On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Michael DeHaan <
mic...@ansible.com> wrote:
> Could go either way.
>
> If you had a pattern like so:
>
> - hosts: localhost
> tasks:
> - svn: ...
>
> - hosts: webservers
> tasks:
> - synchronize: ...
>
> You could do a local checkout to the server once and then blast it out,
> rather than have every server connect to SVN directly.
>
I would prefer doing that; it would be much more efficient than
connecting every client to SVN. When I first read
http://docs.ansible.com/subversion_module.html I thought you could
only use subversion by installing it on the client.
> unarchive would be another alternative if you had a tarball rather than
> synchronize, which is a wrapper around rsync.
>
I will need to check that; may not be what I want to use here
but it is worth checking for a future task.
>
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ansible-project/CA%2BnsWgw2i3e6Sb1x98tpzfvq00dkbmjmEzaN9YbAeyExPRgbTA%40mail.gmail.com.