Hi Floppy
> however packages could be redefined to avoid address >re-use in package transactions.
What type of redefinition are you talking about here, is this not policy rule still.
I don't think it's good for a node to reject an incentive compatible transaction in a package because it reuses an address. I believe miners won't.
> The only downside that I could think of is the scanning time required to check address reuse. Maybe others could suggest solutions for this problem or we can limit the address reuse check only for the chain of transactions.
Other disadvantage of this is that it will affect compact block reconstruction, nodes fee estimation.
Wouldn't it be better to encourage using other safe mitigations of address reuse like silent payments?
Abubakar
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bitcoindev+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/b383aad2-1abc-4b82-9851-1750b1b52f12n%40googlegroups.com.