Hi,
I just downloaded AvareX and am evaluating it.
I like using Avare (it was very helpful for my multi check ride), but I can't seriously use it for cross-country planning as often the total trip time is way off compared to sites like Skyvector, especially if I'm doing a quick look by only entering the origin and destination and these points are fairly far apart. I determined this is because Avare only uses the winds at the destination and does not average winds along the route. I hoped that AvareX would remedy this, but it appears to only use the winds at the origin and also does not average, even though it shows intermediate wind speeds on the wind speed/terrain histogram with only two waypoints entered.
However, I'm posting today about something more insidious, particularly in a high wind situation in a location with significant magnetic declination like Washington state.
It appears that AvareX is either using true winds with magnetic course to calculate ground speed and wind correction angle, or magnetic winds with true course. To be correct, true course should be used with true winds (as imported from the aviation weather service).
I checked Avare and it has the same issue.
Here's a sample plan I did from KPAE to KSEA. I used 30,000 feet as the winds were high enough to make the problem more clear. With a TAS of 150 kts and a true course of 183 degrees, both Avarex and Avare calculated a groundspeed of 197 kts and a wind correction angle of 11 degrees.
However, using true wind and true course on an E6-B yields a ground speed of 187 kts and a wind correction angle of 15 degrees.
So it appears that AvareX and Avare are using magnetic course instead of true course when making the groundspeed/WCA calculation with the true winds aloft data.
This is probably not very noticeable in the Midwest but could be significant on the coasts and could cause fuel reserves to be inadequate.