I made the "i missed it" mistake too many times.
there is a tremendous power in smoothing their cash flows and making them more reliable.
- They will protect the theater business
- They will protect (as much as they can) the home video business
- They can plug Dis+ into their merchandising, their video games, and their park business. (ideas: separate lines at parks for D+ members...you wouldn't even be offering discounted park tickets). Trailers for upcoming films can "launch" first on D+.
- the price will rise over the next 5 years. $1 inc on $7 is 14%.
Disney had traded $80-120 last 5 years before breakout to $140. That's only a 14% premium to old highs.
They had $60B in revenue last year. If they get 50 million subs that's $4.2B/year revenue, 7% increase that should be very profitable.
Also the merger docs were RIDICULOUSLY VAGUE on this. Here's the text. It's tough to parse, but to me it says "No approvals needed, except the obvious stuff, and oh, C) the non-obvious stuff that, taken together or individually, would be immaterial to our ability to close. We
actually need those, too!"
https://take.ms/isSpgNo consent, approval, order or authorization of,
registration, declaration or filing with, or notice to, any Federal,
state or local, domestic or foreign, government or any court,
administrative agency or commission or other governmental,
quasi-governmental or regulatory authority or agency, domestic or
foreign (a “Governmental Entity”), is required...
except for (A)...
(E) such other
consents, approvals, orders, authorizations, registrations,
declarations, filings and notices the failure of which to be obtained or
made would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect.
That last part is - correct me if I'm wrong - saying "stuff that would NOT constitute a Material Adverse Effect are STILL REQUIRED."