Pesnsion updation in terms of regulation 35(1) and as per RBI Formula

[ganpat dhond]

Is there any difference  for Pension  updation in terms of REGULATION 35 (1)  and as per RBI formula ? If anybody has any idea  please  REQUEST for such information .

Thanks 

G J Dhond

[MOHAN P]

Dear Shri Ganapat Dhond,

The difference in nut shell is former is merger of DR  without any load factor and latter with a load factor.

Regards

Mohan.P

--
Visit our blog site http:://bankpensioner.blogspot.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "bankpensioner" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bankpensione...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bankpensioner/1476071107.2893370.1779085035885%40mail.yahoo.com.

[Srinivasan Badri]

RBI formula has nothing to do with our pension regulations Clause 35 1.RBI pension regulations as I understand has no updation clause. They got through negotiations with the involvement of working employees: officers  association.

--

[MOHAN P]

Dear Mr Ganapat Dhond,

We have detailed discussions on these matters under this forum earlier.At the cost of repitation let me clarify your point with an example.

 A copy of relevant portion of  data( just to have   an idea on the subject) submitted by one of the respondents to Apex Court to understand the impact of application of (1)35(1) with Appendix-1 and (2) on updation of pension(formula /details are not found there) with consequent  increase,  is attached here under for your ready reference.

 Full complition report was posted by me here earlier which is available under this forum,for further reference.

RBI formula is also available under this forum elsewhere 

Regards

Mohan.P

On Tue, 19 May, 2026, 11:11 am ganpat dhond, <gjd...@yahoo.com> wrote:

Thanks . Will it be possible for you to give updation example on the basis of  REGULATION 35 (1)  and what  may be difference in absolute monetary value difference in both formula ? Your valued information will be highly appreciated .

regards 

G J Dhond

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bankpensioner/CAMCbyDRVGUrEL6oSZME%2BhmXMHO3%2Bug7kqF43wE8Vwb4wCaUbww%40mail.gmail.com.

[ganpat dhond]

Thanks . Will it be possible for you to give updation example on the basis of  REGULATION 35 (1)  and what  may be difference in absolute monetary value difference in both formula ? Your valued information will be highly appreciated .

regards 

G J Dhond

On Monday, May 18, 2026 at 05:44:56 PM GMT+5:30, MOHAN P <moha...@gmail.com> wrote:

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bankpensioner/CAMCbyDRVGUrEL6oSZME%2BhmXMHO3%2Bug7kqF43wE8Vwb4wCaUbww%40mail.gmail.com.

[Satyanarayana Rao]

Dear learned participants.
U are all aware that there is no provision for pension revision/pension updation in central government, RBI, Nabard  etc.
Still the government DFS has implemented pension updation/revision.
Why the deffendent advocats of DFS are baselessly arguing that there is no provision for pension updation for PSB pensioners?
While approving pension updation to RBI and Nambard and vehemently opposing and orbitarly denying is against the principles of Natural and and fair play and y and equality of law under article 14 and16 and 21.
This is foundation for justice and jurisprudence application of law for Supreme court judges in their Wisdom. That is why the supreme court bench is revisiting the high court verdicts 
and the supreme court judges have understood that there is injustice perpetually forced on pensioners.This constitutional fundamental right of pensioners for pension updation will be upheld and the judgement of high courts will be setaside.
Pl wait for final favourable verdict.

Yahoo Mail: Search, organise, conquer

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bankpensioner/1803148346.3301615.1779169294818%40mail.yahoo.com.

[ganpat dhond]

Thanks

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bankpensioner/CAMCbyDQaRqEeFF_ko_6mhqtLsBe4FK9h3ENKLJLvxYDmdKo8LQ%40mail.gmail.com.

[JSOMA SHEKARA]

As on date only Updation and special allowance cases are pending in courts.

Merger of DA@8088 points, Uniform DA for all pensioners, application of New base year 2016 for all pensioners issues are open for discussion.

While we discuss legal implications, limitations of pension regulations from the academic point of view, no cse laws, judgments, necessary for UFBU to negotiate above issues which are not in court.

It just depends on their willingness, commitment to the cause of retirees and negotiating skills. UFBU and IBA can discuss and arrive at settlement and send a proposal for approval of DFS and regulations can be amended later.

If RBI employees unions can do it, why not UFBU.If AIBOC can negotiate 40:50 pension issues with management, they can negotiate DA merger of PSU Banks also. Reg35/1 is 30 years old. It is ridiculous to deny benefits by quoting a 30 year old regulation which can be amended any time to provide further benefits,

the Constitution itself is amended more than 100 times.

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bankpensioner/618341938.1990478.1779185570685%40mail.yahoo.com.