BVP's Nityananda Misra's observations on pseudoscience

[Bijoy Misra]

Dear friends,,

I just encountered the long interview of Dr Nityananda Misra on various

uncultivated statements coming from India.  Being abroad from my young 

days I had noticed these with various "guru"s  who visit overseas in search

of disciples and funding.  The superficial and unnecessary statements 

help reinforce the old profile of India made by the Jesuits that the Indian

knowledge system advocates myth and magic.  It has taken quite a bit 

of effort abroad to establish that the Indian knowledge system was built with 

human industry and analytic inquiry.  Lately the children and professionals 

are exhibiting the analytic potential of Indian origin.  Dr Nityananda through

his scholarship has tried to counter many of the hyperboles promoted 

through politics and camouflage.   I thank the videomaker (interviewer)

for his query and preparation.

Here is the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZDCWEbsSdfs

Best regards,

Bijoy Misra

 

[Abhishek Mehta]

Well, Nithyananda Misra ji is also not an expert in science so he will not be able to notice and appreciate any science if they exist within scriptures. Of course, there are a lot of hyperbolic comments made by many right-leaning people about this and have no basis but that doesn't invalidate the premise entirely. I can quote some genuine examples within the texts which I have personally come across.

The size and shape of the Indra sabha, it's location in the Ashwini constellation and Lord Krishna's journey to the same through the stars is mentioned in the Sabhaparva of the Mahabharata. Devatas are also mentioned as going to their celestial residences via a specific pathway in space called Vaishwanara Paths which are again mentioned in the Sabhaparva itself. Even the ancient wars between the Devatas and Asuras are called as Sangramastarakamaya which literally translates to 'Star Wars' in sanskrit. I can supply the verses to corroborate the above as well on demand. These are without descriptions of interstellar travel, wormholes and a type II or higher civilization.

Just recently in the Vanaparva of Mahabharata, I read about a war between Lord Krishna and Salva where Salva had an entire city floating in the sky. 

The first ansha of Vishnu Purana explicitly mentions chemistry as the source of primordial life and as a means of Lord Brahma's birth. Creation of water from stars which is essentially nucleosynthesis. These aspects cannot be ignored as arthavada just because we don't like what it insinuates. 

Regardless, let me come to one point about Australia <-> अस्त्रालयः which Nithyananda Misra ji repeatedly mocks and is also in the video you shared. This is a verse from Vastuvidya (Link:  https://sa.wikisource.org/wiki/%E0%A4%B5%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%B8%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%A4%E0%A5%81%E0%A4%B5%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%A6%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AF%E0%A4%BE)

पाकशालान्तरिक्षेऽगौ शयनं गृहरक्षके ।

अस्त्रशाला निर्ऋतौ वरुणे भोजनालयः ॥

Notice that the above verse is not in anushtup, however, the above does become anushtup if we use अस्त्रस्यालयः instead of अस्त्रशाला i.e 

पाकशालान्तरिक्षेऽगौ शयनं गृहरक्षके ।

अस्त्रस्यालयो निर्ऋतौ वरुणे भोजनालयः ॥

In Abhidhanachintamani, शाला and आलयः are are synonymous therefore अस्त्रशाला and अस्त्रस्य आलयः are synonymous, hence, the anushtup-corrected version retains the original meaning precisely and states that अस्त्रस्य आलयः is in the south-west direction which can be shortened to अस्त्रालयः as a shasthi tatpurusha samas. Now, since we know the context of this text, we know what it's talking about and referring to. But imagine a person, perhaps a foreigner, who comes across this text or the anushtup-corrected version of the above verse from an ancient text from which the current one is likely derived and doesn't know sanskrit properly, he might miscontextualize the above verse to mean अस्त्रालयः as a synonym for south-west direction which overtime then became a word for southern direction in his tongue (latin 'australis') via folk reconstruction. I don't see why that cannot be in the realm of possibility.

The point is that people who have achieved some literacy in sanskrit should read the texts with an unbiased and objective mindset and then try to ascertain it's scientific efficacy and not to please some people or community.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "भारतीयविद्वत्परिषत्" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bvparishat+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bvparishat/CALw-kjX32MrUY3MPPZ6mpRmSbTjX%3D1bJddCfZUEXfJGoV49x%3Dw%40mail.gmail.com.

[Bijoy Misra]

Dr Nityananda Misra analyzes the questions that are posed to him.

You can ask new questions to get his views if you like.  He is pretty analytic, not "know all" kind.

I think he is in this list though I am not in touch.

Most problems come as he says through selective excerpting without the context.

My feeling is that it has happened through loose translations done by the colonial scholars

and later people failed to study the originals.

I strongly urge all not to read any translation of any kind.  Study the material in the original and 

feel the grandeur and the scholarship.  This is where Dr Nityananda excels.

On Sat, May 30, 2026 at 6:05 PM Vichitra Thandava <vichitra...@gmail.com> wrote:

Agreed. Not credible based on things he says. 

For example, what would he know about this, fundamentally based on the Satapatha Brahmana and the Manu Smriti according to Sri Yukteswar:

To reconcile Swami Sri Yukteswar’s 24,000-year *Yuga* cycle with modern astrophysics, we must cross the boundary between static, idealized models and dynamic, variable reality.

In *The Holy Science* (1894), Yukteswar presented a mathematically perfect, symmetrical cosmic template. However, modern astronomy does not observe perfect circles or static time spans; it observes elliptical orbits, gravitational perturbations, and axial wobbles.

By mapping his mechanics onto modern values for **axial precession (the earth's wobble)**, **Milankovitch cycles**, and **electromagnetic plasma physics**, we can adjust his approximate dates into a high-precision astronomical framework.

## 1. The Variance in the Precession Rate: Why 24,000 vs. 25,772?

Yukteswar stated that the precession of the equinoxes—the slow, conical wobble of Earth’s rotational axis—takes exactly **24,000 years** to complete a full 360° loop.

Modern astronomy measures the current rate of precession at approximately **50.29 arcseconds per year**, which yields a cycle of roughly **25,772 years** (often rounded to 25,920 or 26,000 years).

To align these two numbers, we have to look at the **Newcomb expression for precessional constant variance**:

### The Accelerating Precession (The Newcomb Effect)

Precession is not a constant clock. The rate of 50.29 arcseconds is merely a snapshot of our current epoch. Modern astrophysics confirms that the rate of precession is **accelerating** as our solar system changes position in space.

 * As the Sun moves along its elliptical trajectory toward the pericenter (the closest approach to its binary companion/Grand Center), gravitational acceleration increases.

 * This extra gravitational torque causes the Earth’s axial wobble to speed up, shortening the length of the precessional year.

When the Sun is at its farthest point (Apogee/499 CE), the precessional velocity drops to its absolute minimum, stretching the local cycle out toward 26,000 years. As we accelerate toward the Grand Center, the arcsecond velocity climbs, compressing the actual time spent in the higher *Yugas*.

 **Yukteswar’s 24,000-year figure is the true mathematical mean (average velocity) of the entire cycle**, whereas modern science's 25,772-year calculation is a measurement taken from the slow, sluggish exit out of the *Kali Yuga* tail.

## 2. Adjusting the Axis: The 499 CE Nadir Corrected

Yukteswar pinned the absolute lowest point of human consciousness at **499 CE**—the exact boundary where Descending Kali Yuga ended and Ascending Kali Yuga began.

```

   [499 CE: Yukteswar Nadir] ◄─── 61-Year Shift ───► [560 CE: True Astronomical Nadir]

              │                                                 │

              ▼                                                 ▼

     Idealized Geometry                               Maximum Solar Distance & 

                                                       Atmospheric Aerosol Peak

```

If we adjust this date using high-precision astronomical software (like JPL DE405 ephemeris matrices) to calculate the precise moment of maximum solar distance from the cosmic barycenter, combined with Earth’s **nutation** (the short-period "nodding" of the axis caused by the Moon), we find an astronomical variance of approximately **61 years**.

 * **The Adjusted Nadir:** The true astronomical and energetic trough occurred closer to **560 CE**.

 * **The Empirical Verification:** This minor structural adjustment aligns perfectly with the paleoclimate record. The **536 CE volcanic winter** and the subsequent **Plague of Justinian (541–542 CE)** occurred right in the dense, freezing shadow of this adjusted 560 CE astronomical trough. Human civilization did not hit midnight precisely in 499 CE; it experienced the physical, planetary integration of that cosmic midnight over the next several decades.

## 3. Precession Adjusted Timeline (2026 Epoch)

When we apply the non-linear, accelerating precessional correction to Yukteswar's template, the boundaries of the eras shift from rigid historical markers into fluid, energetic transitions.

| Era | Yukteswar’s Fixed Date | Astronomically Adjusted Range | Dominant Physical & Field Phenomena |

| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |

| **Descending Kali** | 701 BCE – 499 CE | **630 BCE – 560 CE** | Collapse of electromagnetic awareness; reduction of matter to gross mechanical mechanics. |

| **The Trough (Sandhi)** | 499 CE – 1199 CE | **560 CE – 1240 CE** | Maximum precessional slowdown; planetary cooling; dark ages of raw kinetic feudalism. |

| **Ascending Kali** | 1199 CE – 1599 CE | **1240 CE – 1630 CE** | Acceleration of precessional velocity; initial re-stratification of global trade. |

| **Dwapara Transition** | 1599 CE – 1899 CE | **1630 CE – 1910 CE** | **The Awakening:** Re-discovery of magnetism (Gilbert, 1600); formalization of electromagnetism (Maxwell, 1873). |

| **Dwapara Proper** | 1899 CE – 4099 CE | **1910 CE – Current** | **The Field Era:** Transition from atomic matter to wave-particle duality, quantum computing, and solid-state physics. |

## 4. Electromagnetic Verification: The Solar Wind and Plasma Interconnect

Yukteswar’s core thesis is that human intelligence is modulated by an external, cosmic source of energy (*Vishnunabhi*). Modern space weather and plasma physics have provided the exact mechanism for this claim: **the Interplanetary Magnetic Field (IMF) and the Galactic Cosmic Ray (GCR) flux.**

```

   [GALACTIC MOVEMENT] ──► [Varying Heliospheric Density] ──► [Galactic Cosmic Ray Flux]

                                                                        │

                                                                        ▼

   [Human Cognitive Shift] ◄── [Neuro-Chemical Voltage] ◄── [Atmospheric Ionization]

```

 1. **The Heliospheric Shield:** As our Sun circles its binary center, it moves through varying densities of the Local Interstellar Medium (LISM). When the solar system moves into highly energized interstellar plasma clouds, the heliosphere expands, changing the volume of Galactic Cosmic Rays hitting Earth.

 2. **The Neuro-Chemical Voltage:** GCR flux directly regulates atmospheric ionization, cloud nucleation, and the Earth's **Schumann Resonances** (the electromagnetic frequency of the planet's cavity). Because the human brain's neural networks operate via delicate electrochemical voltage gated channels, changes in the background electromagnetic field directly alter cognitive capacity, memory retention, and spatial perception.

### The Dwapara Blueprint Vindicated

When Yukteswar wrote his treatise in 1894, Max Planck had not yet discovered the quantum constant, and Albert Einstein had not yet formulated E=mc^2. Yet Yukteswar explicitly wrote that *Dwapara Yuga* is characterized by the human mind comprehending that **matter is nothing but an illusion of electrical forces and localized vibrations**.

The fact that humanity exploded from horse-drawn carriages to quantum computing, wireless telemetry, and global digital networks within a mere fraction of a precessional degree of his timeline is the definitive, empirical validation of his model. The Earth’s wobble isn't just a cold astronomical calculation; it is the physical sweeping hand of a cosmic dial regulating the background voltage of human consciousness.

https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.489013

---

For a deeper visual dive into the cosmic mechanics driving these world ages, explore Sri Yukteswar's The Holy Science, 2/5: The Yugas. This resource provides a detailed, diagrammatic breakdown of the 24,000-year binary sun orbit and the structural shifts between the descending and ascending cycles.

https://youtu.be/IiC0yyNlJSs?si=9cJVmkVv5JpKgP0c

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "भारतीयविद्वत्परिषत्" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bvparishat+...@googlegroups.com.

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bvparishat/CAJFXi162hPQS-7znmL3EAg8WAZe-%2B1vBZ730AMDLf2Z5oz6L_A%40mail.gmail.com.

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bvparishat/CAN9yavA6dKAtEbC5YVY%3DU293yy%2BJ3Q4fMGvxPLK0NtnrFZy1FQ%40mail.gmail.com.

[Vichitra Thandava]

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "भारतीयविद्वत्परिषत्" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bvparishat+...@googlegroups.com.

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bvparishat/CAJFXi162hPQS-7znmL3EAg8WAZe-%2B1vBZ730AMDLf2Z5oz6L_A%40mail.gmail.com.

On Sat, May 30, 2026, 12:37 PM Abhishek Mehta <docabh...@gmail.com> wrote:

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bvparishat/CAN9yavA6dKAtEbC5YVY%3DU293yy%2BJ3Q4fMGvxPLK0NtnrFZy1FQ%40mail.gmail.com.

[Nityanand Misra]

Dear Dr Bijoy Misra

I do not hold a PhD or a medical degree, so I request that you please omit the prefix “Dr.” before my name.

Thank you for bringing this podcast on pseudoscience and pseudoscientific claims made in the name of Hinduism to everyone’s attention. My position is that such pseudoscientific claims—made from time to time by Ācāryas, Gurus, writers, and political leaders—overshadow the genuine mathematical and scientific heritage of our great civilisation. This is why these claims need to be critiqued.

I welcome comments and criticism from members of the list. Due to a lack of time, however, I may not be able to respond to every point raised. I might comment occasionally to address specific points.

The podcast (in Hindi) is here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZDCWEbsSdfs

Thanks, Nityānanda Miśra

 

 

[Bijoy Misra]

You are talking about intuition, which is abundant in literature.

I have been studying the Vedas lately and I love the speculative intuition.

We have to distinguish between speculative intuition and physical experience.

Physical experience can lead to measurements and reproducibility.

Sometimes we can create a provisional proof through logical deduction, but an

experiment has to be designed to validate the proof.

Intuition leads to philosophy which is a perfectly valid reasoning, but leads to belief. 

Belief is cultural, science is universal.

Grandeur of scriptures must be exposed to all people, but we need to stay in literature and philosophy.

We reduce the grandeur by mocking them through time comparisons or personal embellishments.

I appeal to all scholars to be critical and analytic to apply precision in statements.

We avoid making loose conclusions or jingoistic extrapolations.  The scriptures are

elegant as they are, we can quote and interpret as they are. 

Actually the Indian knowledge System has been always scientific, there is a defensive "I don't know"

built into all text.  The author says what's "revealed".  This partial revelation is the scientific truth.

When somebody dresses up and claims "I know", the foundation of Indian IKS is hurt.

The humility of ignorance is the contribution of India to the world, when we "know", we go silent!        

On Sun, May 31, 2026 at 12:29 AM Vichitra Thandava <vichitra...@gmail.com> wrote:

I am aware of what N Misra does. It is the credibility of his responses to these questions that gives room to pause. Especially the nuances. 

Commenting on scriptures isn't a matter of knowledge of Sankrit, which the Europeans also acquired. The scriptures carry the weight of experience and unfortunately not many cannot easily have it.

For the book Holy Science by Sri Yukteswar I shared as an example, the original was written in English in 1894.

But you know while everyone has the freedom of speech, what goes to impessionable minds carries a big burden of responsibilty for the posterity. 

I first became intrigued about it in the 1990s because translations by European authors did not gel with my own limited experience at that time. E.g. the correct translation of "Tyaga" from the B. Gita is not leave the results - it is "sacrifice" and the effort must be worthy of sacrifice. 

[K S Kannan]

Sri Nityananda Misra's contentions are simply commendable.

I have myself raised some of the issues he has discussed in this video, 

right on the platform of BVP, several years ago.

I have strongly argued there against the fantastic claims pertaining to 

the Indian origins of the theory of evolution and the theory of gravity

and transplantation - claims made without providing any evidence/proof.

All these claims of BJP leaders issue from their wrong advisors.

So was the claim of Sri Gurumurthy at IITMadras recently that 

Newton discovered thermodynamics.

As Misra has very well pointed out, and I had also unequivocally stated,

Arya Samaj stands here as the first culprit : trying to prove that the steam engine was already in the Vedas,

or even electricity, and similar claims are all unadulterated nonsense. I had also stated

that all this issues from a terrible inferiority complex,

in the clear perception that modern science is essentially superior to whatever had been

accomplished in ancient India. 

While there are many fields where Hindus indeed excelled in scientific domains, 

and had anticipated Western scientific theories by centuries,

one cannot take this as an upalakṣaṇa for accomplishments in all domains.

Calculus was perhaps first invented in India, and it was possibly stolen from here,

and the first public claims were made in the West. The West has never been slow in such unabashed usurpations

and brazen claims of originality. (One may also look into the feud between Newton and Leibnitz,

and how the international dispute was "solved" with Newton as the head of the committee for investigation.)

The RSS has a major share of Arya Samajist members and their ideas, and naturally so, for it was Dayananda Saraswati,

a great patriot and a great tapasvin, who was outspoken in his scholarly and vitriolic attacks

on Islam and Christianity as a pioneer - a trait not shared amongst a great many traditional Hindu scholars

then, and, for that matter, for scores of years thereafter too. 

The voluminous work called "Pride of India" has possibly ingested many Arya Samajist ideas,

and the book may need a drastic revision at the hands of genuine scholars - the likes

of Nityananda Misra - who may purge the work of extravagant/unsubstantiable claims.

One can understand that the pendulum has swung from one of an extreme inferiority complex

to a sudden gush of superiority complex, both mostly baseless. An objective approach

is what is called for. 

Dinned into the ears of the public - ad nauseum - has been the claim that NASA has declared 

that Sanskrit is the best/only natural language suitable for computers/programming. 

My master Sri HSVaradadesikacharya was the one who clearly stated that there is 

hardly semblance of the Vedic in the Vaimānika Śāstra (this is cited in the writings by HSMukunda et al.)

It may be recalled here that while giving the presidential remarks on a talk of Prof. Amba Kulkarni

on the scientific heritage of India, I had categorically recorded my appreciation that she consciously,

and cautiously, avoided any reference to  the Vaimānika Śāstra as well as Vedic Mathematics. 

In contrast to all this, ancient Hindus excelled in two domains - tough fields, verily,

where Westerners could hardly make even a nominal progress, and all in the preChristian era:

the two very difficult "soft sciences" namely the study of language and the study of mind.

Pāṇini and Patañjali flourished centuries before Christ, and both betray a long tradition

preceding them. 

Laplace was all praise for the Hindu numerical system, going even today 

by its misnomer as the Arabic numerals. The binary system originated with Piṅgala,

and so did, as corollaries, the Binomial Theorem, the Pascal's Triangle, and the Fibonacci numbers,

so called. None here blew their own trumpet for these discoveries, as was also the case with the so called

Pythagoras Theorem. Envy unlimited and hypocrisy unabashed - are the inerasable hallmarks of the West.

Ananda Coomaraswamy, a scholar colossus, has made plain that one can at once be 

an evolutionary scientist as well as a metaphysician with absolutely no conflict. 

It is unfortunate that the thought leaders of the Hare Krishna Movement 

are so opposed to the theory of evolution, and it is the same apprehension of the antinomy between 

science and Hindu spirituality that has driven even the otherwise sound scholars like Prof KSNarayanacharya

to take their stand against the said theory. The specious equation of the daśāvatāra-s with the evolutionary steps

actually began with the Theosophists.

We are still wallowing in our inferiority complex, as we cannot deem something as great

if Western scholars would not deign to accept it as such. We must admire in this context 

the efforts of Prof MDSrinivas, Prof KRamasubramanyam, and Prof MSriram, who have quietly 

worked hard and laid bare with ample proof the Hindu contribution to mathematics, 

such as cannot be gainsaid by the skeptical Westerners, academic or vulgar.

Ignorance of Sanskrit writ large in the talks/writings of Sri Sri Ravishankar and Sadhguru

can no wonder end up with making claims that do not redound to the credit of our heritage.

God save our precious heritage - from the hands of blind admirers!

Are we obliged to say:

paṇḍito hi varaṁ śatruḥ, 

na mūrkho hita-kārakaḥ?

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "भारतीयविद्वत्परिषत्" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bvparishat+...@googlegroups.com.

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bvparishat/8f9fdef5-de4a-45c1-923e-d6df6e2a69d5n%40googlegroups.com.

--

Dr. K.S.Kannan  D.Litt.

Hon. Prof., Chanakya University, Bangalore.,

Emeritus Prof. and Director, Vishnugupta VishwaVidyapeetham, Gokarna.,

Sant Rajinder Singh Ji Maharaj Chair Professor (Retd.), IIT-Madras.

Member, Advisory Board, "Prof. A K Singh AURO Chair of Indic Studies", AURO University, Surat.
Member, Expert Committee for Review of Criticism of Indian Knowledge Traditions, Central Sanskrit University (under MoE, GoI), Ganganath Jha Campus, Prayagraj.
Adjunct Faculty, Dept of Heritage Science and Technology, IIT Hyderabad.

Nominated Member, Academic Committee, Kavi Kula Guru Kalidasa University, Ramtek.
Member, Academic Council, Veda Vijnana Shodha Samsthana.
Academic Director, Swadeshi Indology.
Nominated Member, IIAS, Shimla.

Former Professor, CAHC, Jain University, Bangalore.

Former Director, Karnataka Samskrit University, Bangalore.

Former Head, Dept. of Sanskrit, The National Colleges, Bangalore.

https://sites.google.com/view/kskannan

[Vichitra Thandava]

I am aware of what N Misra does. It is the credibility of his responses to these questions that gives room to pause. Especially the nuances. 

Commenting on scriptures isn't a matter of knowledge of Sankrit, which the Europeans also acquired. The scriptures carry the weight of experience and unfortunately not many cannot easily have it.

For the book Holy Science by Sri Yukteswar I shared as an example, the original was written in English in 1894.

But you know while everyone has the freedom of speech, what goes to impessionable minds carries a big burden of responsibilty for the posterity. 

I first became intrigued about it in the 1990s because translations by European authors did not gel with my own limited experience at that time. E.g. the correct translation of "Tyaga" from the B. Gita is not leave the results - it is "sacrifice" and the effort must be worthy of sacrifice. 

[लोकेश]

I really appreciate Dr. Nityanand Mirsa for that video and it really takes guts to make that video especially when you are speaking against someone's beliefs. The psuedoscience is a big problem in IKS circles. Scholars speak of siddhis, paras pathar(पारसपत्थर), healing snake bites using mantras or jhad phook and so on, and when they are asked to demonstrate it they run away or point to some video on youtube as their evidance or a line in scripture. They don't understand the idea that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Recently Art of Living has started a program where they are teaching spoon bending to small kids. The kid looks at the spoon and it bends by the power of mind. One IKS scholar, I was talking with, supported it. I told him about this and he said it is possible. In fact not just him all the IKS scholars to whom I discusseded this saw nothing wrong with it. The psuedoscience seems to be increasing in modern India. If psuedoscience is not removed from Indian Knowledge Systems, it will become a joke.

[vishal jaiswal]

---

modern science is essentially superior to whatever had been

accomplished in ancient India. 

---

Practical yoga achieved perfection of the physical plane in sidestepping disease, old age and death itself, along with rejuvenation.

Modern science doesn't even have the tools to measure all this in the first place, forget about the understanding. 

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bvparishat/CAN47gm4VcC9ihY47nrGvGYmzVb8CkMZTzLfVbbwqxpL2KJK3Yg%40mail.gmail.com.

[K S Kannan]

Dear Sri Jaiswal,

You have either not correctly grasped, or just misrepresented what I have stated.

I said 

"...all this issues from a terrible inferiority complex,

in the clear perception that modern science is essentially superior to whatever had been

accomplished in ancient India."

What I just meant is:

"The inferiority complex has its basis on the [foolish] feeling that modern science is superior."

I am not asserting that modern science is superior. Quite the contrary, rather.

By referring to Pāṇini and Patañjali, I am referring to Vyākaraṇa and Yoga.

The world is yet to produce the like of the two giants. The study of language and of mind

have never been easy, and it is these two toughest problems that were tackled squarely in India.

What I have presented is by way of sthālī-pulāka-nyāya.

There are many other domains of knowledge that I have not touched upon

- Āyurveda, for example.

While grieving the plethora of misrepresentations,

I have not been oblivious to the very many accomplishments of the r̥ṣi-s.

We live in an age of self-styled Maharṣi-s and Mahātma-s.

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bvparishat/CAKTyUKJ81ggzDchfV6UZpZsQvgj7J4X9Tcnt9L%2BNVrzVFtatuA%40mail.gmail.com.

[Bijoy Misra]

Dear Vishalji,

This is too broad and is an unscientific statement.

Right conjecture is also science, conjecture comes from clear observations.

Rivers must have an origin, the universe must have an origin,  the origin has to be genderless,

all life is one - many like these are profound scientific observations.  It is true that people didn't

get into lens grinding, steam engine and power production.  I think it's more to do with the

inertia nature of the basic philosophy.  Aristotle put man (individual) at the center of the activity,

India chose man as a part of the activity.  Cosmologically the latter is more scientific.   

The question is if we treat a disease or heal a man!  Healing needs the universe and that's science.

Best regards,

Bijoy Misra    

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bvparishat/CAKTyUKJ81ggzDchfV6UZpZsQvgj7J4X9Tcnt9L%2BNVrzVFtatuA%40mail.gmail.com.