Dear Tim
I just realized that I was wrong. We have currently
implemented a Harris functional scheme that allows
you to do a type of SCAN@HF, but this is not
what people have done in the original paper.
regards
Juerg
________________________________________
From:
cp...@googlegroups.com <
cp...@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Tim Duignan <
t...@duignan.net>
Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2022 1:33 AM
To:
cp...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [CP2K:16818] Density Corrected DFT
Dear Frederick,
Great thanks for letting me know
Best
Tim
On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 7:09 PM 'Frederick Stein' via cp2k <
cp...@googlegroups.com<mailto:
cp...@googlegroups.com>> wrote:
Dear Tim,
I have implemented the additional terms for meta functionals and have to correct Jürg partially:
Forces do work with meta functionals of all kind, the stress tensors do not work (you will receive an abort). I do not know why they don't yet.
Best,
Frederick
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
cp2k+uns...@googlegroups.com<mailto:
cp2k+uns...@googlegroups.com>.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/1dd23d46-b595-47b2-ad9d-804c4bdb3873n%40googlegroups.com<
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/1dd23d46-b595-47b2-ad9d-804c4bdb3873n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
--
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/CAA9w_TzwLkpRqM_LHwz6gXxoPiBcdtA9Tq%2BjKmwjgQ%3DBPk%3DEMg%40mail.gmail.com<
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/CAA9w_TzwLkpRqM_LHwz6gXxoPiBcdtA9Tq%2BjKmwjgQ%3DBPk%3DEMg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.