I wonder if it would make sense to combine the mapping questions with a design and process discussion. Specifically, I'm thinking about what it means to "serve all modes safely" and whether we might identify and advocate for some bare minimum design standards and planning processes that are needed by bicycle riders and pedestrians on all streets.
These might be expanded for certain priority routes.
Just brainstorming here, but I'm thinking about things like
--DES
transparency on the front end of the planning and design process
--a more conscientious effort
to avoid bike lanes that stop short
--ensuring that all signals recognize
bicycles
--dedicated crossing times for walkers and bikers at critical intersections
--lighting under bridges
--a working Report a Problem system or equivalent mechanism
--increased use of automated
enforcement
--more vertical treatments such as raised intersections (with sufficiently steep incline) including on "arterial" roads
--protected bike lanes that are truly protected
--lowered speed limits
--prioritizing funding toward bridges and underpasses