Algorithm of tariffing directions.

[Roman Buryak]

Hi All,

I do not understand the algorithm of tariffing directions.

A direction of 3 digits (example: 380) was created, and a rate was created for it. Also created a direction that contains the previous prefix and two additional digits (example: 38050, 38067). For the second direction a rate was created too. When charging, a shorter direction is always used. Why?

Thank you in advance.

[Dan B]

Hi Roman,

Did u check the tutorial data? It could be that you have defined your tariffs wrongly, so I suggest you start from there and expand them to your needs. Also a good help is console cost command which offers you deep details regarding how cost was calculated.

Hope this helps.

DanB

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CGRateS" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cgrates+u...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to cgr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cgrates/c8e7104c-0cac-4ab1-a2c1-e10fc19d4c57%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[Roman Buryak]

Hi Dan,

I read the tutorial data. But I could not answer my question.

Yesterday we migrated to the version rc8. And the question now became again.

For example: There are directions 34, 347, 3491. 34 and 347 are linked to the package balance, and 3491 to the monetary balance. In rc7 everything was rated by the package balance. How it will be rated in rc8? And how to avoid such situation?

Thank you in advance!

вівторок, 7 серпня 2018 р. 14:57:24 UTC+3 користувач DanB написав:

[DanB]

Hi Roman,

I am not sure I understand the filtering.
Can you post here an account and explain how do u want to have the
filtering done?

Thanks,
DanB