Jordan Peterson

14 views
Skip to first unread message

Cary Cook

unread,
Jul 19, 2020, 1:41:20 AM7/19/20
to bys-...@googlegroups.com

Patrick likes Jordan Peterson. And I kinda like him too, but I recognize it as an emotional reaction, rather than agreeing rationally with him.  In fact, I find it hard to find any statements in his material that are epistemic enough to agree or disagree with.

 

Patrick sent me this vid, which is over 2.5 hours long, so I'm not asking anyone to sit thru it, unless you just happen to like JP.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f-wWBGo6a2w&feature=youtu.be&fbclid=IwAR2ZX5Yqhmi3apTDzb4dg0R_QWoahJ6JCfaJJ4BPMi3RATc2d_txKi_3RS8

 

This will be a different kind of discussion (if a discussion happens at all).

 

I'll offer a few suggestions.  Any of you are welcome to do the same.

 

Maybe someone wants to talk about Nietzsche saying we create our own values.

------------------------------------------

His view of scripture (Bible at least) appears to be only slightly higher than mine.  Yet he has a record for talking X-Ctns back into Cty - whereas I've never been able to talk anyone into Non-scriptural monotheism.

----------------------------

Here's a part I agree with:

45:30 Everybody acts out a myth. But few people know what their myth is. And you should know what your myth is, because it might be a tragedy.

 

Ctns act out their particular version of the Ctn myth (or at least the "I'm a Ctn" myth).

Atheists used to act out the "There is no God" myth.  Now they usually act out an agnostic humanist myth, or a "Nobody tells me what to think" myth.

 

Like the atheists, I'm reluctant to admit I act out any kind of myth at all, because I think I'm above all that shit.  But I may just have a more arrogant myth.

--------------------------------

He has some stuff on dreams that may be discussion worthy.  I turned Ctn primarily because of dreams.  When I studied the Bible, I noticed how often God used people who paid attention to dreams, so I started assuming SOME dreams were divine communication.  Still do.

--------------------------------

I'd prefer not to discuss the man himself, because, so what if he has said some dumb things.  But if any of you want to, I'll participate.  One guy in the comments said:

"Why did Jordan Peterson cross the road?

God only knows why...  it’s no joke man."

Another said:

"If Socrates were to ever watch this lecture, he would say, "Now I am surer than ever that I know nothing!""

 

Cary

 

Sent from Mail for Windows 10

 

Cary Cook

unread,
Jul 29, 2020, 7:39:43 PM7/29/20
to bys-...@googlegroups.com

The more I see of JP, the more I agree with him.  Does anyone know of an example of him saying something obviously wrong EVEN WHEN SEEN IN CONTEXT?

 

Cary

 

Sent from Mail for Windows 10

 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BYS vs MH" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bys-vs-mh+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bys-vs-mh/5f13dcff.1c69fb81.89e5b.33a1SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING%40gmr-mx.google.com.

 

firech...@gmail.com

unread,
Jan 26, 2021, 2:18:28 AM1/26/21
to BYS vs MH
This seems like something you could have googled for yourself. Here's a Twitter thread that is full of them.


They're not all great, but the very first one is a great turn around, with him admitting he was wrong about a position he expressed 30 seconds earlier in the interview.

Shane

hylom...@gmail.com

unread,
Sep 26, 2024, 11:09:17 AM9/26/24
to BYS vs MH
Happened to drop by and see this thread. This group is long inactive. I'm uninterested in reviving it or discussing Jordan Peterson in detail. But I had to respond to this.

Cary, in this group, you repeatedly demonstrated a strong distaste for wordiness. You are also a stickler for what you consider to be logic, and strongly support "common sense" when it doesn't clash with logic.

Given these facts, I don't see how you could listen to Peterson discuss God or the definition of truth (as he did, for example, in a debate with Sam Harris) and conclude that Peterson is anything but an intellectual bullshit artist.

For the record, I don't follow Peterson closely and have few opinions about him as a philosophical thinker. And I like and respect a lot of convoluted, obscure philosophical prose and am open to challenges to what the past contributor here Meisha Turman has called "truthism". But, given your attitudes, I believe that any liking that you have (had? I don't know if your opinion of Peterson has changed) for Peterson is very much an emotional reaction to the content of what he's saying and not any kind of rational assessment of his style of reasoning.

I'm not particularly interested in an exchange on this topic, though you may of course share a response.

Cary Cook

unread,
Sep 26, 2024, 8:12:05 PM9/26/24
to bys-...@googlegroups.com
Joseph,

That was when JP was new to me.  I wouldn't say that today.

Cary
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages