You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Sign in to report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to cp...@googlegroups.com
Hello all,
I am a little confused about GPW and GAPW method. I understand both use gaussian basis sets to compute de wavefunctions and the density is computed by PW and APW method.
But, when is necessary to use GAPW or GPW?
For all-electron calculations is mandatory to use GAPW?
Can I use both method independent of occupied basis set?
If somebody has a little manual about both methods, I appreciate it.
Regards
hut...@chem.uzh.ch
unread,
Jun 20, 2020, 6:47:09 AM6/20/20
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Sign in to report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to cp...@googlegroups.com
Hi
all electron calculations need the GAPW method. This is also
true for mixed all-electron/pseudopotential calculations.
Pseudopotential calculations can be done either with GPW or
GAPW. The advantage of GAPW is the reduced cutoff and increased
stability of forces. The disadvantage is, that not all
features and properties are available. GAPW is also less
efficient, although this can vary.