ISMRM rawdata vs (B|M)IDS rawdata

已查看 20 次
跳至第一个未读帖子

Henk-Jan Mutsaerts (Henk)

未读,
2022年7月4日 07:48:312022/7/4
收件人 bids-di...@googlegroups.com
Hi all,



Nice ISMRM paper about a standard for MRI k-space (before reconstruction) data.
Is there a potential nomenclature issue that they refer to as this standard as the “ISMRM raw data format”?
Especially for MIDS?


BTW: I have good news about ASL-BIDS: Nature-Scientific Data accepted our paper! Will update you soon

Cheers, Henk

Henk(-Jan) MM Mutsaerts, MD PhD
Amsterdam UMC/UZ Ghent/UCL
Phone: +31 6 4390 8284

dan.handwerker

未读,
2022年7月4日 08:44:202022/7/4
收件人 bids-discussion
ISMRM raw data format is a multi-year effort that with the blessing of ISMRM and already interfaces with substantial reconstruction tools, such as https://gadgetron.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
I don't know anything about MIDS, but if MIDS is supposed to deal with raw k-space data, the designers of MIDS really should be in directly communication with the ISMRM raw data group to make sure they are actually adding value.

Dan

Henk-Jan Mutsaerts

未读,
2022年7月7日 08:09:372022/7/7
收件人 bids-di...@googlegroups.com
Dear Dan,


Of course I agree with you, my point was just that the nomenclature “raw data” is used by two widely used standards in a very different way; and if we should somehow deal with this.

Henk


Henk(-Jan) MM Mutsaerts, MD PhD
Amsterdam UMC/UZ Ghent/UCL
Phone: +31 6 4390 8284
--
We are all colleagues working together to shape brain imaging for tomorrow, please be respectful, gracious, and patient with your fellow group members.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "bids-discussion" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bids-discussi...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bids-discussion/e949606b-1398-4e2f-92f3-55b3f717e5ean%40googlegroups.com.

回复全部
回复作者
转发
0 个新帖子