Hi, all. I agree with Eric that this bird sounds more like a Golden-winged Warbler than a Blue-winged Warbler. But it's not a classic Golden-winged, either. It's got the last note cut off. As Peter Burke implies, Blue-winged and Golden-winged warblers' songs are problematic, and, indeed, the two "species" are problematic.
The photos on Mark Chavez's website look textbook perfect for a Blue-winged Warbler. But the bird could still have Golden-winged Warbler genes (irrespective of the song it learned). Leo Shapiro explains it well and provides compelling data in this article in Birding magazine:
No question about it, the "winged" warblers provide an ontological conundrum for birders. But the ontology is nothing compared to the simple nomenclature. See below, the text of the most recondite proposal ever submitted to the AOU. That bit in there about Alexander Wilson's name for the bird being "preoccupied"?--the bird in question is the Rockwarbler (family Acanthizidae) of Australia!
Anyhow, here ya go (and, yes, the AOU accepted this proposal, and that's why the Blue-winged Warbler is no longer Vermivora pinus):
Olson and Reveal (2009) have shown that the Linnaean name Certhia pinus is a
composite name, based on illustrations of birds of two different warbler species,
the Pine Warbler, now known as Dendroica pinus, illustrated by Catesby, and the
Blue-winged Warbler, now Vermivora pinus, illustrated by Edwards.
Wilson was aware of the problem and essentially restricted the name to what we
now call the Pine Warbler. He, and later Bonaparte, in effect lectotypified Certhia
pinus as Catesby’s plate. Wilson described as new the Blue-winged Warbler, as
Sylvia solitaria. Wilson used the name pinus for the Pine Warbler.
Baird (1858), however, used pinus of Linnaeus for the Blue-winged Warbler, and
gave Wilson credit for the name Sylvia (now Dendroica) pinus, incorrectly
regarding Wilson’s use of that name as a new name. Stejneger (1885) realized
the latter was wrong and used the name Sylvia vigorsii for the Pine Warbler.
Stone (1921) argued again that Wilson was giving a name to Catesby’s
illustration as pinus, and that name, attributed to Wilson, has been used by AOU
since 1931. But Wilson was merely mentioning the name as used by Latham.
Even if he intended it as new it would have been a junior homonym, and
unavailable.
Wilson’s and Bonaparte’s actions clearly made Linnaeus’s name Certhia pinus
the name for the Pine Warbler, and thus Wilson’s Sylvia solitaria is the name for
the Blue-winged Warbler, Unfortunately, that name is preoccupied by Sylvia
solitaria Lewin, 1808 and no other name is available. Olson and Reveal proposed
the name Vermivora cyanoptera.
I propose that we accept this new name and the other consequences of this
study. The Blue-winged Warbler and its citation must be listed as:
Vermivora cyanoptera Olson and Reveal. Blue-winged Warbler.
Vermivora cyanoptera Olson and Reveal, 2009. Wilson Journ. Ornithol. 121:620.
(eastern Pennsylvania.)
We should add to the account: Notes: Formerly Vermivora pinus Linnaeus.
The Pine Warbler should be listed as Dendroica pinus (Linnaeus, 1769) rather
than D. pinus (Wilson) and its citation should be:
Certhia Pinus Linnaeus, 1769, Syst. Nat. (ed. 12) 1:187. Based largely on “The
Pine Creeper” of Catesby, Nat. Hist. Carolina, Florida, and the Bahama Islands,
vol. 1, part 4, pl. and text 61 (in America septentrionali = South Carolina.)
In addition the citation for the genus Vermivora must be changed slightly to read:
Type, by monotypy, Sylvia solitaria Wilson = Vermivora cyanoptera Olson and
Reveal.
Literature cited:
Olson, S. L., and J. L. Reveal. 2009. Nomenclatural history and a new name for
the Blue-winged Warbler (Aves: Parulidae). Wilson Journal of Ornithology
121:618-620.
Name and affiliation of submitter: Richard C. Banks, NACC
Date of proposal: 20 Nov 2009