RE: [FAPA-Forum] FW: 蔡英文的博士學位是否造假: 南嘉生跟蔡英文在怕些什麼?
Allen Kuo
Dear Mark:
Many of the FAPA Forum members here might not be aware of that, after thorough and serious research, this topic has been sufficiently discussed in the BATA Forum, in order to discover the truth (Please refer to one of our discussions below).
The question is:
1) Do you prefer to lead your audiences to trust the conclusion from these four major UK libraries: Senate House Library, London School of Economics Library, Institute of Advanced Legal Studies library, and British Library, in which they all state they do not have the thesis in their collections and no digitized version is known to exist. Or,
2) Do you prefer to lead your audiences to trust the content of a single page image (and in Chinese too) below?
Thanks;
Allen Kuo
From: Michael Richardson [mailto:richards...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, July 8, 2019 7:59 AM
To: Allen Kuo
Cc: BATA
Subject: Re: [BATA] British Library says it does not have Tsai Ing-wen's thesis
The latest update on my search for Tsai Ing-wen's thesis:
First off, I have never been so insulted with vulgarity and varied insults from the internet in all the years I have been writing about Taiwan as has been directed at me in the last 72 hours. I presume most of the insults are from political trolls.
Secondly, never before have I been so misread by so many as I have been accused of making a wide variety of defamatory writing about Tsai that I never wrote.
Third, four libraries (Senate House Library, London School of Economics Library, Institute of Advanced Legal Studies library, and British Library) all state they do not have the thesis in their collections and no digitized version is known to exist.
Lastly, the British Library, which Tsai supporters used to silence the June inquiry into the matter when the issue of the missing thesis first surfaced, has now sent me an unsettling suggestion that Tsai herself restricted access to the thesis. I quote directly from the Customer Service branch of the British Library.
| 3:45 AM (4 hours ago) |
| ||
| ||||
Dear Michael,
Thank you for your feedback.
All theses are supplied via our Ethos service. When I checked the Ethos webpage for the thesis in question I got the following response. It would appear the author has put a block on the thesis (restricted access). You would need to contact the London School of Economics & Political Science for further information.
From: bay-area-taiw...@googlegroups.com [mailto:bay-area-taiw...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Michael Richardson
Sent: Sunday, July 7, 2019 4:04 PM
To: Michael Richardson
Subject: [BATA] British Library says it does not have Tsai Ing-wen's thesis
The mystery deepens...
Michael Richardson
From: fapa-...@googlegroups.com [mailto:fapa-...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Mark
Sent: Monday, July 8, 2019 5:37 PM
To: Frank S T Hsiao; FAPA-Forum FAPA Allmembers
Cc: Su-mei Kao
Subject: Re: [FAPA-Forum] FW: 蔡英文的博士學位是否造假: 南嘉生跟蔡英文在怕些什麼?
Mark Kao
NJ Chapter
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 13, 2019, at 5:11 PM, Frank S T Hsiao <frank...@colorado.edu> wrote:
Subject: [NATPA Forum] RE: 蔡英文的博士學位是否造假: 南嘉生跟蔡英文在怕些什麼?
Dear all:
Here is this Allen Kuo again, the self-appointed so called BATA editor. I have been using my steel katana to chop off his head. It was chopped, but still comes up again and again. Here are my comments below. Shame on the Allen Kuo, the so called BATA Editor.
Anybody can jump in on my comments.
Frank-CO
From: Allen Kuo [mailto:alle...@timebyte.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2019 1:43 PM
To: alim...@gmail.com; 'Forum NATPA' <natpa...@googlegroups.com>; _name_pandas_=E7=8D=A8=E7=8D=A8_=E7=AB=8B=E7=AB=8B_or?= return them' <luby...@gmail.com>; 'nipmcsc' <nip...@gmail.com>; 'bill wu' <taic...@gmail.com>; 'i_love_taiwan' <i_love...@googlegroups.com>; 'Eugene Yeh' <pea...@sbcglobal.net>; 'Chung-Chih Li' <chungc...@gmail.com>; Frank S T Hsiao <frank...@colorado.edu>; 'Peter Chow' <pcho...@gmail.com>; 'Lee李敦厚' <tunh...@hsph.harvard.edu>; 'BATA' <bay-area-taiw...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: 蔡英文的博士學位是否造假: 南嘉生跟蔡英文在怕些什麼?
南嘉生說了一大堆, 為何不直接要求蔡英文從抽屜裏拿出論文公開給人民, 不就結案了? 南嘉生跟蔡英文在怕些什麼? Yes, for this, Allen is probably right. Tsai might come out and explain. That might be one way to show her degree.
怕些什麼? Yes, you have many thing to 怕. Think it carefully. With Allen’s dirty mind and sinister intention, would Allen be satisfied with her explanation if she explain anything? Even if she explain and show her thesis, does Allen or do you believe Tsai that it is her thesis?
And why should Tsai do so to satisfy the stupid question? If you really have a question on her degree, you should just ask LSE directly. Her degree and thesis was listed in LSE, it is only “missing” (stolen by some Chinese?), that clearly means it existed, and if it existed, she certainly received her PhD degree. Period. Is this clear to your atama?
人民有檢驗政治人物的權力, 尤其是一位未來的總統候選人.眾知倫敦政經學院曾經賣過博士學位. But, that is one bad apple, you cannot generalize one bad apple to all the honest students in LSE. Just like one stupid posting cannot generalize to all the people in your BATA. Do you agree? By the way, I don’t have time to check that 賣過博士學位, It may be a false report, or biased sensational report. At least, so far as I can see, it didn’t hurt LSE reputation of one of the best universities in the world.
將台灣未來的前途 (蔡英文是否為騙子) 交付在一個曾經也騙過世人的學院手裏是很危險的. No, not at all. Tsai’s PhD thesis was respectfully posted in Google Scholars, US Congress WorldCat, English Senate Library, etc. it shows LSE degree is admitted and respected by the whole world (nice to be a student of a prestigious university).
而既然倫敦政經學院不完全可信, No. One bad apple does not negate that LSE is the world class institute of higher education. Are you talking about yourself? With your kind of atama, how can people trust you as editor???
蔡英文似乎也從來就沒有指導教授, that is your sinister speculation. If there is no 指導教授 to approve the thesis, she could not graduate, and there should have no “missing” of her thesis. If you have doubt, you should ask LSE. With your kind of education, you don’t know how the higher education operates. Shame on you.
又加上大家遍尋不著蔡英文的論文. Well, 遍尋不著 does not mean it does not exist. The correct word is “missing” in the library, it means somebody stole it, or displace it, or destroy it,from the library. But all these reasons just indicate there was a thesis by Tsai, and she did graduated from LSE.
在此情況下人民要求她出示藏在抽屜裏的論文, 以証明她的博士學位不是買來的, 本來就是天經地義的事. For your atama, it is 天經地義的事. But why should she? I repeat, LSE is world class higher institute, if you have any question, you should ask directly to LSE, not Tsai.
I repeat again. Even if Tsai shows you her thesis, do you believe it is her true thesis? You are very stupid to ask her to show her thesis. And then, where will it end? Are you going to ask her how could she be accepted to teach in Chengda, or got promoted? With your sinister mind, showing her own thesis will not prove anything at all. It will raise more questions, more pointings. If you really interested in, just ask LSE (or Chengda), not Tsai, since even Tsai answered your question, you would never EVER believe her. She is completely correct not to answer your stupid questions.
一位將要擔任總統處理國家大事的政治人物, 在眾多綠營自己人敦促之下無法証明自己的博士學位不是買來的,
博士學位不是買來? Here,you are confusing two thing. One, whether she wrote the thesis and received the PhD degree, one is you are questioning her even if she received her degree, whether she really wrote it.
Both are irrelevant and stupid. First one, I already said missing does not mean there is no thesis. She did received her PhD degree and submitted her thesis to the University and received her degree. That why it is “missing.” There is no question to ask.
The second question is also stupid. Whether she wrote it or not, you should ask the thesis committee members, not Tsai. If the committee members passed the PhD oral examination and granted her a degree, that was the committee’s responsibility. 買來 or not 買來, that was the committee’s and the university’s responsibility to check, none of your business. If you have questions, you should ask the committee members or the university, not Tsai.
難道要等到國民黨嗎? A people like you already 下重手, you don’t need to wait until 國民黨.In fact, 國民黨 may not as bad as your 重手.
那時候就是綠營全軍覆沒的時候了. No, not at all. Your 重手 will make 綠營全軍覆沒.
You should appreciate that your president has the PhD from one of the most prestigious institute of higher education!! Your stupid questions made her more respected and showed her great achievement when she was young.
我們期盼任何人現在要著眼於護衛綠營在未來大選中的安全. 而不是是否會傷到蔡英文的感情 (如果有此念頭的話)! She is a very proud person. You are asking her wrong questions to a wrong person. She is not obliged to answer your sinister questions at all. As a so called “editor,” you should have better atama and do better.
Allen Kuo
From: i_love...@googlegroups.com [mailto:i_love...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of ???
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2019 10:50 AM
To: Forum NATPA; Luby Liao: name pandas 獨獨 立立 or return them; nipmcsc; bill wu; i_love_taiwan; Eugene Yeh; Chung-Chih Li; Frank S T Hsiao; Peter Chow; Lee李敦厚
Subject: [iLoveTW] 從成本角度看曹長青炒起來的「蔡英文的博士學位是否造假？」
從成本角度看曹長青炒起來的「蔡英文的博士學位是否造假？」
曹長青這篇「蔡英文的博士學位是否造假？」其實很好解決。不需要從他所謂的「福爾摩斯探案」方式跟著去瞎摸。
蔡英文一直在學界與政界。這兩個部分都重視學歷，也有完整驗證學歷的體制。只要這兩個單位提出相關資料，結果就出來了。即使因個資法，他們不提供。那就依照以往的運作紀錄，也可以判定蔡英文的論文與學位為真。畢竟蔡英文回國教書時，他們家族的影響力還不能使私立與國立大學造假。退而求其次，我們也可以問蔡英文所任教過學校的教授，他們以往入該校成為專任教授時，要經過怎樣的程序？這樣一問就知道蔡英文的學位送審的論文、學位到底是不是虛假？
至於有人說找不到蔡英文的論文、網路上找不到等，然後追究蔡英文的責任。這是錯的。你可以講你的要求與查證現況，但沒有權力要求當事者對此進行回應。因為保存畢業論文在倫敦政經學院，論文是否要上網則在繳交時會給表格讓當事者自行填寫外，其他都屬於倫敦政經學院的責任與權利。這些都不能要求蔡英文做的。至於當事人要不要回應你的要求，將論文呈獻出來，那是當事者的權利。其實提出這個要求的人，在西方社會應該會被唾棄的。因為提出者搞不懂權利義務的基本邏輯，這是公民教育失敗的例子。
就一個運作有點效率的制度來說，曹長青這篇文章一出來，就會有相關經驗的人、專家出來解釋，這問題不到一天就解決。曹長青也要出面對他提出的問題，做直接回應。至於與之附和的彭文正、賀德芬，也會被理解大學聘任專任教授的學界人士、同僚抨擊，甚至唾棄。
曹長青的問題，早就要有人提出問題：他以什麼樣的身份，如此深度介入台灣的社會與政治運作？一個不具台灣國籍的人，若僅就一件事、同類事情評論，人們不會多加追究為何他會這麼做？但這幾十年來的無役不與，尤其近三年來更是如此。就會有人問。因為這有干預別人國家內政的問題。尤其又經常上這個國家的媒體來討論人家國家的政治與社會問題，並且譴責當事人。我想在先進國家中，這種人會被強烈譴責。
簡單的說，曹長青這一篇文章，在社會上討論所付出的成本，恰好顯示我們社會制度運作相對無效率。制度內可以解決的問題不解決，理解制度的專業者不講話，只會不斷臆測、無理要求，然後大家付出不應該付的成本在起鬨。
--
----------------------------------------------------------
追求時代的風，追求閉目前寧靜的心思
--
請隨時 造訪我們的網站 http://groups.google.com/group/i_love_taiwan
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/i_love_taiwan
若要退出這群組，請送電子郵件給 i_love_taiwa...@googlegroups.com 標題及本文空白就可.
To unsubscribe from this group, please send email to i_love_taiwa...@googlegroups.com
You can leave Subject and Body blank.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "i_love_taiwan" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to i_love_taiwa...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/i_love_taiwan/CA%2Bu8meqniLssmL0FWLEPxpPd%3D8C1YLm7d6rPH4JZfcVAMy%2BvPQ%40mail.gmail.com.--
--
This forum is restricted to NATPA members only. The views and opinions expressed in every post are strictly those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of NATPA.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "NATPA Forum" group.
To post to this group, send email to natpa...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
natpa_forum...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/natpa_forum?hl=en?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NATPA Forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to natpa_forum...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/natpa_forum/DM5PR03MB33405F2BA1072CA7A7AA806B95EF0%40DM5PR03MB3340.namprd03.prod.outlook.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FAPA-Forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to FAPA-Forum+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/FAPA-Forum/DM5PR03MB3340C6BAE5FA742C5727731095EF0%40DM5PR03MB3340.namprd03.prod.outlook.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FAPA-Forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to FAPA-Forum+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/FAPA-Forum/080D83D1-7899-43E3-B241-D7D1166ACC67%40gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Allen Kuo
Hi Mark:
Unfortunately the first photo you provided (the TIW’s diploma) is a fraudulent document.
Based on the following list from Wiki, during 1981–1985 the Vice-Chancellors of the University of London was “Sir Randolph Quirk”. Does the signature from this first photo your provided (the TIW’s diploma) look like “Randolph Quirk”?
If you also compare carefully, the signature from this fraudulent diploma was actually by the recent Vice-Chancellors of 2012–2018, Prof Sir Adrian Smith FRS.
Dennis Peng was the one who uncovered this TIW’s diplomatic fraud a couple days ago. He also provided a legitimate diploma below, for comparison.
Regardless who was the one who provided these fraudulent pictures at the first place and what was his/her incentive, he is actually hurting TIW’s academic reputation, and NOT helping.
Thanks;
Allen Kuo
List of Vice-Chancellors of the University of London
From: fapa-...@googlegroups.com [mailto:fapa-...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Mark
Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2019 7:04 AM
To: Allen Kuo
Cc: FAPA-Forum FAPA Allmembers; Su-mei Kao
Subject: Re: [FAPA-Forum] FW: 蔡英文的博士學位是否造假: 南嘉生跟蔡英文在怕些什麼?
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/FAPA-Forum/5d23ebd3.1c69fb81.76075.d250SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN%40gmr-mx.google.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FAPA-Forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to FAPA-Forum+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/FAPA-Forum/BF1879B4-B1A7-443E-98B9-6620903F99F9%40gmail.com.
Bing
Hi Mark:
Unfortunately the first photo you provided (the TIW’s diploma) is a fraudulent document.
Based on the following list from Wiki, during 1981–1985 the Vice-Chancellors of the University of London was “Sir Randolph Quirk”. Does the signature from this first photo your provided (the TIW’s diploma) look like “Randolph Quirk”?
If you also compare carefully, the signature from this fraudulent diploma was actually by the recent Vice-Chancellors of 2012–2018, Prof Sir Adrian Smith FRS.
Dennis Peng was the one who uncovered this TIW’s diplomatic fraud a couple days ago. He also provided a legitimate diploma below, for comparison.
Regardless who was the one who provided these fraudulent pictures at the first place and what was his/her incentive, he is actually hurting TIW’s academic reputation, and NOT helping.
Thanks;
Allen Kuo
List of Vice-Chancellors of the University of London
<image001.png>
From: fapa-...@googlegroups.com [mailto:fapa-...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Mark
Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2019 7:04 AM
To: Allen Kuo
Cc: FAPA-Forum FAPA Allmembers; Su-mei Kao
Subject: Re: [FAPA-Forum] FW: 蔡英文的博士學位是否造假: 南嘉生跟蔡英文在怕些什麼?
<image003.jpg>
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 9, 2019, at 10:02 AM, Mark <lrm...@gmail.com> wrote:
<image004.jpg>
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 8, 2019, at 9:20 PM, Allen Kuo <alle...@timebyte.com> wrote:
Dear Mark:
Many of the FAPA Forum members here might not be aware of that, after thorough and serious research, this topic has been sufficiently discussed in the BATA Forum, in order to discover the truth (Please refer to one of our discussions below).
The question is:
1) Do you prefer to lead your audiences to trust the conclusion from these four major UK libraries: Senate House Library, London School of Economics Library, Institute of Advanced Legal Studies library, and British Library, in which they all state they do not have the thesis in their collections and no digitized version is known to exist. Or,
2) Do you prefer to lead your audiences to trust the content of a single page image (and in Chinese too) below?
Thanks;
Allen Kuo
From: Michael Richardson [mailto:richards...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, July 8, 2019 7:59 AM
To: Allen Kuo
Cc: BATA
Subject: Re: [BATA] British Library says it does not have Tsai Ing-wen's thesis
The latest update on my search for Tsai Ing-wen's thesis:
First off, I have never been so insulted with vulgarity and varied insults from the internet in all the years I have been writing about Taiwan as has been directed at me in the last 72 hours. I presume most of the insults are from political trolls.
Secondly, never before have I been so misread by so many as I have been accused of making a wide variety of defamatory writing about Tsai that I never wrote.
Third, four libraries (Senate House Library, London School of Economics Library, Institute of Advanced Legal Studies library, and British Library) all state they do not have the thesis in their collections and no digitized version is known to exist.
Lastly, the British Library, which Tsai supporters used to silence the June inquiry into the matter when the issue of the missing thesis first surfaced, has now sent me an unsettling suggestion that Tsai herself restricted access to the thesis. I quote directly from the Customer Service branch of the British Library.
Customer Services - British Library <Customer...@bl.uk>
3:45 AM (4 hours ago)
<image005.gif>
<image005.gif>
to me
<image005.gif>
Dear Michael,
Thank you for your feedback.
All theses are supplied via our Ethos service. When I checked the Ethos webpage for the thesis in question I got the following response. It would appear the author has put a block on the thesis (restricted access). You would need to contact the London School of Economics & Political Science for further information.
From: bay-area-taiw...@googlegroups.com [mailto:bay-area-taiw...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Michael Richardson
Sent: Sunday, July 7, 2019 4:04 PM
To: Michael Richardson
Subject: [BATA] British Library says it does not have Tsai Ing-wen's thesisThe mystery deepens...
Michael Richardson
From: fapa-...@googlegroups.com [mailto:fapa-...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Mark
Sent: Monday, July 8, 2019 5:37 PM
To: Frank S T Hsiao; FAPA-Forum FAPA Allmembers
Cc: Su-mei Kao
Subject: Re: [FAPA-Forum] FW: 蔡英文的博士學位是否造假: 南嘉生跟蔡英文在怕些什麼?
<image006.jpg>
--
This is the Bay Area Taiwanese American E-Mail Group. Our main objective is to provide open communication channel for the Taiwanese American community, let the Taiwan Spirit grow and pass down to the future.
---
這是 Google 網上論壇針對「Bay Area Taiwanese American」群組發送的訂閱通知郵件。
如要取消訂閱這個群組並停止接收來自這個群組的郵件，請傳送電子郵件到 bay-area-taiwanese-...@googlegroups.com。
如要在網路上查看這項討論，請造訪 https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bay-area-taiwanese-american/5d24b066.1c69fb81.d640a.de63SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN%40gmr-mx.google.com。
Bing
Hi Mark:
Unfortunately the first photo you provided (the TIW’s diploma) is a fraudulent document.
Based on the following list from Wiki, during 1981–1985 the Vice-Chancellors of the University of London was “Sir Randolph Quirk”. Does the signature from this first photo your provided (the TIW’s diploma) look like “Randolph Quirk”?
If you also compare carefully, the signature from this fraudulent diploma was actually by the recent Vice-Chancellors of 2012–2018, Prof Sir Adrian Smith FRS.
Dennis Peng was the one who uncovered this TIW’s diplomatic fraud a couple days ago. He also provided a legitimate diploma below, for comparison.
Regardless who was the one who provided these fraudulent pictures at the first place and what was his/her incentive, he is actually hurting TIW’s academic reputation, and NOT helping.
Thanks;
Allen Kuo
List of Vice-Chancellors of the University of London
<image001.png>
From: fapa-...@googlegroups.com [mailto:fapa-...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Mark
Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2019 7:04 AM
To: Allen Kuo
Cc: FAPA-Forum FAPA Allmembers; Su-mei Kao
Subject: Re: [FAPA-Forum] FW: 蔡英文的博士學位是否造假: 南嘉生跟蔡英文在怕些什麼?
<image003.jpg>
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 9, 2019, at 10:02 AM, Mark <lrm...@gmail.com> wrote:
<image004.jpg>
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 8, 2019, at 9:20 PM, Allen Kuo <alle...@timebyte.com> wrote:
Dear Mark:
Many of the FAPA Forum members here might not be aware of that, after thorough and serious research, this topic has been sufficiently discussed in the BATA Forum, in order to discover the truth (Please refer to one of our discussions below).
The question is:
1) Do you prefer to lead your audiences to trust the conclusion from these four major UK libraries: Senate House Library, London School of Economics Library, Institute of Advanced Legal Studies library, and British Library, in which they all state they do not have the thesis in their collections and no digitized version is known to exist. Or,
2) Do you prefer to lead your audiences to trust the content of a single page image (and in Chinese too) below?
Thanks;
Allen Kuo
From: Michael Richardson [mailto:richards...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, July 8, 2019 7:59 AM
To: Allen Kuo
Cc: BATA
Subject: Re: [BATA] British Library says it does not have Tsai Ing-wen's thesis
The latest update on my search for Tsai Ing-wen's thesis:
First off, I have never been so insulted with vulgarity and varied insults from the internet in all the years I have been writing about Taiwan as has been directed at me in the last 72 hours. I presume most of the insults are from political trolls.
Secondly, never before have I been so misread by so many as I have been accused of making a wide variety of defamatory writing about Tsai that I never wrote.
Third, four libraries (Senate House Library, London School of Economics Library, Institute of Advanced Legal Studies library, and British Library) all state they do not have the thesis in their collections and no digitized version is known to exist.
Lastly, the British Library, which Tsai supporters used to silence the June inquiry into the matter when the issue of the missing thesis first surfaced, has now sent me an unsettling suggestion that Tsai herself restricted access to the thesis. I quote directly from the Customer Service branch of the British Library.
Customer Services - British Library <Customer...@bl.uk>
3:45 AM (4 hours ago)
<image005.gif>
<image005.gif>
to me
<image005.gif>
Dear Michael,
Thank you for your feedback.
All theses are supplied via our Ethos service. When I checked the Ethos webpage for the thesis in question I got the following response. It would appear the author has put a block on the thesis (restricted access). You would need to contact the London School of Economics & Political Science for further information.
From: bay-area-taiw...@googlegroups.com [mailto:bay-area-taiw...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Michael Richardson
Sent: Sunday, July 7, 2019 4:04 PM
To: Michael Richardson
Subject: [BATA] British Library says it does not have Tsai Ing-wen's thesisThe mystery deepens...
Michael Richardson
From: fapa-...@googlegroups.com [mailto:fapa-...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Mark
Sent: Monday, July 8, 2019 5:37 PM
To: Frank S T Hsiao; FAPA-Forum FAPA Allmembers
Cc: Su-mei Kao
Subject: Re: [FAPA-Forum] FW: 蔡英文的博士學位是否造假: 南嘉生跟蔡英文在怕些什麼?
<image006.jpg>
--
Allen Kuo
Hi Joe:
This fraudulent picture was first introduced by the legislator Wang Ding Yu (王定宇) as I know. The funny and the sad at the same time behind this picture is that many FAPA past chairmen, which include Chung-Chih Li (李中志) and Mark Kao (高榮龍) grab and distributed it in public immediately, like a lifebuoy that has been found on a sinking boat. Which means they are also in panic under this potential huge scandal (the TIW’s diploma and PhD thesis). And I don’t know why -- assuming that there is absolutely no fraud involved?
I heard Dennis Pang is planning to dig into these two issues further in the near future. Please stay tuned.
Cheer;
Allen Kuo
From: Joseph Lin [mailto:kama...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2019 4:27 PM
To: Allen Kuo
Subject: Re: [BATA] RE: [FAPA-Forum] FW: 蔡英文的博士學位是否造假: 南嘉生跟蔡英文在怕些什麼?
very suspicious! How can the Vice Chancellor of 2018 be the same one as 1984?! Obviously a forgery.
On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 8:19 AM Allen Kuo <alle...@timebyte.com> wrote:
Hi Mark:
Unfortunately the first photo you provided (the TIW’s diploma) is a fraudulent document.
Based on the following list from Wiki, during 1981–1985 the Vice-Chancellors of the University of London was “Sir Randolph Quirk”. Does the signature from this first photo your provided (the TIW’s diploma) look like “Randolph Quirk”?
If you also compare carefully, the signature from this fraudulent diploma was actually by the recent Vice-Chancellors of 2012–2018, Prof Sir Adrian Smith FRS.
Dennis Peng was the one who uncovered this TIW’s diplomatic fraud a couple days ago. He also provided a legitimate diploma below, for comparison.
Regardless who was the one who provided these fraudulent pictures at the first place and what was his/her incentive, he is actually hurting TIW’s academic reputation, and NOT helping.
Thanks;
Allen Kuo
List of Vice-Chancellors of the University of London
--
This is the Bay Area Taiwanese American E-Mail Group. Our main objective is to provide open communication channel for the Taiwanese American community, let the Taiwan Spirit grow and pass down to the future.
---
Bing
Hi Joe:
This fraudulent picture was first introduced by the legislator Wang Ding Yu (王定宇) as I know. The funny and the sad at the same time behind this picture is that many FAPA past chairmen, which include Chung-Chih Li (李中志) and Mark Kao (高榮龍) grab and distributed it in public immediately, like a lifebuoy that has been found on a sinking boat. Which means they are also in panic under this potential huge scandal (the TIW’s diploma and PhD thesis). And I don’t know why -- assuming that there is absolutely no fraud involved?
I heard Dennis Pang is planning to dig into these two issues further in the near future. Please stay tuned.
Cheer;
Allen Kuo
From: Joseph Lin [mailto:kama...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2019 4:27 PM
To: Allen Kuo
Subject: Re: [BATA] RE: [FAPA-Forum] FW: 蔡英文的博士學位是否造假: 南嘉生跟蔡英文在怕些什麼?
very suspicious! How can the Vice Chancellor of 2018 be the same one as 1984?! Obviously a forgery.
On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 8:19 AM Allen Kuo <alle...@timebyte.com> wrote:
Hi Mark:
Unfortunately the first photo you provided (the TIW’s diploma) is a fraudulent document.
Based on the following list from Wiki, during 1981–1985 the Vice-Chancellors of the University of London was “Sir Randolph Quirk”. Does the signature from this first photo your provided (the TIW’s diploma) look like “Randolph Quirk”?
If you also compare carefully, the signature from this fraudulent diploma was actually by the recent Vice-Chancellors of 2012–2018, Prof Sir Adrian Smith FRS.
Dennis Peng was the one who uncovered this TIW’s diplomatic fraud a couple days ago. He also provided a legitimate diploma below, for comparison.
Regardless who was the one who provided these fraudulent pictures at the first place and what was his/her incentive, he is actually hurting TIW’s academic reputation, and NOT helping.
Thanks;
Allen Kuo
List of Vice-Chancellors of the University of London
<image001.png>
From: fapa-...@googlegroups.com [mailto:fapa-...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Mark
Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2019 7:04 AM
To: Allen Kuo
Cc: FAPA-Forum FAPA Allmembers; Su-mei Kao
Subject: Re: [FAPA-Forum] FW: 蔡英文的博士學位是否造假: 南嘉生跟蔡英文在怕些什麼?
<image002.jpg>
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 9, 2019, at 10:02 AM, Mark <lrm...@gmail.com> wrote:
<image003.jpg>
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 8, 2019, at 9:20 PM, Allen Kuo <alle...@timebyte.com> wrote:
Dear Mark:
Many of the FAPA Forum members here might not be aware of that, after thorough and serious research, this topic has been sufficiently discussed in the BATA Forum, in order to discover the truth (Please refer to one of our discussions below).
The question is:
1) Do you prefer to lead your audiences to trust the conclusion from these four major UK libraries: Senate House Library, London School of Economics Library, Institute of Advanced Legal Studies library, and British Library, in which they all state they do not have the thesis in their collections and no digitized version is known to exist. Or,
2) Do you prefer to lead your audiences to trust the content of a single page image (and in Chinese too) below?
Thanks;
Allen Kuo
From: Michael Richardson [mailto:richards...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, July 8, 2019 7:59 AM
To: Allen Kuo
Cc: BATA
Subject: Re: [BATA] British Library says it does not have Tsai Ing-wen's thesis
The latest update on my search for Tsai Ing-wen's thesis:
First off, I have never been so insulted with vulgarity and varied insults from the internet in all the years I have been writing about Taiwan as has been directed at me in the last 72 hours. I presume most of the insults are from political trolls.
Secondly, never before have I been so misread by so many as I have been accused of making a wide variety of defamatory writing about Tsai that I never wrote.
Third, four libraries (Senate House Library, London School of Economics Library, Institute of Advanced Legal Studies library, and British Library) all state they do not have the thesis in their collections and no digitized version is known to exist.
Lastly, the British Library, which Tsai supporters used to silence the June inquiry into the matter when the issue of the missing thesis first surfaced, has now sent me an unsettling suggestion that Tsai herself restricted access to the thesis. I quote directly from the Customer Service branch of the British Library.
Customer Services - British Library <Customer...@bl.uk>
3:45 AM (4 hours ago)
<image004.gif>
<image004.gif>
to me
<image004.gif>
Dear Michael,
Thank you for your feedback.
All theses are supplied via our Ethos service. When I checked the Ethos webpage for the thesis in question I got the following response. It would appear the author has put a block on the thesis (restricted access). You would need to contact the London School of Economics & Political Science for further information.
From: bay-area-taiw...@googlegroups.com [mailto:bay-area-taiw...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Michael Richardson
Sent: Sunday, July 7, 2019 4:04 PM
To: Michael Richardson
Subject: [BATA] British Library says it does not have Tsai Ing-wen's thesisThe mystery deepens...
Michael Richardson
From: fapa-...@googlegroups.com [mailto:fapa-...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Mark
Sent: Monday, July 8, 2019 5:37 PM
To: Frank S T Hsiao; FAPA-Forum FAPA Allmembers
Cc: Su-mei Kao
Subject: Re: [FAPA-Forum] FW: 蔡英文的博士學位是否造假: 南嘉生跟蔡英文在怕些什麼?
<image005.jpg>
Allen Kuo
For your reference.
As expected earlier – Additional report regarding this issue is available by Dennis Peng today. It further describes the details of what I have uncovered earlier. This attached picture below, in which TIW was holding a potential fraudulent diploma, can become a historical picture in the Taiwan history.
Allen Kuo
政經關不了（完整版）｜2019.07.10
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YK0raPzbj8M
From: Allen Kuo [mailto:alle...@timebyte.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2019 5:19 PM
To: 'Joseph Lin'
Cc: 'BATA Group'
Subject: RE: [BATA] 蔡英文的博士學位是否造假: 南嘉生跟蔡英文在怕些什麼?
Hi Joe:
This fraudulent picture was first introduced by the legislator Wang Ding Yu (王定宇) as I know. The funny and the sad at the same time behind this picture is that many FAPA past chairmen, which include Chung-Chih Li (李中志) and Mark Kao (高榮龍) grab and distributed it in public immediately, like a lifebuoy that has been found on a sinking boat. Which means they are also in panic under this potential huge scandal (the TIW’s diploma and PhD thesis). And I don’t know why -- assuming that there is absolutely no fraud involved?
I heard Dennis Pang is planning to dig into these two issues further in the near future. Please stay tuned.
Cheer;
Allen Kuo
From: Joseph Lin [mailto:kama...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2019 4:27 PM
To: Allen Kuo
Subject: Re: [BATA] RE: [FAPA-Forum] FW: 蔡英文的博士學位是否造假: 南嘉生跟蔡英文在怕些什麼?
very suspicious! How can the Vice Chancellor of 2018 be the same one as 1984?! Obviously a forgery.
On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 8:19 AM Allen Kuo <alle...@timebyte.com> wrote:
Hi Mark:
Unfortunately the first photo you provided (the TIW’s diploma) is a fraudulent document.
Based on the following list from Wiki, during 1981–1985 the Vice-Chancellors of the University of London was “Sir Randolph Quirk”. Does the signature from this first photo your provided (the TIW’s diploma) look like “Randolph Quirk”?
If you also compare carefully, the signature from this fraudulent diploma was actually by the recent Vice-Chancellors of 2012–2018, Prof Sir Adrian Smith FRS.
Dennis Peng was the one who uncovered this TIW’s diplomatic fraud a couple days ago. He also provided a legitimate diploma below, for comparison.
Regardless who was the one who provided these fraudulent pictures at the first place and what was his/her incentive, he is actually hurting TIW’s academic reputation, and NOT helping.
Thanks;
Allen Kuo
List of Vice-Chancellors of the University of London
--
This is the Bay Area Taiwanese American E-Mail Group. Our main objective is to provide open communication channel for the Taiwanese American community, let the Taiwan Spirit grow and pass down to the future.
---
Allen Kuo
This is an interesting video. She must be in panic and tried to find this visiting opportunity for the purpose of showing off her PhD diploma yesterday. Unfortunately…
(Please take a look ASAP. This video will not be here too long.)
Allen Kuo
蔡總統訪Dcard 首次秀倫敦政經學院博士學位證書[影]
July 9, 2019
Jay Tu
1991 LSE diploma signed by Stewart Sutherland
1996 LSE diploma signed by Andrew Rutherford
Allen Kuo
因有些壇友不明白為何我送出“蔡總統訪 Dcard 首次秀倫敦政經學院博士學位證書[影]”影片, 質疑我是否是在為蔡宣傳. 請容許我補充說明為何它很重要. 它已顯示出蔡本人因為處理不當弄巧成拙, 已自己步步走向錯誤甚至崩盤之路. 下列步驟是我自己推演的.
1) 在 2012 當 Bing Hsieh (PhD) 在 BATA 指控她的 PhD 是造假的時候, 她無法按照正常程序駁斥 Bing Hsieh 的指控. 她僅只經過直接的友人(同時也是 BATA 的壇友)傳遞消息, 要 BATA 停止討論(而不是否認). 此舉已啟人疑竇.
2) 過去這數星期以來經過曹長青鍥而不捨地求証, 找不到她的論文. 而她又無法直接展示論文以駁斥曹長青. 此舉更進一步啟人疑竇.
3) 前天當有網友踢爆下列 (1) 圖為偽造時, 她大可撇清, 說該証書不是出自於她自己. 而這是她最後能夠撇清的機會.
4) 但很不幸可能是她的幕僚沒有警覺性, 竟然反而安排她在昨天訪問 Decard 並且在影片中故意展示該已經被踢爆的偽造証書. 下列 (2) 圖就是從該影片中節錄出來的.
也終於, 到了這個地步現在蔡本人再也無法撇清了.
Allen Kuo
(1) 圖
(2) 圖
From: Allen Kuo [mailto:alle...@timebyte.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2019 12:10 PM
To: 'bay-area-taiw...@googlegroups.com'; 'I. Love Taiwan'
Cc: '郭建國'
Subject: RE: [BATA] 蔡英文的博士學位是否造假: 南嘉生跟蔡英文在怕些什麼?
This is an interesting video. She must be in panic and tried to find this visiting opportunity for the purpose of showing off her PhD diploma yesterday. Unfortunately…