"Uh oh" coding

12 views
Skip to first unread message

brielle.stark

unread,
Mar 24, 2020, 11:21:47 AM3/24/20
to chibolts
Hello!

We encounter a ton of "uh oh" in our transcripts.... is it most correct to code these as:

&uh &oh

vs. 

uhoh@i

thank you!

brielle.stark

unread,
Mar 24, 2020, 11:22:58 AM3/24/20
to chibolts
or indeed: *uhoh

Thanks :)

Davida Fromm

unread,
Mar 24, 2020, 11:30:32 AM3/24/20
to chib...@googlegroups.com
Brie,

If "uhoh" is used as in "oops", I'd recommend simply transcribing it as one word -- uhoh.  It will be coded as a communicator, which is good.  If you do &uh &oh they'll be considered fillers or fragments.  Also, a reminder that you can distinguish the & entries by using &- for fillers and &+ for fragments.  Hope that helps.

-Davida

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "chibolts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to chibolts+u...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/chibolts/e8111ba6-fcd8-489b-abad-9e57986f7cb3%40googlegroups.com.

brielle.stark

unread,
Mar 24, 2020, 11:32:01 AM3/24/20
to chibolts
Excellent! THanks!


On Tuesday, March 24, 2020 at 11:30:32 AM UTC-4, Davida wrote:
Brie,

If "uhoh" is used as in "oops", I'd recommend simply transcribing it as one word -- uhoh.  It will be coded as a communicator, which is good.  If you do &uh &oh they'll be considered fillers or fragments.  Also, a reminder that you can distinguish the & entries by using &- for fillers and &+ for fragments.  Hope that helps.

-Davida

On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 11:21 AM brielle.stark <briell...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello!

We encounter a ton of "uh oh" in our transcripts.... is it most correct to code these as:

&uh &oh

vs. 

uhoh@i

thank you!

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "chibolts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to chib...@googlegroups.com.

Brian MacWhinney

unread,
Mar 24, 2020, 11:33:44 AM3/24/20
to ChiBolts
Dear Brie,
    Over a year ago, in order to better support fluency coding, we introduced a distinction between the use of the ampersand to mark non-words and its use to mark filler words.  For filler words, we added the hyphen mark as in &-uh and &-um.  It is clear that &-uh is always a filler.  However, the sound "oh" is often what we would call a "co" or communicator, as in "Oh, I didn't realize that."   If it is a real word communicator, then it is just oh.  If it is a filler, which is rather rare, then it is &-oh.  We still use the basic & mark as in &gok for things that are just non-words.  And there are a two more uses of the ampersand, including &=text as in &=laughs for laughing and &* for interposed words (section 9.10.2 of the manual).

-- Brian MacWhinney


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "chibolts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to chibolts+u...@googlegroups.com.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages