Dr. Vineet Chaitanya was an extraordinary person.
Bharat has lost a gem in his passing away.
In his pioneering work on NLP, he demonstrated how Paninian grammar was unparalleled.
He was ever eager to learn, very hard working, and could very well inspire others to work for our heritage.
The rigour of his analysis, and his sensitivity to the drawbacks in many Western attempts in NLP, are rare to be found.
While he introduced me to the merits of the Conceptual Structures propounded by John F Sowa,
I introduced him to the diagrammatic representation of Navya-Nyaya available in the books of Prof VNJha,
who owed it in turn to his own Japanese student. And in less than 3 years of that, Prof Amba Kulkarni,
his extraordinary student with a sound mathematical background, had produced her thesis on the same theme.
I had the fortune to be with him at IIT-Kanpur for nearly two years, which was also when
Prof. Ramakrishnamacharyulu was also there collaborating with him,
and the penetrating questions he would put would open up new horizons for anyone interacting with him.
Many śāstraic assertions would occur to him almost instinctively, what with his keenness of
observing and analysing linguistic data and phenomena.
At a time when Chomsky reigned supreme, it was he who established how the Kāraka-theory, so central to Pāṇini's thesis,
was more powerful than the modern linguistic theories. It was he who put linguistics here in India
on track - on the right track, the indigenous track, at a time when every top linguist in India
was keen to prove that he had some grasp of Transformational Grammar. But for him,
our Linguistics departments would have been worse than what they are.
(I am sorry to say so; yet I am not disparaging: few among the leading scholars
in the Linguistic Depts in India today have had a good exposure to Sanskrit,
much less its grammatical treasures).
He chose never to come into the public gaze. A silent tapasvin he was, with a very clear sense of what direction
he was to pursue in his life. Numerous students have been guided by him.
He was strict in his meditation, allowing none to disturb him.
He ate minimally, spoke minimally, and led an utterly simple life.
There was almost no moment when he was not working.
He richly deserves a great recognition - a Padmavibhushan or its equivalent.
KSKannan