Optimization inputs PDOS with HSE06 level of theory and AI-MD

13 views
Skip to first unread message

Lorenzo Lagasco

unread,
Apr 3, 2026, 12:19:22 AM (3 days ago) Apr 3
to cp2k

Hello everyone,
I'm a new cp2k user and I have a couple of questions, not strictly related to each other:

  1. I have written an input file for a band structure calculation of a system consisting of delafossite CuAlO₂ with an organic dye (coumarin 343) anchored on its surface, using the HSE06 level of theory. However, the calculation appears to be unusually slow (using 4 nodes with 52 processors each, after about 2 hours it has not even completed the first SCF step). I would like to ask whether it would be possible to get feedback on how to optimize the input file, or if there might be some incorrectly set parameters. I have attached both the input file and the xyz file of the system geometry.
  2. At the same time, I am working on NVT CP2K dynamics at the PBE+D3 level of theory for aluminosilicate nanosheets in water of different sizes (the simulation box ranges from about 719 to 900 atoms). Currently, the simulations proceed at a speed of about 25 seconds per MD step (using 1 node with 52 processors for each simulation). Since I need a trajectory of 60 ps with a timestep of 0.5 fs, I would like to ask whether it is possible to improve the computational performance. I am also attaching the input file in this case md-GPW.inp

    Thanks for the help!
final-geom-opt.xyz
CuAlO2_HSE06.inp
md-GPW.inp

Frederick Stein

unread,
Apr 4, 2026, 5:18:21 AM (yesterday) Apr 4
to cp2k
Dear Lorenzo,
It is highly recommended to perform hybrid calculations using the ADMM approach (https://manual.cp2k.org/trunk/CP2K_INPUT/FORCE_EVAL/DFT/AUXILIARY_DENSITY_MATRIX_METHOD.html and https://manual.cp2k.org/trunk/methods/dft/hartree-fock/admm.html). You will need to choose suitable fitting basis sets (BASIS AUX_FIT <basis set name>) in the respective kind sections usually from BASIS_ADMM or BASIS_ADMM_UZH. This should accelerate your calculations significantly.
Regards,
Frederick

Lorenzo Lagasco

unread,
Apr 4, 2026, 1:25:02 PM (yesterday) Apr 4
to cp...@googlegroups.com
Good afternoon,
thanks for the information!  In the meantime, I’d like to take the opportunity to ask if you also have any advice regarding my second question.
Best regards,
Lorenzo Lagasco

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+uns...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/7634d177-82ae-445f-aa43-9068ad1d9392n%40googlegroups.com.

Frederick Stein

unread,
Apr 4, 2026, 2:38:00 PM (23 hours ago) Apr 4
to cp2k
Dear Lorenzo,
Sorry, I forgot about your second question. Others may correct me if necessary. I can only guess. Can you run 2-3 MD steps and send us the timing report at the end of the CP2K output file? Do you run with 52 cores or do you use less? What hardware are you running on and which software stack do you use? Which version of CP2K are you talking about?
Usually, standard-DFT-calculations are most performant if the number of MPI ranks is a square number and you use at most 2 OpenMP threads per MPI rank.
Best,
Frederick
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages