Bond breaking during the optimisation

37 views
Skip to first unread message

Nikhil Maroli

unread,
Sep 26, 2019, 3:01:04 PM9/26/19
to cp2k
The bonds are breaking during the optimization, Initially, i have tried to optimize the structure with gaussian but it started to break bonds even at correct distances. Anyone can give any suggestion to avoid bond breaking in CP2K and to achieve optimized structure.
Inputs are given below for your information.
&GLOBAL
 PROJECT job2
 RUN_TYPE GEO_OPT
&END GLOBAL

&FORCE_EVAL

 METHOD QS
 &DFT
# Please copy the GTH_BASIS_SETS and POTENTIAL files
# which may have been in cp2k-x.x.x/data or cp2k-x.x.x/tests/QS directory
# to the CP2K executable directory if you use these default files.
   CHARGE 0
   MULTIPLICITY 2
  BASIS_SET_FILE_NAME  GTH_BASIS_SETS
  POTENTIAL_FILE_NAME  POTENTIAL
  &MGRID
   NGRIDS 4
   CUTOFF 30
  &END MGRID
  &XC
   &XC_FUNCTIONAL PBE
   &END XC_FUNCTIONAL
  &END XC
 &END DFT
 &SUBSYS
  &COORD
    Pb         1.94602       -2.12632        1.25157
    Br         3.01219       -0.06256        2.35356
    Pb         2.21556        2.03217        1.09683
    Br        -0.12169        3.23840        1.92449
    Pb        -2.34714        2.39328        0.99984
    Br        -3.57990        0.20869        1.95980
    Pb        -2.65498       -2.14276        1.00547
    Br        -0.34094       -3.29325        1.98965
    Pb         2.06448       -1.33415       -1.21263
    Pb         2.13521        1.12177       -1.15878
    Br         0.06365        1.19694       -0.08612
    Pb        -1.79865        1.47428       -1.68114
    Br        -0.57583       -0.01056       -3.59712
    Pb        -1.98293       -1.29020       -1.66395
    Br         0.01062       -1.18331       -0.10788
    Br        -3.82309       -3.16020       -1.27765
    Br         3.19291       -3.45179       -0.50642
    Br        -3.41601        3.49721       -1.28741
    Cs        -0.28609        0.02294        3.08499
  &END COORD

   &KIND Br
    BASIS_SET DZVP-GTH
    POTENTIAL GTH-PBE-q7
   &END KIND

   &KIND Cs
    BASIS_SET DZVP-GTH
    POTENTIAL # type pseudopotential functional name !
   &END KIND

   &KIND Pb
    BASIS_SET DZVP-GTH
    POTENTIAL # type pseudopotential functional name !
   &END KIND

  &CELL
   ABC 50 50 50 # Provisional Cell Param. Please "Add Unit Cell" !
  &END CELL
 &END SUBSYS
&END FORCE_EVAL

Patrick Gono

unread,
Sep 27, 2019, 2:20:00 PM9/27/19
to cp...@googlegroups.com
Dear Nikhil,

I have a couple things to suggest:
1) Your CUTOFF is definitely too small. Please, make sure your model is converged with respect to your CUTOFF by running a series of single-point (ENERGY) calculations, as described in: https://www.cp2k.org/howto:converging_cutoff. In general, the values for CUTOFF should be in the range of (higher) triple digits, 400 - 800 Ry, or even more. Whenever possible, make sure you are converged.
2) You are not using any pseudopotential for your Pb and Cs atoms. Look into the GTH_POTENTIALS file and choose the appropriate one for your choice of basis sets.
3) Are you sure about your cell parameters? If your plan is to study a periodic system, you must specify periodic symmetry and choose appropriate cell parameters. If you plan to simulate an isolated nanoparticle, consider reducing the size of your cell. 50 angstrom in each direction  might be an overkill and needlessly slow down your jobs.

Yours sincerely,
Patrick Gono

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+uns...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/96a565a1-0f85-4692-98fe-68f8d43c59e9%40googlegroups.com.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages