--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Colorado Birds" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cobirds+u...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to cob...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cobirds/CAFjVA_bPjH6o-1rKWhREaDdCQs3YD2WxSjhacmZy94-MGHWsqw%40mail.gmail.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Colorado Birds" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cobirds+u...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to cob...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cobirds/3f59c6e9-1d76-456b-9a23-322158959da5%40googlegroups.com.
I would think the best we could ever be satisfied with is the 'ol "80/20" rule (80% doing it "right") knowing we only have the ability to control messaging and education to the larger segment of the groups defined above associated with birding. We could reach the broader segment of the groups via various media with consistent messaging about wildlife viewing (social technologies, DOW, NPR, TV, RADIO, NEWSPAPER,etc).
Dave L. already mentioned a few ideas -- "special protocols (limited viewing times, guided group visits, or something along those lines)" -- again keep in mind we could have all the special protocols you can create they still have to meld with the ethical values of a human.