrick Gono

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+uns...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/bc268d58-7cab-4c7c-83ba-71bf8d74726f%40googlegroups.com.
Message has been deleted

Xiaokun

unread,
Nov 10, 2019, 3:52:21 AM11/10/19
to cp2k
Dear Patrick Gono,
      
Thanks for your suggestions. I will try your recommendation. 
Yours sincerely,

Xiao-kun

在 2019年11月10日星期日 UTC+8上午1:52:13,Patrick Gono写道:
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp...@googlegroups.com.

Xiaokun

unread,
Nov 10, 2019, 3:54:00 AM11/10/19
to cp2k
Dear Travis,

thanks for your reply, I will have a try.
yours,

Xiao-kun

在 2019年11月10日星期日 UTC+8上午4:35:22,Travis写道:
Hi,

For high spin materials like this, I recommend switching away from the OT method. Sometimes the combination of high spin and use of GGAs makes your system half-metallic.

  &SCF
   EPS_SCF
1e-06
   MAX_SCF
200
   SCF_GUESS RESTART
   ADDED_MOS  
200
   
&OUTER_SCF  F
   
&END OUTER_SCF
   
&SMEAR  T
    METHOD  FERMI_DIRAC
    ELECTRONIC_TEMPERATURE    
3.0000000000000000E+02
   
&END SMEAR
   
&MIXING  T
    METHOD  BROYDEN_MIXING
    ALPHA    
4.0000000000000002E-01
    BETA    
1.5000000000000000E+00
    NMIXING  
5
    NBUFFER  
8
   
&END MIXING
 
&END SCF

-T

Xiaokun

unread,
Nov 13, 2019, 3:23:51 AM11/13/19
to cp2k
Hi Travis,

I have tried your recommended DIAG method for my system. But unfortunately it failed. Even though I changed  EPS_SCF 1e-05 and MAX_SCF 400, it's hard to converge. The energy change seems to be very large (1E0~1E-1) and the 'Convergence' also is a large number during the SCF WAVEFUNCTION OPTIMIZATION progress.  How can I solve this problem?

Yours,

Xiao-kun

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
Message has been deleted
0 new messages