吹哨子保護法對檢舉人獎金比例是多少？

[PAUL HUANG]

Dear 昭姿姊，

請妳代轉這個email給黃國昌立委好嗎？ Thanks!

美國政府對吹哨子保護法檢舉人若成功的話可獲得政府追繳金額10%至30%（減除追查費用）的獎勵。不知黃國昌立委極力倡議的吹哨子保護法對檢舉人獎金比例是多少？

以下是美國成功的案例：

Phillips & Cohen 為其客戶贏得了超過 11 億美元的檢舉人獎勵金。
Phillips & Cohen has earned their clients more than $1.1 billion in whistleblower rewards as a result of our successful cases.

Whistleblower Rewards: How Payouts Work | Phillips & Cohen
https://www.phillipsandcohen.com/whistleblower-rewards/

美國申請獎項 |檢舉人網站

APPLY FOR AN AWARD | Whistleblower.gov

Whistleblowers who voluntarily submit original information by filing a Form TCR (Tip, Complaint, or Referral) to the CFTC Whistleblower Office may be eligible to receive between 10% and 30% of the amount of monetary sanctions collected in a CFTC enforcement action or a Related Action. https://www.whistleblower.gov/overview/applyforanaward

獎勵的重要性
檢舉人獎勵法是成功打擊詐欺和腐敗的關鍵。

The Importance of Rewards

Whistleblower reward laws are the key to successfully combating fraud and corruption.

國民黨海內外黨產總值超過上兆，結果菜政府追回的黨產：

國民黨「不當黨產」逾千億？ 黨產會曝追討進度：已還20億  8/18/2023

八年前蔣家嫡系黨國之女菜騙子「力推」「不當黨產處理委員會」訂立吹哨人檢舉獎金上限，明眼人一看就知道菜在打假球！目前台灣吹哨子檢舉人獎金上限為一仟萬台幣（33萬美金）。期望黃國昌立委實質力推的「吹哨子保護法」檢舉人獎金能夠打破舊法, 採用美國政府對吹哨子保護法檢舉人若成功的話可獲得政府追繳金額10%至30%（減除追查費用）的獎勵。

Sincerely,

Paul

[陳昭姿 Gau-Tzu Chen]

目前本黨的版本是不低於10%。

陳昭姿

---

從: PAUL HUANG [rich...@flash.net]
寄件日期: 2024年10月2日 下午 01:17
至: 陳昭姿 Gau-Tzu Chen
副本: rockyw...@gmail.com; kuochih hong; Dr. JC Fann; Carmen Lin; Carl Yang; 曹長靑; Max C. Chiang; Johnny Huang PSOS; Andrea Lu; Yao-yuan Yeh; Dennis Peng; 台灣日報編輯部; Lin Wencheng; 曾淼泓; jimle...@gmail.com; tai...@gmail.com; taiw...@hotmail.com; Rocky Liao; Allen Kuo; BATA Group
主旨: 吹哨子保護法對檢舉人獎金比例是多少？

[Dennis Peng]

我吹的可是薩克斯風

誰來主持公道呢?

Dennis Peng, Ph.D. 

陳昭姿 Gau-Tzu Chen <GTC...@kfsyscc.org> 於 2024年10月3日 週四 下午6:30寫道：

[alle...@timebyte.com]

彭P若吹奏起薩克斯風 “流浪到北加州灣區”,

絕對可以跟昔日台獨份子所吹奏的 “黃昏的故鄉” 比美!

大家洗耳恭聽.

 

Cheers,

Allen Kuo

 

總鋪師薩克斯風演奏-流浪到淡水

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JsZBR8BR04I

 

黃昏的故鄉《赤い夕陽の故郷》-凡人薩克斯風(朝陽演奏)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UP74bMFoAEA

 

有緣，無緣大家來作伙

燒酒喝一杯 乎乾啦 乎乾啦

扞著風琴 提著吉他 雙人牽作伙

為著生活流浪到淡水

想起故鄉心愛的人 感情用這厚

才知影癡情是第一憨的人

燒酒落喉 心情輕鬆 鬱卒放棄捨

往事將伊當作一場夢

想起故鄉 心愛的人 將伊放昧記

流浪到他鄉 重新過日子

阮不是喜愛虛華

阮只是環境來拖磨

人客若叫阮 風雨嘛著行

為伊唱出留戀的情歌

人生浮沈 起起落落 毋免來煩惱

有時月圓 有時也昧平

趁著今晚歡歡喜喜 鬥陣來作伙

你來跳舞 我來唸歌詩

有緣 無緣 大家來作伙

燒酒喝一杯 乎乾啦 乎乾啦～～

來顆花生～～喝口酒唄*～～

扞著風琴 提著吉他 雙人牽作伙

為著生活流浪到淡水

想起故鄉心愛的人 感情用這厚

才知影癡情是第一憨的人

燒酒落喉 心情輕鬆 鬱卒放棄捨

往事將伊當作一場夢

想起故鄉 心愛的人 將伊放昧記

流浪到他鄉 重新過日子

阮不是喜愛虛華

阮只是環境來拖磨

人客若叫阮 風雨嘛著行

為伊唱出留戀的情歌

人生浮沈 起起落落 毋免來煩惱

有時月圓 有時也昧平

趁著今晚歡歡喜喜 鬥陣來作伙

你來跳舞 我來唸歌詩

有緣 無緣 大家來作伙

燒酒喝一杯 乎乾啦 乎乾啦～～

有緣 無緣 大家來作伙

燒酒喝一杯 乎乾啦 乎乾啦～～

有緣 無緣 大家來作伙

燒酒喝一杯 乎乾啦 乎乾啦～～

乎乾啦 乎乾啦 乎乾啦～～

--
This is the Bay Area Taiwanese American E-Mail Group. Our main objective is to provide open communication channel for the Taiwanese American community, let the Taiwan Spirit grow and pass down to the future.
---
這是 Google 網路論壇針對「Bay Area Taiwanese American」群組發送的訂閱通知郵件。
如要取消訂閱這個群組並停止接收來自這個群組的郵件，請傳送電子郵件到 bay-area-taiwanese-...@googlegroups.com。
如要在網路上查看這項討論，請造訪 https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bay-area-taiwanese-american/CAE17AHzf-8ji4GFBfTP3WPMY74yqHYXU8%2BujU-_bKaO9mNy_Zg%40mail.gmail.com。

[Bob Sheen]

FAPA 2000萬的錢到誰的口袋裏？ 大家追蹤 大風吹 水落石出吧！

它水落石出吧！

如要在網路上查看這項討論，請造訪 https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bay-area-taiwanese-american/000001db1640%24bd1cc960%2437565c20%24%40timebyte.com。

[陳昭姿 Gau-Tzu Chen]

對於Jim Lee 的誹謗，我已經拍照存證，準備隨時提告，我的法案助理有法律背景是別好幾位。前封信我附上截圖（再附一次）。沒有收回或道歉之前，我絕不放過。

陳昭姿

2024年10月5日 08:02，陳昭姿 Gau-Tzu Chen <GTC...@kfsyscc.org>寫道：

本組有人問我吹哨者保護法版本是否有獎金，我查詢並回答之後，Jim Lee 不敢公開（沒種！）只敢對我個人一個非常low的回覆：

寡廉鮮恥！

是嗎？真正寡廉鮮恥的是李先生吧！應該逐出群組！

陳昭姿

[陳昭姿 Gau-Tzu Chen]

本組有人問我吹哨者保護法版本是否有獎金，我查詢並回答之後，Jim Lee 不敢公開（沒種！）只敢對我個人一個非常low的回覆：

寡廉鮮恥！

是嗎？真正寡廉鮮恥的是李先生吧！應該逐出群組！

陳昭姿

2024年10月5日 01:03，Bob Sheen <bobsh...@gmail.com>寫道：

[Taitzer Wang]

Hi Paul,

Your current posting about whistleblower reminds me of the following mail (in blue), which you posted on BATA about another case of an ABC whistleblower on September 12, 2024, specifically about the ABC’s alleged wrong doing in favor of Harris in her presidential debate against Trump. The story is as follows, told by a third party named Mark Penn:

"BREAKING REPORT: Mark Penn, a former senior adviser to Clinton, has called for an internal investigation into ABC, accusing them of rigging the Harris vs Trump debate against Trump. 

[Mark Penn wrote], “I will be releasing an affidavit from an ABC whistleblower regarding the debate. I have just signed a non-disclosure agreement with the attorney of the whistleblower. The affidavit states how the Harris campaign was given sample question which were essentially the same questions that were given during the debate and separate assurances of fact checking Donald Trump and that she would NOT be fact checked. Accordingly, the affidavit states several other factors that were built into the debate to give Kamala a significant advantage. I have seen and read the affidavit and after the attorney blacks out the name of the whistleblower and other information that could dox the whistleblower, I will release the full affidavit. I will be releasing the affidavit before the weekend is out.”

Please answer my following questions:

English:

"As with all claims involving whistleblowers and sensitive political issues, it is essential to evaluate the credibility of the affidavit once it is released and to await any follow-up investigations or responses from involved parties.” For example, so far as I know, “A panel of local judges of Springfield, OH, referred the citizen-initiated (by Haitian Bridge Alliance) criminal case against former President Donald Trump and his running mate U.S. Sen. JD Vance to Clark County prosecutor Dan Driscoll for investigation. (https://www.springfieldnewssun.com/news/court-refers-haitian-groups-springfield-filing-vs-trump-vance-to-prosecutor/UL4CLLGV35ED7OTCW7MSI5BB4I/)

Three weeks have passed since the Whistleblower case mentioned by Mark Penn. Do you know the current status of the "affidavit”? Has the full "affidavit" been released with the whistleblower's name blacked out, as reported? If so, what decisions have been made in the related investigations? Can you share with BATA readers what pre-debate agreement this "affidavit" and its investigation concluded that the ABC debate moderators violated?

漢文：

「與所有涉及『舉報人』和敏感政治問題的指控一樣，一旦『宣誓書』發布，就必須對其可信度進行評估，並等待相關各方的後續調查或回應。」例如，據我所知，「俄州 Springfield 當地法官組成的小組，將公民（Haitian Bridge Alliance) 發起的針對前總統 Trump 及其競選搭檔美國參議員 JD. Vance 的刑事案件移交給 Clark 縣檢察官 Dan Driscoll 進行調查。」

(https://www.springfieldnewssun.com/news/court-refers-haitian-groups-springfield-filing-vs-trump-vance-to-prosecutor/UL4CLLGV35ED7OTCW7MSI5BB4I/)

Mark Penn 提起這個「宣誓書」後，已經過了三個星期了。你知道這份「宣誓書」的現況嗎？這份完整的「宣誓書」是否曾像報導那樣，在「舉報人」的名字被塗黑後公開了？如果是的話，當局的調查已做了什麼決定？你能與 BATA 讀者分享這份「宣誓書」和調查結果裁定了ABC 辯論主持人違反了什麼辯論前的協議嗎？

NFL: Baltimore Ravens  41  OT  Cincinnati Bengals  38

泰澤  10/6

[alle...@timebyte.com]

謝謝 FAPA 西雅圖 Chapter 的前會長 Bob Sheen 沈信彥兄的回應. 
眾知在 Bob Sheen VS. FAPA 的官司中 BOB 大獲全勝, 因此 FAPA 目前在法庭中仍是 "察看, 限期改善" 的狀態.
而如果FAPA/FAPR 財務不明, 一筆爛帳的情況不見改善, Bob 有權要法庭解散他們!
沈信彥兄可以說是吹哨者成功的故事! (請參考附件, 當年信彥兄致FAPA Board 的一封公開信).

不幸最近信彥兄健康嚴重違和, 請大家為這位見義勇為的吹哨人祈禱!

Allen Kuo

如要在網路上查看這項討論，請造訪 https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bay-area-taiwanese-american/CAO6xtoBw69ML4MbALCMdBEite8JRwa2EnC35JSQZ0aCLDMasvg%40mail.gmail.com。