ERIC SCERRI PhDUCLAWebsite: http://www.ericscerri.com
PhilPeople https://philpeople.org/profiles/eric-scerri
Google Scholar https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&user=8w1T5bEAAAAJ
ResearchGate https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Eric-Scerri
Editor-in-Chief of Foundations of Chemistry https://link.springer.com/journal/10698
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Periodic table mailing list" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to PT-L+uns...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/PT-L/7689E292-82F7-4253-BC06-61AE424900F2%40g.ucla.edu.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/PT-L/2C144640-0661-4EF1-9337-40A4F3FAF04C%40meta-synthesis.com.
I just figured that this guy is so cranky that he would fit perfectly into this forum.
"Scientific theories can be classifiable to centre, frontier or fringe regions of science…
Theories at the center level are established as part of mainstream science. Examples include the theory of relativity, the Newton’s laws of motion and Kepler’s laws of planetary motion.
The frontier level is also part of mainstream science, yet there are still unresolved aspects. In other words, these theories are still being challenged by rival explanations…Evolution...[is]... an example of the frontier level of scientific theories. The amount of evidence in science now has elevated evolutionary theory to one of the center level theories of science. Likewise, the extinction of dinosaurs has moved forward from the fringe level at this time...
The fringe level is the point when theories are beginning to make entry into science. At this level, theories may be based on crank ideas or they could be sound, but in either case they are subjected to analysis. In time, they may, or may not, rise to the other two levels."
Erduran S & Dagher ZR 2014, "Scientific knowledge", in Reconceptualizing the Nature of Science for Science Education. Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education, vol. 43, Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9057-4_6 (p. 117)
"The mystery of the Periodic Table PT is… rows of length 2, 8, 8, 18, 18, 32, 32..., signifying number of electrons with twice repeated periods according to 2n^2 with n =1,2,3,4."
“Most challenges to scientific orthodoxy are wrong… A lot of them are crank. But it happens from time to time that a challenge to scientific orthodoxy is actually right. And the people who make that challenge face a terrible situation.”(Science News: “The Status Quark”)
"We scientists should be very careful to guard against excessive smugness."(Science-Based Medicine, “The Case of John Lykoudis Revisited: Crank or Visionary?”)
Scerri E 2020, The Periodic Table: Its Story and Its Significance, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Periodic table mailing list" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to PT-L+uns...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/PT-L/A3D540C6-FDD4-4B3F-A877-893FD94AFA0C%40iinet.net.au.
Hi,
I have recently completed a project that fuses the periodic table of 118 elements with the nuclide chart of 3,300 isotopes, resulting in what I call the "Hybrid Nuclide Chart in ADOMAH PT format."
In this chart, the ADOMAH PT is divided into seven provisional "strands," arranged in order of atomic number, and placed at the top of the sheet. Below it, I have positioned the nuclide chart.
The nuclide chart is a hybrid format: it combines the IAEA's colour classification of decay modes (2025) with the JAEA's classification of half-life ranges (2018 printed edition), expressed through variations in the width of rectangles. Unlike conventional nuclide charts, the axes are transposed, with the vertical axis representing the number of neutrons.
Please note that I have obtained permission from Mr. Valery Tsimmerman of the United States, the originator of the ADOMAH PT, to use it in this way.
IAEA Livechart https://www-nds.iaea.org/relnsd/vcharthtml/VChartHTML.html
JAEA(2018), For the nuclide data, I have used the 2018 printed edition
http://www.aesj.or.jp/~ndd/ndnews/pdf127/No127-06.pdf
JAEA(2014)
https://wwwndc.jaea.go.jp/CN14/index.html
The seven strands form an upward staircase at the points where the electron blocks shift, which I find convenient since the nuclide chart also tends to rise upward.
*Strands and paper sizes
1: 1H–4Be A4 landscape
2: 5B–12Mg A4 landscape
3: 13Al–20Ca A4 landscape
4: 21Sc–38Sr A3 landscape
5: 39Y–56Ba A3 landscape
6: 57La–88Ra Left (57La–70Yb): A3 portrait
Right (71Lu–88Ra): A3 landscape, joined along dotted lines
7: 89Ac–120Ubn Left (89Ac–102No): A3 portrait
Right (103Lr–120Ubn): A3 landscape, joined along dotted lines
When these strands are overlaid to cover the nuclide chart portion, the ADOMAH PT becomes visible. If they are not overlaid but instead connected horizontally in order of atomic number, the result is the hybrid nuclide chart.
Since there is a slight margin between the elements in the nuclide chart, I believe there is room to add further expressions or annotations.
I would appreciate any feedback or comments you may have.
Thank you.
Best wishes,
Nagayasu