Elisabeth Janaina
unread,Jun 2, 2013, 12:20:55 AM6/2/13Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to
Security restricts S. Sudan TV from covering VP’s activities, as his
office dismisses
ArticleComments (112)
EmailPrintSave
May 31, 2013 (JUBA) - South Sudan’s security services on Friday
ordered management of the state owned South Sudan television (SSTV) to
refrain from covering activities involving vice president Riek Machar,
a source told Sudan Tribune.
Vice-president Machar (c) speaking to SSTV journalists (file/ST)
However, media official at the office of the vice-president played
down reports on censorship imposed on the coverage of Machar’s
activities, stressing that no such measures can be taken against "the
top boss" of the South Sudanese government during Kiir’s absence.
Security officials, who warned of tough measures if SSTV journalists
fail to implement the directive, did not give any reason for the move,
which comes a day after privately owned Citizen Television was given a
similar directive.
These developments coincided with president Salva Kiir’s trip to Japan
and recent reports about competition within the presidency over the
leadership of the ruling Sudan people’s Liberation Movement (SPLM).
Responding to Thursday’s claims by Citizen Television, Machar’s press
secretary, James Gadet Dak, told Sudan Tribune, that the vice
president’s the office only became aware of the allegations after
reading Sudan Tribune’s story.
"We are not aware of official policy or decision that restricts media
coverage on political activities. What I know is that the
vice-president, who currently acts in the absence of the president, is
the top boss of all the government’s institutions that are under the
executive, including the security organs," he said.
"And I can assure you that he did not authorise that action as acting
head of the government," he said. The state-owned television and radio
have normally been broadcasting the activities of Machar’s office,
including political functions, he said.
Dak added that if the independent media were facing difficulties in
freely covering apolitical events, they should raise their complaints
to the ministry of information and broadcasting.
The South Sudanese president was seen off at Juba airport by senior
officials including Machar, who in April was stripped of powers
delegated to him by the president, after reports emerged that his
deputy was considering standing for the chairmanship of South Sudan’s
ruling party (SPLM) at an upcoming convention.
There are fears among Kiir’s supporters in the SPLM that he might loss
his seat in the upcoming national convention to elect chairperson of
the governing SPLM and then be in prime position to be the ruling
party’s candidate for the 2015 presidential elections.
“It has been more than one month now since security agents started
being harsh on our activities, forcing us to be selective in what we
report about activities involving the vice president", a presenter
with the state-owned television told Sudan Tribune Friday.
SSTV’s management, the journalist said, do not want to be seen as a
tool disseminating political activities favouring particular
politicians. The presenter, who wished to remain anonymous, said that
"security services have increased threats on what we cover, especially
meetings by the vice president".
Concerning the reports on restrictions imposed on the SSTV
journalists, Dak stressed that Machar activities are well broadcast on
the state-owned TV and radio. But he however admitted they are
subjected to some pressures.
"I sometimes receive complaints from South Sudan TV about the
behaviour of some security agents who agitate that the TV presenters
and reporters should not broadcast some of the political opinions
stated by the Vice President", he said.
Journalists claimed that security agents often acted on the directives
of individuals in the office of the president when threatening
sections of the media who are critical of the performance of Kiir’s
administration.
The presenter said some colleagues had, in the past, received threats
and others were arbitrarily arrested, pointing out that it was not
just the private media facing such mistreatment.
Journalists from independent media organisations "are seriously
criticising our coverage and reporting on the national activities
without taking into consideration [the] challenges we are facing".
State media staff had been "threatened at gun point for technical
faults", the reporter said.
Last year, journalists from the state broadcaster were arrested in Wau
on suspicion of refusing to cover a speech by president Kiir in
aftermath of protests against the Western Bahr el Ghazal government
over the relocation an administrative centre. South Sudanese police
were accused of shooting dead eight protestors, according to rights
groups who say that the events have not been properly investigated.
John Garang, a SSTV presenter was last year arrested by security
agents for allegedly allowing footage to be broadcast showing Kiir "in
unclear and gloomy appearance".
Dak advised TV personnel who complained to take up the matter to the
ministry of information and broadcasting under which they operate and
then see the way forward from that level.
Since independence in 2011, South Sudanese authorities have been
reticent to allow freedom of expression among human rights activists
and the press - some of the stated aims of the SPLM during the civil
war - according to the Committee to Protect Journalists.
CPJ recently wrote an open letter to Kiir asking him to do more to
ensure press freedom and end the self censorship which journalists say
they have been forced into over the actions of the security services,
human rights and corruption.
Washington’s envoy to Juba, Susan Page, said recently that the US
government was "very concerned about the deteriorating levels of press
freedom" in the young nation, which has been increasingly criticised
for its human rights record by the countries that supported its
independence.
(ST)