[BIP Proposal] Informational BIP on Low-R Signature Grinding

72 views
Skip to first unread message

Sean Gilligan

unread,
Jun 9, 2026, 3:47:29 AM (3 days ago) Jun 9
to bitco...@googlegroups.com
Hi Everyone,

I would like to propose a new informational BIP to formally document the
Low-R signature algorithm used by Bitcoin Core and many other wallets.

It was implemented in 2018 in Bitcoin Core by PR 1366 [0]. The Low-r
grinding page on Bitcoin Optech [1] references several other
implementations.

While working on secp256k1-jdk [2] (a new wrapper for secp256k1 for
Java/JDK/JVM-languages) we ended up looking at the C++ implementation
for reference and at rust-secp256k1 for a test vector. Since all wallets
should implement the algorithm identically (for privacy reasons) it
would be helpful to have the behavior clearly documented in an
informational BIP.

I have spoken with a handful of developers who think having a BIP would
be a good idea and it was suggested on PR 13666.

It should be short and relatively simple and also have a nice collection
of test vectors.

What do people think? Any suggestions on what should be included or
pointers to test vectors?

Thanks,

Sean

[0] https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13666
[1] https://bitcoinops.org/en/topics/low-r-grinding/
[2] https://github.com/bitcoinj/secp256k1-jdk

Murch

unread,
Jun 9, 2026, 4:54:23 PM (2 days ago) Jun 9
to bitco...@googlegroups.com
Hi Sean,

Thanks for proposing this idea. It would be splendid if someone were to
write up the best practices for low-r signature grinding. You don’t need
to worry about test vectors too much in advance, they are only required
for advancing a BIP to the Complete status, so if people have more
suggestions, those could also added to the document after the PR is open
or even after it has been published in Draft.

Cheers,
Murch

Sean Gilligan

unread,
Jun 9, 2026, 7:14:50 PM (2 days ago) Jun 9
to Murch, bitco...@googlegroups.com
Thanks Murch!

We will start work on a Draft. Worrying about the test vectors later
sounds like a great idea. They are important and probably the hardest
part of the effort, but aren't necessary for a draft.

As recommended in BIP 3, we'll create a PR against our fork of the BIPs
repo and report back when we have made some progress.

Regards,

Sean
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages