cell optimization strange values of the a, b, c vectors

41 views
Skip to first unread message

Jonathan Campeggio

unread,
Feb 7, 2022, 2:59:00 AM2/7/22
to cp2k
At the attention of the CP2K community,

I have done a cell optimization for a Pd 111 surface. From the experimental cif I have prepared a 111 unit cell. Then I have translated in the x y z directions of 2 3 1 respectively, using periodic boundary conditions.

In the attachment you can find input, output and the coordinates. I expected that the cell would "breath" in the 3 dimensions, while along x it is contracted. Is my idea wrong? Have I done mistakes in the input files.

Thank you for your competence and kindness.
Jonathan
cell.inp
output
pd_cell_111.xyz

Marcella Iannuzzi

unread,
Feb 7, 2022, 5:03:50 AM2/7/22
to cp2k
Dear Jonathan,

You are simulating a bulk system, not a  (111) surface. 
In order to expose a surface, you should add vacuum in the direction orthogonal to the surface you want to expose, i.e., you should use a slab model.
The size 3x2x1 is rather small and probably not suitable to simulate the Pd(111) surface. Consider to increase the system size or use k-points.
Even if you do so, you can expect a relaxation of the topmost layers, but not a contraction in the lateral directions.

Regards
Marcella

Jonathan Campeggio

unread,
Feb 7, 2022, 5:13:29 AM2/7/22
to cp...@googlegroups.com
Dear Marcella,
 thank you for your kind reply. I understand your point.
Best regards,
Jonathan

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+uns...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/b29c595b-c1bc-45c0-8c8e-13b399799cc7n%40googlegroups.com.

Jonathan Campeggio

unread,
Feb 7, 2022, 9:30:26 AM2/7/22
to cp...@googlegroups.com
Dear Marcella,
 I am very sorry to bother you again. As reported in the literature, I have built my slab with PBC along with x and y directions and I have put vacuum along z. The slab is small as you pointed out very correctly, but  I am doing some tests. Then I am running a Geometry Optimization of the slab with the last 2 layers completely fixed (XYZ), and allowing the first two breath along the z directions. As you can see in the position file (pd_slab-pos-1.xyz), the z constraint on the last two layers is not respected, despite it having been given in input. It appears that the second section &FIXED_ATOMS is not considered by the program. What is my error?

Thank you again for your competence and kindness,
Jonathan
slab.inp
pd_slab-pos-1.xyz
slab.xyz
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages