Ethiopia’s rubbish policies

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Elisabeth Janaina

unread,
Apr 15, 2017, 2:25:23 PM4/15/17
to southsudankob
Ethiopia’s rubbish policies
By Kalkidan Yibeltal
April 11, 2017
1
Share:

Last month’s landslide at a dumpsite killed 125 people. Can the next
tragedy be averted?

Ethiopia’s capital Addis Ababa produces 200,000 tons of waste each year.

An old, broken down garbage truck stands inside the near-deserted
compound of the Sandafa Sanitary Landfill, 20 km northeast of Addis
Ababa. The truck has been there since July 2016, the last time the
137-hectare landfill was operational.

Built by the French construction company VINCI Grands Projects at a
cost of over $15 million, it was hoped the disposal and recycling
centre would provide waste management for the capital’s 3.5 million
residents along with 200,000 people living in the surrounding
districts of Oromiya.

Yet seven months into its 2016 opening, operations came to a halt as
local farmers protested, saying they’d been deceived about the nature
of the project, that they’d been inadequately compensated for land,
and complaining of the pollution.

“There were demonstrations in front of the main gate; some of the
farmers were even lying on the road,” recalls a 24-year-old guard at
the site. “They were saying anyone who wished to dump waste at their
doorsteps from then on had to run them over first.”

In response to the protests, senior government officials including
Addis Ababa city mayor Diriba Kuma sat down with community members and
local authorities pledging to make improvements.

“They promised to build wall fences and net ceiling” to keep out stray
dogs and scavenging birds, says Shimallis Abbabaa Jimaa, the
district’s chief administrator. “They even promised to [build]
pipelines to supply clean water.” But since then, he says, “there
hasn’t been any activity”.

Indeed, as Ethiopia’s two largest ethnic groups – the Oromo and Amhara
– rose up and protested against the government alleging systemic
repression and marginalisation from late-2015, the issues at Sandafa
were relegated to the backburner. But that all changed on 11 March as
a tragic landslide at the capital’s overused garbage dumping site
Reppi claimed the lives of 125 people.

[Ethiopia’s unprecedented nationwide Oromo protests: who, what, why?]
Caught off guard

The 36-hectare Reppi Sanitary landfill – better known as Koshe (‘dirt’
in Amharic) – is an open dumpsite on the outskirts of Addis Ababa.
More than 200,000 tons of waste is produced annually in the capital
and, for over half a century, millions of tons of it have been dumped
at Koshe.

More than two hundred households surround the landfill site, while
some families live on the garbage pile itself in makeshift shelters
constructed from plastic, cardboard and wood. Living so close to the
dumpsite without fences, proper drainage or odour control was always
challenging, concedes Belay Melaku, a 35-year-old driver who resides
in the area. “But we have no options” he says.

In 2013, the government came up with a multi-faceted plan to regulate
and eventually close Koshe. To begin with, the British company
Cambridge Industries was contracted alongside Chinese National
Electric Engineering Corporation to commence a $120 million project in
which un-recyclable rubbish would be burnt to generate electricity.
The French Development Agency agreed to financially back the building
of a green park on the other side of the landfill site. And another
waste disposal facility –Sandafa – was identified.

After 50 years, waste dumping at Koshe finally ceased. However, after
farmers blockaded Sandafa Landfill, Reppi once again resumed its
decades-old service. The mountain of solid waste continued to grow
until it inevitably came crumbling down last month.

In that massive landslide, makeshift shelters and houses were
demolished and over 125 people were killed. “It came down on us”, says
Belay, who lost his uncle in the accident. “We have never seen
anything like it.”

For the fourth time in two years Ethiopia observed three days of
national mourning.
Political entanglement

Dagmawit Moges, spokesperson for Addis Ababa city administration, says
a taskforce has been set up to investigate the cause of the accident.
Meanwhile, according to the city’s labour and social affairs office,
the inhabitants 96 of the 102 makeshift shelters that were destroyed
have been relocated to a government-run housing project.

However, despite the devastating tragedy, waste continues to be dumped
at Koshe, with Dagmawit explaining that authorities are still
searching for a lasting solution. “We are looking at our options”, she
says.

One of those options is, of course, Sandafa. But while those who
protested the new site are quick to express sympathy with the victims
of the Koshe landslide, they are adamant that stopping operations at
Sandafa was the right thing to do. “The same thing might happen here
if they continue to dump waste,” says local Teshome Tefera. “We cannot
allow that.”

Administrative officers in the district are similarly firm in their
conviction that the selection process for Sandafa was ill-conceived
from the start, noting that it is a farming and residential area.
“That is the source of all problems,” says chief administrator
Shimallis.

This presents a real dilemma for the government, and one that is made
all the more complicated by Ethiopia’s ongoing political tensions.
Addis Ababa continues to grow, creating pressing challenges such as
that of waste management. But at the same time, any planned expansions
of the capital face strong resistance from the Oromo.

Addis Ababa is entirely surrounded by the Oromiya regional state, and
expansions of the city have often led to the dispossession of land and
the eviction of Oromo farmers. In fact, it was opposition to the
so-called Addis Ababa master plan in November 2015 that eventually
grew and culminated in the more widespread and wide-ranging protests
that engulfed much of Ethiopia in 2016.

[Ethiopia: How popular uprising became the only option]

Where this leaves Koshe, Sandafa and the 200,000 tons of waste the
capital generates each year remains to be seen. Shimallis says he is
willing to entertain a future possibility in which the Sandafa site is
functional once more. “A lot of money is spent on the project”, he
admits.

But Dagmawit strikes a more cautious note. “I don’t see it going back
to work in the near future,” she says. “There are a lot of things that
must be done first.”
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages