Keywords in different languages have the same search volume in one region

40 views
Skip to first unread message

ms.yuliya...@gmail.com

unread,
Oct 31, 2017, 10:00:03 AM10/31/17
to AdWords API Forum
Hi, 

I use API Adwords to get volume of keywords and it's shown as 590. The keywords are 

установка кондиціонерів (in Ukranian) 
установка кондиционеров (in Russian) 

The region is Ukraine. Is there a mistake? Because keywords in different languages are unlikely to have the same search volume in one region

Bharani Cherukuri (AdWords API Team)

unread,
Oct 31, 2017, 1:11:28 PM10/31/17
to AdWords API Forum
Hi, 

Could you enable logging and provide us the SOAP request and response logs for the request in both the regions, so we can take a look and assist you further? You can respond via Reply privately to author option while replying.

Regards,
Bharani, AdWords API Team

Юлия Федотова

unread,
Nov 1, 2017, 6:10:49 AM11/1/17
to AdWords API Forum
I'll send you them a bit later but please pay attention that there in ONE region Ukraine but the languages of keywords are different

вторник, 31 октября 2017 г., 20:11:28 UTC+3 пользователь Bharani Cherukuri (AdWords API Team) написал:

Bharani Cherukuri (AdWords API Team)

unread,
Nov 6, 2017, 2:00:21 PM11/6/17
to AdWords API Forum
Hello, 

Thank you for providing the details. Based on the logs, it looks like you're using very similar keywords in two different languages targeting a single region. Regardless of how many ads you're running on a single keyword, when you get the search volume for a keyword, the API will return same results for similar keywords. It is not possible to distinguish statistics for close variants using the TargetingIdeaService. If using keyword planner from the UI to perform the search, it will return results in a single row for all the similar or identical variants. You may refer to this article for additional reference. Let me know if you have any other questions.

Regards,
Bharani, AdWords API Team

On Tuesday, October 31, 2017 at 10:00:03 AM UTC-4, Юлия wrote:
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages