Only issue with the "nine most common aircraft" is that probably
doesn't even scratch the surface of what might be used or useful.
Take the Cessna 172, there are probably 20+ variants. A, B, C , all
the way through S.
Next you have the Cherokees, PA28-140, -150, 161, -180, -181, -236,
-236, PA28R-200, -201, PA28T-201 and then within those you have
various sub-models.
A good example of differences in the Cherokee line, one of the
planes I routinely flying is a Piper Arrow, PA28-200, at first blush
you'd think it would be the Arrow II, it has the Hershey bar wing
and a 200HP engine, however you'd be wrong, it is actually a
"200B". What's the difference you ask? It has the same wing and
engine as the Arrow II. The difference is the length of the
fuselage, the 200B has a shorter fuselage. I'm not sure if Piper
made a "200A" or if that would have been the "180" which was the
PA28R-180.
My point is there are so many variants it is really up to the user
to create the appropriate entries.
What might be a better option is to have a users create the data for
their specific aircraft model and share it so that it can simply be
imported (and modified if necessary) by somebody else flying the
same model.
Jeff