Dear friends,
Many of you are strong Sanskrit scholars, I would like to draw your attention
to view Panini as the world's first formal scientist. A scientist asks the question
"why" and tries to find laws if the object/event can be reproduced. Panini's "object"
is human speech. Before him some had tried sky mappings to correlate terrestrial
events to sky and some others had tried to correlate human conditions to activities
in life. Rules were modeled, but the simulations have more of a belief than of
science. Panini creates science and creates a standardization. In the process, speech
becomes a language. Lately we don't speak naturally but speak a language. Only,
the Vedas are the natural speech, natural speech is spontaneous, possibly it has a
natural grammar, which is neural.
Panini, as he himself suggests, is a culmination of a long list of early grammarians/scientists
who examined speech. The fundamental contribution is that the human thought is analog,
it converts to speech which is discretized through uttered syllables. The thought is neural,
it is a field. One does not know the expanse of the field, but we capture a part which is a
sentence वाक्य in the Paninian framework. A वाक्य is an acoustic blob, which is heard as a
continuous signal, though it is produced by the muscles in a discrete manner. We have
not inquired to find the original person who proposed this hypothesis, but we know that
the hypothesis has held in India and is true in human biology.
The basic observation for the grammar possibly came from the Vedas that there is a
repetition of sound segments to make the analytic statement that a produced sound is
not trivial, it is associated with a meaning. Discovery of meanings in sounds obsessed
many but the fundamentals are still not fully established. Panini made rules how the
sounds combine through the process of biological utterance and went on to discover
the brain functions of metaphorical processing. In the metaphorical processing the sound
may not point to the object. The Greek scientist Aristotle came in a hundred years later
and analyzed language. He didn't have the privilege of a line of grammarians like Panini
had, and he missed the observation of connecting sound to the object. That the object
assumes many names through metaphorical cognitive function of the brain failed
to reach the western grammar. Words became discrete objects in the west unlike
in Paninian India as parts of trees driven by roots.
Paninian sound trees are marvels of Indian science. A word is cognitive, musical
and expressive. I wish I could write this mail in Paninian style which would be more
precise and creative. The style will capture a natural melody that makes us human.
I will like to convene a "Panini as a Scientist" panel on Sunday May 10, at 11:30 AM
our time (9PM in India). Please write to me if you wish to join as a Panelist. You
can prepare a short ten minute presentation of your observations.
Best regards,
Bijoy Misra
