--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "advaitin" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to advaitin+u...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/advaitin/CADKAaHshw%2Bj2X7RA_Gy4pSbLCQC0K1rG5_eJ1cpCZJqqKFJ5hw%40mail.gmail.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "advaitin" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to advaitin+u...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/advaitin/CA%2BksRZczmkF8jN0_MeRrpnHzn3tyD2PGoXFxsBVpRj5HVmOFsw%40mail.gmail.com.
Swami Turiyananda was born on 3 January 1863
One day at Cossipore Harinath (Swami Turiyananda) asked, “Sir, how are you?” The Master replied: “Oh, I am in great pain. I cannot eat anything, and there is an unbearable burning in my throat.” Harinath knew that a knower of Brahman is beyond the pairs of opposites, pleasure and pain. He understood that the Master was testing him, so he said to him humbly, “Sir, whatever you may say, I see you as an infinite ocean of bliss.” At this, Sri Ramakrishna said with a smile, “This rascal has found me out.”
(p.364, God Lived With Them)
Swami Sarvapriyananda continued to say another related incident: When Harinath persisted seeing Ramakrishna in pain, the latter replied: It's only the mind that becomes a sage and not the body.
regards
subbu
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/advaitin/CAJbmbsGt4dGqniJOZmM_U%2Baq-f-HM-6D0STEi9wwraVDNWyssQ%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/advaitin/CAJbmbsGt4dGqniJOZmM_U%2Baq-f-HM-6D0STEi9wwraVDNWyssQ%40mail.gmail.com.
Namaste Akilesh ji,//The mind cannot be jnani since it is the product of ignorance; the atman need not be, since it cannot be ignorant. So then who is it?//This dilemma would be present even while defining ajnAnI. It is not exclusive to jnAnI.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/advaitin/CAH9%3D%2BBCuaBjeTQozptB2goHb%2BDLSKpD4CpOE3%2BXtAWKLSRv8HA%40mail.gmail.com.
The below is mere words. It’s all very seemingly neat and conceptually plain. In reality, however, it is anything but.
अद्वैतज्ञानं मनोवृत्तिमात्रम्
praNAms Sri Sudhanshu prabhuji
Hare Krishna
advaita jnAnaM manOvrutti mAtraM…yatO vAchO nivartante aprApya manasa saha….please elaborate…no time to discuss in detail…just wanted to know your view points.
Hari Hari Hari Bol!!!
bhaskar
|
BHASKAR YR |
From: adva...@googlegroups.com <adva...@googlegroups.com>
On Behalf Of Sudhanshu Shekhar
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2024 2:58 PM
To: adva...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [advaitin] jivanmukti & Lord Rama query
|
Warning |
|
This email comes from outside of Hitachi Energy. Make sure you
verify the sender before clicking any links or downloading/opening attachments.
|
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "advaitin" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
advaitin+u...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/advaitin/CAH9%3D%2BBAB9dZMK_1dzWTagHRmSWE-u_AS1gYXZn9G-dyrYfUMrA%40mail.gmail.com.
advaita jnAnaM manOvrutti mAtraM…yatO vAchO nivartante aprApya manasa saha….please elaborate…no time to discuss in detail…just wanted to know your view points.
praNAms Sri Sudhanshu prabhuji
Hare Krishna
Thanks for sharing your view points. There cannot be nirguNa nirvishesha jnAna after all anything about jnAna as prama is not / cannot be referring to nirguNa nirvishesha jnAna. As all jnAna is vrutti mAtraM. Is this what you are saying??
Hari Hari Hari Bol!!!
bhaskar
|
BHASKAR YR |
From: adva...@googlegroups.com <adva...@googlegroups.com>
On Behalf Of Sudhanshu Shekhar
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2024 11:12 AM
To: adva...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [advaitin] jivanmukti & Lord Rama query
|
Warning |
|
This email comes from outside of Hitachi Energy. Make sure you
verify the sender before clicking any links or downloading/opening attachments.
|
Hare Krishna Bhaskar prabhu ji.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "advaitin" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
advaitin+u...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/advaitin/CAH9%3D%2BBAm7UwaU7our5-AwU3RjXyz2K%3DCbJBGDCg3g2hB72p9cg%40mail.gmail.com.
Thanks for sharing your view points. There cannot be nirguNa nirvishesha jnAna after all anything about jnAna as prama is not / cannot be referring to nirguNa nirvishesha jnAna. As all jnAna is vrutti mAtraM. Is this what you are saying?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "advaitin" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to advaitin+u...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/advaitin/CADKAaHshw%2Bj2X7RA_Gy4pSbLCQC0K1rG5_eJ1cpCZJqqKFJ5hw%40mail.gmail.com.
praNAms
Hare Krishna
Likewise, expect a jivanmukta has 100% conviction that He is the unchanging Self of all and yet at BMI level, can also be a witness to and participant in the Play simultaneously.
Ø And as per some jeevanmukta’s participation is due to ‘avidyAlesha’ ( a remnant of his previously acquired avidyA), so jeevanmukta is in strict sense not ‘completely realized one’. Hence Videha mukti considered as ‘mukhya mukti’ and jeevanmukti as ‘gaUNa mukti’. Someone would even say : brahma jnAna / realization would bring ‘immediate physical death of that jnAni’ as dehadhAraNa (embodiedness) is avidyAkruta. And one who attains this feat (sadyOmukti) is called ‘sadyOmukta’.
And as per some jeevanmukta’s participation is due to ‘avidyAlesha’ ( a remnant of his previously acquired avidyA), so jeevanmukta is in strict sense not ‘completely realized one’. Hence Videha mukti considered as ‘mukhya mukti’ and jeevanmukti as ‘gaUNa mukti’.
Someone would even say : brahma jnAna / realization would bring ‘immediate physical death of that jnAni’ as dehadhAraNa (embodiedness) is avidyAkruta. And one who attains this feat (sadyOmukti) is called ‘sadyOmukta’.
praNAms Sri Sudhanshu prabhuji
Hare Krishna
In srishTi-drishTi-vAda, avidyAlesha is present during jIvanmukti.
avidyAlesha refers taNo that shakti of avidyA which is the cause of objects which are eligible for aparOksha-perception (अपरोक्षप्रतिभासयोग्यार्थाभासजनिकायाः शक्तिः). This continues despite jnAna because prArabdha-rUpa-pratibandhaka is present.
Other shakti namely प्रपञ्चे पारमार्थिकत्वादिभ्रमहेतुशक्तिः and प्रपञ्चे अर्थक्रियासमर्थत्वसम्पादकशक्तिः are removed. Since these two shakti are removed, which are the cause of bondage, the term "mukti" is very much apt for jIvanmukti.
Ø Again big big nomenclature to avidyA shakti!! Which is ultimately concluded as Kalpita and adhyArOpita. Anyway as I said above when you are talking about pratibaNdhaka you cannot talk about jeevamukti. Very sanctity of ‘mukti’ pada will be lost when there is an iota of pratibandhaka / avidyAlesha. Eha brahmaNi nAnA nAsti kiMchana aNumAtramapi. So some sort of pratibaNdhaka and jeevanmukti cannot co-exist in a same person / jnAni.
Someone would even say : brahma jnAna / realization would bring ‘immediate physical death of that jnAni’ as dehadhAraNa (embodiedness) is avidyAkruta. And one who attains this feat (sadyOmukti) is called ‘sadyOmukta’.
Where have you read this that sadyOmukti entails physical death? Please cite a reference other than klesha-apahAriNI.
Ø Just find out in later vyAkhyAna-s it must have been said. And in kleshApahAriNi this type of non-sense stand has been completely refuted by Sri SSS.
SadyOmukti and jIvanmukti are distinguished. Naishkarmya Siddhi, along with commentary by Chitsukhacharya, 4.56 to 4.61 may be perused. The two views are distinguished. Here also, the jIvanmukti is stated as the alternative.
सम्यग्ज्ञानशिखिप्लुष्टमोहतत्कार्यरूपिणः। सकृन्निवृत्तेर्बाध्यस्य किं कार्यमवशिष्यते ॥ ५९ ॥
वास्तवेनैव वृत्तेनाविद्यायाः प्रध्वस्तत्वात् न किञ्चिदवशिष्यत इत्युक्तः परिहारः ।
अथापरस्साम्प्रदायिक:-
निवृत्त
सर्प: सर्वोत्थं
यथा कम्पं
न मुञ्चति I
विध्वस्ताखिलमोहोऽपि मोहकार्यं
तथात्मवित्
॥६०॥
Please note that both views are in accordance with sampradAya as mentioned by Naishkarmya Siddhi. Cgitsukhacharya says -
एवं सद्योमुक्तिपक्षमङ्गीकृत्य
शेषशेषिभावः
परिहृतः
। अधुना
तात्पर्यमाह - वास्तवेनैवेत्यादिना-
जीवन्मुक्तिक्षे
न शेषशेषिभाव
इत्युत्तरग्रन्थस्य
तात्पर्यमाह ।
That there are two descriptions mukti, namely sadyOmukti and jIvanmukti is clear from Naishkarmya Siddhi. 4.54 to 59 is sadyOmukti, and 4.60 onwards is jIvanmukti.
Ø Brahmaiva hi muktyAvasthA, na-cha brahmaNOnekAkArayOgOsti clarifies bhAshyakAra in sUtra bhAshya. The difference you are talking about between sadyOmukta and jeevanmukta is quite untenable considering the fact that sashareeratvasya mithyAjnAnanimittatvAt.
Mukti and avidyAlesha both can co-exist like tamaH-prakAsha in SDV!!?? What type of mukti it is when this mukta is still having the traces of avidyA ?? can there be a complete eradication of sarpa jnAna and complete (paripUrNa) knowledge of rajju, when one is still having the traces of sarpa jnAna!!??
When you are still talking about pratibandhaka there is no meaning to mukti here…Please share what is your understanding of ‘mukti’ ??
Again big big nomenclature to avidyA shakti!! Which is ultimately concluded as Kalpita and adhyArOpita.
Anyway as I said above when you are talking about pratibaNdhaka you cannot talk about jeevamukti. Very sanctity of ‘mukti’ pada will be lost when there is an iota of pratibandhaka / avidyAlesha.
Just find out in later vyAkhyAna-s it must have been said. And in kleshApahAriNi this type of non-sense stand has been completely refuted by Sri SSS.
Brahmaiva hi muktyAvasthA, na-cha brahmaNOnekAkArayOgOsti clarifies bhAshyakAra in sUtra bhAshya. The difference you are talking about between sadyOmukta and jeevanmukta is quite untenable considering the fact that sashareeratvasya mithyAjnAnanimittatvAt.
By the way in SDV and ajAtavAda different types of mukti-s advocated by bhAshyakAra according to you???
praNAms
Hare Krishna
I think a Jnani should be able to be in Jeevan Mukti state under every situation but still might need some effort.
If sense of duty is present then this effort and time window may be large.
I guess Brahma Jnanam doesn't mean an immediate right response under all situation.
Its a potency in knowledge which when applied manifests the right way, by consuming time and effort.
Or the settling time for this potency in the manifested domain will depend on the situation.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/advaitin/1175857557.3559834.1734426543435%40mail.yahoo.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/advaitin/CAKk0Te2gw_WqVPDiUMPxyoKoNkNiOxtaY9_T_67mDKOujgUWFg%40mail.gmail.com.