Hi,
For the active speaker dataset: Is the MAP metric for the baseline strategy in the validation set available somewhere? the paper contains the MAP for the test set only.
Thanks
Juan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "AVA Dataset Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ava-dataset-us...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ava-dataset-users/6c5b06ef-5303-496f-8989-b4c592daffe8%40googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ava-dataset-users/CAJrbPAyfNAwUS4NMn1SD6zbmTv1gHYHagrq_bWz%2BtZAduqyaJw%40mail.gmail.com.
Juan,Thanks for bringing this up! This is a good point, and we should update the numbers to have consistent metrics on both datasets. As Joseph said, our experiments have shown a very similar result across the released eval split and the "secret" dataset for the challenge, and that seems to have been the case for other workshop participants too. We will update the paper on arxiv asap.Thanks,Sourish
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 9:13 PM 'Joseph Roth' via AVA Dataset Users <ava-data...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
Juan,I'm don't think we ever computed the mAP for the validation set. We primarily used auROC when training and report that on the validation set in the paper. I expect the mAP on the validation to be very similar to that on the test set based on the auROC being similar and the top result in the AVA workshop having identical mAP scores on validation and the test set.
On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 6:18 AM Juan Leon <fuank...@gmail.com> wrote:
--Hi,
For the active speaker dataset: Is the MAP metric for the baseline strategy in the validation set available somewhere? the paper contains the MAP for the test set only.
Thanks
Juan
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "AVA Dataset Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ava-data...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ava-dataset-users/6c5b06ef-5303-496f-8989-b4c592daffe8%40googlegroups.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "AVA Dataset Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ava-data...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ava-dataset-us...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ava-dataset-users/0d9f49b7-b9e8-46b9-b8e2-dcdddcdde84d%40googlegroups.com.
Juan,I'm don't think we ever computed the mAP for the validation set. We primarily used auROC when training and report that on the validation set in the paper. I expect the mAP on the validation to be very similar to that on the test set based on the auROC being similar and the top result in the AVA workshop having identical mAP scores on validation and the test set.
On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 6:18 AM Juan Leon <fuank...@gmail.com> wrote:
--Hi,
For the active speaker dataset: Is the MAP metric for the baseline strategy in the validation set available somewhere? the paper contains the MAP for the test set only.
Thanks
Juan
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "AVA Dataset Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ava-data...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ava-dataset-us...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ava-dataset-users/47f29c63-e302-4e96-9a5b-1df855a92713o%40googlegroups.com.