Best way to get elapsed milliseconds

148 views
Skip to first unread message

Walter Cromer

unread,
Feb 16, 2021, 10:03:47 AM2/16/21
to BeagleBoard
I have a BBB Wireless running Linux beaglebone 4.14.108-ti-r106 #1 SMP PREEMPT Fri May 24 22:12:34 UTC 2019 armv7l GNU/Linux

I am writing in C.

I turn a valve on and then need to read some sensors for N milliseconds and then turn the valve off.

What's the best way to read milliseconds on the BBBw?  I don't have a RTC on this particular unit but could add one using I2C.  I have an Adafruit 4282 with a DS3231 RTC on it on another BBBw that I could use temporarily to prove it works.  What other options are available?


pierric...@gadz.org

unread,
Feb 16, 2021, 10:51:11 AM2/16/21
to BeagleBoard
Depending on how precise you need to be, I would go for the PRU-ICSS. They can control the GPIOs pretty easily. 

Mark A. Yoder

unread,
Feb 17, 2021, 10:10:53 AM2/17/21
to BeagleBoard
The PRUs can give you 10's of ns timing, which is more than good enough for milliseconds, but might be over kill.

I'd think using C on the ARM processor should be fast enough.  I'd use gpiod[1].

If you really want the ns timing of the PRUs, check out the PRU Cookbook[2]

--Mark

Walter Cromer

unread,
Feb 17, 2021, 12:25:07 PM2/17/21
to BeagleBoard
I really don't need ns.  The valve 'on time' is going to be in the range of 500 ms to 2 seconds probably.  

I will review the PRUCookbook!  Thanks!

Walter

Michele Xiloyannis

unread,
Feb 17, 2021, 12:42:35 PM2/17/21
to beagl...@googlegroups.com
Hi Walter, 

I don't think you need an RTC for relative time. clock_gettime should do the job (https://linux.die.net/man/3/clock_gettime)
There are also more intuitive ways to manipulate timespec structs in the RCL (http://strawsondesign.com/docs/librobotcontrol/group__time.html). 

Best, 
Michele

--
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to beagleboard...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/fc16c0ce-4895-4bfd-93a4-245fe6b0d59cn%40googlegroups.com.

Walter Cromer

unread,
Feb 17, 2021, 1:45:49 PM2/17/21
to BeagleBoard
You are correct that this application does not need to know the actual real time but only the relative (elapsed) time since the subroutine began.  I'm familiar with clock_gettime but didn't think it could give me subsecond information.  I'll explore it!

Thanks,!

Walter

Walter Cromer

unread,
Feb 17, 2021, 1:53:35 PM2/17/21
to BeagleBoard
Mark, 

I got the latest PRUCookbook downloaded and when trying to make the hello.pru0.c program in 1.6, I got this error.  

debian@beaglebone:/var/lib/cloud9/PRUCookbook/docs/02start/code$ make TARGET=hello.pru0
/var/lib/cloud9/common/Makefile:29: MODEL=TI_AM335x_BeagleBone_Black,TARGET=hello.pru0
-    Stopping PRU 0
/bin/sh: 1: cannot create /dev/remoteproc/pruss-core0/state: Directory nonexistent
Cannot stop 0
CC      hello.pru0.c
"/var/lib/cloud9/common/prugpio.h", line 53: warning #1181-D: #warning directive: "Found am335x"
LD      /tmp/cloud9-examples/hello.pru0.o
-       copying firmware file /tmp/cloud9-examples/hello.pru0.out to /lib/firmware/am335x-pru0-fw
cp: cannot create regular file '/lib/firmware/am335x-pru0-fw': Permission denied
/var/lib/cloud9/common/Makefile:180: recipe for target 'install' failed
make: *** [install] Error 1
rm /tmp/cloud9-examples/hello.pru0.o

 Initially, I did not have a folder called /var/lib/cloud9/common.  To remedy this I copied the contents of /var/lib/cloud9/PRUCookbook/docs/common to /var/lib/cloud9/common.  Maybe this created a problem?Nevertheless,  I found some other discussions that suggested updating the scripts and kernels from beagleboard.org/upgrade which I did.  I am now running...

Linux beaglebone 4.14.108-ti-r137 #1stretch SMP PREEMPT Tue Aug 25 01:48:39 UTC 2020 armv7l GNU/Linux

And the output of version.sh is 

debian@beaglebone:/$ sudo opt/scripts/tools/version.sh
[sudo] password for debian:
git:/opt/scripts/:[e4e4854ef8ff9ada5c85553376043ee7679167ca]
eeprom:[A335BNLT00C04417BBBK1847]
model:[TI_AM335x_BeagleBone_Black]
dogtag:[BeagleBoard.org Debian Image 2018-10-07]
bootloader:[microSD-(push-button)]:[/dev/mmcblk0]:[U-Boot SPL 2018.09-00002-g0b54a51eee (Sep 10 2018 - 19:41:39 -0500)]:[location: dd MBR]
bootloader:[microSD-(push-button)]:[/dev/mmcblk0]:[U-Boot 2018.09-00002-g0b54a51eee]:[location: dd MBR]
bootloader:[eMMC-(default)]:[/dev/mmcblk1]:[U-Boot SPL 2018.03-00002-gac9cce7c6a (Apr 05 2018 - 13:07:46 -0500)]:[location: dd MBR]
bootloader:[eMMC-(default)]:[/dev/mmcblk1]:[U-Boot 2018.03-00002-gac9cce7c6a]:[location: dd MBR]
UBOOT: Booted Device-Tree:[am335x-boneblack-uboot-univ.dts]
kernel:[4.14.108-ti-r137]
nodejs:[v6.14.4]
/boot/uEnv.txt Settings:
uboot_overlay_options:[enable_uboot_overlays=1]
uboot_overlay_options:[uboot_overlay_addr0=/lib/firmware/BB-W1-P9.12-00A0.dtbo]
uboot_overlay_options:[disable_uboot_overlay_video=1]
uboot_overlay_options:[uboot_overlay_pru=/lib/firmware/AM335X-PRU-RPROC-4-14-TI-00A0.dtbo]
uboot_overlay_options:[enable_uboot_cape_universal=1]
pkg check: to individually upgrade run: [sudo apt install --only-upgrade <pkg>]
pkg:[bb-cape-overlays]:[4.4.20180928.0-0rcnee0~stretch+20180928]
pkg:[bb-customizations]:[1.20180815-0rcnee0~stretch+20180815]
WARNING:pkg:[bb-usb-gadgets]:[NOT_INSTALLED]
pkg:[bb-wl18xx-firmware]:[1.20180517-0rcnee0~stretch+20180517]
pkg:[kmod]:[23-2rcnee1~stretch+20171005]
pkg:[librobotcontrol]:[1.0.3-git20181005.0-0rcnee0~stretch+20181005]
pkg:[firmware-ti-connectivity]:[20170823-1rcnee1~stretch+20180328]
groups:[debian : debian adm kmem dialout cdrom floppy audio dip video plugdev users systemd-journal i2c bluetooth netdev cloud9ide gpio pwm eqep admin spi tisdk weston-launch xenomai]
cmdline:[console=ttyO0,115200n8 bone_capemgr.uboot_capemgr_enabled=1 root=/dev/mmcblk0p1 ro rootfstype=ext4 rootwait coherent_pool=1M net.ifnames=0 quiet]
dmesg | grep remote
[    1.147260] remoteproc remoteproc0: wkup_m3 is available
[    1.231303] remoteproc remoteproc0: powering up wkup_m3
[    1.231426] remoteproc remoteproc0: Booting fw image am335x-pm-firmware.elf, size 217168
[    1.233981] remoteproc remoteproc0: remote processor wkup_m3 is now up
[  108.634522] remoteproc remoteproc1: 4a334000.pru is available
[  108.656634] remoteproc remoteproc2: 4a338000.pru is available
dmesg | grep pru
[  108.019424] pruss 4a300000.pruss: creating PRU cores and other child platform devices
[  108.634522] remoteproc remoteproc1: 4a334000.pru is available
[  108.634642] pru-rproc 4a334000.pru: PRU rproc node /ocp/pruss_soc_bus@4a326004/pruss@0/pru@34000 probed successfully
[  108.656634] remoteproc remoteproc2: 4a338000.pru is available
[  108.656808] pru-rproc 4a338000.pru: PRU rproc node /ocp/pruss_soc_bus@4a326004/pruss@0/pru@38000 probed successfully
dmesg | grep pinctrl-single
[    0.783913] pinctrl-single 44e10800.pinmux: 142 pins at pa f9e10800 size 568
dmesg | grep gpio-of-helper
[    0.796624] gpio-of-helper ocp:cape-universal: ready
lsusb
Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
END

Any ideas?

On Wednesday, February 17, 2021 at 10:10:53 AM UTC-5 Mark A. Yoder wrote:

Mark A. Yoder

unread,
Feb 17, 2021, 2:02:55 PM2/17/21
to BeagleBoard
I suggest updating to a new version of the SD card.  It looks like the PRUs are getting started at boot time, but the path isn't setup right. I think we setup some links so the path /dev/remoteproc/pruss-core0/state  points to the right place.

You could also try:
cd /var/lib/cloud9
git pull
to update cloud9 folders.

--Mark

Walter Cromer

unread,
Feb 17, 2021, 2:25:40 PM2/17/21
to BeagleBoard
Mark, 

git pull on /var/lib/cloud9 fails with 'fatal: Not a git repository (or any of the parent directories): .git 

I'm such a neophyte on git.  What do I need to do?

And, what do you mean by updating to a new version of the SD card? The OS is booting from the SD card and the version.sh information posted earlier is based on that.

Mark A. Yoder

unread,
Feb 17, 2021, 2:30:58 PM2/17/21
to BeagleBoard
On newer versions of the SD card image /var/lib/cloud9 is a git repo which you can do a git pull to update.  Your version is too old.

to download and install an updated version of the SD card image.

--Mark

Walter Cromer

unread,
Feb 17, 2021, 2:45:25 PM2/17/21
to BeagleBoard
So you are saying that this version is too old?

Linux beaglebone 4.14.108-ti-r137 #1stretch SMP PREEMPT Tue Aug 25 01:48:39 UTC 2020 armv7l GNU/Linux



Walter Cromer

unread,
Feb 17, 2021, 2:46:35 PM2/17/21
to BeagleBoard
I asked because the ones on the page @ the link are older than the one I have installed.

Mark A. Yoder

unread,
Feb 17, 2021, 3:47:04 PM2/17/21
to BeagleBoard
Good point, it should work....  I'm running a newer test image[1], but I took my Beagle home so I can't do a quick check on it until later.


--Mark

Walter Cromer

unread,
Feb 17, 2021, 3:56:21 PM2/17/21
to BeagleBoard
I'll get this one onto an SD card and give it a try.   If I can just get this configured I think I can make quick work of this problem!  

Mark A. Yoder

unread,
Feb 17, 2021, 5:34:37 PM2/17/21
to BeagleBoard
I fired up the Beagle at home it the PRU works out of the box.

What do you get running
ls /dev/remoteproc

I get:
ls -ls /dev/remoteproc
total 0
0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 33 Feb 17 17:26 pruss-core0 -> /sys/class/remoteproc/remoteproc1
0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 33 Feb 17 17:26 pruss-core1 -> /sys/class/remoteproc/remoteproc2

If you are missing pruss-core0 and pruss-core1 you could try adding the links by hand and see what happens.

cd /dev/remoteproc
sudo ln -s /sys/class/remoteproc/remoteproc1 pruss-core0
sudo ln -s /sys/class/remoteproc/remoteproc2 pruss-core1

Dennis Lee Bieber

unread,
Feb 18, 2021, 1:04:28 AM2/18/21
to Beagleboard
On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 10:45:49 -0800 (PST), in
gmane.comp.hardware.beagleboard.user Walter Cromer
<walterc-2dFtBuzUeF/tpnMUCzy8b...@public.gmane.org> wrote:

>You are correct that this application does not need to know the actual real
>time but only the relative (elapsed) time since the subroutine began. I'm
>familiar with clock_gettime but didn't think it could give me subsecond
>information. I'll explore it!
>

https://www.tutorialspoint.com/c_standard_library/c_function_clock.htm

The worst you may have to handle is the wrap-around in a long-running
program.


--
Dennis L Bieber

Walter Cromer

unread,
Feb 18, 2021, 8:54:10 AM2/18/21
to BeagleBoard
Mark, 

With the current OS there isn't a /dev/remoteproc even.   

I'm going to try the updated OS build this morning.  

Walter

Walter Cromer

unread,
Feb 18, 2021, 9:27:34 AM2/18/21
to BeagleBoard
Mark ,

It is working with the updated OS.  Thanks so much!   

Now I will explore how to get the simple timing that I need using the PRU.

Walter Cromer

unread,
Feb 18, 2021, 10:00:10 AM2/18/21
to BeagleBoard
I've gone through the cookbook and it's very helpful. 

I'm still fuzzy on how to do what I need to do.  

My main code for controlling the valves, getting user input, etc. is in C.  

I need to call a procedure in C that reads sensors.  I will pass this procedure the number of milliseconds it should read the sensors and then return to the main program and turn the valves off.   The number of milliseconds can, and will likely, change depending on what we are processing with these valves.   I get that input at the start of the main program.    

My thought is that in the procedure that reads the sensors, it will grab a start time (doesn't have to be actual time) value from the PRU, read the sensors, and loop until the current time-start time equals the amount of time it should read the sensors.  Then it will return to the main program.

I just don't know how to read the PRU's clock to get the time values.   I don't think I saw an example in the cookbook for 'branching' out from a main program to use the PRUs for this type of processing.  Just point me in the right direction, please.

Walter

Mark A. Yoder

unread,
Feb 18, 2021, 10:29:44 AM2/18/21
to BeagleBoard
Walter:
  It's good to hear you have the PRUs working.  I still think if all you need is millisecond timing the PRUs are over kill.

In C you can use usleep() and pass it the number of microseconds you want to pause.

--Mark

Walter Cromer

unread,
Feb 18, 2021, 10:35:04 AM2/18/21
to BeagleBoard
Mark, 

I use usleep a lot but in this case I don't want to pause.  I want to keep reading the sensors for N milliseconds.   I do pause between reads using usleep(20000) to create a 20ms delay between sensor reads.   I started with a routine that essentially counts up the amount of time by estimating how long the sensor read routine takes plus the fixed delay time between sensor reads and accumulating this value in a while loop until it reaches the 'stop value' that is approximately the time the valve needs to stay on.  But this is sketchy and I don't like it.  Lots could go wrong.   

In essence, I'm looking to interrupt the sensor read procedure after N milliseconds pass.   

Walter

Mark A. Yoder

unread,
Feb 18, 2021, 10:37:59 AM2/18/21
to BeagleBoard
Have you tried starting a pthread that sleeps for 20 ms and then it stops the read?

Walter Cromer

unread,
Feb 18, 2021, 11:22:32 AM2/18/21
to BeagleBoard
No. I am not familiar with that, Mark.  I found Strawson's reference to it online but it doesn't explain what it is or what it does.   Is there a better reference somewhere? Google didn't bring up anything that looked useful.

Walter Cromer

unread,
Feb 18, 2021, 11:27:48 AM2/18/21
to BeagleBoard
I think if I could just find how to read the clock on the PRU with C, I can probably take it from here.   And of course, it needs to be giving me milliseconds.  From what I read the main clock functions don't work below seconds.

Mark A. Yoder

unread,
Feb 18, 2021, 11:45:52 AM2/18/21
to BeagleBoard
I use __delay_cycles() on the PRU to get accurate timing. Each cycle is 5 ns.  

Here [1] is an example of passing data between the PRU and the ARM.

Try googling pthread tutorial, there appear to be many examples.

I'm still voting for pthreads.

--Mark

Walter Cromer

unread,
Feb 18, 2021, 12:38:24 PM2/18/21
to BeagleBoard
I'll look into the pthread tutorials.   

So is there no way to just read the clock on the PRU to get elapsed time?

Also,  I've booted my BBB Wireless with the SD card with the OS that you recommended and the access point doesn't come up.  It doesn't appear to be disabled in uEnv.txt.  Any ideas on this?

Walter

Mark A. Yoder

unread,
Feb 18, 2021, 12:50:36 PM2/18/21
to BeagleBoard
There is a cycle count register[1]

I'm not using wireless, so I don't know it's current status.

--Mark

Dennis Lee Bieber

unread,
Feb 18, 2021, 1:47:29 PM2/18/21
to Beagleboard
On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 08:27:48 -0800 (PST), in
gmane.comp.hardware.beagleboard.user Walter Cromer
<walterc-2dFtBuzUeF/tpnMUCzy8b...@public.gmane.org> wrote:

>I think if I could just find how to read the clock on the PRU with C, I can
>probably take it from here. And of course, it needs to be giving me
>milliseconds. From what I read the main clock functions don't work below
>seconds.

Have you even looked at the link I posted some hours ago? Duplicated
below.

>On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 10:45:49 -0800 (PST), in
>gmane.comp.hardware.beagleboard.user Walter Cromer
><walterc-2dFtBuzUeF/tpnMUCzy8bUEOCMrvLtNR-...@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
>>You are correct that this application does not need to know the actual real
>>time but only the relative (elapsed) time since the subroutine began. I'm
>>familiar with clock_gettime but didn't think it could give me subsecond
>>information. I'll explore it!
>>
>
>https://www.tutorialspoint.com/c_standard_library/c_function_clock.htm
>
> The worst you may have to handle is the wrap-around in a long-running
>program.

According to the documentation, that function returns clock TICKS
(whatever the tick rate is for the system in question). If you know the
CLOCKS_PER_SECOND you should be able to compute the clocks per
millisecond...

https://linux.die.net/man/3/clock

or use

https://linux.die.net/man/2/times

or better

https://linux.die.net/man/2/clock_gettime in which the return structure is
seconds AND NANOSECONDS


--
Dennis L Bieber

Walter Cromer

unread,
Feb 18, 2021, 2:36:45 PM2/18/21
to BeagleBoard
Yes I did and it did not work on my system.   I don't remember why now. 

Walter Cromer

unread,
Feb 18, 2021, 4:17:02 PM2/18/21
to BeagleBoard
I have a solution that seems to work for our purposes.   

Thanks for all the suggestions and help.  I am going to keep learning the PRUs because I think we'll need them in a more sophisticated version of the product.

This is a great community and I appreciate the patience with this neophyte to BB.

Here's the C code with some parts eliminated for simplicity.  

// *********************  ReadDetectors **********************************

 

void ReadDetectors(int TimeToRead)

{

     

    // initialize local variables

    struct timeval tv_start; //start time

    struct timeval tv_now; // current time 

    long total_elapsed_time_us;

    long start_secs;

    long last_secs;

    long last_usecs;

    long elapsed_us;

     int KeepReading = 1;

    gettimeofday(&tv_now,NULL);

    start_secs = tv_now.tv_sec;

    last_usecs = tv_now.tv_usec;

    elapsed_us = 0;

    total_elapsed_time_us = 0;

    while (KeepReading)

  

        {

   

          // READ SENSORS CODE IS HERE.  REMOVED FOR SIMPLICITY IN THE POST

          

          // update elapsed time

         

          gettimeofday(&tv_now,NULL);

       

          if (tv_now.tv_sec >= last_usecs)  // this if/else code handles the situation where the microsecond value crosses over zero between reads.

          {

              elapsed_us = tv_now.tv_usec - last_usecs;

          }

          else

          {

              elapsed_us = (1000000 - last_usecs) + tv_now.tv_usec;   

          }

          

          total_elapsed_time_us = (tv_now.tv_sec - start_secs)*1000000 + elapsed_us;   // this code adds microseconds for every second that has elapsed since the routine started.  In our case, we won't be in the routine more than 5 seconds ever.

          if (total_elapsed_time_us > TimeToRead) KeepReading = 0;

         

        }


}


}

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages