Singla vs.Union Of India CA No.7993/2023 in SLP(C) Nos.3099 & 5561 of 13 02 2016) Pending FINAL HEARING - Earnest Request to expedite Proceedings

[Srinivasa Murti Devulapalli]

suprem...@nic.in

(Singla vs.Union  Of India  CA No.7993/2023  in SLP(C) Nos.3099 & 5561 of 13 02 2016) Pending FINAL HEARING  - Earnest Request to expedite proceedings)

HARD COPY BY SPEED POST / COURIER

TO:

01. Mr. Justice B R Gavai - Hon'ble Chief Justice, Supreme Court, Tilak Marg, 

NEW DELHI 110001  suprem...@nic.in 

02.  Sri  Narendra Damodardas Modiji, Hon'ble Prime Minister, PMO, South Block, Raisina Hill,   New Delhi-110011

rti-pmo.ap...@gov.in

03. Smt. Nirmala Sitaramanji, 

Hon'ble Finance Minister,  Room No. 129-A, North Block, New Delhi

NirmaSitharaman <nsith...@gmail.com>

SUBJECT:  

M.C. SINGLA vs. UNION OF INDIA VIDE  CA No.7993/2023  in SLP(C)  Nos.  3099 & 5561  (registered on 13 02 2016) PENDING FOR FINAL HEARING - ( Last adjournment date 23 07 2025 ) - EARNEST REQUEST TO EXPEDITE JUDICIAL  PROCEEDINGS 

⚖️🕉️⚖️🕉️⚖️🕉️⚖️

HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE BHUSHAN RAMAKRISHNA GAVAI GARU,

🙏🕉️🙏 namaste

 

At the outset, let me have the  pleasure to introduce myself as Devulapalli Srinivasa Murti running 77 years of age, a retired senior manager from the erstwhile Syndicate Bank, now merged in Canara Bank.  I retired from the service on 28 04 2001 under "SVRS" SCHEME-2000" OFFERED BY THE GOVERNMENT.

PREAMBLE:

It has been the established practice to revise pension to the retired employees periodically along with salary revisions for the working employees from time to time, to commensurate the mounting inflation , is an universal phenomena.

However, we the bank retirees have been deprived of this basic requirement for over three decades ever since the introduction of pension scheme in the banking industry way back in 1993.

During this interregnum period of more than three decades, the salaries of the bank workers  have been revised EIGHT TIMES and whereas, our pension basic has remained STATIC WITHOUT UPWARD REVISION  even till date against the mounting inflation. i furnish the important CALENDAR OF EVENTS  in brief: 

31 03 1994

💢💢QUOTE💢💢

              INDIAN BANKS' ASSOCIATION 

                N O. PD/CIR/76/G(ii)/1905

March 31,1994      Private & Confidential

To 

Chief Executives of Member Banks

Which are parties to the Bipartite Settlement/

Dear Sirs,

Bank Employees (Pension) Regulations 1993  with clarifications (Ex:1)

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rdn3dxE7LOGKpT3lO9b8OvAYoM3jT6We/view?usp=drivesdk

Further to our circular No.PD/CIR/76/G(ii)/1842 dated 17th March,1994, we are enclosing 

herewith:

a) Memorandum of clarifications on some of the provisions in the pension Regulations 

(Annexure-I)

b) Draft of the Trust Deed for forming the pension Fund (Annexure-II)

We are also enclosing herewith for your information, Minutes of the meeting of Small 

Committee on pension held with Unions /Officers Associations on26th March, 1994 

(Annexure III and IV) 

 

PENSION UPDATION CLAUSE(Ex:2)

https://drive.google.com/file/d/10zkOPPWNalsqCMIXq9R8ixuschnL2Deg/view?usp=drivesdk

"2. FORMULA FOR UPDATING PENSION SHOULD BE ON THE LINES OF THE SAME GIVEN IN THE RESERVE BANK PENSION SCHEME. ANY CHANGE THEREIN SHOULD BE INTRODUCED ONLY AFTER MUTUAL AGREEMENT.   💢💢UNQUOTE💢💢

 

Accordingly an AMENDMENT was also carried out to the Pension Regulation 35(1) where the earlier RESTRICTIVE  CLAUSE WAS REMOVED BY MANDATING PENSION UPDATION  APPLICABLE TO ALL PENSIONERS UNIFORMLY.

30 09 2019

SLP ( C ) 005561of 2016   M C SINGLA(DEAD) THR: LR  SHRI BARUMAL etc SLP ( C ) 003099 of 2016  IBA's LEGAL CIRCULAR  ( Ex:3)

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1c0KRA729rspoXPp0rcXXRalRhWDMfUSJ/edit?usp=drivesdk&ouid=115468566243929396633&rtpof=true&sd=true

👆👆

In its Legal Circular dated 30.09.2019 appended herein,  the Indian Banks’ Association has defined the scope of their relationship with member banks.  By its own admission and proclamation, its capacity to represent member banks is limited to the matters specified in the said Circular. 

31 08 2020

 A CASE STUDY ON DIVERSION / EMBEZZLEMENT OF BANK EMPLOYEES PENSION CORPUS  -  FUNDS DIVERTED TO PRIVATE INVESTMENTS -  URGENT NEED FOR AN AUDIT BY "CAG" - THE ONLY CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY - 

AREAS OF

MISAPPROPRIATION:

- By not remitting the management's  contribution towards the pension corpus promptly as envisaged in the regulations.

- Loss of interest for the belated period is not compensated.

- Misappropriation of the Corpus Funds to cover up the Banks' losses (Window dressing Ex: PNB ₹5260 Crores)

- By Diverting the Pension Corpus funds to Private investments  (Ex:OBC ₹200 Crores)

 

IN FACT, THE ABOVE  ACT OF THE CEO OF ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE  IS  PROHIBITED IN TERMS OF THE TRUST DEED  EXECUTED BY THE BANK MANAGEMENTS  AS MANDATED UNDER THE INCOME TAX ACT  AT THE TIME OF INTRODUCTION OF PENSION SCHEME INASMUCH AS  PENSION CORPUS MUST BE INVESTED IN THE APPROVED GOVERNMENT SECURITIES ONLY .  WHEREAS THE SAID BATTERY COMPANY WENT INTO  LIQUIDATION AND CONSEQUENTLY, THE PENSION CORPUS  LOST THE ENTIRE INVESTMENT OF  ₹200 Crores

THUS, BY DIVERTING ₹200 Crores  FROM PENSION CORPUS TO A BATTERY COMPANY, THE  CMD OF ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE INDULGED IN CRIMINAL BREACH OF TRUST FOR EMBEZZLEMENT OF FUNDS - A COGNIZABLE  CRIMINAL OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER  IPC.      

SUPPOSING THE SAME WERE TO BE INDULGED BY ANY ERRING EMPLOYEE,  HE / SHE WOULD HAVE BEEN SUMMARILY  DISMISSED FROM THE SERVICE BESIDES CRIMINALLY PROSECUTING HIM / HER UNDER IPC EVEN FOR A PALTRY AMOUNT OF INVOLVEMENT FOR THAT MATTER.  WHEREAS  THE CEO OF OBC LET GO "SCOT FREE" GLARINGLY

SSSSS

AMES WERE TO BE INDULGED BY ANY ERRING EMPLOYEE , HE/SHE WOULD HAVE BEEN SUMMARILY  DISMISSED FRHE (PLEASE CLICK LINK 🔗👇 FOR FULL DETAILS)

AREAS OF MISAPPROPRIATION: (Ex:4)

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1kNcUT2Jdiv_UKx1OlF52Jg8xiYCJKZFV/view?usp=drivesdk

( Retrieved from my database posted on 31st. August, 2020)

25 12 2021 

OUR LEGAL CRUSADE

𝘼𝙏 𝙏𝙃𝙄𝙎 𝙋𝙊𝙄𝙉𝙏, 𝙈𝙐𝘾𝙃 𝙄𝙉 𝙋𝘼𝙍𝙏𝙄𝘾𝙐𝙇𝘼𝙍, 𝙒𝙀 𝘼𝙇𝙒𝘼𝙔𝙎 𝙍𝙀𝙈𝙀𝙈𝘽𝙀𝙍 𝘼𝙉𝘿 𝙍𝙀𝙈𝘼𝙄𝙉 𝙏𝙃𝘼𝙉𝙆𝙁𝙐𝙇 𝙏𝙊 𝙏𝙃𝙀 𝙏𝙃𝙀𝙉 𝘾𝙅𝙄 - 𝙎𝙍𝙄 𝙉𝙑 𝙍𝘼𝙈𝘼𝙉𝘼 𝙂𝘼𝙍𝙐 (𝙬𝙝𝙤 𝙩𝙤𝙤𝙠 𝙞𝙣𝙞𝙩𝙞𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙫𝙚 𝙖𝙩 𝙤𝙪𝙧 "𝙧𝙚𝙦𝙪𝙚𝙨𝙩-𝙞𝙣-𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙨𝙤𝙣" 𝙙𝙪𝙧𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙃𝙞𝙨 𝙇𝙊𝙍𝘿𝙎𝙃𝙄𝙋'𝙎 𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙨𝙤𝙣𝙖𝙡 𝙫𝙞𝙨𝙞𝙩 𝙩𝙤 𝙑𝙞𝙟𝙖𝙮𝙖𝙬𝙖𝙙𝙖 𝙤𝙣 25 12 2021  𝙁𝙊𝙍 𝙃𝘼𝙑𝙄𝙉𝙂 𝙋𝙍𝙀𝙋𝙊𝙉𝙀𝘿 𝙏𝙃𝙀 𝘾𝘼𝙎𝙀 𝙏𝙊 20 01 2022   𝙀𝙑𝙀𝙉  𝘽𝙔 𝙎𝙐𝘽𝙎𝙏𝙄𝙏𝙐𝙏𝙄𝙉𝙂 𝙏𝙃𝙀 𝘾𝙊𝙑𝙄𝘿 𝘼𝙁𝙁𝙀𝘾𝙏𝙀𝘿 𝙅𝙐𝘿𝙂𝘿𝙂𝙀   𝙄𝙉 𝙏𝙃𝙀 𝙇𝘼𝙏𝙀 𝙈𝘾 𝙎𝙄𝙉𝙂𝙇𝘼'𝙎 𝘾𝘼𝙎𝙀   (𝙀𝙭𝙖𝙘𝙩𝙡𝙮 𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙮 𝙨𝙖𝙢𝙚 𝙙𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙤𝙣 𝙬𝙝𝙞𝙘𝙝 𝙄𝘽𝘼 𝙬𝙖𝙨 𝙙𝙞𝙧𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙩𝙤 𝙨𝙪𝙗𝙢𝙞𝙩 𝙞𝙩'𝙨 𝙧𝙚𝙥𝙤𝙧𝙩 WITHIN THREE  MONTHS. 𝘼𝘾𝘾𝙊𝙍𝘿𝙄𝙉𝙂𝙇𝙔 𝘼𝙎 𝙊𝙁 𝙉𝙊𝙒, 𝙄𝘽𝘼 𝙉𝙀𝘾𝙀𝙎𝙎𝘼𝙎𝘼𝙍𝙄𝙇𝙔 𝙉𝙀𝙀𝘿 𝙏𝙊 𝘾𝙊𝙈𝙋𝙇𝙔 𝙒𝙄𝙏𝙃 𝙏𝙃𝙀 𝙎𝙐𝘽𝙈𝙄𝙎𝙎𝙄𝙊𝙉 𝙊𝙁 𝙄𝙏𝙎 𝙍𝙀𝙋𝙊𝙍𝙏 𝘼𝙎 𝙋𝙀𝙍 𝙏𝙃𝙀 𝘼𝙋𝙀𝙓 𝘾𝙊𝙐𝙍𝙏'𝙎 𝙋𝙀𝙉𝘿𝙄𝙉𝙂 𝙈𝙊𝙏𝙄𝙊𝙉 𝙃𝙀𝘼𝙍𝙄𝙉𝙂 𝙊𝙍𝘿𝙀𝙍𝙎 𝙒𝘼𝙔 𝘽𝘼𝘾𝙆 𝘿𝘼𝙏𝙀𝘿 20𝙩𝙝. 𝙅𝘼𝙉𝙐𝘼𝙍𝙔 2022 

13 02 2023

Simultaneously, We also even caused to raise a Question  in the parliament for which   IN THE OPEN HOUSE  (RAJYASABHA) MINISTER OF STATE OF FINANCE CONFIRMED AS WAY BACK AS ON 13 02 2023 ITSELF   SAYING...

💢Quote💢 "...𝑰𝑩𝑨 𝑺𝑼𝑩𝑴𝑰𝑻𝑻𝑬𝑫 𝑰𝑻𝑺 𝑹𝑬𝑷𝑶𝑹𝑻 𝑻𝑶 𝑻𝑯𝑬 𝑯𝑶𝑵'𝑩𝑳𝑬 𝑺𝑼𝑷𝑹𝑬𝑴𝑬 𝑪𝑶𝑼𝑹𝑻..." 

 -Dr. Bhagawat Karad*_ 💢Unquote💢

DETAILS OF RAJYASABHA PROCEEDINGS:

(Ex:5)

 

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UxXKDV3FuTWDmaCit4NDI_FIi_HcsTWQ/view?usp=drivesdk

(AGAIN I REPEAT AND REMAIN THANKFUL TO Dr.RAJA, THE THEN HON'BLE M.P (from Villupuram, Tamil Nadu) FOR RAISING THE TIMELY PERTINENT QUESTION IN THE PARLIAMENT AS ALSO THE THEN  HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI N V RAMANA GARU WHOM I EVEN MET  IN PERSON AT HIS RESIDENCE  DURING HIS LORDSHIP'S  VISIT TO NATIVE PLACE NEAR VIJAYAWADA WHICH ULTIMATELY RESULTED IN THE PREPONEMENT OF THE CASE TO 20 01 2022 AS STATED SUPRA)

CURRENT STATUS:

 As of now, M.C SINGLA vs.  UNION OF INDIA VIDE  CA No.7993/2023  in SLP(C)  Nos.  3099 & 5561  (registered on 13 02 2016) IS LIKELY TO COME UP FOR FINAL HEARING DURING AUGUST, 2025.

HON'BLE SIR, 

WHAT ALL THE MONETARY BENEFITS WE ACCRUED SO FAR  HAVE BEEN THROUGH THE JUDICIAL PROCESS ONLY.

DESPITE MOUNTING FRUSTRATION, WE HAVE BEEN RELENTLESSLY FIGHTING  FOR OUR LEGITIMATE DEMAND OF PENSION UPDATION SINCE OVER THREE DECADES,  . 

 IN  THIS PROCESS, MANY OF OUR ESTEEMED COLLEAGUES ALREADY ATTAINED FOR HEAVENLY ABODE.  WE ARE DESPERATELY  WAITING FOR OUR TURN TO MEET THEM WITH "ONE FOOT IN THE GRAVE".  

AT THIS FAG END OF  OUR LIVES ,  IT REMINDS ME OF THE FOLLOWING FAMOUS QUOTATION OF  OUR LATE LEGEND STATESMAN & ARCHITECT  OF OUR INDIAN CONSTITUTION- Dr.B.R AMBEDKAR 

"𝙏𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝 𝙨𝙝𝙤𝙪𝙡𝙙 𝙗𝙚 𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙥𝙖𝙜𝙖𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙮 𝙙𝙖𝙮. 𝙊𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙬𝙞𝙨𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 "𝙇𝙄𝙀 𝘽𝙀𝘾𝙊𝙈𝙀𝙎 𝙍𝙀𝘼𝙇"  𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙙𝙚𝙨𝙩𝙧𝙤𝙮𝙨 𝙣𝙤𝙩 𝙤𝙣𝙡𝙮 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙗𝙪𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙬𝙤𝙧𝙡𝙙.."*  𝑫𝒓. 𝑩𝑹 𝑨𝒎𝒃𝒆𝒅𝒌𝒂𝒓

• HON''BLE SIR !  IN  VIEW OF THE FOREGOING FACTUAL POSITION AND WITH FOLDED HANDS , I RESPECTFULLY  SUBMIT  FOR YOUR  EMPATHY & CONCERN TOWARDS US BY EXPEDITING THE JUDICIAL PROCESS IN OUR ABOVE  PENDING CASE IN THE SOLE INTEREST OF JUSTICE & FAIRPLAY WHICH ALONE WILL BRING SOLACE TO  US   AT THIS EVENING HOURS OF OUR LIVES 🙏🕉️🙏

⚖️ || यतो धर्मस्ततो जयः ||⚖️ 

        🙏🌺🕉️🌺🙏

 దేవులపల్లి శ్రీనివాస మూర్తి

 Hyderabad

 30 07 2025

ENCLOSURES: As per the links🔗 furnished above:

🔗Bank Employees (Pension) Regulations 1993 (Ex:1)

🔗PENSION UPDATION CLAUSE(Ex:2)

🔗SLP ( C ) 005561of 2016   M C SINGLA(DEAD) THR: LR  SHRI BARUMAL etc SLP ( C ) 003099 of 2016  IBA's LEGAL CIRCULAR  ( Ex:3)

🔗AREAS OF MISAPPROPRIATION: (Ex:4)

🔗DETAILS OF RAJYASABHA PROCEEDINGS:

(Ex:5)

              ⚖️ || यतो धर्मस्ततो जयः ||⚖️ 

                        🙏🌺🕉️🌺🙏

                 D S Murti 

[JSOMA SHEKARA]

whatever it is. 

1. First of all D.S Murthy is not a party in the  Singhla case. 

2. So he has no locus standi to interfere in the case. 

3. A case should be argued in court hall during the hearing date and not through email or letters. 

4. He can join as pleader in the case and argue the case.

5. Supreme court has provided guidelines /procedure for requesting early hearing of the cases for lawyers representing petitioners.

6. No outside party can make such requests.

So in all these points D S Murthy is completely wrong.

7.Such requests are made in PIL cases.

8. Pension/retiral benefits cases are not considered as PILs.

However  D S Murthy can submit general representation to Registrar of SC to expedite the cases of senior citizens.

9. First of all representation of D S Murthy is illegal and further addressing such letters to PM and FM is ridiculous. D S Murthy should note that neither FM nor PM can direct SC to expedite the case.

On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 11:53 AM Niranjan Cn <niran...@gmail.com> wrote:

Sirs,

Mr D S Murthy, is very senior pensioner and celebrating silver jubilee of pension this year. 

This is any an attempt to clarify/draw attention to the various issues raised in Mr. D S Murthys email :

Sirs,

 

Yes, there should be improvement/revision/updation whatever the name one can call,  bank pensioners need more monthly pension to meet the increase in living expenses substantially.  The Medical Insurance Premium/expenses have also gone up in recent years and becoming unaffordable. 

 

CJI, FM and PM are given feedback by respective departments in the matter by experts in the field.  We should be honest and base our requests only on facts.  There is no need to quote / misrepresent information which are not correct/truth and helpful to us.

 

We got 100% DA, improvement in family pension and one option for res ignees without quoting Regulations (wrongly), without any court order, without proving any misappropriation, etc.

 

A honest and sincere request – will yield better results than placing our genuine requests on incorrect/misinformation/allegations which may harm us more.

 

There should be a rationale in whatever we are doing and there should be facts and facts alone.

1.     Is it right to write to CJI ?  There is a prescribed procedure for requesting hearing of the case at the earliest in SC.  The same has to be followed by the petitioners.  Outsiders have no locusstandi in these issues.

Please find attached letter dtd 18/07/2024 written by SC asking not to write to CJI as the same will not be looked into.

             

2.     All the documents are mentioned in email of Sri. D S Murthy have already filed in the   

              Singlas Case by petitioners.  No new findings/grounds are mentioned.

 

3.     Regarding embezzlement, there is no documentary evidence is produced by Sri D S Murthy and refers to a legal notice – which has no value.  Whenever we allege anything, there should proof, supporting documents to establish the allegation.

Please find attached the details (alleged misappropriation) – wherein all the issues are clarified by FM and also by PNB.

4.     Coming to Regulation 35(1), please read the clause again, please inform which part of the above regulation is not implemented by the Bank.  The same has been dealt by Karnataka High Court in clear terms by Single Judge and also by Divisional Bench.

5. Further , vide 2005 letter DFS has clarified the Govt stand regarding updation in response to Retiree association representation.  This was subsequent to amendment of 2003.  This have been referred in Singlas case at Chandigargh High court also.

 

The fellow pensioners are to be informed of the facts and truth only.  That will make the pensioners to understand the situation and will be ready to accept the outcome.  There is no meaning in creating hype and misinformation campaign – which does’t do any good to anyone.

Leaders/assumed warriors need honesty/sincerity in placing/pleading the demands with appropriate authorities and not gimmicks.

 

Sincerely yours

Niranjan

Encl :

1.     Facts about 35(1)

2.     Facts about alleged embezzlement

3.     CJI letter dated 18/07/2024 – not to write to SC

4. 2005 DFS letter - regarding updation

--
Visit our blog site http:://bankpensioner.blogspot.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "bankpensioner" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bankpensione...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bankpensioner/CAKUBVvdWw4Dw%3DAcqvU4_SXFHoF2tvaNwDjH7VOCD0TmmehYexQ%40mail.gmail.com.

[Niranjan Cn]

[Niranjan Cn]

Sirs,

Mr D S Murthy, is very senior pensioner and celebrating silver jubilee of pension this year. 

This is any an attempt to clarify/draw attention to the various issues raised in Mr. D S Murthys email :

Sirs,

 

Yes, there should be improvement/revision/updation whatever the name one can call,  bank pensioners need more monthly pension to meet the increase in living expenses substantially.  The Medical Insurance Premium/expenses have also gone up in recent years and becoming unaffordable. 

 

CJI, FM and PM are given feedback by respective departments in the matter by experts in the field.  We should be honest and base our requests only on facts.  There is no need to quote / misrepresent information which are not correct/truth and helpful to us.

 

We got 100% DA, improvement in family pension and one option for res ignees without quoting Regulations (wrongly), without any court order, without proving any misappropriation, etc.

 

A honest and sincere request – will yield better results than placing our genuine requests on incorrect/misinformation/allegations which may harm us more.

 

There should be a rationale in whatever we are doing and there should be facts and facts alone.

1.     Is it right to write to CJI ?  There is a prescribed procedure for requesting hearing of the case at the earliest in SC.  The same has to be followed by the petitioners.  Outsiders have no locusstandi in these issues.

Please find attached letter dtd 18/07/2024 written by SC asking not to write to CJI as the same will not be looked into.

             

2.     All the documents are mentioned in email of Sri. D S Murthy have already filed in the   

              Singlas Case by petitioners.  No new findings/grounds are mentioned.

 

3.     Regarding embezzlement, there is no documentary evidence is produced by Sri D S Murthy and refers to a legal notice – which has no value.  Whenever we allege anything, there should proof, supporting documents to establish the allegation.

Please find attached the details (alleged misappropriation) – wherein all the issues are clarified by FM and also by PNB.

4.     Coming to Regulation 35(1), please read the clause again, please inform which part of the above regulation is not implemented by the Bank.  The same has been dealt by Karnataka High Court in clear terms by Single Judge and also by Divisional Bench.

 

The fellow pensioners are to be informed of the facts and truth only.  That will make the pensioners to understand the situation and will be ready to accept the outcome.  There is no meaning in creating hype and misinformation campaign – which does’t do any good to anyone.

Leaders/assumed warriors need honesty/sincerity in placing/pleading the demands with appropriate authorities and not gimmicks.

 

Sincerely yours

Niranjan

Encl :

1.     Facts about 35(1)

2.     Facts about alleged embezzlement

3.     CJI letter dated 18/07/2024 – not to write to SC

On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 9:20 AM Srinivasa Murti Devulapalli <devulapa...@gmail.com> wrote:

[Satyanarayana Rao]

Sri Somasekar ji.

As you have extensive experience and knowledge in legal matters,expressing in our blog

In same manner Sri D.S . Murthy has enlightened the plight of Bank retirees and pensioners in his unique style.

A Little bit of broad veiw and friendly approach is necessary to accommodate the efforts made by individuals to achieve justice to retirees and pensioners.

It is well known fact that all the retirees associations have totally failed to impress the UFBU to successfully achieve pension updation,why anyone should discourage individuals who are beating arround the bush.

Yahoo Mail: Search, organise, conquer

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bankpensioner/CAM%3DeiW1mek7Hp%3DvgXr3V26-VcH%3DbBHvLFjtBaGdPF4chfe9%2B%2BA%40mail.gmail.com.

[JSOMA SHEKARA]

Anybody can write anything whatever they want to CJI or other judges. Who am I to discourage them?

I have just expressed my opinion.

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bankpensioner/1487014365.322925.1753970454778%40mail.yahoo.com.

[T. Raghava]

Dear Sir, 

Sincere thanks for your email which was quite informative. 

Thanks again 

T.Raghava 

General Secretary 

All India Deaf Bank Employees Association 

Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bankpensioner/1487014365.322925.1753970454778%40mail.yahoo.com.

[JSOMA SHEKARA]

Listing of updation cases is beyond the control of pensioners. The wise step is convincing IBA to start discussion on Updation pending court verdict or withdrawing cases on the condition that IBA come out with an updation scheme.  AIBOA has filed a case in Bonbay High court which is adjourned to Sep 2025. SBI pensioners group case in Delhi High court is pending as Bank has not filed its reply. There is uncertainty in Singhla case listing. While IBA is claiming  sub judice because of pending Singhla case, AIBOA instead of convincing IBA to start discussion, pending court verdicts, has filed one more case. Is there any deal?

No union is taking up the merger of DA.  Both IBA representing banks and UFBU are well aware that pensioners  have no other alternatives  but to approach courts which takes 10-15 years to mpass verdict.

They cannot even get information through RTI.

DFS will never pass unilateral orders. Only IBA has to recommend for updation.

Under these circumstances !st phase action, 2nd phase actions, Dharnas are totally irrelevant for pre 2002 pensioners who are aged.

Instead of these gimmicks, all unions AIBRF,AIBPARC, BMS and Mr. Prasad's Union should unite and take issue with UFBU directly.