Elastic workflow output

53 views
Skip to first unread message

zz...@g.harvard.edu

unread,
Jul 2, 2019, 3:38:45 PM7/2/19
to atomate
Hi, 

I was using the elastic workflow to get elastic constants. I successfully run the workflow for graphene, MoS2 and WSe2, and I used the following script to read shear and bulk moduli: 

from atomate.utils.utils import get_database

from pymatgen import Structure

from pymatgen.analysis.elasticity.elastic import ElasticTensor

 

PATH_TO_MY_DB_JSON =  <<my installation directory >> 

atomate_db = get_database(PATH_TO_MY_DB_JSON, admin = True)

results = atomate_db.elasticity.find()

 

entries = [entry for entry in results]

for entry in entries:

    structure = Structure.from_dict(entry['optimized_structure'])

    elastic_tensor = entry['elastic_tensor']['raw'] # convert to pymatgen object

    elastic_tensor = ElasticTensor.from_voigt(elastic_tensor)

    print(elastic_tensor.g_vrh)

    print(elastic_tensor.k_vrh)


The values I got for graphene is the same as what I had by doing calculations manually and performing a fit, but the values for MoS2 is very off. I am suspecting that the units are not consistent. I wonder what the unit the output is? I couldn't find anything in the documentation. Thanks in advance for your help! 


Best,

Zoe 


Joseph Montoya

unread,
Jul 2, 2019, 3:39:48 PM7/2/19
to zz...@g.harvard.edu, atomate
The units should be GPa.
--
Joseph Montoya, PhD
Research Scientist, Accelerated Materials Design and Discovery
TOYOTA Research Institute

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "atomate" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to atomate+u...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to ato...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/atomate/8e49939d-1536-4cb1-965f-63f55c7b44b7%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



Confidential or protected information may be contained in this email and/or attachment. Unless otherwise marked, all TRI email communications are considered "PROTECTED" and should not be shared or distributed. Thank you.
Message has been deleted

zz...@g.harvard.edu

unread,
Jul 2, 2019, 4:00:48 PM7/2/19
to atomate
Hi Dr. Montoya, 

Thanks for your response. But does this unit make sense for 2D materials? GPa can be converted to eV/A^3, but how does it convert to eV/A^2 for a 2D material? 

Best,
Zoe Zhu 
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ato...@googlegroups.com.

To post to this group, send email to ato...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/atomate/8e49939d-1536-4cb1-965f-63f55c7b44b7%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages