on accessing the p8/9 headers

131 views
Skip to first unread message

woody stanford

unread,
Mar 9, 2017, 7:17:59 AM3/9/17
to BeagleBoard
OK, I want to get to the bottom of this whole GPIO issue on the BBB, so I'm opening up this thread as a "documenter" whereby which I can take notes based on my research into how you consistently, stably and SOLIDLY programatically access the GPIO pins on a BBB. I've already done a lot of the footwork so I'm not entirely unknowledgeable, but I want to get to the heart of this issue and solve the mental block people have with this. A private hope.

Either way, probably a good mess of processed links, articles and information where you can start.

woody stanford

unread,
Mar 9, 2017, 7:26:12 AM3/9/17
to BeagleBoard
OK, how I'm looking at this problem, of how to configure and use the GPIO pins on a BBB is as if the BBB is like a PIC or other microcontroller not an SBC to start (I'm starting at the pins and working my way in, conceptually).

So what I'm doing is looking for a datasheet for the p8/9 header electrical portion of the BBB. There is one, but I really don't like how its laid out (let me get you the link though) for the work I'm doing here. We will use these instead:



Here is the link to the BBB Reference Manual (which is still great, just at this stage I want things laid out like I like):


We're going to use this pdf a lot too so here's the  link.

woody stanford

unread,
Mar 9, 2017, 7:39:45 AM3/9/17
to BeagleBoard
What has been coming through loud and clear is the "GPIO Settings" (the little box at the bottom of the images in the previous post). Let's talk about them.

I've done a lot of electrical engineering in my time with digital circuits, so I'm thinking of setting bits 3-7 how you would set up your GPIO on a microcontroller which would basically be bare-bones, fast with pull-downs (this is how a PIC is set up). You can have them float but then you would have to anchor them high or low externally, so let's just pull them down.

A good conservative choice for setting these bits is x0100xxx (expressed in binary here).

So how the GPIO Settings works is you have to set your bits in such a way as to produce the effect you want. Every pin has a MODE (REMEMBER this word) that allows you to configure the pin how you want it (ie. switching over a given GPIO pin to a UART pin so now you have serial communications). That's what the big tables above are for, they list all seven modes for each pin which value is put in bits 0-2.

For example, if you wanted to set these bits to MODE 4 your byte would be 00100010 (in binary).

On Thursday, March 9, 2017 at 5:17:59 AM UTC-7, woody stanford wrote:

woody stanford

unread,
Mar 9, 2017, 8:09:18 AM3/9/17
to BeagleBoard
OK, thru tracing hardware for now, so let's look at overlays for a second. Here is a link to what looks like the cleanest (if not official) code base for gpio configuration.


How this code base set up is traditionally, with a "make file". To build these, you usually just type "make all" or just "make". This is A correct way to distribute this code.

But what I wanted to talk about is universala, more precisely: cape-universala-00A0.dts Now in researching this issue, you'll come across this file over and over again (its like the uEnv file). Here is what I'm suggesting you do in figuring out these DTS files (overlay or cape manager files) is you download the zip of the above github link and look at the files in it manually first. If you go to /src/arm within the ZIP file, you will come across all of your available overlays.

Look for cape-universala-00A0.dts and open it in a text editor (I'm doing it in Windows so I'm using my EditLite). There is an important reason why I'm suggesting this. Look at the contents conceptually first OK? Its easy to figure out how the commenting out works (its similar or identical to C's commenting out). What you notice is that "universala" is obviously set up for using a BBB in the Cloud-9y, stand-alone way (i.e. using a lot of the pins for HDMI output and the like).

Now this is NOT how I use my Beagle. I use it like a tiny UN*X host and telnet (SSH) into it and I want to use all of my GPIO pins as UARTs, SPI's and I2C's (as I'm using it as kind of a controller for a project with a lot of sensors and actuators and stuff). So I want to find an overlay that satisfies my requirements.

So what I did was I started reading through the overlays available. I immediately was attracted to BB-UART1-00A0.dts . Now I was "surprised" when I manually read this file (I say this for teaching effect) because there is only the overlay for activating UART1 in it and it ignores all the other pins completely. This is very different from cape-universala-00A0.dts in that this file seems to be VERY preoccupied with every pin on the board.

My working theory at this point is that they are...of course...overlays. In other words there is some procedure, some approach that allows you to overlay a bunch of these files in such a way that it ends up configuring the pins exactly how you want. But in typical UNIX tradition the reasoning is dense, commenting sparse and the code difficult to sift through.

So that's my working theory right now is I have to determine conceptually HOW these overlays are actually overlaid over top each other. (Thoughts? to the group...conceptually...in plain english, no code what is the overlay process?)


On Thursday, March 9, 2017 at 5:17:59 AM UTC-7, woody stanford wrote:

woody stanford

unread,
Mar 9, 2017, 8:30:08 AM3/9/17
to BeagleBoard
OK, how are these "overlays" set up technically?

In my reading, what seems to be operative, is that these overlays are "compiled" with the magical:

dtc compiler

(Reference: DTC And Compiling Custom Overlays heading in https://vadl.github.io/beagleboneblack/2016/07/29/setting-up-bbb-gpio )

Now GCC being the only way to actually compile something aside (I will not be budged in this opinion), we have to build this "compiler" so we can process our configuration files such that it performs the required operation to the BBB. I'm assuming we just set up out overlays in the correct fashion and then commit them to the OS with the dtc compiler.

I'll document my research into this process here. I need to load it to my BBB, make/build it and then figure out the configuration such that when I'm finished I have a nice constellation of GPIO, UART and I2C pins just the way I want them, and report here.

On Thursday, March 9, 2017 at 5:17:59 AM UTC-7, woody stanford wrote:

woody stanford

unread,
Mar 9, 2017, 9:03:21 AM3/9/17
to BeagleBoard
Thoughts I want to capture (for later discussion):

- working theory: I want to be able to access my communication pins (my SPI, I2C, and UART serial) stuff through TTYO1 thru 6 so I can use streams (a la fopen() in C ) so I have some /dev/ abstraction insulating me from a lot of platform and cross-compilation issues.

- I really need to learn python so I can talk more intelligently on how these ideas relate to python.

- apparently there are three accepted ways of configuring these pins: overlays, the uEnv.txt file (Q: are the overlay names loaded there just the .dts filenames minus the 00A0.dts suffix...kinda looks like) and the config-pin utility. Still have questions in my mind as to how they all work together to configure the board.



On Thursday, March 9, 2017 at 5:17:59 AM UTC-7, woody stanford wrote:

woody stanford

unread,
Mar 9, 2017, 9:13:41 AM3/9/17
to BeagleBoard
Capturing thoughts:

- I'm thinking that there are conceptually two stages to this: (1) configuration (which is loaded by the OS at start-up, which is fine I think for most real applications) and (2) how you actually access the pins from whatever language/environment you are using.
 
- Feeling pretty confident about being able to access via /dev/TTYO1-6 on serial based communication and maybe using a C library for direct GPIO (like digital on/off output/input) access. Wondering if SPI and I2C are serial enough to be able to access them this way. Research will tell.


On Thursday, March 9, 2017 at 5:17:59 AM UTC-7, woody stanford wrote:

woody stanford

unread,
Mar 10, 2017, 3:30:37 PM3/10/17
to BeagleBoard
Since this is my thread, I though I would reach out to my fellows, both professional (ie. Beagleboard) and hobbyist (that that have ACTUALLY solved this issue and can add something to this discussion) if they can shed some light on the following issues.

I'm serious though about people that have done it before, ok, I've been programming UN*X for quite sometime and already know what a popen and a ps are, we don't need yet another elaboration on it. If you have successfully managed to properly configure the GPIO on a BB I would love to hear from you. And I will proceed with my own research on the subject, posting here.

Some of the topics that elaboration would help on are currently:

- how conceptually (not technically, functionally, in english) does "overlaying" work. And better if it is a mundain procedure but I do need it explained (would save me some time).

- Am I correct in assuming that to commit this "overlay" to OS that I need to "compile" it? Have I got it right that its the DTC compiler at the above URL.

- Does this correctly configure my board for the suite of PWM/TIMER/I2C/UART/SPI/CAN/GPIO features available on the p8/9 headers AT START UP?

- Down the line: is there a nice tutorial out there or PDF that deliniates a correct procedure for using /dev/ abstraction to access especially the I2C/SPI/UART features via streams (in let's say C).

- what is the accepted procedure for accessing the pins in GPIO mode?

- A moderators: once we get this issue resolved is there any way we can stickey it to the top of each of the boards sections, as well as the hardware board? I apologize for my forwardness, its just a question.

Thank you for your compliance jk. :D


On Thursday, March 9, 2017 at 5:17:59 AM UTC-7, woody stanford wrote:
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Gerald Coley

unread,
Mar 10, 2017, 5:09:05 PM3/10/17
to beagl...@googlegroups.com
Bye Bye!!

Gerald


On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 4:04 PM, 'woody stanford' via BeagleBoard <beagl...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
Sweet Fish
Q: What kind of fish goes well with peanut butter?

A: Jellyfish!

Categories: Animal Jokes(Fish Jokes), Food Jokes, Riddles(Riddles for Kids)
Copyright © 2013 - All Rights Reserved - Used with Permission.
Share ViaE-MailTwitterFacebookGoogle PlusURL Share
264111
Anonymous

Blow Your Top -Riddles
Q: What is a volcano?

A: A mountain with the hiccups.

 

Categories: Riddles(Riddles for Kids)
Share ViaE-MailTwitterFacebookGoogle PlusURL Share
13227
Anonymous

Identity Theft
Q: What do you call a noodle that committed identity theft?

A: An im-pasta!

Categories: Food Jokes, Word Play Jokes, Riddles(Riddles for Kids)
Copyright © 2013 - All Rights Reserved - Used with Permission.
130
Anonymous

Deportation
I live in constant fear that Trump will deport my latina mother-in-law who lives at 1944 5th Street in a white house with a blue door.  She gets off work at 6PM.

Categories: Jokes about Families(Mother-in-Law Jokes), Ethnic / Country Jokes(Mexico Jokes)
220
Anonymous

Getting on Television
Q: How do you get on television?

A: You sit on it!

Categories: One-Liner Jokes, Word Play Jokes, Riddles(Riddles for Kids)
Copyright © 2013 - All Rights Reserved - Used with Permission.
032
Submitted By: toemeraldcity

Call Me Maybe
Q: How did the telephone propose to his girlfriend?

A: He gave her a ring.

Categories: Relationship Jokes(Dating Jokes), Telephone Jokes, Riddles(Riddles for Kids)
11122
Anonymous

Police Stop at 2AM
An elderly man is stopped by the police around 2 a.m. and is asked where he is going at this time of night.

The man replies, "I am on my way to a lecture about alcohol abuse and the effects it has on the human body, as well as smoking and staying out late." The officer then asks, "Really? Who is giving that lecture at this time of night?"

The man replies, "That would be my wife."

Categories: Old Age Jokes, Relationship Jokes(Marriage Jokes), Alcohol Jokes
490
Anonymous

Shady Dog
Q: Why did the dog sit in the shade?

A: Because he didn't want to be a hot dog!

Categories: Food Jokes, Animal Jokes(Dog Jokes), Funny Thoughts, Word Play Jokes, Riddles(Riddles for Kids)
11001636422
Anonymous

Snowman Transport
Q: How does a Snowman get to work?

A: By icicle.

On Thursday, March 9, 2017 at 5:17:59 AM UTC-7, woody stanford wrote:
OK, I want to get to the bottom of this whole GPIO issue on the BBB, so I'm opening up this thread as a "documenter" whereby which I can take notes based on my research into how you consistently, stably and SOLIDLY programatically access the GPIO pins on a BBB. I've already done a lot of the footwork so I'm not entirely unknowledgeable, but I want to get to the heart of this issue and solve the mental block people have with this. A private hope.

Either way, probably a good mess of processed links, articles and information where you can start.

--
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to beagleboard+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/59810c04-e7f2-4da9-b42e-80c2ee8be07d%40googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--

woody stanford

unread,
Mar 12, 2017, 8:11:16 PM3/12/17
to BeagleBoard
Moderators could you please remove this post. I haven't a clue what he means by "bye bye" but it doesn't sound all that positive. Thank you.
Bye Bye!!

Gerald


To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to beagleboard...@googlegroups.com.
Message has been deleted

Gerald Coley

unread,
Mar 12, 2017, 8:12:59 PM3/12/17
to beagl...@googlegroups.com
It is not. Please keep what you post pertinent to this forum. Oh, I am the moderator.


Gerald

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to beagleboard+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/ee9affaf-6335-4465-aaee-cf4f70c25fb7%40googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Robert Nelson

unread,
Mar 12, 2017, 8:23:18 PM3/12/17
to Beagle Board


On Mar 12, 2017 7:11 PM, "'woody stanford' via BeagleBoard" <beagl...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
Moderators could you please remove this post. I haven't a clue what he means by "bye bye" but it doesn't sound all that positive. Thank you.

Gerald is the mod, and he's pointing it your previous post was not 'on topic', it was spam..

Regards,

woody stanford

unread,
Mar 12, 2017, 9:04:44 PM3/12/17
to BeagleBoard
Gerald is a mod? Look if you guys want me to buy your board, I expect the tech support to be more friendly than that? Can you remind him this is a business.

And maybe get him to fly a moderator banner or something. Thank you

(Likes Gerald so wondering what's up)

Woody.

Jacek Radzikowski

unread,
Mar 12, 2017, 9:08:44 PM3/12/17
to beagleboard
Woody,

you sent a spam. If you expect anybody to help you, you must follow
community rules. Spamming the list with non-related content is not
among them.

Jacek

On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 8:51 PM, 'woody stanford' via BeagleBoard
<beagl...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> Gerald is a mod? Look if you guys want me to buy your board, I expect the
> tech support to be more friendly than that? Can you remind him this is a
> business.
>
> And maybe get him to fly a moderator banner or something. Thank you
>
> (Likes Gerald so wondering what's up)
>
> Woody.
>
> On Sunday, March 12, 2017 at 5:23:18 PM UTC-7, RobertCNelson wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mar 12, 2017 7:11 PM, "'woody stanford' via BeagleBoard"
>> <beagl...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>>
>> Moderators could you please remove this post. I haven't a clue what he
>> means by "bye bye" but it doesn't sound all that positive. Thank you.
>>
>>
>> Gerald is the mod, and he's pointing it your previous post was not 'on
>> topic', it was spam..
>>
>> Regards,
>
> --
> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "BeagleBoard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to beagleboard...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/cd518af1-d3f9-471b-972d-f3da446fbfd9%40googlegroups.com.
>
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--
Given a choice between two theories, take the one which is funnier

Gerald Coley

unread,
Mar 12, 2017, 9:09:04 PM3/12/17
to beagl...@googlegroups.com
Look at what you posted.

We are volunteers here and none of us get paid for what we do. I don't care if you buy a board or not.

I expect posters to follow the rules and post things that pertain to the forum.

Gerald

--
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to beagleboard+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/cd518af1-d3f9-471b-972d-f3da446fbfd9%40googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

woody stanford

unread,
Mar 12, 2017, 9:09:41 PM3/12/17
to BeagleBoard
OK status report, where I'm at is the dtc compiler I was talking about seems only to be buildable with a Debian-style installer, which is a deal-breaker for me because I use stock Angstrom.

Found another overlay compiler by Pantelis Antoniou, but this one doesn't appear to work either because of a missing *.h file on make (however it appears more promising because of its more traditional C structure). I think a little more work on that would be 

Also remember when compiling on MinGW that the make command is "mingw32-make" not "make". However it seems to partially build with that header file problem. (what are you compiling it on MinGW for...its just where I evaluate stuff before committing to a given library/program).

Got some datasheets to look at. Interestingly enough, the datasheet for the Sitara presents their design a little differently as BBB which is interesting. I'll be back.

On Thursday, March 9, 2017 at 5:17:59 AM UTC-7, woody stanford wrote:

Robert Nelson

unread,
Mar 12, 2017, 10:00:43 PM3/12/17
to Beagle Board
On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 8:07 PM, 'woody stanford' via BeagleBoard
<beagl...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> OK status report, where I'm at is the dtc compiler I was talking about seems
> only to be buildable with a Debian-style installer, which is a deal-breaker
> for me because I use stock Angstrom.

Angstrom is dead and has been un-maintained since the fall of 2013.

Regards,

--
Robert Nelson
https://rcn-ee.com/

woody stanford

unread,
Mar 13, 2017, 5:20:10 PM3/13/17
to BeagleBoard
Gerald, can you articulate what you difficulty with my posts are, according to TOS where the violations are, and I will correct them. I am NOT trying to monopolize your board or whatever, I just have questions is all. But if you could be a good moderator and let me know what you concern is with me. If it is reasonable I will agree and make the proper changes.

Or I will be forced to go to Mouser and ask for a refund on my BB. I like it. But I am not committed to using it.

Thank you.


On Thursday, March 9, 2017 at 5:17:59 AM UTC-7, woody stanford wrote:

Robert Nelson

unread,
Mar 13, 2017, 5:30:00 PM3/13/17
to Beagle Board
On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 8:26 PM, 'woody stanford' via BeagleBoard
<beagl...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> Gerald, can you articulate what you difficulty with my posts are, according
> to TOS where the violations are, and I will correct them. I am NOT trying to
> monopolize your board or whatever, I just have questions is all. But if you
> could be a good moderator and let me know what you concern is with me. If it
> is reasonable I will agree and make the proper changes.

The "post" in question is deleted, you sent it via email to 11,495
members. It was a random spam Question & Answer crap

the post was the one before this post "
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/beagleboard/9HoWwEPz-5Q/vNrmYwP0AwAJ "

"proper changes" it already got sent out to 11,495 via email...
there's nothing to change... just don't do it again...

> Or I will be forced to go to Mouser and ask for a refund on my BB. I like
> it. But I am not committed to using it.

William Hermans

unread,
Mar 13, 2017, 5:37:19 PM3/13/17
to beagl...@googlegroups.com
Well, this guy is already on my blacklist, so as far as I'm concerned . . . let me post corny joke garbage posts. Granted, I'm only 1 of those 11,495 people who got mailed. . .

--
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to beagleboard+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

Peter Lawler

unread,
Mar 13, 2017, 11:12:06 PM3/13/17
to beagl...@googlegroups.com
On 13/03/17 12:26, 'woody stanford' via BeagleBoard wrote:

> Or I will be forced to go to Mouser and ask for a refund on my BB.
Wait, Mouser will process refunds if the owner posts spam to a moderated
list?!

P.

woody stanford

unread,
Mar 19, 2017, 10:28:25 AM3/19/17
to BeagleBoard

Ok, here where I'm at (and I do apologize about the jokes...forgot I was on an email server...sorry).

I looked at the various Github solutions and not too impressed with them. (Please don't be offended, I'm just saying...to me)

Here is my question to those guys that have done this before. Let me bounce this logic off of you and where I am wrong PLEASE feel free to correct me. I've just been thinking about it

I have a BBBW Rev C (I think) running stock Angstrom. I go to the uEnv.txt file, I make the directory read/write (anyone remember how to do this...I'm serious...chmod?) and then I add the overlays starting with the lowest one first (so like universela or universeln) then I add overlays (like BB_UART) until I'm left with the particular configuration I need. Is THIS a correct procedure (or am I like totally misunderstanding this approach)?

Then at boot up, it should be configured, right? No BS, just someone that has done this before and has put in the time to think about how they actually did it.

Thoughts, or is this approach totally cracked?

On Thursday, March 9, 2017 at 5:17:59 AM UTC-7, woody stanford wrote:

woody stanford

unread,
Mar 19, 2017, 10:28:31 AM3/19/17
to BeagleBoard

OK, here is where I'm at


**** IMPORTANT: a lot of these things that I'm saying are my own educated guesses, this is not an enumeration of the correct way of enabling and using the P8/9 headers. I just want to make that clear. It doesn't currently work****


The procedure I took was the uEnv.txt route. On my BBBW it is in the /boot directory ( I noticed that its in different spots on different boards). So I had to make the directory Read/Write so I did this:


chmod 644 /boot


which makes it R/W for owner and R for group, I think.


The I pico'ed the uEnv.txt file and cut and pasted this line under its equivalent commented out line:


cape_enable=bone_capemgr.enable_partno=BB-UART1,BB-UART2,BB-UART3,BB-UART4,BB-UART5


...and saved it.


I then rebooted.


From what I've gathered, this will configured the UART1 thru 5's on the p8/9 pins to their base UART mode. Then I looked up the pin configurations in the BBB reference manual and found the pins “named” (I see there are multiple modes, so I just went with the name of the pin as I figured this is the default) UART1_TXD, UART1_RXD...UART5_TXD, UART5 RXD.


According to the manual:


UART5_RXD is pin p8_38

UART4_TXD is pin p9_13


I jumpered these physically figuring I would write a short program to shoot some data across to check that they are transmitting and receiving right (I don't have an O-Scope). I checked this connection thrice just to make sure I had the physical layer right.


I gathered from various posts on BB that how you access these serial connections via the /dev/ttyO1 thru /dev/ttyO5 device streams. I assumed that you just open a stream to the device and fread and fwrite from them. Am I correct to do this? Would read and write be better (ie. Using file handles as opposed to fptr's?) here?


So here is my code:


[code]

//*********************************

// UART 4 to UART 5 connection test

//

// For correctly configured Beagleboard Black Wireless

// (Use uEnv.txt procedure by uncommenting capes you need

// in this case BB_UART4 and BB_UART5)

//

// Remember to physically jumper across:

// P8_38 (UART5_RXD)

// to

// P9_13 (UART4_TXD)

// Important: on a BBBW the P8 is on the RIGHT and the P9 is on the LEFT

// Easy to forget this

// ********************************


#include <stdio.h>

#include <string.h>


main()

{

FILE *dptr1, *dptr2;

char buf[255];

char buf2[255];


//manual clear both test buffers

memset(buf,0,255);

memset(buf2,0,255);


//set test transmit buffer to a value that can be read

strcpy(buf,"Transmit Test String.");


printf("Opening UART4 for transmit\n");

dptr1=fopen("/dev/ttyS4","w");


printf("Opening UART5 for receive\n");

dptr2=fopen("/dev/ttyS5","r");


printf("Writing test string \"%s\" to UART4_TXD\n",buf);

fwrite(buf,sizeof(buf),1,dptr1);

fflush(NULL);


printf("Receiving test string from UART5_TXD\n");

fread(buf,sizeof(buf2),1,dptr2);


printf("Received test string: %s\n",buf2);


fclose(dptr1);

fclose(dptr2);


}

[/code]


All this code when compiled and run does is send a test string out UART4_TX out to UART5_RX.


OK, THE MOMENT OF TRUTH: what happens when I do this?


The program outputs:


Opening UART4 for transmit

Opening UART5 for receive

Writing test string "Transmit Test String." to UART4_TXD

Receiving test string from UART5_TXD

^C


...it hangs on the receive (so I'm not even sure if it transmitted correctly) why I included the caret C to indicate where I had to stop execution with a <ctrl>C because it hung there.


Any ideas?  


On Thursday, March 9, 2017 at 5:17:59 AM UTC-7, woody stanford wrote:

evilwulfie

unread,
Mar 19, 2017, 10:40:46 AM3/19/17
to beagl...@googlegroups.com
Do yourself a favor. Dump Angstrom which is not supported anymore and go with a newer stock debian image.
People here dont support Angstrom here. It was horrable to begin with.
--
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to beagleboard...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/53822ae9-ef4e-4a9d-8e0c-c77cb4548b86%40googlegroups.com.

woody stanford

unread,
Mar 21, 2017, 7:46:50 AM3/21/17
to BeagleBoard
Wulf Man, yeah I actually took a look at the boot sequence on my BBBW and apparently its Debian. Don't know here I got the Angstrom idea from. I tend to read a lot of things so they might have been older documents.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages