See:
https://github.com/githwxi/ATS-Postiats-contrib/tree/master/projects/MEDIUM/SHOOTOUTIn the ATS2 directory, I have the following entries:
fasta-redux k-nucleotide mandelbrot pidigits reverse-complement spectral-norm
In each case, I picked a top submission based on C or C++ and was able to match
it with a version in ATS2 that is more or less a translation of the original version. I was
hoping to generate some good publicity for ATS2.
Also, Will Blair told me that he got a version of n-body in ATS2 that would rank at the
top as well.
Honestly, I don't think that they really need ATS experts. If one uses gprof, one should
be able to tell that the ATS version in each case does pretty much the same as its corresponding
C/C++ version. On the other hand, I am an ATS/ATS2 expert. I don't think that I can tell whether two
pieces of ATS code do the same or not by just reading the code.
I think the concern for the Benchmark team is likely this: If some person is skeptical of the performance
of ATS, then it would be very hard for them to defend ATS. If ATS were slow, then this concern would not
be there. But it would not be exciting, either :)