Re: [cameroon_politics] John Fru Ndi of Cameroon's Social Democratic Front: The Transformation of a Political Movement into a Political Business, and then into a Political Racket

75 views
Skip to first unread message

Ofege Ntemfac

unread,
May 28, 2016, 5:25:27 AM5/28/16
to ambasbay, globalc...@yahoogroups.com, SDF, shesausa, Southern Cameroon, Big group, africanworldforum, FREE AMBAZONIANS, cameroon_politics, camne...@yahoogroups.com
Ntongtuman Tchouteu January of Mbouda via Kassava Farms per Refugee status,
How exactly did you gain access to the Bay that you post therein so freely?

2. This I like about your article:
You wrote this for the intention of Massa Aaron Nyangkwe (and his fellow Bleeding Bleeders):
"I know if someone cuts Ni John Fru Ndi, you could bleed."
Abai ni Mu:
Let me attach this other Fela for the enjoyment pleasure of Massa Aaron.
Fela: A dey Look and A dey Laugh!
That said, here is the thing.
You invent an article with a very sonorous title based on Scifi and witchcraft: simply because you did not take the pains to investigate the issue and produce facts, sound evidentials, to back your claims. Whereas the facts are out there. Then you nativize and localize and trivialize the issue in your tribal celebration of your fellow bamileke fratas who are just as guilty and Massa John Fru Ndu regarding the massive disaffection with the SDF.
I could, if I were so inclined, prove with tangible facts that a political movement has indeed been transformed into a political business and then a racket.
That Political Movement is the Movement for the actualization of the independence and sovereignty of the Southern British Cameroons and it is for this movement alone that the SDF was created.
That transformation happened when the said SDF let in the francophones and bamilekes and when the corrupt agenda of the francophones and bamilekes (most of the UPC refugees) became the SDF agenda.
The same posse hijacked the KNDP.
The same posse has hijacked the SDF.
When I return I will demonstrate to you that your CUN agenda stinks. It smells very much like the fraudulent "Re-unification" thievery foisted on too trusting Southern Cameroonians by the UPC of yore.
CUN is another con artistry qua concolonial claptrap; on all fours with the other gross thievery called PAAWACCEEEEEE, promoted by the impenitent collabo, Kenneth Begheni Ndeh.
 

On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Jean Bosco Tagne <jta...@gmail.com> wrote:
Well said and it's the truth about the mother .....ker

Sent from my iPad

On May 27, 2016, at 11:40 PM, enow007 Eno...@yahoo.com [cameroon_politics] <cameroon...@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Pa Fru Ndeh 

The good prof can scold nobody.  He has his own small life to live which has been a great struggle like everyone else.  I applaud his long struggle. However,  the scums of Cameroon are children raised with stolen money like yourself. You have no moral authority to talk against the thievery in Yaounde that by implication you're part of, nor speak about a movement whose victory you stole.  Master Jonathan Awasum can continue from here. 



Sent from my MetroPCS 4G LTE Android device
-------- Original message --------
From: "Pa Fru Ndeh PaFr...@YAHOO.COM [cameroon_politics]" <cameroon...@yahoogroups.com>
Date: 5/27/2016 11:30 PM (GMT-05:00)
Subject: Re: [cameroon_politics] John Fru Ndi of Cameroon's Social Democratic Front: The Transformation of a Political Movement into a Political Business, and then into a Political Racket

Augustine Enow Agbor,
I believe you are the one I labeled a few months ago as the Minister of NW/SW Hatred .....
I may not agree with Prof Tatah Mentan's choice of words, but guess what, I support him fully in using those wordsfor the very reason, people like you who represent the SCUM OF REASON on this earth, with what you have saidbelow.
Let me give you a small story.  George W. Bush, sent a small boy, I believe in his late 30s or so to the ArmedServices Committee in Congress to request for $12billion for the Afghan or Iraq war.  I was watching it on C-SPAN.This young man held a sheet of paper and reuqested $12billion.  The people on the armed services committee lookedat each other in total disbelief.  Then the Chairman started speaking, he said, between 5 of them in this committee, theyhave over 100 years of experience in Congress and in this committee and have NEVER seen anything like this.They said they were prepared to help him and authorize the funds, and that he should not dis-respect the Armed Committee.The young man should go back and do his work, itemize all items on what the money would be used for and come backto them with an appropriate folder of all the relevant items.
It Prof Tatah Mentan's words amount to the requisite SCOLDING -> so be it!
Some of you are so leftist that when one now speaks the facts and truth directly in your SAD & UGLY faces,it is taken to mean something else.  Manyaka peepo dem.  Les sabitous.  Nonsense.
 Blessed Be Cameroon
Pa Fru Ndeh

      From: "Agbor Enow Augustine Eno...@yahoo.com [cameroon_politics]" <cameroon...@yahoogroups.com>
To: cameroon...@yahoogroups.com
Cc: "amba...@googlegroups.com" <amba...@googlegroups.com>; "camne...@yahoogroups.com" <camne...@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 5:11 PM
Subject: Re: [cameroon_politics] Re: [camnetwork] John Fru Ndi of Cameroon's Social Democratic Front: The Transformation of a Political Movement into a Political Business, and then into a Political Racket
  
Dear Prof. TatahMentan

Using the scums of the earth to characterize Tchouteu Janvier is irrelevant to the content of the argument in question. The only reason people turn to such low blows is when they do not have an adequate counterargument to make. If you judged his position so lacking and irrational that deserve your scorn, heralding yourself as the enlightened one as opposed to the scums on the social media might is scornful and a self-fulfilled prophesy. Debate and allow the readers to analyze and learn from every position.
Augustine Enow Agbor


The outcome of my life is not more than three lines: I was a raw material I became mature and cooked And I was burned into nothingness.                            Rumi

--------------------------------------------
On Fri, 5/27/16, Immanuel TatahMentan inme...@yahoo.com [cameroon_politics] <cameroon...@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Subject: Re: [cameroon_politics] Re: [camnetwork] John Fru Ndi of Cameroon's Social Democratic Front: The Transformation of a Political Movement into a Political Business, and then into a Political Racket
To: "cameroon...@yahoogroups.com" <cameroon...@yahoogroups.com>
Cc: "amba...@googlegroups.com" <amba...@googlegroups.com>, "camne...@yahoogroups.com" <camne...@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Friday, May 27, 2016, 3:55 PM


 



 


   
     
     
      Aaron,In
fact, the social media have made it compelling for one to
discuss with the scums of the earth. Else, I fail to see how
the SDF Movement becomes the biography of John Fru Ndi. The
theoretical and methodological foundations of studying
Social Movements disallow the reductionism displayed in the
Janvier historical distortions and misrepresentations. Boh
dissected this anti-Fru Ndi tract in a way that one does not
need to detain one's attention repeating it. To those
historically ignorant, which is not an intellectual virtue
anyway, any worthy study of the SDF as a Movement that
transformed into that of a political party with its ups and
downs, should use the Social Formations Theory and
Methodology. Hence, one would be saved from opportunistic
presentations and distortions peddled by the ilks of
Janvier. My concern is not with John Fru Ndi, as it is with
a Social Movement wasted by opportunists seeking to share
the spoils of political office endemic to LRC. You see this
myopia all over. The history of LRC becomes the biographies
of  Ahidjo and Biya tagged together. Hell No!!!
tatah
mentan
 Human
Community=Human Communication=Human Productivity I was led
to understand the value of my anger and my desire to speak
out, through these words from Mary Catherine Hilkert, a
Dominican theologian. She wrote in Speaking with Authority:
Catherine of Siena and the Voices of Women Today:
“Sometimes the words of protest are the only words we can
speak clearly in the face of complex forces of evil woven
into the fabric of our lives and world. We cannot always see
or name the way forward. Further, no liberation front or
political or social program can be identified with the reign
of God. But even the cry of protest is a word of grace that
moves us to resistance and to searching for another way. The
beginning of finding a new path is speaking the truth of
what clearly is not God’s will for human life
….”

    On Friday, May 27,
2016 7:01 AM, "Herbert Boh herbe...@yahoo.com
[cameroon_politics]"
<cameroon...@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 

 
 



 


   
     
     
      Enough tried! Enough said! No one sent
me to redeem anyone from their ignorance. And, as I said, I
am not going to be the co-author of an emotional piece of
slander.
So, be happy, Janvier!
You should have not only your opinion, but also your facts.
Make them up as you go along!
Literary critiques say
something about authors. They are like prisoners. None ever
agrees they committed the crime that landed them in
jail.
Ntumfoyn Boh
Herbert


Sent from my iPhone
On May 27,
2016, at 2:43 AM, Tchouteu Janvier j_ka...@yahoo.com
[cameroon_politics] <cameroon...@yahoogroups.com>
wrote:














 

 



   
     
     
      Wow! This is time consuming. All
the
same, I think there is a Cameroonian song out there that
says "Eh, na me a
find nam..." Na me a truly find this one by asking you
for pointers. For
the sake of historical clarity, I will address the points
raised by Herbert Boh
below.



Dear bro,
Herbert,



As I indicated before, I wrote
this
piece in 2004, a month before the presidential elections of
that year and two
years after the Fru Ndi/ Ngwasiri deal with the CPDM that
buttressed the
system's intellectually dishonest postulation that the
SDF was a Northwest
party. By the two forging the deal with the CPDM against the
genuine interest
of the party, Cameroonians and the close to a century-old
Cameroonian struggle,
Fru Ndi and Ngawsiri, whether knowingly or unknowing
indicated a surrender to
the system, something that would take generation(s) to undo.
It looks like you
still have not realized that. A classic revolutionary mind
would see that in a
spark, especially when comparing that with other situations
in
history---Cameroonian and worldwide.



The writing was done under a great
deal of emotional turmoil because I was basically
transcending from judging a
figure I had regarded as my leader for 12 years,
incarcerated for supporting,
fell out with family and friends for and mortgaging ten
years of my life for a
cause that he had basically derailed by his actions that
may have been
taken because he did not know any better.  Once again, this
account is a
profile, not a biography, and it was done without emotional
constraints in a
deeply analytical manner.  Still, there were self-worries
of "What if
I am wrong", which is why it never got published until
now, with the side
hope that my hero for twelve years would redeem himself.
Apparently he did not.
You too judged and condemned him following the senatorial
elections/charade.



I know those who worked with Fru
Ndi
during the controversial periods highlighted in the profile
are likely to think
that they too would be judged and perhaps condemned. I
object to judging or
condemning somebody based on association.



Before I address the points you
raised below, I have to point out that these questions
crossed my
mind---"When did Boh Herbert join the SDF; when did he
join the chairman's
retinue and when did he become his aide? "Also, based
on the responses
from figures like Boh Herbert, Martin Yembe, Tatah
Mentan etc., it looks
like there would be a change of guards in the SDF soon with
a deal of immunity
for the SDF chairman of 26 years from the young guards who
would be taking
over?" The responses tell as much as they failed to
tell. Mt response
to the points you raised are highlighted as
follows:



   
 1. You
say of Fru Ndi that he "has been presenting himself,
with tacit and at times open support from the French-imposed
establishment, as the unchallenged or most prominent leader
of the
hundreds of political parties that constitute Cameroon’s
so-called
opposition".

Janvier, like Fru Ndi or hate him, he is the undisputed
leader of the
opposition. He has been since the 1990s and it has not
depended on open or
tacit approval of the French-imposed establishment. You must
know, although the
agenda you are pursuing here is blinding you, that both the
French and the French-imposed
establishment abhor Fru Ndi. If Fru Ndi was the man of the
French and
French-imposed system, he would have been president since
1992.
 Bro, it is accepted in
revolutionary circles that when your enemy starts praising
you, know that you
have made a mistake. Media, corporations and government work
together in
certain countries, France for one, so when the international
media lauds Biya
all the time for winning elections against the country’s
number opposition
leader Fru Ndi, you know right away that he has been used to
valid the fraud
and consciously or unconsciously acts as an enabler and
sustainer of the system.
The system needs him for legitimacy. They make one another
relevant. The mafia
system would never embrace someone who left and then
threatened them. They
would only use and dump him afterwards. The casualty of
course is the
Cameroonian people. Fru Ndi is exponentially richer than he
was in 1990. Yes,
in this camp of so-called opposition parties made up of
former CPDM people who
know that they cannot beat the system but can benefit from
it, Fru Ndi is
number one.  When did he come to the
realization that he cannot beat the system? Not in
2014.



2. You
refer to "union nationalists" repeatedly in this
document.



I put it
bluntly to you, Janvier, that you are trying to scam
history by inventing a group of activists that you grew in
your fertile
imagination. You also have this political category that you
refer to simply as
"some" - as in the bullet point which reads:
"By some as a quest
to regain lost privileges".
 When did people start
calling themselves Christians. Years after they started
following the teachings
of Christ. Deduce from that analogy. Most in the SDF NEC in
the early 1990s
were convinced changing the system was the way forward,
extoled the national
and civic-nationalist path of the SDF at the time and got
their inspirations
from earlier nationalists like Um Nyobe, Felix Moumie, Nde
Ntumazah etc., nationalists
the custodians of the system called radical nationalists, a
word best used to describe
ethnic nationalists with fascist tendencies. Those unique
people in the SDF are
precisely the union-nationalists. Did you adhere to that
idea?
 You wrote
“You also have this political category that you refer to
simply as "some" - as in the bullet point which
reads: "By some
as a quest to regain lost privileges".
 What were you thinking. I
had Diakolle Diasalla in mind. Now you are making me to
think harder. Hmm others
also qualify.



3. You
write of Fru Ndi's financial situation as a businessman
after three decades of biz that his "financial position
was not a source
of envy".

By who, may I ask? As the owner of a major residence in
Ntarikon; the owner of
two of West Cameroon's two biggest bookshops; the owner
of a half-finished
office complex on Commercial Avenue; with property in Baba;
and driving his own
4-wheel drive and 504 Peugeot, Fru Ndi was perhaps not as
rich as Janvier but that
does not sound like he was not envied. Yours is a repeat of
the derogatory
reference the CPDM made of "le petit libraire de
Bamenda".
 I may disagree with
somebody, but to be spiteful as you insinuated. No my
brother. He was not
wealthy. He was comfortable---Cameroonian standards. Today
he is wealthy. The
wealthy and very rich are the ones often envied.



4. Fru
Ndi's boldness and tenacity you say "verged on
arrogance and self-centeredness".

This is what Janvier is decreeing and it is pure nonsense!
Fru Ndi was already
known for donating books to several secondary schools; he
was paying school
fees for students that were not his relations; and he was
sinking a
considerable amount of his money promoting football as
leader of PWD Bamenda.
Does that sound like self-centeredness?
 You will agree with me that
the SDF is a pale shadow of its former self. Tell me that he
doesn’t bear any responsibility
for that. He has been in power for 26 years---and tell me if
power and wealth craving
to the detriment of an all-embracing cause that people have
even died for does
not bear the trappings of arrogance and
self-centeredness.




5. When
the SDF was being put together, you claim, Fru Ndi
"spearheaded the sidelining of other non-Northwest
province figures that
were committed to a national force to change the
country".



Shame on
you for not only hatching this lie but for having the
courage to tell (write) it with a straight face. You should
also be ashamed
that you even think Fru Ndi wanted this to be a
Northwest-only thing.
 Albert Mukong, a founder of
One Kamerun(OK) with Ndeh Ntumazah insisted on engaging
like-minded advocates
of change in the other provinces against the desire of the
other founding
fathers, some of whom wanted it to be an Anglo affair and
confined until the
SDF was registered and launched. You don’t intend to
disagree with me that
Albert Mukong’s mission to involve Yondo Black and Ekani
Anicet didn’t have the
blessings of his comrades back home, do you? Certainly there
is no file on
that, but that account and variants of it are or were
whispered around within
circles in the SDF.




6. Your
other claim is that when other seemingly more important
"SDF Founding Fathers" turned down "the offer
to become Chairman
or president due to personal fears or worries, Fru Ndi
demanded that he be paid
if he were to take the risk of
signing".
 Shame on
you, again! This is what I said you needed to do first:
get the birth of the SDF right first before you pretend you
can write its
history.
 Once again, I doubt there
is a file on that, but that account and variants of it are
or were whispered around
within circles in the SDF. Tell me you never heard of
that.
 



7. After
the SDF was launched, you suggest that Fru Ndi, who had
already left the CPDM in protest at the absence of internal
democracy, had no
idea why an opposition was founded. You refer to an
interview he granted and
want readers to believe that when he was asked "in an
interview about what
he wanted for Cameroon, Fru Ndi's reply was "We
want grass root
democracy."
 Now, was
that all he said or this is all what you want to pretend
he said do he can look as stupid as you would like to paint
him? 
 
 Good you used the word
suggest there, because you were not paraphrasing me in a
statement that is so
off-on-the-tangent. "We want grass root
democracy." This was the most
important sentence in his interview and it was the headline
on the front page
of the magazine.



8. Here
is more of what you write: "By 1992," say you
"Dr. Digs Asanga and Dr. Samuel Tchwenko wielded the
most influence within
the ranks of the SDF".



Waooooh!
Not even Fru Ndi, right? Given where you are tele-guiding
the history of the SDF, you ignore people like Andrew
Akonteh (to mention only
one). As someone, whose reading of the SDF was obviously
shaped and limited by
what little you could see from Kassava Farm or Half Mile
Limbe, you cannot help
celebrating Dr. Tchwenko "as the party's ideologue
and architect behind
the extension to the Southwest, West and Littoral
provinces". Your memory
is so short you cannot even remember fellow Kassava Farm
leaders like Shallo,
among others. The wonderful leadership from people like the
Dr. who led the SDF
from Douala and our Bamileke brothers, whose solid support
earned the SDF's
nickname of Anglo-Bami party are all
forgotten.

Yes, by 1992, I said. The
SDF chairman’s Provincial tours began in December 1991.
But the implantation of
the party at provincial and lover levels were ongoing in
1991 principally in
the NW and SW. Dr. Asanga was the chief weaver at the time
connecting the
strings as the Secretary General. Getting the SW to the side
of SDF with
memories of Foncha still fresh in the minds of
Southwesterners was a Herculean
task accomplished by the “Tchwenko-led
multi-ethnic team” as I wrote, but which you
omitted. I see you are in
the dark on how figures like Ebai Namme (then CPDM Youth
President), Honarable
Ndando (CPDM Parliamentarian), Evaristus Foupoussi joined
the SDF. Or you think
the Bamilekes with memories of the UPC war still fresh in
their minds, saw the
light one day and threw their faith behind the SDF without a
union-like
engagement with their social groups.
 As I
said in my
previous reply to you, this work is a profile of Fru Ndi and
not about SDF per
se. Others mentioned are just footnotes on the account of
how he dragged the
party down. Once again, read the account I wrote about the
SDF, and you will
find out the acclaim I had for Akonteh, Shalo etc. (The
Social Democratic Front
(SDF) PART I: The 1990-1997 Historic Party of the Opposition
in Cameroon https://www.amazon.com/Social-Democratic-Front-SDF-PART-ebook/dp/B00FHAGG8I/ref=as_sl_pc_qf_sp_asin_til?tag=newcamvie-20&linkCode=w00&linkId=V6EVSYWRRMYIKZMW&creativeASIN=B00FHAGG8I
)
 
 I
see that you are
still stuck in your fictional notion of Janvier, Cassava
Farm and SDF.  Hasn’t my works of the 1990s and time
proven
that my grasp of the concept of a struggle, philosophy of a
cause, political
ideology, history etc., especially over Cameroon, has shown
many of our
self-styled Socrates wanting, including you?  Many in the
SDF and beyond identified Dr.
Tchwenko as the party’s ideologue not me, but suffice to
say that he was the
best intellectual mind I exercised with and I told him in
2000 that he was
unfortunately, the only revolutionary in NEC, engaged in a
cause that is revolutionary
in its demand but few even understood the enormity of the
task. And when I say
revolutionary, I meant in the classic sense, if you know
what I mean.
 During
my dozens of
visits to Bamenda, the “Ntarikon Palace” and other SDF
activities in the NW, I
came to the conclusion that our comrades there had a grossly
misconceived notion
of themselves (Highly inflated) and others in the other
provinces (underlooking
them). Limbe, was the most informed and most organized SDF
bastion in the
country and the only one that could host weekly rallies, a
feat others including
Bamenda tried to emulate and failed.
 
 9. The
real history of Cameroon has a record of parliamentary
elections boycotted by the SDF, among others. And that
ballot and the boycott
had consequences. Your account does not remember that it
happened.

Once again, the account is
a profile of Fru Ndi, like I did one of Paul Biya in 1995
entitled “Paul Biya:
The living Specter that is Haunting Us http://viewsnewcameroon.blogspot.com/2010/09/living-spectre-that-is-haunting-us.html
)
 
 10. In
blind pursuit of your goal of using a historical account to
glorify certain and demonize others, you argue that the
"SDF gained in
popularity for not signing the heavily flawed Tripartite
agreement". And,
lest anyone forgets, you explain that this was "a stand
the Southwest
provincial coordinator and national executive member Dr.
Samuel Tchwenko sold
to the SDF chairman and the rest of the party’s National
Executive Committee
(NEC)."
 No
surprise there, given what we have already reviewed
above.
  You tried hard there, but
intellectual honesty
prevailed. You couldn’t bring yourself to say it was
false.  Out of curiosity, why do you think while Fru
Ndi was under house arrest, the system (France and Biya)
were prepared to
strike a deal with Dr. Tchwenko to become the Prime Minister
with partial
executive power, select his cabinet, a deal he turned down
and warned the SDF
leadership never conciliate with the system or else see its
soul corrupted? And
why did you think Fru Ndi gave him the free hand to deal
with the system?
Revolutionaries do not betray an ideal, a cause that is the
meaning of their
lives. Chemfor who was the go-between for the government
pointed out that the
system recognized him as the second most influential in the
SDF at the time.



11. There is more. You
write: "By the end of 1991, Southwesterners had been
won over into
the SDF by the Tchwenko-led multi-ethnic
team."  Unlike
the Fru Ndi one-ethnic team of North-westerners,
right? Don’t
put words into my mouth.
 12. Why
stop there? Unable to, you add: "In a network
led by Dr. Samuel Tchwenko, the majority of the francophone
populations that
supported the historic UPC were brought over into the SDF,
giving the party a
national outlook and civic nationalist semblance in a
growing national ideal
called Cameroonian Union-Nationalism. And it was these
civic nationalists
in the party that gave Fru Ndi the financial support and
confidence, so that by
the summer of 1992, the Fru Ndi-led SDF had more than 70% of
the national
support of Cameroonians."
 What is false about
that?



You could
follow the logic of your allegations. Why not change the
title into "The SDF that Dr. Samuel Tchwenko
Built"? Fru Ndi will
love you for the popularity figure of +70 percent that you
give him by 1992.
Can you tell readers what the science is behind the poll you
are citing here?
Or, did you just pull that figure out of the hat? Did you
just invent that
figure the same way you invented those group of Cameroonians
or is it a network
you call "Cameroonian Union-Nationalists"? Then,
there are those you
call "Francophone union nationalist" whose hearts
Fru Ndi apparently
won by speaking Pidgin-English.
 Oh, you didn’t say it is
false. WHO ARE THE KAMERUNISTS (UNION NATIONALISTS OF
CAMEROON http://viewsnewcameroon.blogspot.com/2013/02/who-are-cameroons-union-nationalisyts.html)?
Gives you an insight into that category of
Cameroonians.13. You
also write: "By July 1992, beefed up by a
broad circle of intellectuals and ideologues drawn from
across the national
territory and provided with a national ideal of Cameroonian
union-nationalism
that he purported to embrace at the time, Fru Ndi was
unquestionably the
greatest asset to the struggle and with that came
self-confidence."
 I see you have no
concept of a clearly defined national idea.  Read “WHO
ARE THE KAMERUNISTS (UNION
NATIONALISTS OF CAMEROON http://viewsnewcameroon.blogspot.com/2013/02/who-are-cameroons-union-nationalisyts.html)?
To gain a greater insight, that is.  For a cause to be
successful, an exhorting literature and national ideal are
needed to be in
place.
 














































































































































































































 

    On Thursday, May 26,
2016 10:49 PM, "'Mannu T.' anom...@yahoo.com
[cameroon_politics]" <cameroon...@yahoogroups.com>
wrote:
 

 
 



 


   
     
     
     
"Power
corrupts; absolute power corrupts absolutely and Unlimited power is apt to
corrupt the minds of those who possess
it"
   
  From: 'Pa Fru
Ndeh' via ambasbay <amba...@googlegroups.com>
  To: "cameroon...@yahoogroups.com"
<cameroon...@yahoogroups.com>;
"camne...@yahoogroups.com"
<camne...@yahoogroups.com>;
"amba...@googlegroups.com"
<amba...@googlegroups.com>

  Sent: Thursday, May 26,
2016 6:12 PM
  Subject: Re:
[cameroon_politics] Re: [camnetwork] John Fru Ndi of
Cameroon's Social Democratic Front: The Transformation
of a Political Movement into a Political Business, and then
into a Political Racket
   
Janvier
Chando Tchouteu,
Have
you read Professor Tatah Mentan's submittal a few
minutes ago? Blessed
Be Cameroon
Pa Fru Ndeh

 
 
  From: "Tchouteu
Janvier j_ka...@yahoo.com
[cameroon_politics]" <cameroon...@yahoogroups.com>
  To: "camne...@yahoogroups.com"
<camne...@yahoogroups.com>;
"cameroon...@yahoogroups.com"
<cameroon...@yahoogroups.com>;
"amba...@googlegroups.com"
<amba...@googlegroups.com>

  Sent: Thursday, May 26,
2016 11:19 AM
  Subject:
[cameroon_politics] Re: [camnetwork] John Fru Ndi of
Cameroon's Social Democratic Front: The Transformation
of a Political Movement into a Political Business, and then
into a Political Racket
   












Dear
Herbert,
Thanks
for your two cents on this presentation. It is fundamentally
about Fru Ndi and how he, as the leader of the SDF, led it
down the drain. Rather than just summarily rejecting the
veracity of the work, your position would be more
intellectually  appreciated even by those who disagree with
you if you are dialectical in your approach. That is, taking
out the points you think are wrong piecemeal and countering
them with points that you consider truthful or factual.

I
indicated earlier that I wrote the work in 2004 and added a
few paragraphs recently to bring it up to the times. So, I
don't see anything to change there, unless someone or
people  prove that I erred.
Back
in the first half of the 1990s when I started writing
political essays on that phase of the struggle, I remarked
to a top NEC member that  the SDF was susceptible to
betrayal due to the fact that the SDF meant different things
to different people. I and many people who joined the SDF in
1990 were civic-nationalists, otherwise called Cameroonian
union-nationalists, and identified with the historic UPC of
1946-1971, just like many in the NW SDF leadership were CPDM
before 1990. I am likely to deduce that you were an
Anglophone or Southern Cameroonian nationalist back then.
Since a common goal of getting rid of Biya was the
overriding objective, those hues were overlooked by most
people until 1997. The hues produced pro-SCNC guys like Nfor
Nfor, straightlaced revolutionaries like Dr. Tchwenko,
union-government guys like Professor Nkui, Professor
NKamndou, Professor Asanga etc, etc.
My
account of the historic SDF is "The Social Democratic Front (SDF)
PART I: The 1990-1997 Historic Party of the Opposition in
Cameroon. https://www.amazon.com/Social-Democratic-Front-SDF-PART-ebook/dp/B00FHAGG8I/ref=sr_1_42?s=digital-text&ie=UTF8&qid=1464275798&sr=1-42&refinements=p_27%3AJanvier+Tchouteu"
 
All the best,
Janvier Chando


    On Thursday, May 26,
2016 10:32 AM, "Herbert Boh herbe...@yahoo.com
[camnetwork]" <camne...@yahoogroups.com>
wrote:
 

 
 



 


   
     
     
      Dear
Janvier,
Just
to set the record straight, I do not agree with you. The
facts are not straight. There is even a heavy dose of
fiction to it. 
To write the
history of the SDF, a minimal requirement would be to get
the facts about its birth right. That you do not even begin
to do. 
If
you argue the case that the SDF was, in fact, some
incarnation of the so-called historic UPC with factions
and/or movements within its top ranks that never existed,
except as the author has germinated them in his brain and
birth them on paper, then there is a serious omission of
fact.
My hope is
that this is some DRAFT on which you are still working. It
is a good start to what could be a good book, but a good
book will fly on the solid facts it will provide to
readers. 
I
have to congratulate and thank you for spending time doing
it and will stay my critique until you have a finished,
fact-checked and vetted product. Putting the DRAFT as it is
under the scrutiny required of a book review would be
failing to acknowledge that I have understood it to be a
work in progress.
Good
luck!
Ntumfoyn Boh
Herbert

 

    On Thursday, May 26,
2016 2:27 AM, "Mishe Fon mish...@yahoo.com
[camnetwork]" <camne...@yahoogroups.com>
wrote:
 

 
 



 


   
     
     
      This
is a well written piece although full of factual deceptions.
Your historical perspective is admirable but it would serve
all of us readers better if some of us do not end up
considering this kind of history tweaking as
"Intellectual Fraud or Political Masturbation". I
will pick one simple example (as an active participant of
the Political Movement of the nineties myself) to explain
where you lost me in your excellent rendition of your SDF
history. You cite profusely, a certain group of individuals
(mainly Francophone Intellectuals) who joined the SDF as
"Cameroon Union Nationalists"; I must confess to
you that as a staunch SDF militant (at that time and a
provincial executive + being a strong financial
contributor based in Yaoundé), I am
hearing of this "CUN" wing of the Party for the
first time. If you talked of CUN in UPC politics, I will be
with you 100%. Pah "Njoh" Fru Ndi is not
a saint and has made his fair share of political blunders
(some of which you eloquently highlight in your
"historical narrative" BUT I still don't see
how Pah "Njoh" Fouda Ndi has blocked YOU, ME or
any other Cameroonian from doing what they feel should be
done to FIX the country. Talk is cheap. The regime in
Yaoundé has created about 180 so-called Political Parties,
most of which we only hear about when decreed
"S"Elections are approaching.
That
is how you will discover characters like Jean Njeunga,
Daniel Soh Fone, Albert Dzongang, Dakole Daissala, Koumbin
Bilitik, Isaac Feuzeu, Hubert Kamgaing, Marcus Lontouo,
Hameni Bieuleu, Tabi Owono, etc who will either resurface
from where-ever they had been hiding or surface afresh,
making a complete mockery of what "DemocraZy" is
all about, vociferating outlandish abracadabra nonsense
over the airwaves (pocketing each their 29 million CPDM
Bribe money for participation. Massa Tchouteu, you want to
write History, by all means write one which is real and not
"Story Telling genre Arabian Nites". For the 2011
Presidential elections, ELECAM claimed that there were 4.5
million registered voters. Paul Biya gave himself 3.7
million, Fru Ndi was given 520,000 and the 21 other
Presidential Candidates shared approximately 270,000 (for
their hard work). Remember we've been told the
population of Cameroon hangs around 26 million (without any
credible census data). You do the Math and tell me what is
wrong with that scenario.NB:
My dear brother; This is not to start a fight nor do I want
to belittle your excellent job. It is a simple
"academic" critique with no harm
intended.Tah
Mfar Mishe Fon














 

 



   
     
     
     
John Fru Ndi of Cameroon's
Social Democratic Front:The Transformation of a Political
Movementinto a Political Business, and then
into aPolitical
Racket




Janvier
Tchouteu


Acknowledgement

This account is dedicated to the
loving memory of all the Cameroonians who suffered and died
in their selfless commitment to the cause to found the New
Cameroon.






 Cameroon’s Greatest Political
Betrayal




For over two-and-a-half decades now,
John Fru Ndi has been presenting himself, with tacit and at
times open support from the French-imposed establishment, as
the unchallenged or most prominent leader of the hundreds of
political parties that constitute Cameroon’s so-called
opposition, a rag-tag group that purports to be engaged in
the post 1990 phase of the Cameroonian struggle interpreted
differently:By union nationalists as a
continuation of the five-decade struggle to bring down the
French-imposed system or establishment and found a New
Cameroon that is democratic, free, liberal, independent,
progressive and modernBy liberals and moderates as a
struggle to unseat Paul Mvodo Biya, the French puppet that
manages the French-imposed system in CameroonBy Anglophone nationalists as a
struggle to end the decades of being marginalized by
Francophone dominated Ahidjo-Biya regimes (though not
Francophone majority-backed)By some as a quest to regain lost
privilegesand by others as an opportunity to
partake in the possible benefits the Biya regime and
establishment offer renegades, opportunists and
fortune-seekers.
Having lived three decades of his adult
years as a businessman, Fru Ndi’s financial position was
not a source of envy. But what most appreciated about him
was his tenacity and boldness, even though many people
turned a blind eye to the fact that his tenacity and
boldness verged on arrogance and self-centeredness
(considered by many as a necessary quality for a business
man). It is not surprising therefore, that in 1989 when the
Social Democratic Front (SDF) of Cameroon was being put
together, Fru Ndi spearheaded the sidelining of other
non-Northwest province figures that were committed to a
national force to change the country. It is not surprising
still that when more prominent members of the inner-circle
of the group called “The SDF Founding Fathers” turned
down the offer to become Chairman or president due to
personal fears or worries, Fru Ndi demanded that he be paid
if he were to take the risk of signing in as the head of the
opposition party that was about to be registered and
launched.
With the launch of the SDF in May
26, 1990, Fru Ndi became a source of awe, taking almost the
entire credit for it, even though he did not spearhead the
crafting, creation and launch of the SDF. Months after, when
asked in an interview about what he wanted for Cameroon, Fru
Ndi’s reply was “We want grass root democracy.” It was
clear to the insightful that he lacked a clear vision at a
time that the SDF was outgrowing the purpose of its founding
fathers. But with the multitude of intellectuals,
civic-nationalists and ideologues that swelled the ranks of
the SDF after its launch, there was never a shortage of SDF
insiders to give the far-reaching meaning to the purpose of
the SDF’s creation. By 1992, Dr. Siga Asanga and Dr.
Samuel Tchwenko wielded the most influence within the inner
ranks of the SDF— Dr. Siga Asanga as Secretary General,
the brain in the group of founding fathers, and as Fru
Ndi’s elder relative; and Dr. Samuel Tchwenko as the
party’s ideologue and architect behind the extension of
the party’s reach to the Southwest, West and Littoral
provinces.
When the National Coordination of
Opposition parties(NCO) was formed in 1991, Fru Ndi’s
disputed popularity amongst Cameroonians at the time came to
the forefront when the steering committee that was created,
elected Samuel Eboua (head of the National Union for
Democracy and Progress—NUDP) as the chairman,  with John
Fru Ndi(SDF) as vice-chairman, and Adamou Ndam Njoya (head
of the Cameroon Democratic Union—CDU), Jean-Jacques Ekindi
(Progressive Movement—MP), Charles Tchoungang (OCDH) and
Djeukam Tchameni (CAP-Liberte) as members of the managing
committee. When the NCO started the "Operation Ghost
Towns", following the student protests led by the
Student body called “Parlement” in
the Spring of 1991, the Cameroon opposition appeared solid
and united, even though most of the heads of the opposition
parties had been former members of the ruling party less
than two years before. The objective of the “Ghost Town”
operations was to use strikes to close down the Cameroonian
economy during the week, and allow commerce to function only
on the weekends, in order to force the Biya regime to
convene a Sovereign National Conference to come up with a
new constitution and a transparent electoral process for
Cameroon. By the end of October 1991, the Biya regime was on
its knees, and so decided to call for “TRIPARTIE” talks
to resolve Cameroon’s political impasse with
pre-conditions to be met by the Coordination of Opposition
Parties (NCO) and the government. The NCO called off the
“Ghost Towns” operations, but the government failed to
respect its obligations. For that reason, the coordination
pledged to boycott the talks, only to attend it
later.
It was in the aftermath of the
TRIPARTITE that the SDF gained in popularity for not signing
the heavily flawed Tripartite agreement, a stand the
Southwest provincial coordinator and national executive
member Dr. Samuel Tchwenko sold to the SDF chairman and the
rest of the party’s National Executive Committee (NEC). 
By the end of 1991, Southwesterners had been won over into
the SDF by the Tchwenko-led multi-ethnic team; the UPC (the
historic upholder of Cameroonian nationalism) was in
disarray after having been taken over by renegades; and
Samuel Eboua, the unifying head of the NUDP had been booted
out by Bello Bouba Maigari, the sly and former Prime
Minister of Cameroon. In a network led by Dr. Samuel
Tchwenko, the majority of the francophone populations that
supported the historic UPC were brought over into the SDF,
giving the party a national outlook and civic nationalist
semblance in a growing national ideal called Cameroonian
Union-Nationalism. And it was these civic nationalists in
the party that gave Fru Ndi the financial support and
confidence, so that by the summer of 1992, the Fru Ndi-led
SDF had more than 70% of the national support of
Cameroonians.
From early 1992, Fru Ndi became
instantly recognizable as the symbol of the Cameroonian
struggle for democracy, prosperity, freedom and liberty. In
his traditional Northwest regalia, he was recognized in the
Northwest province as one of their own; in his use of
English language, he identified with Anglophones; while in
his rhetoric in Pidgin-English that was often translated
into French, he warmed himself into the hearts of
Francophone union nationalist, especially in those areas
where the historic UPC fought against the Ahidjo-French
forces in the late 1950s and 1960s.
By July 1992, beefed up by a broad
circle of intellectuals and ideologues drawn from across the
national territory and provided with a national ideal of
Cameroonian union-nationalism that he purported to embrace
at the time, Fru Ndi was unquestionably the greatest asset
to the struggle and with that came self-confidence. That is
why he declared his willingness to run for the upcoming
presidential elections without discussing it in the National
Executive Committee of the SDF, even though no changes had
been made to the heavily-flawed laws and electoral process.
Nevertheless, Fru Ndi swayed the National Executive
Committee over to back his intentions, and with the deep
support of the civic nationalists otherwise called the
union-nationalist who constituted more than seventy percent
of the party at the time, he won the October 1992
presidential elections against the incumbent Paul Biya. 
But the French-backed Biya regime declared the incumbent
Paul Biya as the winner. Many in the party hierarchy,
especially the union-nationalists, blamed Fru Ndi and his
clique for withdrawing the petition to the Supreme court, a
petition that called for the cancellation of the elections.
This petition was filed during the counting process in
objection to the heavily flawed nature of the elections,
even though based on results from the field at the time, Fru
Ndi was leading in the vote count. A cancellation and a
rerun would have been done with a more prepared, more
organized and more determined SDF backed by a population
that would have been more convinced that the establishment
was about to be dismantled. However, the Fru Ndi/Carlson
Anyangwe withdrawal of the petition emboldened the Biya
regime to add more fake re

__._,_.___

Posted by: enow007 <eno...@yahoo.com>

Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (2)

Have you tried the highest rated email app?
With 4.5 stars in iTunes, the Yahoo Mail app is the highest rated email app on the market. What are you waiting for? Now you can access all your inboxes (Gmail, Outlook, AOL and more) in one place. Never delete an email again with 1000GB of free cloud storage.

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cameroon_politics/

.

__,_._,___

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ambasbay" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ambasbay+u...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--





The thing always happens that you really believe in; and the belief in a thing makes it happen.

Ofege Ntemfac

unread,
May 28, 2016, 5:31:07 AM5/28/16
to ambasbay, globalc...@yahoogroups.com, SDF, shesausa, Southern Cameroon, Big group, africanworldforum, FREE AMBAZONIANS, cameroon_politics, camne...@yahoogroups.com
Pipi Dem

You may find this still cut from Den of Lions edifying.
It is still under edit and not yet properly bloodied:
CUN as another francophone con.

: The French Cameroun Concolonial Agenda

Deconstructing the UPC Reunification Hoopla

On April 10, 1948, the radical French Cameroun nationalists met at a bar in the Douala Bassa quarter to form the Unions des populations du Cameroun (UPC), with immediate independence and “reunification” with British Cameroons as the twin policies on its agenda (Richard Joseph 1977: 92). The UPC did not, and could not, however, explain its “reunification” slogan given the specific context of French Cameroun and South Cameroons as separate, distinct and independent Class B UN Trust Territories under UNO mandate and then trust systems. The UPC assumed that its audience had a common understanding of its ill-defined message. At best, and as stated by historian Simon Ngenge, the UPC (and its Southern Cameroons satellite, One Kamerun (OK) Party) did not themselves appraise the full meaning of the words unification and/or reunification. (Ngenge, 2003) At worst, as leaven is to change (or to assimilate to its own nature) so too did the UPC just translate into another francophone Trojan horse contraption hell-bent on the concolonization, annexation, assimilation and plain subjugation of Southern Cameroons under false pretenses![1] The aforementioned can only be the case. Which probably also explains why a first-schedule (1957) decision of the Southern Cameroons government under Emmanuel Mbella Lifafe Endeley was to outlaw the UPC from every inch of the state of Southern-West Cameroon.

Hindsight now explicates why the UPC could not put content to its “reunification” sloganeering. The “Reunifcation” agenda was (1) lifted, on the shufti, from the Ewe irredentism in Togoland  (2) founded on a false premise and (3) did not meet the “administration union” clause as defined by the Trusteeship Treaty (4) a matter for the UN and consequently the word “reunification” was not on the plebiscite ballot.

To date, the UPC has not defined what it meant by “reunification given the circumstances of both French Cameroun and the British Cameroons. Resultantly, since nature abhors a vacuum, the Ahidjo-Biya colonial regimes, which is guilty of corrupting the nationalism which the UPC stood for, in favour of neocolonialism has now translated the UPC “reunification” and Foncha’s “unification” into neocolonization, concolonization, annexation, assimilation and plain subjugation of Southern Cameroons, with the full support of the francophone majority.

Whereas “reunification” and “unification” and “annexation” and the modalities thereof of “reunification” and “unification” and “annexation” are very precise political science and academic concepts, politicians and even scholarship tend to misconstruction the meaning and the felicity of “reunification” and “unification” as related to the politics of the Cameroons to suit an, often narrow, agenda. This maybe explains why, books and speeches written by the misguided, politicized francophones especially, talk of “reunification” whereas Southern Cameroonian politicians went to Foumban to discuss the modalities of the “unification” of the two Cameroons. Period. The opening speech of the two leaders at the start of the Foumban conference clearly demonstrated that they were not talking about the same thing. Ahidjo was talking about “re-unified” Cameroon while Foncha stuck to “unification.” Unification and re-unification are not the same concepts in political science, constitution-making and state engineering. The wonderment remains how exactly Ahidjo expected to structure his doublespeak of a confederation and a federation and a reunified Cameroun when Southern Cameroons was never part of French Cameroun at its creation on March 16, 1961.

The prime minister of Southern Cameroons, John Ngu Foncha, himself said so in his opening speeches.

During his initial address Ahidjo said:

“…In less than three months from now, the union between us shall be an accomplished fact, and we should prepare for it with the faith and the seriousness that such a task requires. We know that whatever may be our desires to sweep aside all obstacles, many technical details remain to overcome as we shall see as the work goes on. This is not to discourage us for we already know that solid constructions are never achieved with a sweep of the hand, but it is essential that, whatever may have been the respective positions before the referendum, that we approach all these questions with total goodwill, that we approach them with neither regret nor bitterness.

The majority has clearly taken their stand and there is no other thing to do today than to respect the will of the people by building for them a future within the framework that they have fixed. In a question of this nature there should neither be victor nor vanquished for our mission is not to defend our personal positions but to make the best of our experience and abilities to construct a reunified Cameroun that shall be organized and prosperous.

I appeal to all my countrymen from across the Mungo, that whether they be of the majority or the minority, whether they defend positions that were accepted or rejected during the plebiscite, I appeal to them to turn resolutely henceforward towards the future, with all sincerity. The Cameroons of tomorrow needs all its children, and none will be considered redundant who is prepared to participate loyally to the common task.

Gentlemen, the principal objective of this gathering is to study together the important outlines of our future constitution. You know that even before the referendum and since then during our talks with Mr. Foncha, we choose a federal framework.

Why this formula? It is because linguistic, administrative and economic differences do not permit us to envisage seriously and reasonably a state of the unitary and centralized type. It was because a confederal system on the other hand, being too loose would not allow the close coming together and the intimate connection that we desire. “

In reply, Foncha said:

“…It is important that at a conference for the drawing up of a constitution for unification we should not remember those who have worked to bring about this great event which is in the process of being fulfilled. It is true that all the tribes in the Republic of Cameroun have contributed in one way or another in unification but the people of Foumban have done it in a special way. They have never taken serious notice of the frontier restriction, but they have continued to move peacefully to the Southern Cameroons where they have freely remained and build and marry. They have very strong family ties on both sides, and it is a credit to Foumban that its boys and girls marry freely with other tribes. The sultan of Foumban himself has taken special interest in unification by his visits and participation in the affairs of Southern Cameroons. It is therefore, most befitting, that the first important conference should be held in Foumban.  We congratulate the sultan and his people for the warm welcome accorded us.

The present conference is a very important one in the history of unification.  For the first time after 44 years of separation and development under different masters with different cultures, we, our traditional rulers, have come together to consider the method of coming together once more. The desire to come together has overcome years of separation and it is my hope that we can overcome all other obstacles that may present themselves in our path to produce a workable constitution which will satisfy the wishes of the people who have voted for it. Not only are the whole Kamerun people looking up to us, but also other unfortunate divided people all over the world are looking to us to lead the way. We should therefore be determined, in the spirit of compromise, to produce good results within the next few days.”

Unification of two states has a blueprint which ends with a “Treaty of Union” deposited at the UN Secretariat. There is no such treaty anywhere in the world because it does not exist and because the union of Southern Cameroons and French Cameroun is plain concolonisation.

Save for rare francophone scholars who recommend a revisit of the unification agenda to create a confederation, most francophones are on all fours with their government in the doomed expedition to concolonize qua annex the independent Southern British Cameroons. In 1961, the same francophone regime tried and failed to concolonize the independent Northern British Cameroons through a jinxed expedition to the International Court of Justice, ICJ.

 

 

The UPC, to be sure, championed and financed reunification meetings, the majority of which took place in the British Cameroons. Such meetings were not always welcomed in the French Cameroun because of the authoritarianism and intolerance of the French colonial authorities, their hostility toward the radical UPC, and the reunification movement (Ndoh 1996; Ngouamkou 1996).

The Anglophone-francophone split was evident yesterday when it came to an application of the UPC re-unification qua concolonization agenda. The UPC invented the One Kamerun (OK) party under Ndeh Ntumazah as a front to keep its political agenda alive. The KNDP and the OK, however, differed very strongly over the construction of unification. While the OK advocated reunification immediate (whatever that means) the KNDP on its part wanted independence for Southern Cameroons first of all, before a gradual process toward reunification by negotiating with president Ahidjo on acceptable terms. Another factor that made alliance impossible was that OK was considered to be the offspring of the UPC and the ongoing terrorist activities in French Cameroon were fresh in many minds. This scared the KNDP leaders considered as men who, apart from their Christian beliefs, hated violence naturally. (Ngenge, )

Both Chem-Langhëë and Njeuma say that terms such as “reunification” and unification” tend to be weasel words, deployed by rival politicians, meaning all things to all masters. (Paideuma). The absence of a mutually qua universally accepted circumscription and  definition of “reunification” and “unification” in relation to the decolonization process and with particular reference to the Cameroons leads to dangerous equivocation to this day. Meaning “reunification” and “unification meant different things to different peoples. Whereas the Southern Cameroons saw independence in “unification”, French Cameroun, even the UPC, like a ravenous lion confronted by a lamb, saw lamb chop annexation and colonization of Southern Cameroons. A hymn to concolonisation was even entone in French Cameroun before Independence:  “le 1er Octobre on va saisir le Cameroun du sud” or we shall grab Southern Cameroons on October 1. In truth, the UPC. French Cameroun thus grounded its concolonial agenda on a reconstituted German Kamerun but did not dare demand the return of Chad, Gabon, Central Africa and Congo. The limited their concolonial schemes to the very vulnerable Southern Cameroons.

Deaf, dumb and blind contemporary francophone concolonialists qua annexationists qua republicans qua so-called patriots and their equally deaf, dumb and blind collabo confederates have resurrected the recreation of a myth called “Kamerun” with the singular intention of subjugating the Southern British Cameroons based on the devious logic that once upon a time there lived a German colony called Kamerun which colony must be re-enacted. Whereas the Gabonese, the Chadians, the Congolese and the Central Africans will surely confute any Camerounese attempt to recolonize their countries under the false pretenses that there were once upon a time part of German Kamerun.

Prof C. Anyangwe’s confutation of the re-unification of Kamerun myth as peddled by deceitful francophones is very just (see The African Commission’s Ruling in Gumne et al v. Cameroun : Digest and Comment, 1 February 2010)

Professor Anyangwe writes:

“In its Memorial in Communication 266 complainants asserted and demonstrated that the Southern Cameroons has been annexed by Republique du Cameroun and remains under the colonial occupation of that country. The Commission rightly characterised this development as very serious. Indeed it is, and the people of the Southern Cameroons do not make the charge of colonial occupation lightly. First, the occupying State does not deny that it is in complete and asphyxiating control of the Southern Cameroons and administering the territory following its inherited French system. Over the years it has been fishing for some possible justification of its seizure of that territory. In the 1960s it argued that it simply took over a hitherto separated part of its territory handed over to it by the UN and Britain. When challenged to produce the instrument by which the UN and Britain allegedly ceded the Southern Cameroons to it (a legal impossibility since neither the UN nor Britain were owners of the territory), Republique du Cameroun changed its story. It claimed that its occupation of the Southern Cameroons is by virtue of what it called “reunification on 1st October 1961 following the plebiscite vote on 11 February 1961”. But when it was pointed out that one cannot credibly talk of so-called ‘reunification’ when the Southern Cameroons was never, in the first place, a part of French Cameroun, and when at the plebiscite there was no such option as ‘reunification’ and there could not have been any, Republique du Cameroun then changed once more the basis of its hopeless claim. It then sought to found its claim on a brief and ill-defined German Kamerun entity and then proclaimed itself the state successor to that entity. But German Kamerun (parts of which are now legally within at least five different countries) lasted only some 25-odd years and was long since extinct. Besides, the political existence of Republique du Cameroun dates not from 1884 but from the inception of French colonial rule in 1916.

Further, it is both a legal and a factual impossibility for a country to succeed at independence not to the territory of the immediate predecessor state but to the territory long extinct of a remote predecessor state. Furthermore, the plebiscite itself was a complete refutation of the lie that the Southern Cameroons is a part of Republique du Cameroun. If the Southern Cameroons were a part of that country the plebiscite would have been redundant and the territory simply handed over to Republique du Cameroun like Ifni handed over to Morocco by Spain, Hong Kong to China by Britain and Walvis Bay to Namibia by South Africa. Claim to territory can never be founded on mere geographical contiguity or on a remote, superficial and ephemeral historical connection. That is why the claim of Spain to Gibraltar and the claim of Argentina to the Falkland Islands have never succeeded. The plebiscite in the Southern Cameroons was a clear and loud statement by the international community that the native inhabitants of the Southern Cameroons constitute a people and therefore have the inalienable and continuing right to self-determination.”

Another group using the reunification concolonial agenda on the sly to foster their notorious tribal expansionism qua land grab is the Bamilekes of French Cameroun.  The Bamilekes republicans used up (and are still using up) the “reunification” swansong to invent a contraption called “Poo-graffi” or Grass field Peoples founded on the extraordinary claims that grass field peoples in the North West and the West and the same hence the partition of Cameroons was uncalled for and hence the state of West Cameroun never existed. From thence, the Bamilekes can now flood schools in Southern Cameroons with their children at the expense of the poorer Southern Cameroons children as is the case currently where most schools as well as the economy and administration of the Southern British Cameroons are flooded with the Bamilekes simply because they wield a higher economic muscle. Yet the Southern British Cameroons is nothing but a cash cow to the swarming Bamilekes who pay only lip service to causes important to Southern Cameroonians. For example, the Bamilekes flood schools in Southern Cameroons with their offshoot can have better choices and chances in the global workplace. Whereas in the dog eat dog system in Cameroun today, every francophone or Bamileke child registered in a Southern Cameroonian school, or job, is, per force, at the expense of a bona fide Southern Cameroonian.  

Take Joseph’s Lon Nfi’s just observation of the francophone (Bamileke in the main) concolonization policy as obtains in the education subsector:

In line with the constitutional biculturalism of the state, government recognized two educational subsystems in 1961, the Anglophone and Francophone subsystems with two examination systems. The existence of two subsystems of education was confirmed in 1993 with the creation of the BACCALAUREAT and G.C.E examinations boards. Unfortunately schools and other institutions of learning in Anglophone Cameroon were later staffed with Francophones who taught lessons and set examinations in the French language and or in Pidgin English. This was the case with technical education which was never given the Anglo-Saxon character in government schools.

Government Technical Colleges in Anglophone Cameroon therefore operated under the Francophone subsystem of education since 1972. Such schools had Francophone examinations such as CAP, PROBATOIRE and BACCALAUREAT rather than the G.C.E as their end-of-course examinations. Even after the creation of the G.C.E Board in 1993, Anglophone students from these Government Technical Colleges wrote G.C.E Technical examinations organized by this board as an external examination and not as an obligatory end of course examination. These examinations did not very much promote values cherished by the Anglophones especially self-reliance, civility, moral probity and honesty.

With the Francophone character of technical education in Anglophone Cameroon, Government Technical Colleges were therefore staffed with Francophone teachers with a good number of students coming from the neighbouring Bamileke, Mbo and Douala villages in French Cameroon. There was no teacher training college or higher institution to train teachers for technical education for the Anglophone subsystem until 2009 when the Higher Technical Teachers Training Colleges, Bambili was created. At the beginning of the 2011-2012 academic year, Francophone teachers in Government Technical High Schools in Bamenda, Buea, Kumba and Ombe constituted more than 72 percent of the staff strength of these schools. This may be seen as attempts to eradicate the Anglophone culture through the adulteration or pollution of its subsystem of education. Products of these “francophonised‟ Government Technical Colleges could not be identified with Anglophone values of moral probity, obedience and civility. These colleges are known for vandalism and chaos.”[2]



[1] The neologism concolonization is ascriptive to the colonization of a colony by a colony.

[2] Lon Nfi Joseph, The Anglophone Cultural Identity in Cameroon 50 years after Reunification, International Journal of Advanced Research (2014), Volume 2, Issue 2, 121-129




Ofege Ntemfac

unread,
May 28, 2016, 6:26:22 AM5/28/16
to ambasbay, globalc...@yahoogroups.com, SDF, shesausa, Southern Cameroon, Big group, africanworldforum, FREE AMBAZONIANS, cameroon_politics, camne...@yahoogroups.com
Sequel:
It is thus vile, insensitive and an extreme provocation that after using the francophone concolonial system to position themselves in all sectors of the economic life of the annexed Southern British Cameroons this January fellow would huff and puff about bamileke dominance of the administration of Southern Cameroons as if they got there by merit.
This calls for an inquest, a wake and a tribunal.

Tchouteu Janvier

unread,
May 28, 2016, 9:26:14 AM5/28/16
to africanw...@googlegroups.com, ambasbay, globalc...@yahoogroups.com, SDF, shesausa, Southern Cameroon, Big group, FREE AMBAZONIANS, cameroon_politics, camne...@yahoogroups.com
Dear Ofege,

You confirmed what I said. The SDF meant different things to different people, and those nuances were masked by the unifying objective of getting rid of Paul Biya, which to some (the Cameroonian nationalists in particular) would be the first phase of dismantling the then four-decade-old French-imposed system.

Tribalists amaze me.The word Bamileke did not appear in the profile I wrote, but our tribalists with the native mindset tagged me with it right away, hallucinating about the hatching of a Bamileke conspiracy everywhere. It is obvious that no matter how unconscious I am of my Bamileke side, people with the anti-Bamileke fixation would always tag me with the stereotype hatched by Foccart that effectively cast the Bamilekes as the internal enemy of Cameroon. And despite my Anglophone upbringing that pulled from two generations before me, it is convenient for the Anti-Francophones to tag me a Francophone.

There is no glee in being a public executioner, which is why I held back from publishing this profile for more than a decade, hoping that the person I considered a hero for more than a decade would realize himself again and try to reverse the damages he had wrought on the party and cause so many had sacrificed and died for.

I hope this is he end of this chapter.

All the best,

Janvier (T)chouteu


--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "AfricanWorldForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to africanworldfo...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to africanw...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/africanworldforum.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/africanworldforum/CAKL30KnwLAgck3rABufrTunNrGxC9fXedmXFCPNcKeb1GUOkDw%40mail.gmail.com.

Ofege Ntemfac

unread,
May 30, 2016, 6:04:34 AM5/30/16
to ambasbay, africanworldforum, globalc...@yahoogroups.com, SDF, shesausa, Southern Cameroon, Big group, FREE AMBAZONIANS, cameroon_politics, camne...@yahoogroups.com

UN Resolution Gives Great Hope for Southern Cameroons Sovereignty: SCNC REACTS TO RECENT UN RESOLUTIONS ON DE-COLONIZATION

posted by Akene Asobo May 24, 2016 Home
scnc-flag-590x354


*In the Series of United Nation resolutions of the 9th of December 2015 that have sovereignty implication for the Southern Cameroon Struggle, we believe that the news of its coming was the basis of the rumour by the UNO State that their British Cameroon was going to be freed on that 9th of December 2015 .
Since the resolutions came out, there have been a lot of wrong comments from abroad and at home. But here in below, we publish an incisive analysis by the SCNC of what these resolutions really mean for the struggle of Southern Cameroon.
We have studiously read the December 9th 2015 UN Resolutions on decolonization, as well as the reactions from many quarters particularly our members in the diaspora.
The views expressed fall into two categories namely:
Those that sincerely confess that they do not understand the relevance of those resolutions to our specific problem, and
Those who try to interpret wrongly by referring to Resolution 1608 as dead, hence the Southern Cameroons could never be liberated.
In this situation, the SCNC is duty-bound to herein below, scientifically explain the implications of these Resolutions for the benefit of all Southern Cameroons citizens.
Generally speaking, the UN General Assembly voted overwhelmingly to re-affirm its commitment to the principle of self-determination as the Divine Right of all peoples.
This re-assertion indicates that the World Body is fully aware and concerned about the different levels of human rights abuses, and certainly will eventually resolve our annexation problem.
Specifically speaking, the list of the remaining colonial territories comprising American Samoa, Anguilla, Bermuda, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Guam, Montserrat, Pitcairn, Saint Helena, Turks and Caicos Islands, and the United States Virgin Islands, still in the possession of the United States, Britain, and France, does not include the Southern Cameroons.
The meaning is that the Southern Cameroons was already de-colonized.
Elsewhere the UN has published another list of 15 Territories, including the Southern Cameroons as former Trust Territories which were decolonized by 1994. (See UN website sources URL:
http://www.un.org/en/decolonization/selfdet.shtml;
The first essential message implied – by having not included our territory among those to be decolonized – is that we were already Independent as of 1st October 1961 even though most of our intellectual elite continue to be unaware.
The second message is that our problem is annexation, which means the swallow-up of our state by another state. And its de-annexation requires an entirely different procedure.
This analysis is especially important to some of our Nationalist Movements such as the UNO-State Group and the Southern Cameroons Lawyers Association. They have wrongly continued to insist that we need to be independent, whereas our quest at the present stage is for Sovereign Recognition since we are already independent as of 1st October 1961.
It is also important to some of our compatriots who unfortunately are calling for an armed struggle, being ignorant that an Independent State does not articulate our annexation type of problem through armed struggle. It would, like in war-torn Syria, destroy our country before we return to the very peace table where we should have started.
How we achieved Full Independence.
By scientific analysis the SCNC has 72 proofs of our Separate Independence from that of the Francophone Republic of Cameroun. But suffice us to here-in below present you just a half dozen of the most elementary of them.



1. The Plebiscite “Yes” vote was a decision to achieve Independence, and not to “join” whom ever for two reasons.
The Independence issue was prioritized by being given the first position in the Plebiscite Question of “Do You Wish to Achieve Independence by Joining Nigeria?” Or “Do You Wish To Achieve Independence By Joining the Republic of Cameroon?”
The issue of Independence was the antecedent of the condition of “joining”, meaning that it was indispensable, whereas the “joining”, was merely secondary.
A simple analogy is that in a similar question of “Do You Wish to Go to New York by Air or by Sea”, the most important point is the decision to go to New York. It is not the means of transport.
Furthermore, the UN endorsement vote of 19th April 1961 on the outcome of the Plebiscite was on our decision to achieve independence, and NOT on any “Joining”.
If the endorsement vote was for the “joining”, the United Nations would not have called for the Post-Plebiscite International Conference whereat the conditions of “joining” were still to be discussed and its “modalities” worked out.

The second reason is that throughout the 72-year history of the United Nations, the Organisation grants Independences. That is why it designated 1st October 1961 as the Independence Day of Southern Cameroons. Indeed, the World Body has never granted any “joining”

2. The UN-required post-Plebiscite international conference did not hold, so there was no occasion to have established any “joining” between us and the Francophone Republic of Cameroun through a Treaty which could only have resulted from an International Conference.

It should be understood that the substituted Foumban conference did not meet the standard of an International Conference, to have worked out the required Treaty.

It follows that “The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Cameroon”, ironically called by the county’s entire virgin name at the suffix, as well as the multitude of other subsequent constitutions therefrom, do not have the weight of a Treaty.

And being strictly the exclusive Fundamental Law of the Francophone Republic, it has no binding force on the statehood of Southern Cameroons.

Worse still neither Britain nor the UN – which was to witness the occasion – informed the Southern Cameroons government that they would not attend the conference. Obviously the Southern Cameroons government would not have proceeded to the venue to be dominated by an overwhelming number of the francophone delegation.

With this vacuum the Francophone Republic was able, through a mere revision of their virgin constitution to impose their name, flag, anthem, code of arms and national capital on the Southern Cameroons till date, as the insignia of a Federation which was never constituted.

And the Southern Cameroons became a mere appendix.

3. It is further noteworthy that in the aftermath of the failure to convene the International Conference, the United Nations did not call-off, suspend, or cancel their grant of independence to Southern Cameroons.

Similarly Britain, the Administering Authority, did not deny delivering the independence, which would have happened by continuing to maintain their Trusteeship presence in the Territory.

Furthermore, the Republic of Cameroun, on their part, did not complain about the irregularity of federating with another independent state without a prior Treaty.

As a result, the Southern Cameroons majestically moved forward and consummated her full Independence on the designated 1st October, 1961.

The term consummated means the populations celebrated the event, which affixed their Permanent Seal on the Independence.

It follows that, there was no longer any Independence “by joining” as such, meaning that we unconditionally achieved Full Independence inadvertently.

This Sovereign Class of Independence is the very type that most African countries achieved, which our people were clamouring for as a “third option”, but the British brushed aside.

4. There have been external confirmations to our independence. Aside from the UN excluding us from being either a colony or a Trust Territory, the Republic of Cameroun has itself repeatedly recognised our separate Independence.

For instance, they placed the representative star of Southern Cameroons on their flag from 1961 to 1972 which symbolises that we were separately independent to have qualified for a star.

5. Another piece of evidence is that the Republic of Cameroun inserted the word “United” and the name of the country at some point became United Republic of Cameroon. Whenever the term “United” appears in the name of a country it shows that the states that formed the supposed federation were independent states.

An example is the use of the terminology “United” to describe the 52 states of the USA which shows that the states were independent countries that came together as equals.

The same applies to “United” in the name United Kingdom, which is also emphasising that Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and England were independent kingdoms that united as equal partners.

6. Finally, on the 20th of February 2014 during a fake re-unification celebration in Buea (fake because re-unification does not exist where there was no prior unification in terms of a joint independence), Mr. Biya himself declared that the Southern Cameroons is an independent state. The population was clapping without understanding the message.

In the speech a copy of which we have, for whoever may wish to verify, he said “history cannot forget that Buea was once the Headquarters of West Cameroon”, and “history cannot also forget that Buea was once the Capital of Southern Cameroons”

The meaning is that when our country was an un-independent territory Buea, the seat of government was a mere headquarters. But when we achieved independence, the very Buea transformed into a Capital.


Conclussion
Having proved that the Southern Cameroons is a fully independent State from whatever angle of analysis, the implied United Nations message to us through its recent Resolutions is not that we pursue our de-annexation by armed struggle.
Rather, it is for us to proceed through pure democratic means, using established UN Institutions. The ideal procedure is for us to begin from litigation, the outcome of which would enable us rouse the international community to act. This is the way (path) the smaller Republic of Cameroun went (took) before redeeming the Bakassi Peninsular from the almighty Nigeria. Not even the Security Council can veto the decision of a court.
This is the vision that, after 11 years of research and analysis, guided the SCNC to first sue the Republic of Cameroon in the local high Court in Bamenda, Southern Cameroons in September 2011.
The dismissal verdict six months later coupled with two related arrests of Thomas NWACHAN, the primary researcher and filer of the case, helped open the door for the case to enter the Geneva-based UN Human Rights Committee.
Our 72-page petition by reason of 400 synoptic arguments, jointly and severally indicting the Francophone Republic, Britain and the UN, was received by the court on April 9, 2014.
Ladies and gentlemen, we are in regular contact with the court to which we have submitted further evidence on demand. But you know the court takes its time between three to five years to render its verdict.
However, we are confident of a victorious outcome, considering the positive results of the previous personal cases of two of our citizens, Gorgi Dinka and Albert Mukong, against the Republic of Cameroun by this very court.
It follows that we must watch out against repeating the errors of the past. As an Independent State we can no longer concede to the deceptive proposals of another referendum, constitutional reform, re-federation, and Vice-Presidency when there is no prior Treaty to anchor any of these reforms.
This does not suggest that there is now room for a Treaty either. Not only is it impossible to reconvene the UN-prescribed post-Plebiscite International Conference, the parties to the Treaty no longer exist for the following reasons, as well.
The Trusteeship Authority expired on 30th September 1961, with the downing of the British flag. So neither the UN nor Britain can return to the Southern Cameroons to work out the Treaty, on the basis of the Trusteeship Agreement. In addition, as an independent State only the Southern Cameroons can work out a Treaty between herself and whomever.
Furthermore, the Republic of Cameroun tore away the democratically elected government of Southern Cameroons in 1972, so there is no legitimate government representing the Southern Cameroons with whom to work out any such Treaty today.
Thus the Francophone Republic will finally be left alone to be licking its wounds. Since, in light of the foregoing arguments, the Southern Cameroons is bound to be restored its deserved sovereignty.
Long Live the SCNC
Long live the UN Right to Self Determination
Long Live the Would-Be State of Southern Cameroons

Signed:Chibok ndu

THOMAS N. NWACHAN
B.A. Hist., M.A Pol. Sc., M.A Mgt.
1969 combined winner of Fulbright of US Congress, and
The Lawrence Wien International Scholarships
Through Brandeis University, Mass, USA.

__._,_.___

On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 6:46 PM, 'Ogwo Manny Ogwo' via ambasbay <amba...@googlegroups.com> wrote:

Our reps are online ready to answer your question 

https://purechat.me/bn3hgu

 

Thank you for using Bonaco Telecom service today. The greatest gift you can give us is that of referral. Tell your friends about Bonaco. Refer them via email or your social networks, Forward the Link address  http://www.bonaco.net/customer/register  and thanks for spreading the work.

 

FQA

Sign up and Log into your account.  Click the Mobile App under the Dashboard.

Click the Orange Button to activate your mobile App account.

Select the green button captioned Show Password to see your Password. Remember your registered phone number is your ID.

 

Visit your App Store and download BONACO.

Enter your ID and your Passcode when prompted during download. The system will install all your numbers for easy calling. Start Making domestic and International phone calls from Bonaco Apps.

CEO

BonacoTelecom

sup...@bonaco.net


For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ambasbay" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ambasbay+u...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Ofege Ntemfac

unread,
May 30, 2016, 6:15:53 AM5/30/16
to ambasbay, africanworldforum, globalc...@yahoogroups.com, SDF, shesausa, Southern Cameroon, Big group, FREE AMBAZONIANS, cameroon_politics, camne...@yahoogroups.com
CORRIGENDUM: The March 4, 1916 creation of French Cameroun.

Unification and re-unification are not the same concepts in political science, constitution-making and state engineering. The wonderment remains how exactly Ahidjo expected to structure his doublespeak of a confederation and a federation and a reunified Cameroun when Southern Cameroons was never part of French Cameroun at its creation on March 4, 1916. On this day,  French Cameroun was born out of a French decision to, judiciously, as per Article 9 of the League of Nations Covenant, carve the portion of German Kamerun under its mandate into five countries. The five countries created on the same day,  March 4, 1916 were, Gabon, Cameroun, Chad, Congo and the Central African Republic. The French called these countries the “Pre-carré” and made them France’s private Eden or hunting grounds in Africa.March 16, 1916


Ofege Ntemfac

unread,
May 31, 2016, 8:41:50 AM5/31/16
to globalc...@yahoogroups.com, ambasbay, SDF, shesausa, Southern Cameroon, Big group, africanworldforum, FREE AMBAZONIANS, cameroon_politics, camne...@yahoogroups.com
Demonstrating the Concolonization/Annexation of Southern British Cameroons by French Cameroun
Prof C. Anyangwe’s confutation of the re-unification of Kamerun myth as peddled by deceitful francophones is very just (see The African Commission’s Ruling in Gumne et al v. Cameroun : Digest and Comment, 1 February 2010.
Professor Anyangwe writes:
In its Memorial in Communication 266 complainants asserted and demonstrated that the Southern Cameroons has been annexed by Republique du Cameroun and remains under the colonial occupation of that country. The Commission rightly characterised this development as very serious. Indeed it is, and the people of the Southern Cameroons do not make the charge of colonial occupation lightly. First, the occupying State does not deny that it is in complete and asphyxiating control of the Southern Cameroons and administering the territory following its inherited French system. Over the years it has been fishing for some possible justification of its seizure of that territory. In the 1960s it argued that it simply took over a hitherto separated part of its territory handed over to it by the UN and Britain. When challenged to produce the instrument by which the UN and Britain allegedly ceded the Southern Cameroons to it (a legal impossibility since neither the UN nor Britain were owners of the territory), Republique du Cameroun changed its story. It claimed that its occupation of the Southern Cameroons is by virtue of what it called “reunification on 1st October 1961 following the plebiscite vote on 11 February 1961”. But when it was pointed out that one cannot credibly talk of so-called ‘reunification’ when the Southern Cameroons was never, in the first place, a part of French Cameroun, and when at the plebiscite there was no such option as ‘reunification’ and there could not have been any, Republique du Cameroun then changed once more the basis of its hopeless claim. It then sought to found its claim on a brief and ill-defined German Kamerun entity and then proclaimed itself the state successor to that entity. But German Kamerun (parts of which are now legally within at least five different countries) lasted only some 25-odd years and was long since extinct. Besides, the political existence of Republique du Cameroun dates not from 1884 but from the inception of French colonial rule in 1916.
Further, it is both a legal and a factual impossibility for a country to succeed at independence not to the territory of the immediate predecessor state but to the territory long extinct of a remote predecessor state. Furthermore, the plebiscite itself was a complete refutation of the lie that the Southern Cameroons is a part of Republique du Cameroun. If the Southern Cameroons were a part of that country the plebiscite would have been redundant and the territory simply handed over to Republique du Cameroun like Ifni handed over to Morocco by Spain, Hong Kong to China by Britain and Walvis Bay to Namibia by South Africa. Claim to territory can never be founded on mere geographical contiguity or on a remote, superficial and ephemeral historical connection. That is why the claim of Spain to Gibraltar and the claim of Argentina to the Falkland Islands have never succeeded. The plebiscite in the Southern Cameroons was a clear and loud statement by the international community that the native inhabitants of the Southern Cameroons constitute a people and therefore have the inalienable and continuing right to self-determination.
Let the record be put straight. At the plebiscite the people of the Southern Cameroons voted first and foremost to achieve independence (the effective date of which was set by the UN to be 1st October 1961) and, as a secondary matter, to form a political association with Republique du Cameroun under certain terms and conditions. At the plebiscite there was therefore no such thing as a so-called ‘vote for reunification’. There could have been no such vote because there was no such alternative. Nor was there any so-called ‘reunification’ on 1st October 1961. That date was billed as the date on which UN trusteeship over the Southern Cameroons was to end, resulting in independence for the territory; it was also the date on which there was to come into existence an agreed federal form of political association between the Southern Cameroons state and Republique du Cameroun, duly underpinned by an Act of Union subscribed to by both parties.
But before that date Republique du Cameroun had illegally assumed jurisdiction over the Southern Cameroons by performing acts of sovereignty in the territory, while the British conspiratorially looked the other way. On 1st September 1961 Republique du Cameroun passed in its parliament an annexation law (in the form of a constitutional amendment law deceptively denoted as a ‘federal constitution’) by which it formally claimed the Southern Cameroons as part of its territory and asserted jurisdiction over it. In that same month Republique du Cameroun’s French-led troops marched into the Southern Cameroons and immediately announced their presence and demonstrated their trigger-happy nature by murdering six citizens in cold blood, again while the British looked the other way.
1st October 1961 witnessed the formal ending of UN trusteeship over the Southern Cameroons. But the independence which the people had voted for and whose effective date the UN had set for 1st October 1961 remains paper independence to this day because its enjoyment was immediately suppressed by Republique du Cameroun in two very significant ways. Republique du Cameroun sent its troops into the Southern Cameroons, with the result that it remains an occupied territory to this day. Then, after the British Commissioner of the Southern Cameroons departed on 1st October 1961 Republique du Cameroun immediately appointed one of its citizens to the Southern Cameroons as the new colonial governor, stepping into the shoes of the departed British Commissioner. The new and French-speaking colonial officer was euphemistically styled ‘inspecteur d’ administration’, a denomination later changed to that of ‘governeur de province/region’. Thus, the so-called ‘reunification’ much trumpeted by Republique du Cameroun is a mere myth and at best a Nazi-type ‘reunification’ of Alsace Lorraine and then Austria, with the Third Reich.
 
In the 1970s, believing it had achieved its colonial goal of a complete francophonisation of the people of the Southern Cameroons and total destruction of their identity, and in order to have unhindered access to the wealth and natural resources of the Southern Cameroons, Republique du Cameroun contrived to manufacture another ‘reunification’ which it called ‘unification’, a stage in its imperial agenda admitting of no diversity, no multiculturalism, no multi-nationalism, within its colonial set-up: the Southern Cameroons had to be completely extinguished, its people destroyed as a distinct and separate people and then sunk wholesale into the French world of Republique du Cameroun. But Republique du Cameroun did not reckon with the innate human yearning for freedom, the innate human nature and ability to resist oppression and domination, the innate individual and collective human instinct for survival, and the resilience of the people of the Southern Cameroons in the face of great national adversity and peril. (Anyangwe, )
Now that its colonial occupation of the Southern Cameroons has been thoroughly exposed Republique du Cameroun claims to have been able to find a new basis for its tragic colonial adventure in the Southern Cameroons. It now makes the dishonest and infantile claim that the ICJ ruling in the ‘Bakassi case’ confirms that the Southern Cameroons is part of the territory of Republique du Cameroun and that the ruling acknowledges Republique du Cameroun’s sovereignty over the Southern Cameroons. But this is more of wishful thinking than what the ICJ decided in that case. The ICJ could not have decided those points for the simple reason that those matters were never pleaded before the Court. It is elementary that a court of law does not adjudicate on matters not put before it and argued by the parties. Sovereignty over the Southern Cameroons and the boundaries of the Southern Cameroons were not issues before the Court. Therefore, the Court cannot possibly be taken to have decided those issues. In any event, the ICJ is not a territorial sovereign; it does not have territory with which to assuage the colonial cravings of expansionist states. In 1961 Republique du Cameroun had tried to lay the foundation for its expansionism by claiming in the Northern Cameroons case that it had an interest in a so-called “reunification of all the people of Cameroun.” Republique du Cameroun had already set its eyes on annexing the Southern Cameroons. Its next step was to grab the Northern Cameroons via the ICJ. Had it succeeded it would have moved on to lay claim to parts of Gabon, Congo, Central African Republic and Chad on the basis that the pieces of territory in question formed part of German Kamerun. Fortunately, the ICJ at the time quickly saw through this imperial agenda and non-suited Republique du Cameroun which promptly declared what turned out to be an ephemeral day of crocodile tears.
The evidence of annexation and colonial occupation of the Southern Cameroons is therefore overwhelming; and every citizen of the Southern Cameroons is a colonized being however much those co-opted into the administration of the colonialist (a typical French colonial practice) might pretend. But there is further evidence of colonialism which tallies with the findings of a study (2009) by the Middle East Project of the HSRC entitled ‘Occupation, Colonialism, Apartheid: A Re-assessment of Israel’s practices in the Occupied Palestinian Territories under International Law.’ “The terms of the Declaration on [the Granting of Independence to Colonial Peoples and Territories],’’ the study affirms, “indicate that a situation may be classified as colonial when the acts of a State have the cumulative outcome that it annexes or otherwise unlawfully retains control over territory and thus aims permanently to deny its indigenous population the exercise of its right to self-determination.”
First, the indigenous population of the Southern Cameroons have no control over their territory, the territorial integrity of which has been violated by Republique du Cameroun by the fact of occupation of the Southern Cameroons and the partitioning of the Southern Cameroons into provinces/regions tagged to contiguous Cameroun Republic areas. This violates the UN Declaration on the Granting of Independence.
Secondly, the people of the Southern Cameroons hitherto self-governing under British colonial rule have since been deprived of the capacity for self-governance. Republique du Cameroun exercises total civil and military administration of the Southern Cameroons through a hierarchy of Republique du Cameroun officials. Unlike under British colonial rule, there is now no Southern Cameroons parliament, no Southern Cameroons government, no Southern Cameroons judiciary, no Southern Cameroons administration, no Southern Cameroons public service, and no Southern Cameroons police service. Republique du Cameroun retains full and total control over the territory. The people of the Southern Cameroons cannot freely determine their political status. They cannot freely pursue their economic and social development according to the policy they should freely choose. They cannot exercise the right to their economic, social and cultural development. The enjoyment of the independence voted for at the plebiscite in 1961 has been suppressed by Republique du Cameroun, thereby violating the right of the people of the Southern Cameroons to self-determination. Republique du Cameroun is seeking permanently to deny the people of the Southern Cameroons the exercise of their inalienable and continuing right to self-determination.
Thirdly, whereas international law ordains that the territory and economy of a colonial territory must remain separate and distinct from that of the colonising power, Republique du Cameroun has completely subordinated and subsumed the territory and economy of the Southern Cameroons to its own, in fact fused the economy of the Southern Cameroons into its own so that structurally there is no longer any distinction between the two, with the result that the people of the Southern Cameroons have been totally deprived of the capacity to govern and order their economic affairs. Their right to economic self-determination has thus been suppressed.
Fourth, Republique du Cameroun is in breach of the principle of permanent sovereignty over natural resources in relation to the Southern Cameroons. The right of permanent sovereignty over natural resources entitles a people to freely dispose of their wealth and natural resources and in no case shall they be deprived of it. Oil, timber, gas, mineral and cash crop resources are taken from the Southern Cameroons for the exclusive development of Republique du Cameroun. The Southern Cameroons has changed little in the past 50 years: The existing few kilometres of tarred roads are the typical colonial ‘extractive routes’ meant to facilitate the evacuation of natural resources and food commodities from the Southern Cameroons to Republique du Cameroun. Most parts of the Southern Cameroons are unreachable throughout the year and head load over long distances is still very common. Water, electricity and health facilities remain rare amenities. Infrastructural development is virtually absent. The enjoyment of second, like first, generation human rights remain a pipe dream.
Fifthly, Republique du Cameroun has denied the people of the Southern Cameroons the right freely to express, develop and practice their culture. The practices of Republique du Cameroun privilege the French language, the French legal system, the French administrative system, the French educational system and the French-based cultural referents of Republique du Cameroun, while materially and purposefully hampering the Anglo-American-based cultural development and expression of the people of the Southern Cameroons.
Clearly, the implementation by Republique du Cameroun of its colonial policy has been systematic and comprehensive. The exercise by the people of the Southern Cameroons of their right to self-determination has been frustrated in all its principal modes of expression. Living in complete denial even in the face of compelling evidence, Republique du Cameroun argues lamely that Africa is now free and therefore the Southern Cameroons is not under colonial occupation. But that is like arguing that there is now no slavery in the world because slavery was abolished a long time ago. Colonialism is colour-blind. It is no less reprehensible because it is perpetrated by one of our kind. No one has ever argued that Americans and the Irish were never colonised by the British because they are all whites (and even with a substantial cultural and blood relations). German occupation of France was rejected as was Japanese occupation of China. 
Colonisation is slavery, a form of terrorism and a threat to international peace and security. Article 20 of the African Charter emphatically rejects it and the AU in the preamble to that Charter strongly denounces it. The existence of colonialism in any form or manifestation, including economic exploitation, is thus incompatible with the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights. It is also incompatible with the United Nations Charter, the United Nations Declaration on Decolonisation and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights is duty bound to affirm its support for the aspirations of the people of the Southern Cameroons, under Republique du Cameroun’s colonial rule, to exercise their right to self-determination, including independence. If there is any doubt about this aspiration let an independence referendum, internationally supervised and monitored, be held in the Southern Cameroons. That is an internationally recognised peaceful method of resolving an issue of this nature and for which there are many precedents.
Further to the Furthermore:
UNIFICATION’ and ‘RE-UNIFICATION
Prof Carlson Anyangwe provives even more etailed notes on the “unification” versus “reunification” issue in an interview with Abakwa Times.
Excerpt.
As I have said there was no reconstitution of extinct ‘Kamerun’ in 1961 or at any time after that date. It was and shall ever be infeasible for that to happen. The ‘reunification’ of ‘Kamerun’ would have entailed bringing together the Southern Cameroons, the Northern Cameroons (part of Nigeria since June 1961), Cameroun Republic, the Neue Kamerun (part of Gabon and Congo Brazzaville), and the Duckbill (part of Chad and Central African Republic). The projected political association of the Southern Cameroons and Cameroun Republic in 1961 cannot credibly be touted as reunification for the simple reason that the Southern Cameroons and Cameroun Republic never at any time formed a single political entity and then later became separated, in which case the projected political association could then have been accurately said to have been ‘reunification.’ It is futile trying to go back to the territory over which Germany proclaimed a protectorate in 1884. Let the record be put straight. There was no Kamerun nation in 1884 or at any time before or after that date. The area depicted in colonial maps as Kamerun at the time of Germany’s defeat in World War I was inhabited by a multitude of distinct and far flung tribal communities with hardly any connection or anything in common with each other. As of 1914 only in the coastal area was there any sense of the existence of Kamerun. What was claimed in 1884 was the Dwala (Douala) mud flat estuarine enclave. That was the territory, and none other, that the Duala chiefs handed over and could have handed over to the Germans. In 1884 the Ambas Bay coastal strip (Bimbia to Bakassi) and its hinterland was British and not part of the German Kamerun. Even when it was later ceded to Germany in 1887 it was quickly retaken by the British in August 1914 and became the British Cameroons. Germany’s original Douala estuary protectorate proclaimed in 1884 and subsequently extended inland went to France and it became French Cameroun. The idea that there was a Kamerun nation that was partitioned or dismembered following the defeat of Germany is an elephantine political falsehood peddled over the years to serve a hegemonic agenda.
There could not have been and there was no ‘reunification’ for the following additional reasons. At the plebiscite there was no such offer as ‘reunification’ as a choice. Such an offer would have been a complete negation of the international tutelage system and the United Nations Charter. Since there was no such choice there could not have been a vote for an inexistent alternative. Further, reunification would have made a complete nonsense of the plebiscite itself. If the Southern Cameroons was a part of Cameroun Republic the plebiscite would have been redundant and the territory simply returned to Cameroun Republic like Ifni to Morocco or Hong Kong to China. The indiscriminate and promiscuous use of the terms ‘unification’ and ‘reunification’ by some people is reflective of poverty of thought. Those who talk of ‘reunification’ seem unaware that even at Foumban the supposedly welcoming banner at the meeting room proclaimed, ‘Vive le Cameroun unifié’. The banner did not say, and could not have said, ‘Vive la République du Cameroun unifiée’, ‘Vive la République du Cameroun reunifiée’, ‘Vive le Cameroun reunifié, or ‘Vive le Kamerun unifié/reunifié’. Cameroun Republic’s Note Verbale of 24 December 1960 spoke of unification and not reunification.
Two or more countries can unify to form one country whether they had any previous historical connection or not with each other. Sometimes the word ‘united’ or ‘union’ is used to denote such unification as in United States of America, United Kingdom, Union of Socialist Soviet Republics, United Republic of Tanzania. Sometimes the new country takes a completely new name as in the case of the union of the Gold Coast and British Togoland which saw Ghana as the new name of the conjoint countries, or the union of British Somaliland and Italian Somaliland which took Somalia as the name of the new state, or again the union of Zanzibar and Tanganyika which gave rise to Tanzania. Sometimes also the names of the uniting countries are simply conjoined as in the case of the union of New Guinea and Papua where the new country took the name Papua New Guinea. So, conceivably there could have been a union or unification of the Southern Cameroons and Cameroun Republic resulting in a new name for the new state. Since two or more countries cannot unite informally, a union of the Southern Cameroons and Cameroun Republic would have resulted in a new state and a new name and would have been on clear terms set out in a union agreement subscribed by the two uniting countries. This did not happen. Contraptions such as ‘federal republic of Cameroon’ and ‘united republic of Cameroon’ despotically decreed into existence were not genuine legal and political expressions. They were strategies for effecting the annexation of the Southern Cameroons and to enable its people to adjust to the francophonity and the French world of Cameroun Republic. In the mindset of Cameroun Republic’s colonial-minded political leaders the term unification quickly metamorphosed within a matter of months into reunification. The shift was meant to soft-cushion and whitewash territorial expansion, annexation, and colonial occupation.
Cameroun Republic claims it simply recovered the Southern Cameroons as part of its territory returned to it by the UN, but it has been unable to say when and how it acquired the Southern Cameroons and when and how it lost the territory to the United Nations. Cameroun Republic chose to ignore international law. It conveniently forgets that in 1961 it made a similar claim in respect of the British Northern Cameroons but it was rejected in 1963 by the International Court of Justice in the Northern Cameroons case. Following the rejection of that claim Cameroun Republic declared the British Northern Cameroons its Alsace-Lorraine, promising to recover it. It then decreed 1st June an annual day of ‘mourning’ for what it claimed to be the loss of part of its territory. But one year afterwards no one ever heard again of Cameroun Republic’s Annual Day of National Mourning and of its thoroughly misplaced Alsace-Lorraine analogy.
When the President of the occupying State suddenly announces an impending journey to Buea, capital of the Southern Cameroons, to ‘celebrate’ an imaginary ‘reunification’, he is provocatively going to Buea to commemorate colonial occupation by staging a Roman-like ‘victory parade’. In this instance though there is no military victory for the Camerounese occupation forces to show. Cameroun Republic cannot show evidence of any conquest by bullet or even by pen. Going to Buea to ‘celebrate’ colonial occupation is adding insult to injury because the message that is being communicated is this: “I am here in Buea. Yes, you have been annexed. You can go and drink the sea.” As part of the preparation for that ‘celebration’ the ever scheming rulers of Cameroun Republic plotted to knock down the Schloss. The reason is that they cannot stand the powerful symbolism of Southern Cameroons statehood that the Schloss represents. It is the same strong power of the symbolism of the name Victoria that prompted them to purport to change it to ‘Limbe’ in the hope of wiping out a piece of our shining history. Now they must be devising ways by which to move Buea Mountain, Victoria sea front, and Bakassi to their territory. Well might they ever spend troubled nights! Geography too is on our side. It is the same geography that impelled the Germans to move the capital of their original Kamerun colonial territory from Douala to Buea in the territory they had just newly acquired.
The falsity that any such event as ‘reunification’ took place on 1 October 1961 can be seen in another respect. Before that date Cameroun Republic purported to exercise acts of sovereignty in the Southern Cameroons even while it was still a UN trust territory. And in October 1961 Cameroun Republic’s ‘Inspecteur Fédéral d’Administration’ simply stepped into the shoes of the run-away British Commissioner of the Southern Cameroons. The President of Cameroun Republic himself assumed the role and functions previous carried out by the UK Government in relation to the Southern Cameroons.
Ironically, the reunification rhetoric would seem to apply more to the proposition for joinder to Nigeria than to Cameroun Republic. The Southern Cameroons had 45 years of intense and fruitful and constitutional association with Nigeria. It was separated from Nigeria on 1 October 1960. So in 1961 the plebiscite alternative of joining Nigeria could well have been touted as reunification of the Nigerian polity. But that language was never used and even the joinder of the British Northern Cameroons to Nigeria was never and has never been presented as reunification.
Furthermost to the Furthermore: (idem)
Reunification.
No talk on ‘reunification’ of territories is meaningful unless there is clearly identified the territories that were once unified, separated and then re-unified. Germany which was unified by 1871 thanks to the labours of Bismarck, remained one country until the defeat of Hitler in 1945 when it was split in 1949 into two states, the Federal Republic of Germany and the German Democratic Republic. When the Berlin Wall came down in 1990 the two countries agreed to reconstitute a single Germany, underpinned by a treaty. The 1990 reconstitution of Germany was correctly presented as ‘reunification’. The same would be true if the two states of North Korea and South Korea were today to decide to reconstitute the single independent state of Korea that was forcibly annexed in 1910 by Japan as Chosun and which was split in 1948.
In the present case one cannot credibly talk of reunification of Kamerun, the German colonial territory that lasted less than thirty years. Five parts of that entity are now within the territory of five limitrophic states: Nigeria, Gabon, Congo-Brazzaville, Chad and Central African Republic. Reunification or even unification of Kamerun will require bringing together again all these various parts to form a single state, inclusive of the Southern Cameroons and Cameroun Republic. That has never been on the cards, is not and will never be. One cannot even begin to talk of reunification or even unification of Cameroun Republic. The existence of Cameroun Republic as a political expression goes back to French Cameroun which emerged in 1922 as a result of the political force represented by the mandates system. (It is noteworthy that from 1916 when Germany was defeated in Kamerun until the institution of the mandates system in 1922, France, still licking the wounds of its crushing defeat in 1870 by Prussia, held the Kamerun area under its occupation as enemy territory seized in war, the enemy being of course Germany). At independence Cameroun Republic inherited its territories from French Cameroun. The country has suffered no dismemberment. There are therefore no separated parts which are then being reconstituted. One cannot therefore speak of unification or reunification of Cameroun Republic.   The Southern Cameroons was not part of French Cameroun, has never been and will never be part of Cameroun Republic. The plebiscite vote on 11 February 1961 for independence, and political association with Cameroun Republic in a federation of two states, equal in status cannot therefore be presented as a vote for ‘reunification’ whether of Cameroun Republic or of Kamerun, a name that has never had currency in Cameroun Republic, and an entity long extinct. At the plebiscite on 11 February 1961 there was no such political status option available as ‘reunification’. There could therefore have been no vote for an option that was not available.
Politicians did sometimes use the term ‘reunification’. But our politicians are not known for always using apposite terminology. Besides, the fact that the term was used does not make such use legally, historically and etymologically correct. There has been no such thing as ‘reunification’ of the Southern Cameroons and Republic of Cameroun. Even at Foumban, the banner on display spoke of ‘unification’ and not of ‘reunification’. Some argue that the terms ‘reunification’ and ‘unification’ mean one and the same thing in Cameroon historiography. Historiography is writing about history rather than of history, a meta-level analysis of descriptions of the past. If that is the case writers of our history who persevere in the use of unification and reunification as interchangeable terminologies lay themselves open to a charge of poverty of thought and conceptualization regarding the event they analyse. The truth of the matter is that Republic of Cameroun’s addictive use of ‘reunification’ is meant to camouflage the fact of its colonial occupation of the Southern Cameroons and to condition the people of the territory to acquiesce in that colonialism. In the watery mouth of the slippery rulers of Cameroun Republic ‘reunification’ has changing meaning depending on time, place and audience. According to Cameroun Republic officialdom, that country achieved ‘independence’ on 1 January 1960 and then ‘reunification’ on 1 October 1961. It then proceeded to achieve ‘total national unity’ on 20 May 1972 and ‘completion of total national unity’ on 4 February 1984. It valiantly moved on to achieve ‘completion of complete national unity’ following the promulgation of the 1996 constitution, and ‘the apotheosis of national unity’ since then. The voyage to Buea of the President of Cameroun Republic would then be the ‘super apotheosis of national unity’. This is an impressive Alice-in-Wonderland gobbledegook! The appropriation of ‘unification’ or ‘reunification’ by Cameroun Republic is a self-serving highly instrumental strategy. It has always been an attempt by that country to legitimize its colonial occupation, rule and exploitation in the Southern Cameroons. All Southern Cameroons anti-colonial forces are determined to delegitimize that rhetoric and narrative.
Southern Cameroons plus Cameroun Republic cannot be equal to Cameroun Republic. That would be annexation, not reunification. Cameroun Republic knows this only too well. So right from the beginning it contrived to make its annexation and colonial occupation of the Southern Cameroons somehow palatable to swallow. It uses reunification as a polysemous expression to camouflage annexation. It has been aided in this cheap language ploy by the polysemous name ‘Cameroon’. There cannot be reunification of two political entities resulting in the existence of only one of the two reuniting entities. In other words, to say that the Southern Cameroons + Cameroun Republic = Cameroun Republic is a mathematical nonsense and is possible only if the Southern Cameroons = zero, which is not and cannot be the case. The equation: the Southern Cameroons + Cameroun Republic = Cameroun Republic signifies in political terms that the Southern Cameroons has been absorbed, annexed, colonized by Cameroun Republic. This is the conclusion arrived at by every single serious writer whether jurist, politician or social scientist who has applied their mind to the Southern Cameroons tragedy.[1] 
Further to the Furthermost: (idem)
Uti possidetis Juris
This is in fact what I say in that publication: Successful self-determination claims since the end of European colonization constitute evidence of state practice borne out of the conviction that contemporary human rights law recognizes self-determination as a continuing right that is not necessarily inconsistent with the principles of uti possidetis and respect for territorial integrity. The right to self-determination, which now has the character of jus cogens, is not only a procedural right available in the process of decolonization and by which the inhabitants of a colonial territory freely decide their political status. It is also a substantive human right, the right of all peoples to self-rule or sovereign statehood and, like all human rights it is inherent, continuing, unquestionable and inalienable. It may be invoked by a people subjected to circumstances such as domination, oppression, genocide, colonization, and other gross human rights abuses, and is available even in the context of a decolonized country.
The well-established principle of territorial integrity protects the geographical space that legally belongs to a state and is secured by a series of consequential rules, namely, rules prohibiting interference within the domestic jurisdiction of a state, rules forbidding the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity and political independence of states, rules imposing respect for borders as they were on the date of independence, and the rule of obligatory non-recognition of territorial changes brought about in breach of international law. The principle serves two basic purposes. It gives legal protection to the legitimate territorial configuration of a state, and so necessarily frowns on secession and annexation/occupation. It confines the exercise of territorial sovereignty to the spatial area that lawfully belongs to the state and, by necessary implication, forbids territorial expansion or other forms of imperialism.
The principle of uti possidetis (literally translated to: ‘as you possess, you shall continue to possess’) ordains that a state shall continue to possess the same amount of territory it possessed as of a particular critical date which, for de-colonized states, is the date of independence. This principle sanctifies succession to colonial boundaries as they stood on the date of independence by the successor state. Frontiers do not disappear when decolonization or state succession takes place. Nascent states may not therefore change the colonially-inherited territorial status quo by extending their boundaries.
In 1964, African leaders adopted a resolution on Border Disputes among African States by which they pledged “to respect the borders existing on their achievement of national independence.” This principle is reiterated in Article 4 b of the Constitutive Act of the African Union and also in the Protocol Relating to the Establishment of the Peace and Security Council of the African Union. Arguably, the principle has now crystallized into, and acquired the status of, a rule of African regional customary international law and is therefore binding on African states. Like the principle of territorial integrity, uti possidetis is meant to prevent irredentist claims and expansionism.
Further, further to the furthermost:


[1] Professor Carlson Anyangwe. Interview with Abakwatimes in 2012
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Col 3:4 When Christ, who is our life, shall appear, then shall ye also appear with him in glory. Christ appears in your life right here, right now: one nanosecond after you believe and confess that Jesus is Lord.
https://www.facebook.com/CAYMCameroon


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ambasbay" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ambasbay+u...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--





The thing always happens that you really believe in; and the belief in a thing makes it happen.



--





The thing always happens that you really believe in; and the belief in a thing makes it happen.



--





The thing always happens that you really believe in; and the belief in a thing makes it happen.
__._,_.___

Posted by: Ofege Ntemfac <ntemfac...@gmail.com>

Have you tried the highest rated email app?
With 4.5 stars in iTunes, the Yahoo Mail app is the highest rated email app on the market. What are you waiting for? Now you can access all your inboxes (Gmail, Outlook, AOL and more) in one place. Never delete an email again with 1000GB of free cloud storage.


.

__,_._,___


Ofege Ntemfac

unread,
May 31, 2016, 12:41:07 PM5/31/16
to cameroons...@yahoogroups.com, cameroon...@yahoogroups.com, globalc...@yahoogroups.com, ambasbay, shesausa, Southern Cameroon, Big group, africanworldforum, FREE AMBAZONIANS, camne...@yahoogroups.com
 Your point being?????
Look, colonialism happened.
Whether we like it or not.... colonialism created its own realities which realities we are.
That is the real world being dealt with in here not some nonconcrete from Scifi and the Intergalactic.
Must we now allow a type of neocolonialism (concolonialism) to take its course because ancient day colonial rule followed a pattern which pattern was regimented by the questions you ask?
I refuse to be colonized: You should do same.
By the way, do you know some German colonized around and about who manifest the traits of the Hun?
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Col 3:4 When Christ, who is our life, shall appear, then shall ye also appear with him in glory. Christ appears in your life right here, right now: one nanosecond after you believe and confess that Jesus is Lord.
https://www.facebook.com/CAYMCameroon


On Tuesday, May 31, 2016 9:07 AM, "Herbert Boh herbe...@yahoo.com [cameroons_sdf_party]" <cameroons...@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 
Is it not endorsing the colonial establishment when one uses the argument that the Berlin Conference sanctioned what must apply?

How did the signing of a letter by Douala Chiefs, basically begging Germany to annex/colonize Douala automatically mean that the Chiefs of other kingdoms (Bimbia, for example, in Ambazonia) no longer had a right to do their own thing? 

Was Bimbia ruled from Douala and by Douala Chiefs for Douala Chiefs to be considered to have had the final say by signing a letter?

Is it not clear from the ferocious resistance to Germany out up by other Chiefs that the deal with the Douala Chiefs applied only to them and Douala until everyone got enslaved by the Germans?

Ntumfoyn Boh Herbert



Sent from my iPhone

On May 31, 2016, at 9:47 AM, Janvier Tchouteu j_kam...@yahoo.com [cameroon_politics] <cameroon...@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 
Massa Ofege,

I remember I told you several years ago that history is not Prof. Carlson Anyangwe's forte and clearly outlined the historical development of Kamerun(German Kamerun) that debunked his hallucinations that you are peddling again today.  Confusing the younger generation who have been brainwashed in school by the system with further distortions of their history, while calling yourself an advocate for change  and a fighter against the system or establishment  could be considered  a further act of betrayal of the far-reaching goals of the struggle for the New Cameroon and New Africa.

Once again, British presence was on part of what is today Victoria, and that presence was not officially sanctioned by the imperial office. The official attempt by Hewitt to do so  failed because he arrived too late after the Duala Chiefs had signed in with the Germans, a move that the Berlin conference on Africa confirmed months later.

I look forward to the day when  your admired activism would be  geared towards a purposeful and brutally honest cause that would advance the well-being of Cameroonians, Africans and humanity as a whole.

All the best,

Janvier Tchouteu
__._,_.___

Posted by: Herbert Boh <herbe...@yahoo.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (3)

Have you tried the highest rated email app?
With 4.5 stars in iTunes, the Yahoo Mail app is the highest rated email app on the market. What are you waiting for? Now you can access all your inboxes (Gmail, Outlook, AOL and more) in one place. Never delete an email again with 1000GB of free cloud storage.


.

__,_._,___


Ofege Ntemfac

unread,
May 31, 2016, 1:25:22 PM5/31/16
to cameroons...@yahoogroups.com, cameroon...@yahoogroups.com, globalc...@yahoogroups.com, ambasbay, shesausa, Southern Cameroon, Big group, africanworldforum, FREE AMBAZONIANS, camne...@yahoogroups.com
Furthermore:
With great foresight into what could happen when individuals and groups attempt to vindicate lurking vicious ambitions bounden on land grab and the desire to colonize others the Might AU crafted some powerful words into its Charter about the inviolability of boundaries resulting from Colonial Rule.
Or boundaries FROZEN at independence.
The rest is history or, should I say, academic?
Article 4.b. of the Constitutive Act of the African Union on “the respect of borders existing on achievement of independence”.
LRC achieved independence on 1 January 1960 (without the Southern Cameroons  ); Nigeria achieved independence on 1 October 1960 (without the British Northern Cameroons).
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Col 3:4 When Christ, who is our life, shall appear, then shall ye also appear with him in glory. Christ appears in your life right here, right now: one nanosecond after you believe and confess that Jesus is Lord.
https://www.facebook.com/CAYMCameroon


__._,_.___

Posted by: Ofege Ntemfac <ntemfa...@yahoo.com>

Have you tried the highest rated email app?
With 4.5 stars in iTunes, the Yahoo Mail app is the highest rated email app on the market. What are you waiting for? Now you can access all your inboxes (Gmail, Outlook, AOL and more) in one place. Never delete an email again with 1000GB of free cloud storage.


.

__,_._,___


Tchouteu Janvier

unread,
May 31, 2016, 1:34:56 PM5/31/16
to cameroon...@yahoogroups.com, cameroons...@yahoogroups.com, globalc...@yahoogroups.com, ambasbay, shesausa, Southern Cameroon, Big group, africanworldforum, FREE AMBAZONIANS, camne...@yahoogroups.com
I consider all the different African peoples who resisted colonialism as heroes for fighting for the "African honor". It doesn't matter if those they picked up arms against were British, French, German, Spanish, Italian etc, since these foreign powers were engaged in a pacification process that had racist, imperialistic, self-centred and oppressive underlining.

While certainly not endorsing colonialism, I cannot ignore the fact that history and many other aspects of life have a starting point; and if we have to talk about Kamerun, Cameroons, Cameroon, Cameroun, the starting point is the elastic deal the Douala chiefs made with the Germans that gave them rights to the interior, hinterlands that they dis not control. But that is how it happened throughout Africa. Lobengula of the Ndembeles gave Cecil Rhodes limited mining rights and the next thing he knew, they took over his country and extend control to the Shonas who were his vassal, and today, we have Zimbabwe from that deception.

Yes, the imperialists deceived us and agreed among themselves how to manage their collective deception. Should we reverse that or forge a new reality that  mitigates that painful past? I am for the latter. Perhaps these two excerpts from a work written from 1988 to early 1990, before multi-party politics in Cameroon.

Excerpts of the book "Disciples of Fortune" had these among others on the subject;;

"The aging king pondered the depressing news for days without coming to a satisfactory plan of his own. He too was aware of the fate suffered by grassland kings taken to the South, a place heavily infested with mosquitoes and known to be too receptive to alien values. He could not understand why the indigenes at The Coast accepted foreign rule over themselves and those in the interior without even consulting rulers like him. Nobody, not even the king’s youngest wife could convince him not to see a threat in the news.
King Tchatchoua knew he had to look brave as he assembled his warriors the next day and told them the challenging news. In a dramatic manner that was the true reflection of the king’s personality, he let his warriors know that white men had defeated and degraded some of their brothers in the land of raffia-wine boozers, using batons that spat fire and invincible arrows that could not be pulled out. He explained to them that the brave and peace-loving Banganté people whose noblesse, dignity and elegance had never been trampled upon, could become the next target for the conquering white men."


...........


“What actions do you have in mind? That is not even the point. What you have in mind is comparable to a die that is about to be cast. Nobody knows the side that is likely to turn up. You don’t need me to point out to you that Kamerun would cease to exist as a single territory if we fail. Yes, my dear brother. It would cease to be the one and united Kamerun we dream of making prosperous. You have to take into account the French, British and Belgians you consider as allies. It is obvious they would become the grabbers of the spoil that would be Kamerun. Perhaps the Portuguese and the Spaniards too would also want a share if they give us a helping hand in defeating the Germans.”
“Ludicrous!”
“Samba, my friend! There is nothing ludicrous about my line of thinking. Do not be blinded by the values they espouse and the interests they want to gain. Getting rid of the Germans in the manner you just described would be like hoping to kill a tiger to replace it with a panther, a puma, a jaguar, and even a lion cub. We know that the tiger is more dangerous than any of the four, but let’s not forget the obvious fact that the four put together have the potential to wrought more damage than the lone tiger.”
“I don’t think any of those powers intend to replace the Huns here in Kamerun after we send them away.”
Nana Njike shook his head no. “What would their interest be if they help us get rid of their white brothers and become independent, when it is so obvious that a Kamerun free of European colonial rule would serve as an example to other Africans under their rule?”
“They hate the Germans too.”
“You are a soldier, my friend,” Nana Njike said somberly, “I don’t want to believe that you are focusing only on the causes of the problems. We should also envisage a course to take to get rid of the problems in a befitting manner. I want you to think of the likely repercussions. Any progressive people should take into account the likelihood that a remedy might turn out badly. That’s what we should fear the most. An effort to change things around us shouldn’t bring disintegration with it.”
“What if Germany’s European enemies don’t get directly involved?” Samba asked
Nana Njike shook his head with rue. “Ah my brother, it would be disastrous for you to move against the Germans alone, especially with the limited force you are having. You should always consider the price to pay to achieve the objectives of the cause. The outcome should always outweigh the sacrifices.”
“There is a way. It is difficult for you to see it because you are not a soldier,” Samba said desperately.
“Let’s try not to be emotional about this,” Nana Njike retorted in a slightly irritated voice. “I expect us to be rational here. And don’t forget I grew up in the hands of one of Germany’s great solders in Kamerun. He would never go for the move you are about to make. It is suicidal.”
“Suicidal?” Samba asked, sounding incredulous.
“Okay! Let’s consider this probability. What if we become victorious after a war with Germany, a war against their colonial army in Kamerun, that is, without considering the reinforcement factor? We know that Kamerun holds a strategic position when it comes to German interests in Africa. We also know that the Germans are also a warrior people with a deep and unwavering pride. You don’t believe Germany would accept defeat in Kamerun when it has its military might intact, do you?”
“You may be unaware of the rising political and military tempo in Europe. The Kaiser wouldn’t bother to dwell on a minor setback in Kamerun if Germany has better interests to safeguard in Europe.”
Nana Njike shrugged. His inability to make his point to Samba was beginning to infuriate him. “Okay, let’s finalize everything with a terminal victory for us. Then Kamerun would become a liberated land, a splendid achievement, I would say. Let’s be honest with ourselves. The Germans have done a commendable job during the past thirty years by bringing our diverse peoples together. Still, I don’t see it as a complete success. We are yet to arrive at a workable unity, my dear friend. That’s why I think the Kamerunian people still need to work out an understanding under the Germans. We should create instruments of inter-dependence between our diverse peoples until the appropriate time for self-rule. That’s something I foresee as achievable in the next  thirty years. The Germans are our enemy and master. Still, we need them, if only to keep our Kamerun together.”
“I don’t foresee a split if we go ahead with my game plan,” Samba insisted.
“Forces of disintegration are difficult stop when already set in motion,” Nana Njike said with a nod, “We have about three hundred different ethnic groups or tribes within our borders, with different cultures, dialects and even religions. Let’s not forget the history of animosity between these diverse people. We equally shouldn’t be blind to the rising problem of the Christian South and the Muslim North. One likely and inevitable outcome would be a split between the North and the South.”
“You are overreacting to your fears. We need to bury our trepidations if we want our land to be free,” Samba half-screamed.
“Fear?” Nana Njike asked quietly.
Herr Njike! I want you to know that the northerners and southerners have been showing some degree of cooperation of late,” Samba pointed out with a note of desperation in his voice.
“Ah, my brother! Maybe you missed something. I am concerned about the issue of leadership, that’s all.”
“I am glad you are not afraid.”
“Wouldn’t you agree with me on the fact that the religious leaders and traditional rulers in the North are not keen on relinquishing some of their powers to a national leadership that comes from the South, especially at this early stage when most of our people are yet to identify themselves as Kamerunians? I don’t have to tell you that the religious leaders over there are yet to come to terms with the fact that some southerners now believe in a single god they also share.”
“That’s insightful,” Samba offered.
“Thanks! My observation about this might be wrong. Hmm! Don’t you think many of them view Christianity as a strange religion that white men are imposing on our people? They actually think it is against their interest in this land. Now, the blind subservience of their subjects is another factor we cannot afford to ignore. We need to take that into consideration too, you know.”
“I am listening,” Samba said.
“Most of the common folks in the North are deeply loyal to their religious leaders and traditional rulers. Even the Germans recognize that aspect in their rule in the North, you know. Let’s talk about the South. People may be tempted to look at the South as a single or united entity. But you and I know that it is not the case. Unless we put together a carefully webbed structure and have it in place very soon, we risk a return to the old system of control that sees authority limited to the fringes of our villages. That would spell the end of the coalescence system the Germans have so far managed to create. Chaos, chaos of unthinkable proportions is the likely scenario in those cosmopolitan areas where the indigenous populations never really accepted the newcomers. We can’t rule out clashes as the indigenes try to impose the old rules against the wish of the majority of the population. That would delegitimize the status of equality for the settler populations.”
“Kamerun wouldn’t return to the old traditional values or way of doing things. The old ways are an anachronism to the New Kamerun I have in mind. At least, our progressive minds will enable us come up with a workable compromise that would take into account the interests of all. You and I need to get our people on board, that’s all.”
“What is the time frame? What is the national idea?”
Herr Njike, our pressing problem at the moment is this: How do we put our forces together and evict the Germans from our Kamerun? Your influence in the West is crucial. I don’t see how we can succeed in this affair without your involvement,” Samba pleaded.


On Tuesday, May 31, 2016 12:07 PM, "Herbert Boh herbe...@yahoo.com [cameroon_politics]" <cameroon...@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


Is it not endorsing the colonial establishment when one uses the argument that the Berlin Conference sanctioned what must apply?

How did the signing of a letter by Douala Chiefs, basically begging Germany to annex/colonize Douala automatically mean that the Chiefs of other kingdoms (Bimbia, for example, in Ambazonia) no longer had a right to do their own thing? 

Was Bimbia ruled from Douala and by Douala Chiefs for Douala Chiefs to be considered to have had the final say by signing a letter?

Is it not clear from the ferocious resistance to Germany out up by other Chiefs that the deal with the Douala Chiefs applied only to them and Douala until everyone got enslaved by the Germans?

Ntumfoyn Boh Herbert



Sent from my iPhone
On May 31, 2016, at 9:47 AM, Janvier Tchouteu j_kam...@yahoo.com [cameroon_politics] <cameroon...@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Massa Ofege,

I remember I told you several years ago that history is not Prof. Carlson Anyangwe's forte and clearly outlined the historical development of Kamerun(German Kamerun) that debunked his hallucinations that you are peddling again today.  Confusing the younger generation who have been brainwashed in school by the system with further distortions of their history, while calling yourself an advocate for change  and a fighter against the system or establishment  could be considered  a further act of betrayal of the far-reaching goals of the struggle for the New Cameroon and New Africa.

Once again, British presence was on part of what is today Victoria, and that presence was not officially sanctioned by the imperial office. The official attempt by Hewitt to do so  failed because he arrived too late after the Duala Chiefs had signed in with the Germans, a move that the Berlin conference on Africa confirmed months later.

I look forward to the day when  your admired activism would be  geared towards a purposeful and brutally honest cause that would advance the well-being of Cameroonians, Africans and humanity as a whole.

All the best,

Janvier Tchouteu


On Tuesday, May 31, 2016 8:35 AM, "Ofege Ntemfac ntemfa...@YAHOO.COM [cameroons_sdf_party]" <cameroons...@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


__._,_.___

Posted by: Herbert Boh <herbe...@yahoo.com>

Have you tried the highest rated email app?
With 4.5 stars in iTunes, the Yahoo Mail app is the highest rated email app on the market. What are you waiting for? Now you can access all your inboxes (Gmail, Outlook, AOL and more) in one place. Never delete an email again with 1000GB of free cloud storage.

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cameroon_politics/

.

__,_._,___


Tchouteu Janvier

unread,
May 31, 2016, 2:07:01 PM5/31/16
to camne...@yahoogroups.com, cameroon...@yahoogroups.com, cameroons...@yahoogroups.com, globalc...@yahoogroups.com, ambasbay, shesausa, Southern Cameroon, Big group, africanworldforum, FREE AMBAZONIANS
I consider all the different African peoples who resisted colonialism as heroes for fighting for the "African honor". It doesn't matter if those they picked up arms against were British, French, German, Spanish, Italian etc, since these foreign powers were engaged in a pacification process that had racist, imperialistic, self-centred and oppressive underlining.

While certainly not endorsing colonialism, I cannot ignore the fact that history and many other aspects of life have a starting point; and if we have to talk about Kamerun, Cameroons, Cameroon, Cameroun, the starting point is the elastic deal the Douala chiefs made with the Germans that gave this European power rights to the interior, hinterlands that they the Duala Chiefs did not control. But that is how it happened throughout Africa. Lobengula of the Ndembeles gave Cecil Rhodes limited mining rights and the next thing he knew, they had taken over his country and extended control to the Shonas who were his vassal; and today, we have Zimbabwe from that deception.

Yes, the imperialists deceived us and agreed among themselves how to manage their collective deception. Should we reverse that or forge a new reality that  mitigates that painful past? I am for the latter. Perhaps these two excerpts from a work written from 1988 to early 1990, before multi-party politics in Cameroon, may throw more light into that line of thinking.

Excerpts of the book "Disciples of Fortune" had these among others on the subject;;

"The aging king pondered the depressing news for days without coming to a satisfactory plan of his own. He too was aware of the fate suffered by grassland kings taken to the South, a place heavily infested with mosquitoes and known to be too receptive to alien values. He could not understand why the indigenes at The Coast accepted foreign rule over themselves and those in the interior without even consulting rulers like him. Nobody, not even the king’s youngest wife could convince him not to see a threat in the news.
King Tchatchoua knew he had to look brave as he assembled his warriors the next day and told them the challenging news. In a dramatic manner that was the true reflection of the king’s personality, he let his warriors know that white men had defeated and degraded some of their brothers in the land of raffia-wine boozers, using batons that spat fire and invincible arrows that could not be pulled out. He explained to them that the brave and peace-loving Banganté people whose noblesse, dignity and elegance had never been trampled upon, could become the next target for the conquering white men."


...........


“What actions do you have in mind? That is not even the point. What you have in mind is comparable to a die that is about to be cast. Nobody knows the side that is likely to turn up. You don’t need me to point out to you that Kamerun would cease to exist as a single territory if we fail. Yes, my dear brother. It would cease to be the one and united Kamerun we dream of making prosperous. You have to take into account the French, British and Belgians you consider as allies. It is obvious they would become the grabbers of the spoil that would be Kamerun. Perhaps the Portuguese and the Spaniards too would also want a share if they give us a helping hand in defeating the Germans.”
“Ludicrous!”
“Samba, my friend! There is nothing ludicrous about my line of thinking. Do not be blinded by the values they espouse and the interests they want to gain. Getting rid of the Germans in the manner you just described would be like hoping to kill a tiger to replace it with a panther, a puma, a jaguar, and even a lion cub. We know that the tiger is more dangerous than any of the four, but let’s not forget the obvious fact that the four put together have the potential to wrought more damage than the lone tiger.”
“I don’t think any of those powers intend to replace the Huns here in Kamerun after we send them away.”
Nana Njike shook his head no. “What would their interest be if they help us get rid of their white brothers and become independent, when it is so obvious that a Kamerun free of European colonial rule would serve as an example to other Africans under their rule?”
“They hate the Germans too.”
“You are a soldier, my friend,” Nana Njike said somberly, “I don’t want to believe that you are focusing only on the causes of the problems. We should also envisage a course to take to get rid of the problems in a befitting manner. I want you to think of the likely repercussions. Any progressive people should take into account the likelihood that a remedy might turn out badly. That’s what we should fear the most. An effort to change things around us shouldn’t bring disintegration with it.”
“What if Germany ’s European enemies don’t get directly involved?” Samba asked
Nana Njike shook his head with rue. “Ah my brother, it would be disastrous for you to move against the Germans alone, especially with the limited force you are having. You should always consider the price to pay to achieve the objectives of the cause. The outcome should always outweigh the sacrifices.”
“There is a way. It is difficult for you to see it because you are not a soldier,” Samba said desperately.
“Let’s try not to be emotional about this,” Nana Njike retorted in a slightly irritated voice. “I expect us to be rational here. And don’t forget I grew up in the hands of one of Germany ’s great solders in Kamerun. He would never go for the move you are about to make. It is suicidal.”
“Suicidal?” Samba asked, sounding incredulous.
“Okay! Let’s consider this probability. What if we become victorious after a war with Germany , a war against their colonial army in Kamerun, that is, without considering the reinforcement factor? We know that Kamerun holds a strategic position when it comes to German interests in Africa . We also know that the Germans are also a warrior people with a deep and unwavering pride. You don’t believe Germany would accept defeat in Kamerun when it has its military might intact, do you?”
“You may be unaware of the rising political and military tempo in Europe . The Kaiser wouldn’t bother to dwell on a minor setback in Kamerun if Germany has better interests to safeguard in Europe .”
Nana Njike shrugged. His inability to make his point to Samba was beginning to infuriate him. “Okay, let’s finalize everything with a terminal victory for us. Then Kamerun would become a liberated land, a splendid achievement, I would say. Let’s be honest with ourselves. The Germans have done a commendable job during the past thirty years by bringing our diverse peoples together. Still, I don’t see it as a complete success. We are yet to arrive at a workable unity, my dear friend. That’s why I think the Kamerunian people still need to work out an understanding under the Germans. We should create instruments of inter-dependence between our diverse peoples until the appropriate time for self-rule. That’s something I foresee as achievable in the next  thirty years. The Germans are our enemy and master. Still, we need them, if only to keep our Kamerun together.”
“I don’t foresee a split if we go ahead with my game plan,” Samba insisted.
“Forces of disintegration are difficult stop when already set in motion,” Nana Njike said with a nod, “We have about three hundred different ethnic groups or tribes within our borders, with different cultures, dialects and even religions. Let’s not forget the history of animosity between these diverse people. We equally shouldn’t be blind to the rising problem of the Christian South and the Muslim North. One likely and inevitable outcome would be a split between the North and the South.”
“You are overreacting to your fears. We need to bury our trepidations if we want our land to be free,” Samba half-screamed.
“Fear?” Nana Njike asked quietly.
Herr Njike! I want you to know that the northerners and southerners have been showing some degree of cooperation of late,” Samba pointed out with a note of desperation in his voice.
“Ah, my brother! Maybe you missed something. I am concerned about the issue of leadership, that’s all.”
“I am glad you are not afraid.”
“Wouldn’t you agree with me on the fact that the religious leaders and traditional rulers in the North are not keen on relinquishing some of their powers to a national leadership that comes from the South, especially at this early stage when most of our people are yet to identify themselves as Kamerunians? I don’t have to tell you that the religious leaders over there are yet to come to terms with the fact that some southerners now believe in a single god they also share.”
“That’s insightful,” Samba offered.
“Thanks! My observation about this might be wrong. Hmm! Don’t you think many of them view Christianity as a strange religion that white men are imposing on our people? They actually think it is against their interest in this land. Now, the blind subservience of their subjects is another factor we cannot afford to ignore. We need to take that into consideration too, you know.”
“I am listening,” Samba said.
“Most of the common folks in the North are deeply loyal to their religious leaders and traditional rulers. Even the Germans recognize that aspect in their rule in the North, you know. Let’s talk about the South. People may be tempted to look at the South as a single or united entity. But you and I know that it is not the case. Unless we put together a carefully webbed structure and have it in place very soon, we risk a return to the old system of control that sees authority limited to the fringes of our villages. That would spell the end of the coalescence system the Germans have so far managed to create. Chaos, chaos of unthinkable proportions is the likely scenario in those cosmopolitan areas where the indigenous populations never really accepted the newcomers. We can’t rule out clashes as the indigenes try to impose the old rules against the wish of the majority of the population. That would delegitimize the status of equality for the settler populations.”
“Kamerun wouldn’t return to the old traditional values or way of doing things. The old ways are an anachronism to the New Kamerun I have in mind. At least, our progressive minds will enable us come up with a workable compromise that would take into account the interests of all. You and I need to get our people on board, that’s all.”
“What is the time frame? What is the national idea?”
Herr Njike, our pressing problem at the moment is this: How do we put our forces together and evict the Germans from our Kamerun? Your influence in the West is crucial. I don’t see how we can succeed in this affair without your involvement,” Samba pleaded.



On Tuesday, May 31, 2016 1:30 PM, "Tchouteu Janvier j_ka...@yahoo.com [camnetwork]" <camne...@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


I consider all the different African peoples who resisted colonialism as heroes for fighting for the "African honor". It doesn't matter if those they picked up arms against were British, French, German, Spanish, Italian etc, since these foreign powers were engaged in a pacification process that had racist, imperialistic, self-centred and oppressive underlining.

While certainly not endorsing colonialism, I cannot ignore the fact that history and many other aspects of life have a starting point; and if we have to talk about Kamerun, Cameroons, Cameroon, Cameroun, the starting point is the elastic deal the Douala chiefs made with the Germans that gave them rights to the interior, hinterlands that they dis not control. But that is how it happened throughout Africa. Lobengula of the Ndembeles gave Cecil Rhodes limited mining rights and the next thing he knew, they took over his country and extend control to the Shonas who were his vassal, and today, we have Zimbabwe from that deception.

Yes, the imperialists deceived us and agreed among themselves how to manage their collective deception. Should we reverse that or forge a new reality that  mitigates that painful past? I am for the latter. Perhaps these two excerpts from a work written from 1988 to early 1990, before multi-party politics in Cameroon.

Excerpts of the book "Disciples of Fortune" had these among others on the subject;;

"The aging king pondered the depressing news for days without coming to a satisfactory plan of his own. He too was aware of the fate suffered by grassland kings taken to the South, a place heavily infested with mosquitoes and known to be too receptive to alien values. He could not understand why the indigenes at The Coast accepted foreign rule over themselves and those in the interior without even consulting rulers like him. Nobody, not even the king’s youngest wife could convince him not to see a threat in the news.
King Tchatchoua knew he had to look brave as he assembled his warriors the next day and told them the challenging news. In a dramatic manner that was the true reflection of the king’s personality, he let his warriors know that white men had defeated and degraded some of their brothers in the land of raffia-wine boozers, using batons that spat fire and invincible arrows that could not be pulled out. He explained to them that the brave and peace-loving Banganté people whose noblesse, dignity and elegance had never been trampled upon, could become the next target for the conquering white men."


...........


“What actions do you have in mind? That is not even the point. What you have in mind is comparable to a die that is about to be cast. Nobody knows the side that is likely to turn up. You don’t need me to point out to you that Kamerun would cease to exist as a single territory if we fail. Yes, my dear brother. It would cease to be the one and united Kamerun we dream of making prosperous. You have to take into account the French, British and Belgians you consider as allies. It is obvious they would become the grabbers of the spoil that would be Kamerun. Perhaps the Portuguese and the Spaniards too would also want a share if they give us a helping hand in defeating the Germans.”
“Ludicrous!”
“Samba, my friend! There is nothing ludicrous about my line of thinking. Do not be blinded by the values they espouse and the interests they want to gain. Getting rid of the Germans in the manner you just described would be like hoping to kill a tiger to replace it with a panther, a puma, a jaguar, and even a lion cub. We know that the tiger is more dangerous than any of the four, but let’s not forget the obvious fact that the four put together have the potential to wrought more damage than the lone tiger.”
“I don’t think any of those powers intend to replace the Huns here in Kamerun after we send them away.”
Nana Njike shook his head no. “What would their interest be if they help us get rid of their white brothers and become independent, when it is so obvious that a Kamerun free of European colonial rule would serve as an example to other Africans under their rule?”
“They hate the Germans too.”
“You are a soldier, my friend,” Nana Njike said somberly, “I don’t want to believe that you are focusing only on the causes of the problems. We should also envisage a course to take to get rid of the problems in a befitting manner. I want you to think of the likely repercussions. Any progressive people should take into account the likelihood that a remedy might turn out badly. That’s what we should fear the most. An effort to change things around us shouldn’t bring disintegration with it.”
“What if Germany ’s European enemies don’t get directly involved?” Samba asked
Nana Njike shook his head with rue. “Ah my brother, it would be disastrous for you to move against the Germans alone, especially with the limited force you are having. You should always consider the price to pay to achieve the objectives of the cause. The outcome should always outweigh the sacrifices.”
“There is a way. It is difficult for you to see it because you are not a soldier,” Samba said desperately.
“Let’s try not to be emotional about this,” Nana Njike retorted in a slightly irritated voice. “I expect us to be rational here. And don’t forget I grew up in the hands of one of Germany ’s great solders in Kamerun. He would never go for the move you are about to make. It is suicidal.”
“Suicidal?” Samba asked, sounding incredulous.
“Okay! Let’s consider this probability. What if we become victorious after a war with Germany , a war against their colonial army in Kamerun, that is, without considering the reinforcement factor? We know that Kamerun holds a strategic position when it comes to German interests in Africa . We also know that the Germans are also a warrior people with a deep and unwavering pride. You don’t believe Germany would accept defeat in Kamerun when it has its military might intact, do you?”
“You may be unaware of the rising political and military tempo in Europe . The Kaiser wouldn’t bother to dwell on a minor setback in Kamerun if Germany has better interests to safeguard in Europe .”
__._,_.___

Posted by: Tchouteu Janvier <j_ka...@yahoo.com>

Have you tried the highest rated email app?
With 4.5 stars in iTunes, the Yahoo Mail app is the highest rated email app on the market. What are you waiting for? Now you can access all your inboxes (Gmail, Outlook, AOL and more) in one place. Never delete an email again with 1000GB of free cloud storage.

Camnetwork is the premier Cameroon/Cameroun forum since 1997.

.

__,_._,___


Pa Fru Ndeh

unread,
May 31, 2016, 7:20:57 PM5/31/16
to globalc...@yahoogroups.com, ambasbay, SDF, shesausa, Southern Cameroon, Big group, africanworldforum, FREE AMBAZONIANS, cameroon_politics, camne...@yahoogroups.com
Dear All,

Anyone who was been following the PAAWCE Open Agenda for the conquest of the Presidency of the United Republic of Cameroon,
knows fully well that we seek to liberate Kamerun.  All of it.  We start with West Cameroon and East Cameroon.

I would like to THANK Ntemfac Ofege for reproducing Professor Carlson Anyangwe's stateful arguments below.

 
The Spokes Person
PAAWCE Presidency



From: "Ofege Ntemfac ntemfa...@YAHOO.COM [globalcameroun]" <globalc...@yahoogroups.com>
To: "globalc...@yahoogroups.com" <globalc...@yahoogroups.com>; ambasbay <amba...@googlegroups.com>; SDF <cameroons...@yahoogroups.com>; shesausa <shes...@yahoogroups.com>; Southern Cameroon <southern...@yahoogroups.com>; Big group <sa...@yahoogroups.com>; africanworldforum <africanw...@googlegroups.com>; FREE AMBAZONIANS <FREE_Amb...@yahoogroups.com>
Cc: cameroon_politics <cameroon...@yahoogroups.com>; "camne...@yahoogroups.com" <camne...@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 8:35 AM
Subject: Kamerun, PAAWCE, UNION CAMEROUN as the New Face of Concolonial Deception: Re: [globalcameroun] Re: [cameroon_politics] John Fru Ndi of Cameroon's Social Democratic Front: The Transformation of a Political Movement into a Political Business, and then into a Political Racket




Posted by: Ofege Ntemfac <ntemfa...@yahoo.com>


__,_._,___


Ogwo Manny Ogwo

unread,
May 31, 2016, 8:08:08 PM5/31/16
to africanw...@googlegroups.com, ambasbay, globalc...@yahoogroups.com, SDF, shesausa, Southern Cameroon, Big group, FREE AMBAZONIANS, cameroon_politics, camne...@yahoogroups.com

Our reps are online ready to answer your question 

https://purechat.me/bn3hgu

 

Thank you for using Bonaco Telecom service today. The greatest gift you can give us is that of referral. Tell your friends about Bonaco. Refer them via email or your social networks, Forward the Link address  http://www.bonaco.net/customer/register  and thanks for spreading the work.

 

FQA

Sign up and Log into your account.  Click the Mobile App under the Dashboard.

Click the Orange Button to activate your mobile App account.

Select the green button captioned Show Password to see your Password. Remember your registered phone number is your ID.

 

Visit your App Store and download BONACO.

Enter your ID and your Passcode when prompted during download. The system will install all your numbers for easy calling. Start Making domestic and International phone calls from Bonaco Apps.

CEO

BonacoTelecom

sup...@bonaco.net


On May 28, 2016, at 8:26 AM, 'Tchouteu Janvier' via AfricanWorldForum <africanw...@googlegroups.com> wrote:

Ofege Ntemfac

unread,
Jun 1, 2016, 4:36:23 AM6/1/16
to ambasbay, globalc...@yahoogroups.com, SDF, shesausa, Southern Cameroon, Big group, africanworldforum, FREE AMBAZONIANS, cameroon_politics, camne...@yahoogroups.com
Begheni Ndeh,
When he surfaced in power Adolf Hitler had grand designs to recover German Colonies in Africa.
He went to war about the matter and lost.
By inventing the UN and the Trusteeship systems and the Decolonization processes the rulers of this world told ancient and future colonial masters....NO in very emphatic terms.
Furthermore, the UN Charter and the UN system and the emphasis on self determination likened colonization and related ventures akin to War Crimes.
May I proclaim that we have all read how one Kenneth Jean Begheni Ndeh and his pal (one Tchouteu January) intend to foster a COLONIAL Enterprise involving 1. British Cameroons 2. Gabon 3 Chad. 4 Congo and 5 Central African Republique:
Hence scheming a War Crime:
All in the name of a DEAD entity called KAMERUN.

The United Nations and Decolonization - Declaration

www.un.org/en/decolonization/declaration.shtml
United Nations
Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples ... proclaimed by the peoples of the world in the Charter of the United Nations to ... of the world ardently desire the end of colonialism in all its manifestations,.

United Nations Global Issues

www.un.org/en/globalissues/decolonization/
United Nations
Today, fewer than 2 million people live under colonial rule in the 16 remaining ... The international trusteeship system was established by the UN Charter.

The United Nations and Decolonization

www.un.org/en/decolonization/
United Nations
The United Nations and Decolonization ... proclaimed the first International Decade for the Eradication of Colonialism, including a specific plan of action.

The United Nations and Decolonization - General Assembly Resolutions

www.un.org/en/decolonization/ga_resolutions.shtml
United Nations
General Assembly Resolutions. Historical General Assembly Resolutions. Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples

...

[Message clipped]  

Ofege Ntemfac

unread,
Jun 1, 2016, 7:49:06 AM6/1/16
to amba...@googlegroups.com, globalc...@yahoogroups.com, SDF, shesausa, Southern Cameroon, Big group, africanworldforum, FREE AMBAZONIANS, cameroon_politics, camne...@yahoogroups.com
CAMEROON UNIVERSITY REFORMS GEARED AT EXTINGUISHING THE ANGLO SAXONS EDUCATION SYSTEM IN UNIVERSITY OF BAMENDA AND BUEA…Analyst say: This is What Lies Ahead When Harmonization of Universities Takes Effect(RIP TO THE VERY PRECIOUS/CHERISHED ANGLO SAXONS EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM) What is your opinion should Cameroon University system be harmonized or the Anglophone/Francophone Systems should be managed independently according to their respective cultures?
LikeShow more reactions
CommentShare
Ntemfac Ofege CULTURAL VIOLENCE
'Cultural violence' refers to aspects of culture that can be used to justify or legitimize direct or structural violence, and may be exemplified by religion and ideology, language and art, empirical science and formal science. [3]
Cul
tural violence makes direct and structural violence qua concolonisation or the colonization of a colony by a colony look or feel "right," or at least not wrong, according to Galtung. [4]
I posit that both structural and cultural violence are so deeply embeded in the current Camerounian system that they belie all major and even minor system adjustments.
Hunger and poverty – derived from deprivation, spoliation, colonisation, etc - are two prime examples of what is described as “structural violence,” that is, physical and psychological harm that results from exploitive and unjust social, political and economic systems. The violence in structural violence is attributed to the specific organizations of society that injure or harm individuals or masses of individuals without even realsing what they are doing. Deliberate structural and cultural violence is something else: genocide. Crime against humanity.
In his book Violence: Reflections on a National Epidemic, James Gilligan defines structural violence as "the increased rates of death and disability suffered by those who occupy the bottom rungs of society, as contrasted with the relatively lower death rates experienced by those who are above them." Gilligan largely describes these "excess deaths" as "non-natural" and attributes them to the stress, shame, discrimination and denigration that results from lower status. He draws on Sennett and Cobb, who examine the "contest for dignity" in a context of dramatic inequality. The problem with those practicing structural, and especially cultural violence in Cameroun – and elsewhere - is that they always make their act seem and feel right.
Ntemfac Ofege
Write a comment...

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Col 3:4 When Christ, who is our life, shall appear, then shall ye also appear with him in glory. Christ appears in your life right here, right now: one nanosecond after you believe and confess that Jesus is Lord.
https://www.facebook.com/CAYMCameroon


Pa Fru Ndeh

unread,
Jun 1, 2016, 8:35:56 AM6/1/16
to amba...@googlegroups.com, globalc...@yahoogroups.com, SDF, shesausa, Southern Cameroon, Big group, africanworldforum, FREE AMBAZONIANS, cameroon_politics, camne...@yahoogroups.com
Ntemfac Ofege,

Are you barring or forbidding me or anyone else from self-determination 
for West Cameroon and East  Cameroon?
Our objectives/goals are simply different.
Pursue your goals of self-determination and
I will pursue my goals of self-determination.

My GOAL: Have a PAAWCE be the next President of Cameroon with 
residence at UNITY Palace in Yaounde, the federal capital territory.

If your objective is to thwart this goal, you will not succeed, I can assure you.
The train had left the station in 2006.  It is now 10 years.
 
Blessed Be Cameroon
Pa Fru Ndeh



From: Ofege Ntemfac <ntemfac...@gmail.com>
To: ambasbay <amba...@googlegroups.com>
Cc: "globalc...@yahoogroups.com" <globalc...@yahoogroups.com>; SDF <cameroons...@yahoogroups.com>; shesausa <shes...@yahoogroups.com>; Southern Cameroon <southern...@yahoogroups.com>; Big group <sa...@yahoogroups.com>; africanworldforum <africanw...@googlegroups.com>; FREE AMBAZONIANS <FREE_Amb...@yahoogroups.com>; cameroon_politics <cameroon...@yahoogroups.com>; "camne...@yahoogroups.com" <camne...@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2016 4:35 AM
Subject: Re: Kamerun, PAAWCE, UNION CAMEROUN as the New Face of Concolonial Deception: Re: [globalcameroun] Re: [cameroon_politics] John Fru Ndi of Cameroon's Social Democratic Front: The Transformation of a Political Movement into a Political Business, and then into a Political Racket

Ofege Ntemfac

unread,
Jun 1, 2016, 3:25:13 PM6/1/16
to ambasbay, globalc...@yahoogroups.com, SDF, shesausa, Southern Cameroon, Big group, africanworldforum, FREE AMBAZONIANS, cameroon_politics, camne...@yahoogroups.com
Laughable.

Ofege Ntemfac

unread,
Jun 3, 2016, 9:25:28 AM6/3/16
to africanw...@googlegroups.com, ambasbay, globalc...@yahoogroups.com, SDF, shesausa, Southern Cameroon, Big group, FREE AMBAZONIANS, cameroon_politics, camne...@yahoogroups.com
  • Ntemfac Ofege
    Write a comment...
  • Ntemfac Ofege
    Write a comment...
Mark Bareta and Fon Sama shared a link.
Cynthia Nguni, a very close-family friend to the victim (Linda) updated that she has had sleepless night for the past 72 hrs working with the North Carolina Medical Team on…
bareta.press
  • Ntemfac Ofege
    Write a comment...
  • Ntemfac Ofege
    Write a comment...
Henry and Harry Ngwa, Graduating from one of the Prestigious School District in Houston, Texas. CyWoods High School, Cypress Fairbanks ISD!
Elizabeth Ngwa's photo.
LikeShow more reactions
CommentShare
Comments
Ntemfac Ofege
Write a comment...
--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "AfricanWorldForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to africanworldfo...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to africanw...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/africanworldforum.

Ofege Ntemfac

unread,
Jun 3, 2016, 9:29:21 AM6/3/16
to cameroons...@yahoogroups.com, amba...@googlegroups.com, globalc...@yahoogroups.com, shesausa, Southern Cameroon, Big group, africanworldforum, FREE AMBAZONIANS, cameroon_politics, camne...@yahoogroups.com
  • Comments
    Em El Rene
    Em El Rene Na for civilians this pipo get power. Boko Haram di kill them , na for unarmed civilian them go come get power. Absolute nonsense! ! This video don over vex me. Na wati ? Even if dat boy do na wati!!
  • Ntemfac Ofege
    Write a comment...
  • Ntemfac Ofege
    Write a comment...
Mark Bareta and Fon Sama shared a link.
Cynthia Nguni, a very close-family friend to the victim (Linda) updated that she has had sleepless night for the past 72 hrs working with the North Carolina Medical Team on…
bareta.press
  • Ntemfac Ofege
    Write a comment...
  • Ntemfac Ofege
    Write a comment...
Henry and Harry Ngwa, Graduating from one of the Prestigious School District in Houston, Texas. CyWoods High School, Cypress Fairbanks ISD!
Elizabeth Ngwa's photo.
LikeShow more reactions
CommentShare
Comments
Ntemfac Ofege
Write a comment...
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Col 3:4 When Christ, who is our life, shall appear, then shall ye also appear with him in glory. Christ appears in your life right here, right now: one nanosecond after you believe and confess that Jesus is Lord.
https://www.facebook.com/CAYMCameroon

@NchweteOfege
ICH: The Collapse Of The Western Fiat Monetary System May Have Begun conta.cc/1qJsPSA via #constantcontact
May 19, 2016


On Wednesday, June 1, 2016 4:49 AM, "Ofege Ntemfac ntemfa...@YAHOO.COM [cameroons_sdf_party]" <cameroons...@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


CAMEROON UNIVERSITY REFORMS GEARED AT EXTINGUISHING THE ANGLO SAXONS EDUCATION SYSTEM IN UNIVERSITY OF BAMENDA AND BUEA…Analyst say: This is What Lies Ahead When Harmonization of Universities Takes Effect(RIP TO THE VERY PRECIOUS/CHERISHED ANGLO SAXONS EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM) What is your opinion should Cameroon University system be harmonized or the Anglophone/Francophone Systems should be managed independently according to their respective cultures?
alt
__._,_.___

Posted by: Ofege Ntemfac <ntemfa...@yahoo.com>

Have you tried the highest rated email app?
With 4.5 stars in iTunes, the Yahoo Mail app is the highest rated email app on the market. What are you waiting for? Now you can access all your inboxes (Gmail, Outlook, AOL and more) in one place. Never delete an email again with 1000GB of free cloud storage.


.

__,_._,___


Ofege Ntemfac

unread,
Jun 4, 2016, 3:54:42 AM6/4/16
to africanw...@googlegroups.com, ambasbay, globalc...@yahoogroups.com, SDF, shesausa, Southern Cameroon, Big group, FREE AMBAZONIANS, cameroon_politics, camne...@yahoogroups.com
In a late afternoon move on Friday June, 3rd 2016, all Heads of Departments (HODs ) of the University of Buea (UB) and Bamenda (UBa) said NO to harmonization. The Minister of Higher Education, Prof Jacques Fame Ndongo looked visibly shocked that lecturers from these two universities stood their grounds in Yaoundé and spoke with one voice. They told the Minister who had used the LMD as an excuse to call for harmonization that the Anglophone system remains the best and if there is a need for any harmonization, then the Francophone universities in the country must go the Anglophone way.
God is still saying something.
The Cameroun government has been planning for years to harmonize academic programmes in the Cameroons state universities. Such a move received fierce…
bareta.press
55 comments
Comments
Fred Awomah Achondoh
Fred Awomah Achondoh Well if harmonization means making university curriculum similar to international standards then its a good move. International standards all move towards the English system why is our case different. But I think the government just want to further frustrate the young generation. Nigerian universities are not full yet. We can still go the Nigerian direction. Yes or oui?
Mark Bareta
Mark Bareta Fred Awomah Achondoh that is not what the government want. Listen to what one lecturer wrote. "You cannot be talking about harmonization of university programmes. Universities are created based on the needs of society and each of them must have their s...See More
Like · Reply · 5 · 5 hrs
Fred Awomah Achondoh
Fred Awomah Achondoh Ma brother. That's a good piece of information. I am pleased you pointed this out
Like · Reply · 1 · 5 hrs
Bomi Jack
Bomi Jack Very good
Nkeng Nkeng
Nkeng Nkeng Wow ,this is interesting to know. Had it been it had been done like this in all the sectors things would have been different by now.
Petrus Tonus Ngongus
Petrus Tonus Ngongus Hail to the UB and UBa heads of departments for their unanimity! I pray they persist with that welcome move, shunning away all sell-outs whom might mar the process by secretly allying with the minister of Higher Education as usual for their egoistic motives.
Like · Reply · 3 · 5 hrs
Cyprian Lionel Junior
Cyprian Lionel Junior I hope opposition leaders in Cameroon can learn from this.
Like · Reply · 2 · 5 hrs
Konfor Zack
Konfor Zack They have done well by saying NO and should keep their stand. At least they are not selling the future of the unborn generation like others did in 1961.
Like · Reply · 2 · 5 hrs
Amstrong DaBrain
Amstrong DaBrain Thank ya Bareta for keeping us updated. Them go bow..
Aaden Karl
Aaden Karl Thanks for updates and also for firmed decision taken by these heads of departments(hods). Hope some of them wouldn't be bribed to set confusion as usual ?
Sen Forfeke Mofor
Sen Forfeke Mofor Myself agst that. If I consider how the system of education was during my studies both in Dschang and douala universities(Module system), it's quite different from the anglo-saxon system of education. French universities does both political science an...See More
Ceo Davis
Ceo Davis good work bro
Eric Akanji
Eric Akanji I totally agree with the minister. A French says anglo-fools because anglophones react before the come back to their reasoning. It pays nothing to fostrate a policy which have been carefully thought of and it had worked
Eric Akanji
Eric Akanji Which has worked internationally because it does not match with what they think is an Anglophone system. The minister does not just get up one day and say I want to implement a policy. Government policies are carefully studied and every motivation is c...See More
Monah Zealia
Monah Zealia Talk with facts' don't state yr opinions & expect everyone to succumb! Is not a matter of anglophones or francophones..& if that be the case I think francophones need to do a review of their educational system cos is always been disorganised! With clea...See More
Like · Reply · 10 · 2 hrs · Edited
Ndiba William Itoe
Ndiba William Itoe Mark they shnt speak in one voice but with a stronger voice that with make unity palace to panic.
Like · Reply · 1 · 2 hrs
Akoson Pauline Diale
Akoson Pauline Diale Mark, therez a letter puportedly coming from Marafa Hamidou Yaya. Do some homeworl and get back to the audience here. It makes for an interesting read
Germaine Yongue
Germaine Yongue That's awesome we must stand our grounds
Lionel Mesumbe
Lionel Mesumbe That's what I wanna see them doing. Thumps up!!!
Pierre N. Osaze
Pierre N. Osaze The French system of education is really frustrating. ..to state this clearly. ...If you have a bachelor degree in any of the francophone universities in Cameroon, applying for a masters programme abroad becomes a problem. Courses are rarely recognise...See More
Like · Reply · 2 · 36 mins · Edited
Abraham Johnson Batey Batey
Abraham Johnson Batey Batey I continue to say that, nothing will be harmonised and not at this critical political moment. President Biya will not want to entertain controversies now because, we shall give him that now, BIG TIME.
Like · Reply · 1 · 2 hrs
Adamu Ntubu Shey
Adamu Ntubu Shey Look at a minister in my dear Fatherland...this a good source of samples for gerontological studies..
Akame Gerald
Akame Gerald Perfect...!!! One voice, one decision.
Ashu Brieldith Jr.
Ashu Brieldith Jr. That's good.. they've started the fight well,would they be able to resist the pressure till the end? Because the"Francophones "don't give up easily.
Like · Reply · 2 · 1 hr
Ngiebong Vanyn
Ngiebong Vanyn Yes yes yes
Winifred Fohtung
Winifred Fohtung Amen! kudos Sirs.
Solange Bate
Solange Bate For once we stood for what is right...kudos to the HODs
Like · Reply · 1 · 1 hr
Ernest Massa
Ernest Massa I hope it is not the harmonisation of Qui or Yes
Like · Reply · 1 · 1 hr
Nixon McNeilo
Nixon McNeilo Perfect.....
Fonkoua Roland Fonkoua
Fonkoua Roland Fonkoua For how long? Wait until some few are connered with with promises of fake promotions, u will see how they will start running like wild dogs
Like · Reply · 1 · 1 hr
Fonkoua Roland Fonkoua
Fonkoua Roland Fonkoua #Mark Bareta note #Abraham Johnson's comment. Am glad he is also against the so called harmonization
Pius Nsambe
Pius Nsambe This is not the first time they've attempted this harmonisation sham. They tried way back in 1982/83 but we came out on hot protest march in B'da and they bowed.
Like · Reply · 1 · 1 hr
Mbout John Nyah
Mbout John Nyah God bless them. They shouldn't stop til their goal of "no to harmonization of Anglophone universities" is achieved.
Che Eugene
Che Eugene What the heck does the minister think he's trying to do?
Tabe Lovlyn Tabe
Tabe Lovlyn Tabe Harmony begins with one language. As long as we have two languages, let us us have our separate systems. Anglophones MUST say NO to marginalisation. Anglophones keep suffering because many cannot speak french upon graduation. We are obliged to speak french meanwhile they francophones are not obliged to speak English. This is just the beginning.
Nong Conrad
Nong Conrad That's true and it's time to tell the world our own story
Leke Walter
Leke Walter That's the way to go brethren. I lend my 100% support for this noble course. La Republique is crazy. Always putting one on his nerves. Stupid fellows
Jum Amos
Jum Amos I WOULD LIKE TO CONGRATULATE THE VERIOUS HEAD OF DEPARTMENTS IN THE TWO STATE UNIVERSITIES FOR THEIR DECITION. GOD WILL ADD YOU MORE WISDOM AND WE ANGLOPHONES ARE BEHIND YOU. WELL MR ASHU THE PRESSURE OUR PEOPLE ARE PUTTING WILL LAST IF WE CONTINUE TO PRAY FOR THEM.
Like · Reply · 1 · 1 hr · Edited
Epie Njume Herve
Epie Njume Herve All the European countries knows that Germany has the best system of education which has resulted toconcrete cementic growth of their economy. From the curriculum to what the thought in class. But the French, British, Portuguese. Russians and even the...See More
Like · Reply · 2 · 1 hr · Edited
Monique Kwachou
Monique Kwachou Just to correct this:
What was being done is not harmonisation. They were imposing francophone staff who are not bilingual on the universities.
These staff in turn instituted francophone ways in their departments without actual changes in school polic
...See More
Like · Reply · 3 · 57 mins
Peyechu Andrew
Peyechu Andrew They have divided and ruled us for long even in our houses.That time maybe coming to an end.
Bunji Antoinette
Bunji Antoinette I like that. This was almost done to the Engineering faculty too . Though they did not succeed, they still succeeded to send all anglophone lecturers to the ministry as researchers and punished the students with francophone lecturers who cannot speak english. I still dont know why the Nalova is not doing anything about it
Like · Reply · 1 · 42 mins
Elvis Cheo
Elvis Cheo Unity is strength, No harmonization my Proffs.
Bih Emmanuella
Bih Emmanuella Oh my God I can feel bubbles of happiness in my stomach, it's as if I was there. Nonsense put all together make I here that their nonsense again. They send their kids to the US and England to study in English then want to selfishly take away the last opportunity from poor Cameroonians to study under a good educational system. Thanks Mark, feed us with more information. I am still hungry
Ntemfac Ofege
Ntemfac Ofege This is not harmonization, this is pure concolonisation: the colonisation of a colony by a colony. French Cameroun has NO RIGHT to annex Southern British Cameroons let alone attempting to force feed its corrupt sub culture on us. That is not happening and this is the last straw. This fellow, Fame Ndongo. All he thinks is tribalism.
Ndi Julius
Ndi Julius Firstly what are they harmonising ?
Dominic E. Ncho
Dominic E. Ncho Unity, integration, harmonization! All words used in their efforts to assimilate/marginalize anglophones. Rubbish!
Like · Reply · 1 · 19 mins
Viban Jude
Viban Jude Harmonisation to me is an excellent idea. As long as the new system will be Cameroonian not francophone nor anglophone. It could be a chance to brandish our bilingual heritage to world
Ntemfac Ofege
Write a reply...

Ntemfac Ofege
Write a comment...
Col 3:4 When Christ, who is our life, shall appear, then shall ye also appear with him in glory. Christ appears in your life right here, right now: one nanosecond after you believe and confess that Jesus is Lord.
https://www.facebook.com/CAYMCameroon

@NchweteOfege
ICH: The Collapse Of The Western Fiat Monetary System May Have Begun conta.cc/1qJsPSA via #constantcontact
May 19, 2016


Ofege Ntemfac

unread,
Jun 13, 2016, 4:54:49 AM6/13/16
to africanw...@googlegroups.com, ambasbay, globalc...@yahoogroups.com, SDF, shesausa, Southern Cameroon, Big group, FREE AMBAZONIANS, cameroon_politics, camne...@yahoogroups.com
Gentlemen, and Ladies.
Greetings.
I received the following preview of Dr Anthony Ndi's new book lately:
Title:  The Golden Age of Southern Cameroons: Vital Lessons for Cameroon.

A cursory reading set me thinking that I may have a lot to say about this volume.
Happy reading and I hope you have a lot to say as well.

 
 
 
 
Introduction to the New Edition
 
The first edition of this book titled: The Golden Age of Southern (West) Cameroon, was locally published ten years ago in Bamenda, North West Region, Cameroon, a country with a poor reading culture. This is further worsened among the Anglophones by the fact that they constitute by far smaller population than their Francophone compatriots. For that reason, it is a well established adage that if you want to preserve a secret, or to keep anything away from public knowledge in Cameroon, the safest place to do so is within the pages of a book. As proof of this, I encountered a friend recently, who argued fiercely and passionately about all that he thought went wrong with the 1961 Plebiscite and the subsequent Foumban Constitutional Conference, which he held accountable for all the Anglophone woes. Sadly, however, much of what he said did not square up with the facts on record, but was based on conspiracy theories, fallacies and sheer conjecture. In a bid to help him broaden his views so as to buttress his arguments on the topic, I politely suggested for him to read pertinent literature on the subject, notably the book by John Percival.[1] His reaction was typical: “How big is the book?” and next, “How many pages is it?” Needless to say I was greatly disappointed especially as he is popular and influential elite whose opinion is highly respected in the community because of his eloquence and forceful personality.     
                                               
As pointed out, The Golden Age of Southern (West) Cameroon was published a decade ago with a little over one thousand copies. However, barely five years later, they had run out of stock in the few bookshops, where they were on sale with requests for more, even for use as a textbook in secondary schools and colleges. This was in spite of the fact that it had neither been formally launched nor publicly advertised anywhere; it simply passed from hand to hand or by word of mouth. Yet, there were those readers, who further requested if possible, for it to be translated into French given that our Francophone compatriots are either poorly informed, care little about who and what the Anglophones are or, much less, accept the existence of Anglophones as a unique polity within the country, or still more distressing recognise the legitimate existence of an “Anglophone problem”.
 
 
 
“Anglophones” or “Southern Cameroonians”
 Many are those who regard the “Anglophones” or “Southern Cameroonians” and their complaints as something of a curiosity, a minority group like all the other ethnic groups in Cameroon; but generally as a sort of nuisance, an insatiable lot, who do not deserve any more attention than they already have been accorded. Consequently, the prevalent grievances about their: second class citizenship, marginalisation, assimilation and annexationist tendencies of Anglophone Southern Cameroonians by the ruling Francophone elite are simply incomprehensible, even to some of the top grade administrators and intellectuals. It is regrettable that with the passage of time especially after the 1972 debacle, memories have waned or have been so warped and politicised that Southern Cameroonians or Anglophones are increasingly regarded and equated with large ethnic groups elsewhere in the country on the basis of size requiring no extra attention than these others.  Historically, this is sad and much like playing the ostrich over a nagging problem that cannot be ignored or wished away.
 
  This attitude totally negates the indisputable, historical fact that Southern Cameroons enjoyed full internal autonomy or Self Government for seven years; in actual fact, four long years ahead of French Cameroon, its size notwithstanding. For that matter, it had a vibrant House of Assembly, a House of Chiefs (or Senate), an independent Judiciary, an ideal Public Service with a government and ministers presided over by an Executive Prime Minister. Of equal, indelible significance is the process by which Southern Cameroons attained its political autonomy, which did not come on a platter of gold as every iota of its identity was critically contested. Unfortunately, these facts are hardly done justice to in our national history. Reunification, the complicated process by which Southern Cameroons chose to join Republic of Cameroon was a massive international affair endorsed by the UN, the international community and sanctioned by over 70% of the electorate in a UN organised plebiscite, declared as exemplary; free, fair and transparent.
 
 These are documented facts of history that cannot by any means or for any reason, simply be minimised or trampled on as they are bound bubble up and out sooner or later. The surprise therefore, is how the entire Federal Republic of Cameroon could have been made to vote in the 1972 referendum over an issue which ten years previously, in February 1961 had involved only a fifth or 20% of the entire Federal Republic of Cameroon. This is all the more embarrassing given that more than fifty years later, there still remain huge gaps about Anglophone, “Southern Cameroons” in the minds of the vast majority of the Francophones in the country. This sort of game cannot usher Cameroon as a modern democratic nation united not in “false” uniformity but in diversity far into a stable future in a world that daily shrinks into a global village in the face of modern technology and infusion of radical ideologies.
 
These issues were handled in the first edition and are further elaborated upon in the present volume, which for emphasis is titled: The Golden Age of Southern Cameroons - Prime Lessons for Cameroon. It was during the period of its Golden Age, that the foundation was laid for it to acquire the status of a Quasi Federal Territory within the Federation of Nigeria. Appellations of the North and South West have changed from Provinces to Regions but they are used interchangeably in this volume depending on whether reference is being made to the period before 12 November 2008, when the decree replacing the Provinces with Regions was promulgated,  after,  or even earlier when by a simple decree, the  name reverted from the United Republic of Cameroon (URC) to the pre-reunification appellation “Republic of Cameroon” which French Cameroon adopted at independence in 1960.[2]
 
On the whole, this volume has extensively been enriched in quality and significantly enlarged in size to cater for areas which readers indicated needed amplification. This is precisely the case with the elaboration on the dubious role the British played initially as the Mandatory and later as Trusteeship Authority over the Territory, its obstinate insistence to administer Southern Cameroons as an “integral” part of its Nigerian Colony from 1916 -1961 and, especially the role of Nigerians (Ibo) within that unfortunate arrangement. Consequently, additional light has been thrown on their function as the “black colonial masters” by proxy, for Britain in Southern Cameroons, one that backfired tremendously. However, the greatest significance in this edition is the additional chapter on the “Invincibility of the Southern Cameroons Spirit”. This comes with an analysis of its anatomy, emphasising its indefatigability and prowess – the greater the suppression, exclusion or attempts at assimilation by the Francophone majority, the more resolute the spirit.
 
 The Nigerians (Ibos) with British assistance had earlier tried this trick and failed woefully as ultimately, the Southern Cameroonian choice of re-unification with Republic of Cameroon, was practically a decisive sanction against Britain and Nigeria. Also exploited and added to the appendices are pertinent extracts of the declassified British secret papers especially those dealing with Southern Cameroons during the administration of Dr. John Ngu Foncha, 1959-1961, when the struggle towards the plebiscite was fiercest with the British covertly and openly backing the opposition KNC/KPP alliance and facilitating carpet crossings to topple the KNDP re-unificationist government. This unveils stinking filth about British colonial administration. That is why the enlarged product is not merely a revised edition but actually, a brand new edition renamed: The Golden Age of Southern Cameroons: Vital Lessons for Cameroon, which better reflects its new essence, content and outlook.
 
 
 
 
“The Golden Age of the Southern Cameroons Civil Service”
 
It will be recalled that it was Rev. Father George Nkuo, then, Rector of Buea Town Catholic Parish, Buea Diocese, whose rousing homily on the “Golden Age of the Southern Cameroons Civil Service,” inexplicably read like pages taken out of the manuscript I had prepared for a volume with that title and impinged on the production of the first edition of this book ten years ago. It is amazing that barely one year later, precisely on 8 July 2006; he was elevated to the Episcopacy as Bishop of Kumbo, the Diocese, which sprang out of the famous Shisong Parish inaugurated by the Sacred Heart Missionaries in 1913.[3] Rev. Fr. George Nkuo in his inspiring sermon at the funeral of Late Mr. Ernest Kalla Lottin in Buea on Saturday 13 November 2004 graphically described him as belonging to: "The generation of civil servants, who despite their human failings had discipline; where people were paid for work done with commitment for our Fatherland, where corruption and embezzlement were heavily reduced", a nostalgic period, which the priest maintained could hardly be challenged as: "The golden age of the civil service in Cameroon". The image he recommended for the new generation of civil servants as typified by the life of Mr. Lottin, was that of people:
 
Who cannot be bought; whose word is their bond; who put character above wealth; who possess opinion and a will; who are larger than their vocations; who do not hesitate to take chances.... who will be as honest in small things as in great things; who will make no compromise with wrong; whose ambitions are not confined to their own selfish desires; who will not say they do something because everybody else does it ...who are not ashamed to stand for the truth when it is unpopular; who can say 'no' with emphasis although the rest of the world says 'yes"[4]
Every syllable of the powerful homily seemed to strike a common cord with what I had separately and independently written. It was as if the priest and I had been reading from the same song sheet and he had torn the key note from my manuscript – all, far too providential to be regarded and dismissed as a mere coincidence. In fact, it was divine providence; a “mission” challenging me to bring out in a more elaborate and forceful manner, what I had written simply as a chapter in my book in case this seminal work never had a chance to be exposed for the benefit of posterity by anybody. It directly reminded me of Chinua Achebe’s timeless novel: Things Fall Apart[5], and his apt observation on being interviewed on CNN, that it was a book waiting to be written if not by him, then by some other person.
Thus Shisong (Kumbo) is the foundation of the Catholic Church in Bamenda Division, precisely the entire North West Region at the time, which presently comprises two Dioceses and some eighty Catholic Parishes besides the numerous Fields and Congregations of the Presbyterian Church in Cameroon and the Cameroon Baptist Convention. Politically, it is one of the ten Regions of Cameroon comprising seven divisions administered by a governor with headquarters at bamenda.
 
However, unlike positive note on the elevation of Rev. Father George Nkuo to the Episcopate, the same thing cannot be said of His Excellency, Rt. Hon. Chief Ephraim Inoni, erstwhile Prime Minister, on the political plane. He raised great hopes, when he introduced the audacious ‘Operation Antelope’ programmed to root out bribery and corruption which had become deeply entrenched in the civil service, where some dishonest workers dubiously earned multiple salaries and bled the government coffers white. This reform received universal acclamation and raised great expectations. Regrettably, not much seems to have changed while he himself fell victim to a new anti-corruption outfit, the National Anti-Corruption Commission (CAN) established by the government and, ironically,  presently together with dozens of other high profiled government and parastatal officials is behind bars on alleged charges of embezzlement of public funds. In fact, several more of these reforms have been instituted to fight the scourge of corruption in Cameroon since then, generally with feeble results as corruption has eaten deep into the core of the society and has become near indestructible.
 
Southern Cameroons: Moral Fibre
History per se does not set out teach any specific lessons, but taken as the ‘collective memory’ or wisdom of a people and,  a record of the good, the bad and the ugly, we can always extract whatever moral applies to our particular circumstance from it: what to emulate, to retain or to avoid and discard. In the course of this study for example, some startling points have come to light. Principally, it has established the reality that Southern Cameroons does undeniably have a unique, glorious past containing an authentic indigenous culture shaped by appreciable contributions from British and German colonial experiences greatly sanctified by Christian ethics from which enormous hope and inspiration could be drawn. Among the main actors both in the public and private sectors were heroes and heroines in the art of nation-building, noble characters whose lives could become role models. The substance of the much applauded "Anglo-Saxon" component, meaning specific British contributions to Cameroon culture was largely through the contributions of the voluntary agencies on which they relied.
 
 The impact of missionary activity on the other hand was overwhelming, with Christian ethical values transcending and impacting on all aspects even on secular life. All over the Territory, the early Europeans, especially missionaries in their contacts with the people reported very high moral and ethical standards with exemplary family life that existed prior to European and missionary contacts.  Rev. Father Michael Moran reporting from Kumbo after touring the entire Bamenda Region in 1923 stated emphatically that the people had nothing to learn from Europe about family life; while, administrative officers presiding over cases in Native Courts, testified that theft and lying were literally unknown[6].
 
By the late 50s individual members of Parliament and Government without exception were also strong leaders and ardent Christians in the Catholic, Presbyterian and Baptist Churches, where some of them were zealous pastors. This impact originated from the fact that Voluntary Agencies (the Missions) preponderantly controlled education at the primary, secondary and teacher training levels, where Religious Knowledge and Moral Education were emphasised and imparted by ordinance, as much in Government and Native Authority (NA) schools as in Mission institutions. The same procedure applied to health and social services that were largely controlled by these Christian missionary denominations known as “Voluntary Agencies”. To the extent that these agencies expressly existed and functioned strictly in accordance with British Colonial Government policy in its colonies together with their Mandated and later Trust Territories, the results can therefore be regarded as Anglo-Saxon oriented.
 A cursory examination of the apparent geographical disparities that exist between the North and South-West Regions ultimately turns out to reveal that these are in fact, complementary and indeed are a spectacular natural heritage for the mutual benefit of the inhabitants of both Regions and for Cameroon as a nation. Intimate interactions at the individual, family, cultural, linguistic, economic, social, political and spiritual levels, after over a century of co-existence established much more than a fragile, political, inorganic unity. Rather what has evolved over time has been a vibrant spiritual union of hearts and minds bonding the people, which cannot so easily be severed by rabble rousing.
 
It is an acknowledged notion that the integral unity of the whole, generally depends on the solidity and harmony of its constituent parts beginning with the family, through the village and clan up to the division and region. The processes of devolution taking place in many old nations of the world including our very own colonial masters; France and Britain after centuries of highly centralised existence testify to this fact. National integration "erected" on the foundation of fraternity, peace, justice and shared common values become solid blocks for building a nation that can endure. In Southern Cameroons there was a general awareness and deliberate attempts made to suppress and eliminate the vices of ethnicism, sectionalism, tribalism, bribery and corruption both in private and public life. This was deliberately undertaken as a conscious political option by successive Administrations and by the various Christian denominations operating in the Territory. Unity was understood to mean not "unity in uniformity" but "unity in diversity" respecting differences such as exist in a salad bowl; a concept that was implemented right down to primary school syllabuses southern Cameroons. There was freedom of choice and action at all levels.
 
Although both Britain and Germany, former colonial masters made appreciable material and political contributions to the evolution of Southern Cameroons as a distinct political entity, Britain through its Nigerian “black” colonial overlords was overtly responsible for much of the economic and administrative underdevelopment and backwardness of the Territory. In the ultimate analysis Britain stifled its political evolution towards independence. On the other hand, while Christianity played a primordial role in the rise of the “Golden Age” in Southern Cameroons, the imposition of the autocratic One-Party system and lay state mentality after re-unification under President Ahidjo deliberately and systematically muffled and extinguished it.
 
Living Lessons of History: Global
An important point about History is its value as a predictive tool for inculcating national integration. It is a universally acknowledged fact that has been consciously and judiciously used in the education syllabuses of great nations to good effect. Our bicultural, bilingual and multi-ethnic diversity offers a rich background and provides an excellent source and reason for the institution of a similar approach in the Cameroon educational system. Properly handled, History could instil mutual understanding, tolerance and respect for each other's cultural heritage as well as dedication to duty, transparency and assiduity in public and private affairs, the foundations of which already existed in the federal constitution. As a source of wisdom and means of nation building, History comes next only to the Bible.
 
However, unlike the Bible or the Koran, History is neutral and stands neither for nor against, it is simply a record of the facts as they happened. Consequently, it is amoral. It does not forgive, and those who fail to learn the lessons of History inevitably pay a high price for their transgressions. World History is littered with the graves of countless leaders and individuals such as: Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussolini, Slobadan Milosevic, Dada Idi Amin, Jean Bedel Bokassa, Marcias Nguema, Samuel Doe; Mobutu Sesse Seko Kuku Ngenda  Waza Banga (the Invincible Warrior  or ‘the cock who leaves no chick untouched’) of Zaire and Sani Abacha, who flouted and neglected the lessons and wisdom of History. We are inescapably bound to, and are an indelible part of our past – playing the ostrich, and not to know what happened before we were born, simply because we were not there, is to remain forever a child.
 
One decade down memory lane, on the African scene, Ivory Coast (Côte d'I·voire) finally stabilised; while next door the deadly ‘Ebola epidemic’, a well known but yet incurable disease crept in and wrought great havoc claiming some five thousand lives in the neighbouring states of Liberia, Guinea Conakry, and Sierra Leone. It is only recently that it has been brought under control. In Libya, General Muammar Ghaddaffi was ultimately flushed out but unfortunately chaos has brought in ISIS shattering fragile unity that once prevailed in that country; Tunisia, the root of the “Arab Spring” as well as Egypt are gradually regaining normalcy; Southern Sudan reverted to serious civil strife with incredible bloodletting and the situation there is still fluid much like the al Shabab Moslem terrorist insurgency in neighbouring Somalia. Neighbouring Central African Republic is gradually recovering from the Seleka coalition of rebel Moslem groups locked up in battle against the Anti-Balaka, a Christian group in a stubborn and distressing civil war.
 
 In Nigeria  on the other hand, there was another fierce, veiled Moslem Jihadist insurgency called, ‘Boko Haram’(“Western Education is Bad”), an incredibly pointless  brutal, terrorist, gang that within a few years overran several North Eastern Nigerian States frequently foraging into Cameroon burning, maiming, raping, abducting and viciously murdering thousands of innocent citizens. It is currently being quelled by a combination of Chadian, Niger, and Malian and Cameroonian troops after Nigeria had proven itself helpless at their hands. However, this inglorious story was more than balanced by the fact that for the first time in its fifty-four years as an independent country, the mighty Nigerian nation, the biggest and easily the richest on the African continent organised elections in March 2015 that were universally acknowledged as: free, fair, transparent and credible, with the incumbent, President Goodluck Jonathan peacefully and gracefully conceding victory to his opponent Retired General Mohammadu Buhari. With a popularly elected government now in power there can be little doubt that the Boko Haram insurgency would sooner rather than later become a spent force and a matter of history.
 
 Elsewhere, the Arab Spring has continued to fester and degenerate in: Syria, Yemen and much worse in Iraq, which is in the throes of the Islamic State of Iraq (ISIS or ISIL), an extremist, brutal, Jihadist Islamic movement out to re-establish an Islamic Caliphate. They have proved most intractable but nevertheless are on the wane. In Europe, the Ukraine suffered a relapse with the balkanisation of its Eastern flank and the Crimea tearing off with the covert support of Russia. Meanwhile, the number of migrants from the areas of conflict and unrest in Northern Africa, Somalia, Eritrea and the Middle East struggling to get across the Mediterranean Sea into Europe drown in hundreds on a daily basis. This is becoming an intractable problem for the Europeans powers.
 
 Put on a scale, the decade has witnessed little positive change in terms of world peace and stability, while internally in Cameroon, after the Green Tree Agreement, which resolved the Bakassi Peninsula Boundary Conflict between Nigeria and Cameroon, the latter has remained fairly peaceful and stable but for the refugee influx and defence problems accruing from the Boko Haram insurgency in Nigeria and the Central African Republic civil war draining resources that otherwise should have gone into development, investment and social services in the country. This further demonstrates just how much the world has become a global village especially now that it is taking a combination of: Nigerian, Chadian, Nigerien and Cameroonian forces to face the Boko Haram insurgency in the region.
 
Triumph for The Rule of Law: Kofi Anan
l endorse the historic and matchless advice inscribed in gold given by Kofi Anan, the iconic UN Secretary General, under whose auspices the Green Tree Agreement was struck. Nothing in recent Cameroon history approximates this blue print. The Green Tree Agreement was the formal treaty which resolved the century old bloody, Cameroon-Nigeria border imbroglio over the oil and natural gas rich Bakassi peninsula. It transferred authority over Bakassi Peninsula from Nigeria to Cameroon, a historic process aptly described as: the “Triumph for the rule of law” by the Secretary-General of the UN, Kofi Anan. The dispute with roots running as far back as to 1913, 1981, 1994, and 1996 resulted in armed clashes between Nigeria and Cameroon. The dispute was referred to the International Court of Justice and on 10 October 2002, the ICJ ruled in favour of Cameroon. This was the first ever, of its kind on the African continent. On departing from Cameroon in 2000 and after deep reflection, Kofi Anan the Secretary-General of the UN, who resolved this intractable problem, in his wisdom, cautioned:
 I leave Cameroon with the impression that there is only one Cameroon, multilingual and multi-ethnic. I encourage dialogue of these stakeholders. In every country, there are problems of marginalization. The way it has to be solved is by dialogue and not by walking away.[7]
The hope is that the ruling elite in Cameroon hearken to these words of wisdom and strive to implement them in accordance with the spirit, in which they were delivered. it had called for dialogue and reason rather than intimidation and obstinacy; an approach similar to that which led to the Green Tree Agreement, such that we do not have to endure hurts, wait for another century and have to go the International Court of Justice at the Hague.
Footprints on the Sands of Time
As well, there are innumerable statesmen, nationalists, heroes, heroines and African leaders, who lived edified lives and have left brilliant footprints worth emulation. Among these   are: Kwame Nkrumah of Ghana, Leopold Sedar Senghor of Senegal, Julius Nyerere of Tanzania, Jomo Kenyatta of Kenya and living monuments like Nelson Mandela and Frederik Willem de Klerk of South Africa and Kenneth Kaunda of Zambia. Here at home there are several nationalists, heroes and role models who laid down their lives for the Cameroon Motherland. These include amongst others; Martin Paul Samba, Rudolph Douala Manga Bell, Reuben Um Nyobé,  Félix Roland Moumié, together with countless  missionaries, catechists and pastors and traditional rulers who sacrificed their lives fighting battles against: ignorance, disease, poverty, superstition and instilling unity through fraternal love. To be able to move forward with confidence both at the individual, collective and national level, we need to be conscious of this fact and the determination to leave our own footprints in whatever small ways determined to leave  our portion of the country better than we met it. Indeed this was part of the essence in the "Truth and Reconciliation Commission" which was initiated in South Africa and is presently being replicated in many other countries.
 
For the purpose of inculcating national consciousness, basic knowledge of our History should not be the preserve of a few; but even that of children who can remember to celebrate their birthdays and above all; citizens with the civic responsibility to vote and pay taxes deserve to know something about why and how they do these things and consequently about their Motherland. This knowledge forms the basis for informed loyalty, patriotism and nationalism. If we do not know where we are coming from, we cannot for certain say where we are going to, and even worse, define our own identity. We are likely to repeat errors of the past, if we do not know and avoid them and, although we cannot change the past we can use its knowledge to shape and improve the future.
 
 Civic knowledge therefore is every citizen's right and should be handled formally in schools as well as informally by the mass media for the public at large using anecdotes, didactic material, moral lessons and whatever else works to extol and showcase our historic and ancestral icons, role models, heroes and heroines. It is perhaps the best and cheapest way to fight bribery, corruption and election rigging and in the ultimate analysis, cutting down on expenditure invested on defence, the forces of law and order and the penitentiary services, following the simple principle that it is better to “prepare and prevent, than to repair and repent”.
 
Finally, it should be known that every being, everything that exists or happens in time and space is an intrinsic part of, and has its history. Whether we know it or not, whether we love it or hate it, we live in and are part of the current of history. To ignore this it would be acting like the foolish cock, which imagines that if it does not crow, the day will not break. We can either be active "makers" of history leaving indelible "positive" or "negative" footprints on the sands of time; its "victims," or simply passive, anonymous elements, but we cannot exist outside history.  Not to know what happened before we were born is to remain forever a child. History is about "being" and that is why theologians logically maintain that God, the Creator of the universe is the indisputable Author of all History.
 
 
A Great Debt of Gratitude
I could not handle the requests for a reproduction of the book, an updated version or a practically new version because my hands were full, until the recent insistence by Prof. Jude Fokwang, Department of Sociology, Regis University, Denver, USA, that there is certainly a felt need for a second edition of the book to be published internationally and made available on the internet especially for the Cameroon Diaspora. Other than the fact that he is exclusively responsible for the onerous task of arranging for the publication, he has done extensive analytical editing bringing out several pertinent observations that have helped to edify the contents of the work. To this extent, he literally qualifies as a co-author. Indeed this publication is the response to his request, which hopefully may tackle some of the vital issues, throw further light and ignite positive curiosity on where further information could be sought to meet outstanding questions. If on the other hand, the issues raised stimulate constructive debate seeking solutions to some of the problems that bedevil our beloved motherland, then some of the objectives of this publication would have been achieved. For the same reason, I am greatly obliged to Dr. Michael Lang of the History Department of the University of Bamenda for proofreading the manuscript and making crucial suggestions that have helped to shape and strengthen its contents.
 
 The lapse of ten years since the publication of the first edition of this book has witnessed a colossal erosion of some of the outstanding personalities who immensely contributed to that publication. The illustrious contributors, who have passed away include: Mr. John Mofor Ndi, who as a top administrator in Southern Cameroons, graciously shared with me his rich experiences as well as rare archival material; Professor Richard Gray, who was much more than a supervisor and mentor. He literally moulded me into whatever l have become academically, his memory remains overwhelming; Mrs. Elizabeth Chilver, a great actress and a monument on Southern Cameroons research in the social sciences, gave me every imaginable assistance and encouragement till she lost her sight and finally passed away recently.  Toeing the line, have been Dr. Omer W Yembe, literally an elder brother, role model and mentor and recently Mr. Nicholas Ade Ngwa, a retired Principal Civil Administrator and an iconic personality, who played a pivotal role on the socio-political and administrative podium of Southern Cameroons. He made significant contributions to the appendix as well as wrote the foreword to the first edition of this book. Whenever, I needed an objective clarification or a crucial document of the time, l turned to him for clarification. His recent passing away has been a monumental loss to this nation. At the personal level, I miss these gigantic individuals immensely and for Cameroon as a nation, each of them leaves a yawning gap hard to bridge. We owe it to posterity to exploit and project as far as possible, whatever visions they bequeathed for use as solid blocks for positive nation building.
 
Anthony Ndi,
Foncha Street, Nkwen
13 June 2015
 
 
 
 


[1] John Percival, The 1961 Cameroon Plebiscite, Choice Or Betrayal (Langaa Research and Publishing   CIG, Mankon, Bamenda) 2008.
 
 
[2] See Article 1 of Decree No. 2008/376 of 12 Nov. 2008. Also, Emmanuel Y Sobseh, Rethinking Citizenship, Politics and Governance in Cameroon, Global Press, p.93 for the decree of 1984 which renamed the country reverting to the name French Cameroon adopted at independence in 1960.
 
[3] Shisong was the foundation of Roman Catholicism in the North West Region and seed of the bitterest clashes between the Missionaries and their zealous followers on the one hand and the Traditional Establishment backed by the AOs on the other. The Diocese presently combines the ancient foundations of the faith as well as enormous areas of primary evangelisation, a good challenge to Bishop Nkuo, who apparently is equal to the task in bulldozing and breaking new grounds in primary evangelisation and development.
[4]Homily at the Funeral Mass of Pa Ernest Kalla Lottin  at  St. Anthony's Parish Church, Buea Town, Saturday 13/11/04 by Rev Fr. George Nkuo
[5] The historical novel published in 1958 depicts the conflict and impact on Igbo society brought about British colonial rule and Christianity.  
[6] These stories resonated from Nso to Kom, Bum, Wum, Mamfe and Kumba. Regardless of the pressure, the people generally insisted on firsthand knowledge and the truth. These can be found in the accounts of Messrs W E Hunt, Edward G Hawkesworth, Cantle among others, and later on, those of Collumpton and Malcolm Milne and john Percival in the late 1950s to early 1961. See Anthony Ndi, Mill Hill Missionaries and the State in Southern Cameroons, 1922-72; also Southern West Cameroon revisited, 1950-1972, Vol 1.
[7] Former UN Secretary General, Kofi Annan, on the Anglophone Problem in 2000.
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Col 3:4 When Christ, who is our life, shall appear, then shall ye also appear with him in glory. Christ appears in your life right here, right now: one nanosecond after you believe and confess that Jesus is Lord.
https://www.facebook.com/CAYMCameroon

@NchweteOfege
ICH: The Collapse Of The Western Fiat Monetary System May Have Begun conta.cc/1qJsPSA via #constantcontact
May 19, 2016


Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages