Permanent constitution for Sudan requires the demise of Bashir regime

[Elisabeth Janaina]

Permanent constitution for Sudan requires the demise of Bashir regime

Article
Comments (0)

email Email
print Print
pdfSave
separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

By Mahmoud A. Suleiman

This article comes against the backdrop of the decision of the
Sudanese parliament to approve amendments in the 2005 Constitution and
rejected by the components of the political opposition both civil and
armed. It is noteworthy that on Tuesday, April 25, 2017, the Sudanese
parliament passed a resolution of constitutional amendments on public
freedoms, forcing even the other Muslim Brotherhood Movement (MBM)
faction in Sudan the Popular Congress Party (PCP), known for its
positions in support of the national dialogue, to announce its
acquittal. Moreover, the amendments, in general, have retained the
powers of the security apparatus –the notorious so-called National
Intelligence and Security Services (NISS), which the opposition
rejects in all its forms because they have exceeded the proposals made
by political forces that participated in the ‘National Dialogue-Wathba
Dialogue’ calling for reducing these powers and limiting the functions
of the (NISS) in collecting and analyzing information. Here, reality
thinking is in short supply in the (NCP) regime household chaired by
the Génocidaires Omer Hassan Ahmed al-Bashir to the detriment of the
Sudanese nation Victim of the rule of fools and reckless daredevils.

The foregoing call for the demise of the ruling National Congress
Party (NCP) before consensus on the permanent constitution of Sudan
did not come from a vacuum. It came because Omer al-Bashir’s
assumption of power in Sudan does not foresee a democratic system
which would represent a threat to Omar al-Bashir who is wanted by the
International Criminal Court (ICC). Thus, Bashir and his entourage
work tirelessly Day and Night with all the strength for the
continuation of the arbitrariness for the sake of lifelong rule for
their genocidal Master of Grace, to avoid his arrest and trial in The
Hague, as happened to his ilk other dictators such as Laurent Gbagbo
of Republic of Côte d’Ivoire, Hussein Habre of Chad, Germaine Katanga
of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), former Yugoslavia
Serbian war criminals leaders indicted and tried by the ICC such as
Slobodan Miloševi?, Radovan Karadzic and Charles Taylor the first
African president to be prosecuted in an international court where he
has been found guilty of aiding and abetting war crimes and crimes
against humanity for supporting rebels who carried out atrocities in
Sierra Leone in return for "blood diamonds".
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/apr/26/charles-taylor-guilty-war-crimes

Thus, Omer al-Bashir’s whim for being in power of Sudan for life
preoccupies his thinking day and night as a saviour from the
predicaments that await him at the prison cells at The Hague in the
Netherlands and causing him panicky all the time. So, Bashir finds
some reassurance and consolation from his presence in power to rule
what remained of the land and people of Sudan.

The amendments to the Constitution, in general, have retained the
powers of the security apparatus, which the opposition rejects in all
its forms because they have exceeded the proposals made by political
forces that participated in the national dialogue calling for reducing
these powers and limiting the functions of the security apparatus
i(NISS) n collecting and analyzing information.

The drafting of a Permanent Constitution for Sudan requires a plethora
of important groundbreaking moves among the most important of which is
achieving just, comprehensive and lasting peace that would bringing
the criminals to justice to face the predicaments of the atrocious
crimes they have perpetrated in the rights of the people of the
country since the ill-fated coming into the helm through military coup
d’ état three decades ago. Among other crucial requirements is the
unfettered return of the Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs), refugees
and immigrants to their original homes and Hawakeer in the regions to
participate in the development process. This obviously includes
removal of the foreigners imported by the (NCP) regime to occupy the
land of the native Sudanese citizens with a view to bringing about a
groundbreaking demographic change of the Darfur region which the
regime considers the indigenous population as its archenemies and
supporters of the rebel movements.

Omer al-Bashir’s dictated order of ‘permanent constitution is nothing
more than his infamous Wathba dialogue that meant to distract the
Sudanese people and the political opposition away from the basic
issues that concern the citizen more. The Wathba Dialogue has
contributed into extending the life of the ruling regime of the
National Congress Party (NCP) for more than three years that have been
added to the survival of Omar al-Bashir in the rule of Sudan for the
lean 28 years l Noting that Omer Bashir’s never-ending national
dialogue- aka Wathba Dialogue – started since its inception on January
27, 2014 so far. As it is known globally that the International
Criminal Court (ICC) has issued two arrest warrants in 2009 and 2010,
against the Sudanese President Omar Hassan Ahmed al-Bashir for crimes
against humanity, war crimes and the organization of "genocide and
other atrocities" in the Darfur region, western Sudan. Moreover, the
successive visits to countries outside Sudan by Omar al-Bashir became
a symbol of criminality and fugitiveness from the international
justice. With all the foregoing degree of criminality, Omer al-Bashir
in view to his lack of insight and foresight, dares to call on the
Sudanese people to participate in drafting a permanent constitution,
bearing in mind that he and his entourage undermined Sudan’s
constitution and overthrew the democratically elected government in
which the National Islamic Front (NIF) as a political party was part
of that coalition government in 1989 during the military coup led by
Omar al-Bashir. The most important and difficult question to answer is
as to how confident the people of Sudan are and assured that the
ruling regime of the NCP would fulfil the promise that it will
implement what is included in the permanent constitution to be
drafted.

Questions continue to elicit reassuring answers, including how much
the Sudanese political opposition parties and the armed movements have
trusts on Omar al-Bashir’s commitment to covenants to fulfill what is
agreed upon because previous experiences of the peace agreements were
not met by the National Congress Party regime, led by Omar al-Bashir
who is now unashamedly calling on the opposition forces to join his
ranks for the Sudan’s New Permanent constitution draft agreement.

The US court has certified testimony from witnesses who said Sudan
continued to provide support and shelter to Osama bin Laden’s al-Qaeda
network, which carried out attacks on embassies in Nairobi, Kenya and
Dar es Salaam in Tanzania, which killed 200 people, including 12
Americans, in 1998. Sudan pays an astronomical sum of $ 7.3 billion to
the relatives of the American victims and others. Thus, the existence
of the ruling regime of the National Congress Party in Sudan is a
disaster for both citizens today and future generations. But the
strange thing is that the Sudan stopped attending the hearings and
completely ignored the case after that. The judge expressed his
astonishment at the emergence of Sudan after a month of the sentences,
and his surprise at the request of Sudan to repeal these provisions!
Oh God, it is not the time for gloating, because the amount of the
money required to pay for the victims of the al-Qaeda bombings will be
deducted from the livelihood of the oppressed Sudanese citizens who
suffer the woes of civil wars and injustice.

On the other side and as Ayesha al-Basri said Omar al-Bashir’s
successive visits to countries despite his indictment by the (ICC) for
the crimes he has perpetrated against the Sudanese citizens in Darfur
are a blow to the victims and contempt for justice.

The NCP regime and the Darfuri armed movements, Justice and Equality
Movement (JEM) and Sudan Liberation Movement of Minni Minnawi (SLM-MM)
along with the National Umma Party (NUP) in August 2016 signed the
African Union brokered the Roadmap Agreement, a framework for a
political process to end the war and achieve democratic reforms. As
expected, the NCP regime created obstacles to reach to an agreed
cessation of hostilities with a view to facilitating the delivery of
humanitarian relief to Sudanese citizens in places of conflict and war
zones. Instead, the regime as expected put forward its hidden agenda,
the so-called the outcome of an internal dialogue process and called
it the ’National Document’. The armed opposition, as expected,
dismissed this document and said it never meant anything to them and
they stuck to the need to implement the Roadmap which Khartoum
categorically dismissed.

The (NCP) regime Security apparatus, the National Intelligence and
Security Services (NISS) continue arbitrarily arresting opposition
figures for expressing their opinion regarding the human rights
violation that the entity commits against the legitimate rights of
political opposition. The recent detention of Ibrahim al-Shiekh and
his colleague Abubakr Yousif Babiker both from Sudanese Congress Party
(SCoP) for their support for the Darfur Student who resigned from the
University of Bakht aL Ruda which is a blatant violation of the
Transitional Constitution of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA)/
Naivasha Agreement of the year 2005. Ironically, Omer al-Bashir has
been tirelessly working to get rid of that constitution which
addressed the freedoms and the democratic process for Sudan prior to
the secession of the South Sudan State. His regime is now trying
through his unelected parliament to convert the 2005 Constitution into
a (NCP) preferred so-called ‘Permanent Constitution to suit his one
party rule under dictatorship.

The NCP regime chaired by Omer al-Bashir is no stranger to outrageous
long lasting damaging decisions that would contravene the peaceful
living of the people of Sudan through revocation of covenants and
reneging negotiated, agreed and signed peace agreements with the
parties in dispute. Furthermore, Omer al-Bashir and his regime cannot
be relied on to reach a just and sustainable peace that will stop the
Janjaweed waged proxy warfare and restore security and stability for
the people of Sudan in Darfur, the Nuba Mountains, the Blue Nile,
Eastern Sudan, and all the other parts of the country affected by the
ravages of wars.

No to NCP Constitution

The Sudanese people remain opposed to any constitution approved by the
National Congress Party (NCP) parliament backed by semi-parties formed
by the ruling regime led by Omar al-Bashir.

Before the ending of this article, it is necessary and our duty to
give a voice of thanks and praise to Sheikh Yaqut and the people of
his village in the reception and hospitality of more than 1200
students from Darfur at the University of Bakht al-Ruda who have made
mass resignations from the University for the treatment of racism by
the University Administration. Moreover, the National Intelligence and
Security Services (NISS) of the Government of the National Congress
Party (NCP) denied their entry to the National Capital of Sudan
Khartoum. The Security elements passed threats to Sheikh Yaqut and the
people of the Village for hosting the students. However, Sheikh Yaqut
and the citizens of his village went ahead with the hospitality of the
students, despite the threat from the security services. By doing so,
they presented a rare form of devotion for patriotism and humanity. In
conclusion, we have to chant, saying Long Live the struggle of the
Sudanese people and Long Live the sincerity of Sheikh Yaqut and the
struggles of the people of the village of Sheikh Yaqut!

There remains an important question that waits for an answer as to how
we trust and be certain that those who had previously undermined the
Constitution of Sudan after their coup against a democratic government
would come up with a Permanent Constitution for Sudan? Here as if we
were expecting the wolf and the hyena to take care of our goats and
sheep or out of the frying pan into the fire!

Winona LaDuke the American environmentalist, economist, and writer,
known for her work on tribal land claims and preservation, as well as
sustainable development has been quoted as saying: (Mother Earth needs
us to keep our covenant. We will do this in courts, we will do this on
our radio station, and we will commit to our descendants to work hard
to protect this land and water for them. Whether you have feet, wings,
fins, or roots, we are all in it together).

Barbara Levy Boxer the American politician who served as a United
States Senator from California 1993 to 2017. A member of the
Democratic Party, she previously served in the U.S. House of
Representatives 1983 to 1993 has been quoted as saying: (We know no
document is perfect, but when we amend the Constitution, it would be
to expand rights, not to take away rights from decent, loyal
Americans. This great Constitution of ours should never be used to
make a group of Americans permanent second-class citizens. )

Dr Mahmoud A. Suleiman is an author, columnist and a blogger. His blog
is http://thussudan.wordpress.com/


The views expressed in the 'Comment and Analysis' section are solely
the opinions of the writers. The veracity of any claims made are the
responsibility of the author not Sudan Tribune.

If you want to submit an opinion piece or an analysis please email it
to com...@sudantribune.com

Sudan Tribune reserves the right to edit articles before publication.
Please include your full name, relevant personal information and
political affiliations.