Rudolph Tanzi, RE: C.s. Morrison, RE: [Sadhu Sanga] Physics and qualia

37 views
Skip to first unread message

Vasavada, Kashyap V

unread,
Jun 20, 2017, 8:14:41 AM6/20/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com

Dear Rudy,

At the moment I am open to all ideas about quantum mechanics, sentient observation and particle interactions. Perhaps you can elaborate what you mean by “fine line” .

With regards.

Kashyap

 

From: online_sa...@googlegroups.com [mailto:online_sa...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Rudolph Tanzi
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 6:34 PM
To: Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
Cc: C. S. Morrison <cs...@hotmail.co.uk>
Subject: Re: C.s. Morrison, RE: [Sadhu Sanga] Physics and qualia

 

Dear Kashyap,

 

I would think there may be a fine line between “sentient observation” of a human and “reaction to an interaction” of a particle in considering experiences that define realties.

 

Rudy

 

 

 

more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Rudy Tanzi

unread,
Jun 20, 2017, 2:31:19 PM6/20/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
I meant where do we draw the line between our perception interpreting the universe that we participate in experientially in consciousness and the interactions of a single particle in which action-reaction likewise creates an experiential event? Is that not also a form of consciousness?

Sent from Rudy's iPhone 




--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sa...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/Online_Sadhu_Sanga/54567b44b5b54c25b7b55ddbb36919b5%40IN-CCI-EX03.ads.iu.edu.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

JACK SARFATTI

unread,
Jun 20, 2017, 4:08:27 PM6/20/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
NO RUDY!

there is no action-reaction in the case of a single particle!!
you do not seem to have understood anything I have said about that or what John Walker clearly wrote about that.

Anyone who cannot understand the math in Sutherland's papers will never really understand consciousness as a physical phenomenon.


Serge Patlavskiy

unread,
Jun 20, 2017, 9:04:54 PM6/20/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
-
Jack Sarfatti <jacksa...@icloud.com> on June 20, 2017 wrote:
>Anyone who cannot understand the math in Sutherland's 
>papers will never really understand consciousness as a 
>physical phenomenon.
.
[S.P.] Luckily, "anyone who cannot understand the math in Sutherland's papers" and is not satisfied with various panpsychistic and physicalistic solutions may opt for a good alternative approach. I mean that there is a chance to understand the mechanisms of consciousness by considering consciousness as a phenomenon of informational nature which can be isolated from complex systems like a living organism.
.
However, this approach is by no means easier. This is because that, before starting to talk about consciousness, we have first to consider a special meta-theory (which would make room for the activity of informational factor in general and consciousness in particular) and we have also to consider several important concomitant applied theories. 
.
A good analogy is as follows. Somebody may start from copying files to the flash drive -- this corresponds to start talking about consciousness immediately. But, in fact, we have first to consider some operation system to make out computer to work -- this corresponds to constructing a special meta-theory. Then we have to install the drivers necessary for the flash drive to be "seen" by operation system, and then to format our flash drive under FAT32 or NTFS -- this corresponds to constructing the concomitant applied theories. And only then we may start copying files to the flash drive -- this corresponds to starting constructing the very applied theory of consciousness.
.
Best,
Serge Patlavskiy





From: "'JACK SARFATTI' via Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." <Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com>
To: "online_sa...@googlegroups.com" <Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 11:08 PM
Subject: Re: Rudolph Tanzi, RE: C.s. Morrison, RE: [Sadhu Sanga] Physics and qualia

C. S. Morrison

unread,
Jun 21, 2017, 12:31:37 PM6/21/17
to 'JACK SARFATTI' via Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D.

Dear Jack,  Rudy and others,

Might I offer the alternative suggestion that anyone who does not understand the implications of DARWIN's theory doesn't understand consciousness. We don't know what consciousness is.  But we do know that it is a highly complex instance of something that appears perfectly organised for some function - the encoding of sensory information (real or imagined) in a genetically evaluated way ( where by genetically evaluated I mean that situations that tend to be bad for our prospects of passing on our genes to future generations tend to give us unpleasant experiences whilst those that are good for those prospects tend to give us relatively pleasant ones (for most people most of the time)). Every example of such perfect organisation is explained as a product of positive natural selection.. The organisation in our consciousness ought therefore to be explained the same way. Each small step toward that organization must have had a beneficial effect upon our ancestors' chances of passing on their genes to future generations.

Just think what that means. Since we have no neuroscientific reason to expect visual data to be encoded in retinal-image-like forms anywhere in the human brain, the generators of colour qualia (whatever they are physically) must have been organised through natural selection to produce the colour qualia in these forms. This seems to me to imply that each point in our visual experience must be associated with a distinct output that the system we call our consciousness is generating. The effect of the different types of colour qualia that might appear there can then be understood as varying the probability of that output. For some reason it was beneficial for those colour-adjusted probabilities to vary across that space of potential outputs in a way that was more and more similar (even with colour constancy and the filled in blindspot, etc) to the patterns of light intensity variations across the retina. In my book THE BLIND MINDMAKER I have shown why such evolution would occur if we were the aspect of nature that selects the random outcomes of position measurements of a single quantum particle that the brain has adapted to introduce randomness into our attention-focussing process.

That is why my theory of Position Selecting Interactionism is likely to be the correct explanation. Only if a consciousness is positioning a physical effect at particular positions under the influence of its qualia are you ever going to explain how its colour qualia came to be organised into patterns resembling the patterns of particular wavebands of incident light interacting with the retina.

And if your theory can't explain that, no matter how much of Sutherland's maths you understand, you can't possibly have understood consciousness.

Best wishes,
Colin

If interested, my theory is detailed in my book

THE BLIND MINDMAKER: Explaining Consciousness without Magic or Misrepresentation

https://www.amazon.com/Blind-Mindmaker-Explaining-Consciousness-Misrepresentation/dp/1541283953

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Blind-Mindmaker-Explaining-Consciousness-Misrepresentation/dp/1541283953

Send from Huawei Y360

Hameroff, Stuart R - (hameroff)

unread,
Jun 21, 2017, 1:44:09 PM6/21/17
to online_sa...@googlegroups.com

Which came first, consciousness or the brain?

 

The notion that consciousness emerged from complex brain computation is belied by the increasing number of mainstream scientists and philosophers who

resort to panpsychism, not to mention Eastern philosophers and quantum consciousness enthusiast who all agree, in various ways, that qualia and feelings existed before life.

If so, feelings (e.g. due to Penrose OR events) in the primordial soup may have prompted the origin of life, and driven its evolution. Behavior is based on reward (feelings,

not gene survival), including not only hedonism, but altruism and spirituality.

 

And I dont agree that consciousness is necessarily complex. What's complex about a toothache?

 

cheers

 

Stuart Hameroff


From: online_sa...@googlegroups.com <online_sa...@googlegroups.com> on behalf of C. S. Morrison <cs...@hotmail.co.uk>
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 9:25 AM
To: Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com; 'JACK SARFATTI' via Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D.; online_sa...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Rudolph Tanzi, RE: C.s. Morrison, RE: [Sadhu Sanga] Physics and qualia
 

Jack Sarfatti

unread,
Jun 21, 2017, 1:44:31 PM6/21/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com


Sent from my iPad

On Jun 21, 2017, at 9:25 AM, C. S. Morrison <cs...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:

Dear Jack,  Rudy and others,

Might I offer the alternative suggestion that anyone who does not understand the implications of DARWIN's theory doesn't understand consciousness.

No you may not.
Obviously many of you do not understand the culture of theoretical physics. You muddle general conceptual explanations with particular applications of the former. 

For example, when Einstein explained gravity IN GENERAL he did so by writing

Guv + 8piG/c^4 Tuv = 0

That does not mean one understands the PARTICULAR details of the Earth's gravity field without solving the above equations with input data from empirical measurements.

Similarly, when I explain consciousness IN GENERAL in terms of Rod Sutherland's PQM locally-retrocausal action-reaction Lagrangian"s "two-way" (Bohm-Hiley) coupling between INTRINSICALLY MENTAL advanced DESTINY/retarded HISTORY quantum information de Broglie-Bohm pilot fields and their classical level MATTER Bell "beables"
that does not mean that we understand all the PARTICULAR details of human consciousness, without a lot more information e.g. Hameroff's microtubules, MRI, EEG etc details of the classical neuronal beables.

JACK SARFATTI

unread,
Jun 21, 2017, 6:33:32 PM6/21/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com

On Jun 21, 2017, at 11:39 AM, Rudy Tanzi <rudy...@gmail.com> wrote:

I agree that species-specific perception must serve and be driven by survival taking on properties of a self-organizing system. Comparing bacteria to humans, we know there is much more to perceive than than that of bacteria reacting to attractant and repellents. Likewise, we would have to say the same about ourselves if we
consider alternately evolved beings that we are not capable of perceiving.  

Maybe so, but beside my point.

In perception, our senses bring us feelings of reward or punishment that serve survival. Our memories of reward and punishment become desires and fears, respectively. When these fears and desires become obligatory for survival, they eventually become genetically programmed instincts via a process that is partly Darwinian and partly epigenetic. The intellectual brain then strategizes, recapitulates, and projects around our instincts and acquired fears and desires, the bases of all emotions,  to create rational thought and imagination. 


Maybe so, but beside my point.


The heated debate arises when we consider the "true" nature of what is actually being perceived and processed by the brain in what we call consciousness.


That is the "hard problem" (David Chalmers) that I have solved. It is a simple physics problem. The proof will be in the pudding, i.e. conscious AI nano-electronic chips.

Most argue it is input from a purely physical world that is evolving. Others say it is pure awareness becoming aware of itself in self-organizing systems such as humans or bacteria. Some argue the only output of awareness is information that further modifies awareness in the absence of a physical substrate. 

Scientifically meaningless .Too vague, not testable. Your key nouns  "input", "awareness" "information" are not properly defined in any Popper-falsifiable way. This is in contrast to PQM in which your key nouns are all defined in terms of mathematical objects that are part of the battle-tested action principle (Lagrangians etc) of theoretical physics that are empirically Popper falsifiable in principle.

The question is how can we do the experiments needed to address these possibilities using a scientific method.

Wrong, one must first have the correct theoretical idea in order to know what kind of experiments to do.

Those tapping into the intuition afforded by deep meditation may argue why bother with the science at all.

Such people are primitive throwbacks to a pre-scientific era. I am not denying that meditation may have health benefits, but that is again irrelevant - off topic digression.


The reply to that is intuition and meditation are entirely personal in terms of the answers they bring. But, science makes it universal for all of those who care to learn. 

(My apologies to any on this list who do not wish to receive my emails) 

JACK SARFATTI

unread,
Jun 21, 2017, 6:33:41 PM6/21/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
You can ask same question of any other key noun in theoretical physics like

"wave function"

"qubit'

"entropy"

"observable"

"particle"

"field"

"energy"

"linear momentum"

"angular momentum"

"spin"

"Born rule"

"chemical bond"

"energy band"

"quasi crystal"

"Bose-Einstein condensate"

"Higgs field"

"electron"

"proton"

"nucleon"

"meson"

etc. etc. etc.

Your uses of "information" "awareness" etc. have no empirical Popper-falsifiable fundamental operational meaning in terms of known physical laws with mathematical form.  Essentially, everything you and almost everyone else, says about consciousness is pre-scientific Scholasticism "replacing one mystery with another" and in the end invoking "deus ex machina" "and then a miracle happens" (e.g. Copenhagen "collapse" of the wave function). 
PS. The use of idempotent projection operators | > < | in Von Neumann strong measurement theory does not at all explain how "THE WORD becomes "FLESH," i.e. in Heisenberg's terms "potentia" —> "actual" aka "the reality problem"

In contrast, my use of the same nouns you use do have operational meaning (P.W. Bridgman) in principle in terms of battle-tested ideas of essentially mainstream theoretical physics today starting with the action principle of Schwinger, Feynman applied to the Bohm pilot wave theory as done by Rod Sutherland in a special toy model that points the way to generalization to more realistic models with more complex "beables" than the classical "point particle".


On Jun 21, 2017, at 12:45 PM, Rudolph Tanzi <rudy...@gmail.com> wrote:

Jack:

Regarding the interchange below, if the "key nouns" are all defend as "mathematical objects", then how does a non-mathematician try to understand this without the terms I used or similar ones? 

Rudy



Most argue it is input from a purely physical world that is evolving. Others say it is pure awareness becoming aware of itself in self-organizing systems such as humans or bacteria. Some argue the only output of awareness is information that further modifies awareness in the absence of a physical substrate. 

Scientifically meaningless .Too vague, not testable. Your key nouns  "input", "awareness" "information" are not properly defined in any Popper-falsifiable way. This is in contrast to PQM in which your key nouns are all defined in terms of mathematical objects that are part of the battle-tested action principle (Lagrangians etc) of theoretical physics that are empirically Popper falsifiable in principle.



On Jun 21, 2017, at 3:31 PM, JACK SARFATTI <jsar...@aol.com> wrote:

Most argue it is input from a purely physical world that is evolving. Others say it is pure awareness becoming aware of itself in self-organizing systems such as humans or bacteria. Some argue the only output of awareness is information that further modifies awareness in the absence of a physical substrate. 

Scientifically meaningless .Too vague, not testable. Your key nouns  "input", "awareness" "information" are not properly defined in any Popper-falsifiable way. This is in contrast to PQM in which your key nouns are all defined in terms of mathematical objects that are part of the battle-tested action principle (Lagrangians etc) of theoretical physics that are empirically Popper falsifiable in principle.

Dr. Rudolph E. Tanzi
Joseph. P. and Rose F. Kennedy Professor of Neurology
Harvard Medical School
Vice-Chair, Neurology; Director, Genetics and Aging Research Unit
Massachusetts General Hospital
114 16th Street
Charlestown, MA, 02129

My new TED talk:
(Curing Alzheimer’s with Science and Song)











Whit Blauvelt

unread,
Jun 21, 2017, 6:33:41 PM6/21/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
Prof. Hameroff,

One of the things to like about your perspective: It can be taken to imply
that feelings are primary, and computation a secondary effect of
consciousness; in contrast to orthodox claims that computation is primary,
and feelings a secondary effect.

I'm sure this is too simple to fly, but wonder if roughly speaking it's the
direction you want to go with this. You at least seem to be suggesting that
evolution didn't make sex pleasurable; instead pleasure made evolution
sexual.

Best,
Whit

Rudy Tanzi

unread,
Jun 21, 2017, 6:33:41 PM6/21/17
to Jack Sarfatti, Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
I agree that species-specific perception must serve and be driven by survival taking on properties of a self-organizing system. Comparing bacteria to humans, we know there is much more to perceive than than that of bacteria reacting to attractant and repellents. Likewise, we would have to say the same about ourselves if we
consider alternately evolved beings that we are not capable of perceiving.  

In perceptin, our senses bring us feelings of reward or punishment that serve survival. Our memories of reward and punishment become desires and fears, respectively. When these fears and desires become obligatory for survival, they eventually become genetically programmed instincts via a process that is partly Darwinian and partly epigenetic. The intellectual brain then strategizes, recapitulates, and projects around our instincts and acquired fears and desires, the bases of all emotions,  to create rational thought and imagination. 

The heated debate arises when we consider the "true" nature of what is actually being perceived and processed by the brain in what we call consciousness. Most argue it is input from a purely physical world that is evolving. Others say it is pure awareness becoming aware of itself in self-organizing systems such as humans or bacteria. Some argue the only output of awareness is information that further modifies awareness in the absence of a physical substrate. 
The question is how can we do the experiments needed to address these possibilities using a scientific method. Those tapping into the intuition afforded by deep meditation may argue why bother with the science at all. The reply to that is intuition and meditation are entirely personal in terms of the answers they bring. But, science makes it universal for all of those who care to learn. 

(My apologies to any on this list who do not wish to receive my emails) 
Sent from Rudy's iPhone 





On Jun 21, 2017, at 7:09 AM, Jack Sarfatti <jsar...@aol.com> wrote:

C. S. Morrison

unread,
Jun 21, 2017, 7:01:58 PM6/21/17
to online_sa...@googlegroups.com, Hameroff, Stuart R - (hameroff), Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com

Dear Stuart,

The complex thing about a tooth ache is the fact that it is felt to occur in a particular tooth. In fact it is felt to occur in a tooth that's damaged!  Need I say more!  That is an incredibly precise piece of qualia engineering.  So how does the brain accomplish this feat? How can it match the searing pain with the feeling of that tooth or at least that location in the set of feelings we call our mouth? How does Orch OR solve that problem? My theory of Position Selecting Interactionism published in my book THE BLIND MINDMAKER does explain this fact. It tells us why damage should be represented in very intense unpleasant sensations, and it tells us why the system that underlies human consciousness in my theory (a single quantum particle confined in a structure that regularly measures its position) would evolve in a way that makes representations of damage feel like they are occurring in the correct part of the body.

Anyway,  in my view consciousness has been around from day one.  It is in my view the essence of a single particle.  But the experiences of these consciousnesses are nothing like the highly organised consciousness that we constitute. They essentially consist of the infinite set of potential positions of the particle each of which is represented in qualia caused by other conscious particles whose intensity determines how likely the consciousness of the particle is to select that location according to the Born rule. It takes a vast amount of positive natural selection to produce the structures that make a single particle with this sort of experience feel like it is the whole organism in whose brain it resides and participates.

Best wishes,
Colin

C.  S.  Morrison - Author of THE BLIND MINDMAKER: Explaining Consciousness without Magic or Misrepresentation.

Whit Blauvelt

unread,
Jun 22, 2017, 4:12:26 AM6/22/17
to 'JACK SARFATTI' via Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D.
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 12:31:07PM -0700, 'JACK SARFATTI' via Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D. wrote:

> That is the "hard problem" (David Chalmers) that I have solved. It is a simple
> physics problem. The proof will be in the pudding, i.e. conscious AI
> nano-electronic chips.

Considering we have skeptics who doubt that even other humans are conscious,
or doubt it of other mammals -- who I don't join with -- and considering
that there are others of us -- including me -- who think the Turing Test can
easily be passed by a conventional program of great enough complexity -- yet
no consciousnesss at all, what is the proof of the proof in this pudding?

Okay, if we start transporting our own consciousness into and back out from
such nano-electronics, that will be proof. And some singluarians claim we'll
soon do that. But short of that, what's a reliable experimental design to
spot true consciousness in an electronic chip?

Best,
Whit

Sungchul Ji

unread,
Jun 22, 2017, 4:12:26 AM6/22/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
Hi Stuart and Colin,

In my book just proofed [1], I suggested that there may be an irreducibly triadiic relation (ITR) among body, awareness and consciousness, just there is such relation among the three components of the Peircean sign, i.e., object, sign (also called representamen), and interpretant.  

There are many possible examples of ITR [2, 3, 4] in philosophy, religion, quantum mechanics, general relativity, category theory, chemistry, and biology (see Table 9.1 in [1]), which motivated me to apply ITR to the mind-body problem, leading to the results summarized in Figure 10.34 below (its PDF version is attached in case the figure is distorted in transit).  ITR can be visually represented as a commutative triangle in category theory having three nodes (e.g., body, awareness, and consciousness) and three edges (e.g., f, g, and h) that obey the commutative condition, i.e., f x g = h, which reads "f followed by g leads to the same result as h".    


                                         f                                    g

                       Body ------------> Awareness ---------->  Consciousness
                   (Firstness)                (Secondness)                  (Thirdness)
             <Experience (E)>         <Subjective E>             <Objective E>
              <Information (I)>          <Physical I>                  <Mental I>

                     [Object]                       [Sign]                      [Interpretant]
                           |                                                                       ^
                           |                                                                        |
         
                  |____________________________________|

                                                             h


Figure 10.34.  A possible distinction between 'Awareness' and 'Consciousness' within the context of the Peircean principle of ITR (Irreducible Triadic Relation; Chapter 9). The symbol, "A ---> B", can be read as "A determines B", "B presupposes A", or "B supervenes on A", etc.   f = physical or physiological process; g = mental process; h = information flow resulting from historical and/or social selection processes.  E = Energy; I = Information.  Reproduced from Section 10.22 in [1].


The ITR diagram (also called the ITR template) can be read in two complementary ways -- synchornically and diachronically -- the concepts imported from linguistics.

Reading Figure 10.34 diachronically  suggests that body emerges first and then awareness followed by consciousness, which may provide a possible answer to the question raised by Stuart.  


In passing, it is interesting to note that the synchronic reading of Figure 10.34 would suggest that body, awareness, and consciousness are the different aspects of the same entity X that can be referred to as any one of the three elements of the triad, consciousness, awareness or body (due to the irreducibility), with equal validity, depending on the convenience of thought.  In other words, the naming of X is arbitrary from the semiotic point of view.   


Finally, one challenging question raised by Figure 10.34 is whether or not Body can be entities other than living organisms such as humans.  For example, can Body be elementary particles ?  In other words, can elementary particles be conscious ?  The easier question to answer would be "Can ITR be applied to abiotic entities ?".  The answer to this question is yes, in my opinion.  I have reasonalbe evidence that ITR applies to all self-organizng chemical reactions such as the Belousov-Zhabotinsky reaction  (see Figure 9.8 in [1]).  If someone can prove that ITR applies to elementary particles, that would validate the the prediction recently made by Josephson in [5]: 


   "Semiotics will eventually overtake quantum mechanics in the same way as quantum mechanics overtook classical physics."


For the convenience of future discussions, I took the liberty of referring to this statement as the Josephson conjecture [1, Statement (4.8)].


With all the best.


Sung


References:

   [1] S. Ji (2017) The Cell Language Theory: Connecting Mind and Matter.  World Scientific, New Jersey (in press).

   [2] Ji, S. (2016). WAVE-PARTICLE DUALITY IN PHYSICS AND BIOMEDICAL SCIENCES.  Symmetry: Science and Culture 27 (2): 99-127 (2016).  http://www.conformon.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/PDE_SymmetryFestival_2016.pdf
    [3]  Ji, S. (2015). Planckian distributions in molecular machines, living cells, and brains: The wave-particle duality in biomedical sciences.  In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Biology and Biomedical Engineering, Vienna, March 15-17, 2015. Pp. 115-137. http://www.conformon.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/PDE_Vienna_2015.pdf
   [4]Ji, S. (2015). PLANCKIAN INFORMATION (IP): A NEW MEASURE OF ORDER IN ATOMS, ENZYMES, CELLS, BRAINS, HUMAN SOCIETIES, AND THE COSMOS.  In: Unified Field Mechanics: Natural Science beyond the Veil of Spacetime (Amoroso, R., Rowlands, P., and Kauffman, L. eds.), World Scientific, New Jersey, 2015, pp. 579-589).  http://www.conformon.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/PDE_Vigier9.pdf
 
 [5] Josephson, B. (2016).  Biological Organization as the True Foundation of Reality.  http://sms.cam.ac.uk/media/2277379




 


On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 6:43 PM, C. S. Morrison <cs...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:

Dear Stuart,

The complex thing about a tooth ache is the fact that it is felt to occur in a particular tooth. In fact it is felt to occur in a tooth that's damaged!  Need I say more!  That is an incredibly precise piece of qualia engineering.  So how does the brain accomplish this feat? How can it match the searing pain with the feeling of that tooth or at least that location in the set of feelings we call our mouth? How does Orch OR solve that problem? My theory of Position Selecting Interactionism published in my book THE BLIND MINDMAKER does explain this fact. It tells us why damage should be represented in very intense unpleasant sensations, and it tells us why the system that underlies human consciousness in my theory (a single quantum particle confined in a structure that regularly measures its position) would evolve in a way that makes representations of damage feel like they are occurring in the correct part of the body.

Anyway,  in my view consciousness has been around from day one.  It is in my view the essence of a single particle.  But the experiences of these consciousnesses are nothing like the highly organised consciousness that we constitute. They essentially consist of the infinite set of potential positions of the particle each of which is represented in qualia caused by other conscious particles whose intensity determines how likely the consciousness of the particle is to select that location according to the Born rule. It takes a vast amount of positive natural selection to produce the structures that make a single particle with this sort of experience feel like it is the whole organism in whose brain it resides and participates.

Best wishes,
Colin

C.  S.  Morrison - Author of THE BLIND MINDMAKER: Explaining Consciousness without Magic or Misrepresentation.

https://www.amazon.com/Blind-Mindmaker-Explaining-Consciousness-Misrepresentation/dp/1541283953

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Blind-Mindmaker-Explaining-Consciousness-Misrepresentation/dp/1541283953



Send from Huawei Y360

On 21 Jun 2017 18:43, "Hameroff, Stuart R - (hameroff)" <hame...@email.arizona.edu> wrote:

Which came first, consciousness or the brain?

 

The notion that consciousness emerged from complex brain computation is belied by the increasing number of mainstream scientists and philosophers who

resort to panpsychism, not to mention Eastern philosophers and quantum consciousness enthusiast who all agree, in various ways, that qualia and feelings existed before life.

If so, feelings (e.g. due to Penrose OR events) in the primordial soup may have prompted the origin of life, and driven its evolution. Behavior is based on reward (feelings,

not gene survival), including not only hedonism, but altruism and spirituality.

 

And I dont agree that consciousness is necessarily complex. What's complex about a toothache?

 

cheers

 

Stuart Hameroff


Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 9:25 AM
To: Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com; 'JACK SARFATTI' via Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D.; online_sadhu_sanga@googlegroups.com

Subject: Re: Rudolph Tanzi, RE: C.s. Morrison, RE: [Sadhu Sanga] Physics and qualia

Dear Jack,  Rudy and others,

Might I offer the alternative suggestion that anyone who does not understand the implications of DARWIN's theory doesn't understand consciousness. We don't know what consciousness is.  But we do know that it is a highly complex instance of something that appears perfectly organised for some function - the encoding of sensory information (real or imagined) in a genetically evaluated way ( where by genetically evaluated I mean that situations that tend to be bad for our prospects of passing on our genes to future generations tend to give us unpleasant experiences whilst those that are good for those prospects tend to give us relatively pleasant ones (for most people most of the time)). Every example of such perfect organisation is explained as a product of positive natural selection.. The organisation in our consciousness ought therefore to be explained the same way. Each small step toward that organization must have had a beneficial effect upon our ancestors' chances of passing on their genes to future generations.

Just think what that means. Since we have no neuroscientific reason to expect visual data to be encoded in retinal-image-like forms anywhere in the human brain, the generators of colour qualia (whatever they are physically) must have been organised through natural selection to produce the colour qualia in these forms. This seems to me to imply that each point in our visual experience must be associated with a distinct output that the system we call our consciousness is generating. The effect of the different types of colour qualia that might appear there can then be understood as varying the probability of that output. For some reason it was beneficial for those colour-adjusted probabilities to vary across that space of potential outputs in a way that was more and more similar (even with colour constancy and the filled in blindspot, etc) to the patterns of light intensity variations across the retina. In my book THE BLIND MINDMAKER I have shown why such evolution would occur if we were the aspect of nature that selects the random outcomes of position measurements of a single quantum particle that the brain has adapted to introduce randomness into our attention-focussing process.

That is why my theory of Position Selecting Interactionism is likely to be the correct explanation. Only if a consciousness is positioning a physical effect at particular positions under the influence of its qualia are you ever going to explain how its colour qualia came to be organised into patterns resembling the patterns of particular wavebands of incident light interacting with the retina.

And if your theory can't explain that, no matter how much of Sutherland's maths you understand, you can't possibly have understood consciousness.

Best wishes,
Colin

If interested, my theory is detailed in my book

THE BLIND MINDMAKER: Explaining Consciousness without Magic or Misrepresentation

https://www.amazon.com/Blind-Mindmaker-Explaining-Consciousness-Misrepresentation/dp/1541283953

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Blind-Mindmaker-Explaining-Consciousness-Misrepresentation/dp/1541283953

Send from Huawei Y360

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.

-- 
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference 
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org 
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--
Sungchul Ji, Ph.D.

Associate Professor of Pharmacology and Toxicology
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology
Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy
Rutgers University
Piscataway, N.J. 08855
609-240-4833

www.conformon.net
A_model_of_consciousness.pdf

Serge Patlavskiy

unread,
Jun 22, 2017, 4:12:26 AM6/22/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
-
Stuart Hameroff  <hame...@email.arizona.edu> on June 21, 2017 wrote:
>The notion that consciousness emerged from complex brain 
>computation is belied by the increasing number of mainstream 
>scientists and philosophers who resort to panpsychism, not to 
>mention Eastern philosophers and quantum consciousness 
>enthusiast who all agree, in various ways, that qualia and feelings
> existed before life.
.
[S.P.] First. There is nothing like "mainstream scientists and philosophers". The case is that comprehensive paradigm in the field of consciousness studies is not established yet. By "mainstream scientists" in this field we must understand those who do have their own solutions to how the objective events (like physical sensory signals) become transformed into subjective events (like appearance of new elements of experience, new elements of knowledge, new information, and suchlike). 
.
Second, as to "increasing number". Consciousness studies is a field where the quantity does not automatically change into quality. I mean that the increasing number of those who do not understand how consciousness works will never result in the effective version of the theory which explains how consciousness works. I have mentioned this fact yet in my reply to David Chalmers on Psyche-D forum on Oct 26, 2007. In his post on Oct 25, 2007 David wrote:
.
"We are pleased to announce the launch of MindPapers, a new website with a bibliography covering around 18000 published papers and online papers in the philosophy of mind and the science of consciousness."
.
As I see, nothing has changed in understanding of the problem among Arizona guys for the last decade -- a stagnation concerning new ideas continues. The mainstream cognitive environment in the field of consciousness studies must be constituted by the thinkers who do have their versions of the theory of consciousness, even if there will be just a few of them.
.
[Stuart Hameroff] wrote:
>Which came first, consciousness or the brain?
.
[S.P.] As I hold, the possession of consciousness is indispensable for life. I use the term "consciousness" to stand for a natural ability of the living organism to reduce own overall entropy by processing the physical sensory signals and transforming them into elements of experience. I mean that to have an adequate model of the outer world (due to activity of consciousness) is as important for the organism as to consume food and to take part in energetic interactions. Here, by "living organism" I mean as unicellular, so multicellular organisms. My principle is: one organism -- one exemplar of consciousness.
.
In so doing, every living organism has such a brain+nervous system+sense organs (or whatever stands for these in the given organism) as is required by normal functioning of its exemplar of consciousness. So, possession of such a body organ as a brain is secondary in reference to possessing the exemplar of consciousness.
.
[Stuart Hameroff] wrote:
> And I dont agree that consciousness is necessarily complex.
.
[S.P.] The adult and serious thinker must understand that this problem is extremely complex, and we can hardly expect to get easy solutions to it. Many those, who, as thinkers, are not still adult and serious, start directly from trying to explain consciousness. They naively expect that since they can explain how the wall-clock works (they have all the necessary methods and models to explain this), they can explain how consciousness works as well. 
.
But my solution is much more complex. This is because that, before to start talking about consciousness, I think it is necessary first to construct a special meta-theory (which would make room for the activity of informational factor in general and consciousness in particular) together with several important concomitant applied theories. 
.
A good analogy is as follows. Somebody may start from copying files to the flash drive -- this corresponds to start talking about consciousness immediately, or having used the traditional methods and models, like those we use in Physics. But, in fact, we have first to consider some operation system to make our computer to work -- this corresponds to constructing a special meta-theory. Then we have to install the drivers necessary for the flash drive to be "seen" or accessible by operation system, and then to format our flash drive under FAT32 or NTFS -- this corresponds to constructing the concomitant applied theories. And only then we may start copying files to the flash drive -- this corresponds to start constructing the required applied theory of consciousness.
.
The effective theory of consciousness cannot be constructed within the limits of the existing meta-theory called the Modern Materialistic (Physical) Picture of the World. By analogy, the MS Word program cannot be launched under DOS operation system -- it requires a special operation system, like MSWindows or iOS. So, to construct a special meta-theory and a set of concomitant applied theories is an objective necessity before we can start explaining how consciousness produces experience. In other words, the problem of consciousness is objectively irreducibly complex. 
.
[Stuart Hameroff] wrote:
>What's complex about a toothache?
.
[S.P.] To be honest, I have no interest in spending time on playing with children in a sandbox. I patiently await for an adult and serious discussion of the problem.
.
With respect,
Serge Patlavskiy




From: "Hameroff, Stuart R - (hameroff)" <hame...@email.arizona.edu>
To: "Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com" <online_sa...@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 8:43 PM
Subject: [Sadhu Sanga] Which came first, consciousness or the brain?

Stephen Jarosek

unread,
Jun 22, 2017, 4:12:26 AM6/22/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
>"at least seem to be suggesting that evolution didn't make sex pleasurable; instead pleasure made evolution sexual."

I like this twist, Whit. Here's my more general take on your theme (feelings are primary, and computation a secondary effect of consciousness):

"The desire to be is the source of complexity."

Note that the desire to be has to assume a toolkit of emotions, because once an entity desires to be, they have the basis for all other emotions... like desiring food, pursuing comfort, fearing loss and avoiding pain. And this, in turn, brings us to the mind-body problem, and how an entity interfaces with experience.

Thus, how an entity defines the things that matter depends on how its body is predisposed to interacting with it environment. A leopard with four paws is predisposed to interacting with its environment very differently to a hunter with a spear. Subsequently, their neuroplastic brains will be wired very differently. Yet the one thing that both the leopard and the hunter have in common is the desire to be.

sj
--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017

Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)

Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports

Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03

Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138

Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer

Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin

Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org

Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org

Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga

Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sa...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/Online_Sadhu_Sanga/20170621184413.GA23369%40black.transpect.com.

Ganesh L S

unread,
Jun 22, 2017, 6:16:40 AM6/22/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com

It's a most absorbing discussion that has raised the following questions and points in my mind, and i hope members of this group will please help provide some answers.


1.  To what extent do we share identical or similar definitions of "consciousness" and "mind"?  Hopefully, we agree (almost?) completely about the "brain" as a physical object.


2.  In any case, all of us clearly and unambiguously observe that there are conditions, laws and rules (CLaR) that operate in our Universe, and should be so in others (multiverses) too.  Even the absence of CLaR (anywhere) will automatically and trivially dictate a primal or root CLaR specifying so.  On the contrary, is "nothingness" feasible at all anywhere, anytime?  These CLaR inter alia relate to all aspects of our lives, physical, mental and beyond, if any.  So, what is the primal or root source of these CLaR?


3.  There have been some points earlier about primal or root randomness.  However, as mentioned above, even this should arise from the corresponding CLaR.  All models and theories dealing with QM and its interpretations, however fine they may be, must eventually meet head on with CLaR and their eventual single source.


4.  Let's note that CLaR are not physical in themselves, but do have a strong presence by manifesting in and through our physical Universe.  Clearly, the CLaR must precede any physical manifestation.


Best wishes,
LSG.
--------------------------------------------------------



From: 'Serge Patlavskiy' via Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D. <Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 9:14 AM
To: Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [Sadhu Sanga] Which came first, consciousness or the brain?
 
--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sa...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

Bruno Marchal

unread,
Jun 22, 2017, 6:46:56 AM6/22/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
Hi Stuart,


On 21 Jun 2017, at 19:01, Hameroff, Stuart R - (hameroff) wrote:

Which came first, consciousness or the brain?

I can explain that IF the brain/body (or whatever is assumed for "my" consciousness to occur) is Church-Turing emulable, THEN consciousness came first (but not necessarily human consciousness).

It is a bit like:

Number-addition-multiplication ==>
Number-3p-self-reference ==>
Number-1p-self-reference ==>
Consciousness ==>
Number's relative Dreams ==>
Coherent multi-consistent dreams ==>
Physical laws ==>
Humans ==>
Human consciousness.



 

The notion that consciousness emerged from complex brain computation is belied by the increasing number of mainstream scientists and philosophers who


The problem with this view is that it needs to ascribe to material object a magical ability to select a computation among an infinity which are already realized in elementary arithmetic (and arithmetic is usually postulated by all scientists). 






resort to panpsychism, not to mention Eastern philosophers and quantum consciousness enthusiast who all agree, in various ways, that qualia and feelings existed before life.

If we assume Mechanism (in cognitive science, not in physics), that is, if we assume the brain to be Turing emulable (be it quantum or not), then it is simple to show that elementary arithmetical truth realize already all computations. In that sense, qualia and feelings existed "before life", in fact even before time, and space, which we can recover as stable coherent sheaves of number dreams. A dream is the 1p view that we can associate to any computation rich enough to sustain machine or number-self-reference.





If so, feelings (e.g. due to Penrose OR events) in the primordial soup may have prompted the origin of life, and driven its evolution. Behavior is based on reward (feelings,
not gene survival), including not only hedonism, but altruism and spirituality.

OK. 


 

And I dont agree that consciousness is necessarily complex. What's complex about a toothache?

The machine already know that consciousness is very simple and obvious from the 1p view, and very complex to explain, even impossible, in pure 3p view. The explanation can be done in the pure 3p view, but only by adding an act of faith, which Mechanism can limit to the belief that we can survive with an artificial computer (maybe a quantum one) at the place of the body. We need to not forget this, or we get an inconsistent 3p complete account of 1p, which has been proved impossible. 

Many people try to use quantum physics to explain consciousness. If we assume Mechanism, the contrary happens. We get an explanation of the quantum (and material) aspect of reality by assuming only elementary arithmetic, and a principle of invariance of consciousness for a digital functional permutation. The quantum arises from the fact that we have infinitely many virtual (immaterial) relatively implemented bodies in arithmetic. 

Note that some theory of human consciousness based on the quantum might be partially correct, but have to be incomplete, as the laws of physics *have to* be retrieved from arithmetic if Digital Mechanism is assumed in the cognitive science.

Best,

Bruno



 

cheers

 

Stuart Hameroff

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 

----------------------------
Fifth International Conference 
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org 
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sa...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Stephen Jarosek

unread,
Jun 22, 2017, 8:39:52 AM6/22/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com

Excellent points. Hence my own interest in the semiotics of CS Peirce, where the potential for this kind of thinking is ripe for further development. Firstness, secondness and thirdness, perhaps understood in the context of motivation, association and habituation respectively, are relevant to any entity that makes choices from an ecosystem. This opens up the narrative to explore concepts like nothingness, void, space, etc. At its most primal, for example… what are the laws that “motivate” a virtual particle of the quantum void to become a matter particle that persists across time?

Asingh2384

unread,
Jun 22, 2017, 11:47:01 AM6/22/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
Dear All:
Human neuro-biological consciousness (qualia) is a subset of and powered by the eternal universal consciousness represented by the implicate order or laws of the universe.
Since, there is no unique universal clock or time, "what came first?" is an ill-posed question. Human brain experienced or qualia clock is local with a relative time that has NO relevance to the eternal universal consciousness.
Best Regards
Avtar Singh  


Bruno Marchal

unread,
Jun 22, 2017, 12:45:01 PM6/22/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
Hi Whit,

On 21 Jun 2017, at 20:44, Whit Blauvelt wrote to Prof. Hameroff:

>
>
> One of the things to like about your perspective: It can be taken to
> imply
> that feelings are primary, and computation a secondary effect of
> consciousness; in contrast to orthodox claims that computation is
> primary,
> and feelings a secondary effect.
>
> I'm sure this is too simple to fly, but wonder if roughly speaking
> it's the
> direction you want to go with this. You at least seem to be
> suggesting that
> evolution didn't make sex pleasurable; instead pleasure made evolution
> sexual.

That would sustain my theory that sex comes from cannibalism + lazy
digestion! At a time we were in between the proto-procaryotes and the
eucaryotes!

I doubt that computation are a product on consciousness, unless
"consciousness" is the cosmic mind who created the numbers.
Kronecker's God.

It is not well known, yet a tiny part of the arithmetical reality does
encodes and emulate all computations. That is not part of any
hypothesis, but is proved in all good textbook on logic and
computability.

Feeling are real, and they have relative role, like consciousness can
accelerate anticipation, but to make them primary seems to me using
the difficult to explain the simple, as I mentioned recently. Feeling
involves consciousness. Computation involves only addition and
multiplication, (or abstraction and application, or ...).

Now, there is no doubt that feeling seems and even are primary from
the first person view, and are (atemporal) attribute of a sort of
Universal Person (canonically associated to universal number as I have
described some weeks ago).

Best,

Bruno
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/Online_Sadhu_Sanga/20170621184413.GA23369%40black.transpect.com
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/



Bruno Marchal

unread,
Jun 22, 2017, 12:45:01 PM6/22/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
On 22 Jun 2017, at 11:35, Ganesh L S wrote:

It's a most absorbing discussion that has raised the following questions and points in my mind, and i hope members of this group will please help provide some answers.

1.  To what extent do we share identical or similar definitions of "consciousness" and "mind"?  Hopefully, we agree (almost?) completely about the "brain" as a physical object.

I think most agree that *consciousness*, like St-Augustine *time*, is what we know the most but get stuck in the inability to define it.

I almost define it by a form of knowledge that there is some reality/truth.

I define knowledge of a machine by using Theatetus on Gödel's probability predicate. 


2.  In any case, all of us clearly and unambiguously observe that there are conditions, laws and rules (CLaR) that operate in our Universe,

OK, but I would say "in our apparent Universe". 

Especially that if we assume the brain is Turing emulable (in the sense of preserving consciousness in a digital transplant), then the evidences can be reinterpreted as evidences against physicalism. 






and should be so in others (multiverses) too.


What can be proved, assuming no more than the laws of addition and multiplication, is the existence of a "labyrinth of dreams", or a "consciousness flux". 

Does it converge to a well defined physical reality? Open problem. 






 Even the absence of CLaR (anywhere) will automatically and trivially dictate a primal or root CLaR specifying so.  On the contrary, is "nothingness" feasible at all anywhere, anytime? 

Assuming the existence of a digital substitution level which preserves consciousness, all we need to assume is one Church-Turing universal system. Amazingly, elementary arithmetic is enough.




These CLaR inter alia relate to all aspects of our lives, physical, mental and beyond, if any.  So, what is the primal or root source of these CLaR?


Any Church-Turing universal system will do. The theology of the universal machine/number is formalism independent.




3.  There have been some points earlier about primal or root randomness.  However, as mentioned above, even this should arise from the corresponding CLaR.  All models and theories dealing with QM and its interpretations, however fine they may be, must eventually meet head on with CLaR and their eventual single source.

Absolutely. In science, we never claim the truth, and we put our assumptions on the table, explaining the difficult from the simple (and not the opposite, even if the real tool, in the theological or spiritual realm,  is indeed the (quite) opposite).





4.  Let's note that CLaR are not physical in themselves,

Excellent point!



but do have a strong presence by manifesting in and through our physical Universe.  Clearly, the CLaR must precede any physical manifestation.


I think, assuming Digital Mechanism (in the theological science),  the CLaR are the universal numbers. They have, as it seems, a very wise Mother (the arithmetical truth), but are terrible children, never satisfied by *any* theory. 

Church's thesis rehabilitates Pythagorus, and Gödel's incompleteness rehabilitates Plato's conception of Reality, where the sharable measurable numbers are only a thin surface of a more deeper, and immaterial, reality. With Mechanism, in a first pass "Arithmetical truth" is enough, and in a second pass, even the sigma_1 arithmetical truth is enough. (But this is not supposed to be asserted without recalling we don't know our substitution level, nor that Digital Mechanism is true, or we get inconsistent).

I speculate that the universal number might be born enlightened, and that the "Singularity" belongs to the past. The AI question is not when the machine will be as clever as us, but as when they will be as deluded as we are. Formally, the classical theology of the universal machine is close to Lao-ze, Parmenides, Moderatus of Gadès, Plotinus, and I suspect many hindu and buddhist school. It is a naive and "simple" toy", but incompleteness brings all the nuances at the place needed. 

Bruno





Best wishes,
LSG.
--------------------------------------------------------



For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference 
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org 
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sa...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Srinivasa Rao Kankipati

unread,
Jun 22, 2017, 12:45:01 PM6/22/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
​​
I dont understand what is meant by universal consciousness. It of course is a respectable-looking phrase without any understandable meaning. Nobody cares to definite it first. If laws are there and work themselves out, then where is the need for consciousness on the part of the actors? If an apple falls to the ground, does it need to have consciousness as a precondition? So far as I can comprehend, consciousness is a faculty of the brain of a living being. I dont think inert matter has consciousness, and even less so the existence of panpsychism. No life, no brain function. No brain function, no consciousness. It is a mischievous quality of human consciousness to hypothesise that consciousness is universal, and it is even more mischievous to pretend being conscious what universal consciousness is. I have not seen two dead persons being conscious of each other or of even themselves, or two dead persons being conscious of me, nor am I conscious of what a dead person is doing, but I have enough consciousness until I die to imagine that there is universal consciousness (dead persons excepted). HaHaHa.

On 22 June 2017 at 20:46, 'Asingh2384' via Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D. <Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
Boxbe This message is eligible for Automatic Cleanup! (Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com) Add cleanup rule | More info

Dear All:
Human neuro-biological consciousness (qualia) is a subset of and powered by the eternal universal consciousness represented by the implicate order or laws of the universe.
Since, there is no unique universal clock or time, "what came first?" is an ill-posed question. Human brain experienced or qualia clock is local with a relative time that has NO relevance to the eternal universal consciousness.
Best Regards
Avtar Singh  


-----Original Message-----
From: Bruno Marchal <mar...@ulb.ac.be>
To: Online_Sadhu_Sanga <Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Thu, Jun 22, 2017 3:46 am
Hi Stuart,


 
cheers
 
Stuart Hameroff

Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 9:25 AM
To: Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com; 'JACK SARFATTI' via Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D.;online_sadhu_sanga@googlegroups.com

Subject: Re: Rudolph Tanzi, RE: C.s. Morrison, RE: [Sadhu Sanga] Physics and qualia
Dear Jack,  Rudy and others,
Might I offer the alternative suggestion that anyone who does not understand the implications of DARWIN's theory doesn't understand consciousness. We don't know what consciousness is.  But we do know that it is a highly complex instance of something that appears perfectly organised for some function - the encoding of sensory information (real or imagined) in a genetically evaluated way ( where by genetically evaluated I mean that situations that tend to be bad for our prospects of passing on our genes to future generations tend to give us unpleasant experiences whilst those that are good for those prospects tend to give us relatively pleasant ones (for most people most of the time)). Every example of such perfect organisation is explained as a product of positive natural selection.. The organisation in our consciousness ought therefore to be explained the same way. Each small step toward that organization must have had a beneficial effect upon our ancestors' chances of passing on their genes to future generations.
Just think what that means. Since we have no neuroscientific reason to expect visual data to be encoded in retinal-image-like forms anywhere in the human brain, the generators of colour qualia (whatever they are physically) must have been organised through natural selection to produce the colour qualia in these forms. This seems to me to imply that each point in our visual experience must be associated with a distinct output that the system we call our consciousness is generating. The effect of the different types of colour qualia that might appear there can then be understood as varying the probability of that output. For some reason it was beneficial for those colour-adjusted probabilities to vary across that space of potential outputs in a way that was more and more similar (even with colour constancy and the filled in blindspot, etc) to the patterns of light intensity variations across the retina. In my book THE BLIND MINDMAKER I have shown why such evolution would occur if we were the aspect of nature that selects the random outcomes of position measurements of a single quantum particle that the brain has adapted to introduce randomness into our attention-focussing process.
That is why my theory of Position Selecting Interactionism is likely to be the correct explanation. Only if a consciousness is positioning a physical effect at particular positions under the influence of its qualia are you ever going to explain how its colour qualia came to be organised into patterns resembling the patterns of particular wavebands of incident light interacting with the retina.
And if your theory can't explain that, no matter how much of Sutherland's maths you understand, you can't possibly have understood consciousness.
Best wishes, 
Colin
If interested, my theory is detailed in my book
THE BLIND MINDMAKER: Explaining Consciousness without Magic or Misrepresentation
Send from Huawei Y360
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.

-- 
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference 
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org 
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
-- 
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference 
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org 
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
-- 
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference 
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org 
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
-- 
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference 
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org 
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.

M. R. N. Murthy

unread,
Jun 22, 2017, 4:21:06 PM6/22/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
22 June 2017

Dear Ganesh,

According to biological science, consciousness is the brainchild(!)
of brain. According to Vedanta, both (Purusha, Prakriti; Jada, Chaitanya;
Shiva, Shakti) are manifestations of Branhman and have always existed even
if not manifested.

Regards,

Murthy



>
> It's a most absorbing discussion that has raised the following questions and
> points in my mind, and i hope members of this group will please help provide
> some answers.
>
>
>
> 1. To what extent do we share identical or similar definitions of
> &quot;consciousness&quot; and &quot;mind&quot;? Hopefully, we agree (almost?)
> completely about the &quot;brain&quot; as a physical object.
>
>
>
> 2. In any case, all of us clearly and unambiguously observe that there are
> conditions, laws and rules (CLaR) that operate in our Universe, and should be so
> in others (multiverses) too. Even the absence of CLaR (anywhere) will
> automatically and trivially dictate a primal or root CLaR specifying so. On
> the contrary, is &quot;nothingness&quot; feasible at all anywhere, anytime?
> These CLaR inter alia relate to all aspects of our lives, physical, mental and
> beyond, if any. So, what is the primal or root source of these CLaR?
>
>
> 3. There have been some points earlier about primal or root randomness.
> However, as mentioned above, even this should arise from the corresponding CLaR.
> All models and theories dealing with QM and its interpretations, however fine
> they may be, must eventually meet head on with CLaR and their eventual single
> source.
>
>
>
> 4. Let's note that CLaR are not physical in themselves, but do have a strong
> presence by manifesting in and through our physical Universe. Clearly, the CLaR
> must precede any physical manifestation.
>
> Best wishes,
> LSG.
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> From: 'Serge Patlavskiy' via Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of
> Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D.
> Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 9:14 AM
> To: Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Sadhu Sanga] Which came first, consciousness or the brain? -
> Stuart Hameroff on June 21, 2017 wrote: >The notion that consciousness
> emerged from complex brain >computation is belied by the increasing number of
> mainstream >scientists and philosophers who resort to panpsychism, not to
> >mention Eastern philosophers and quantum consciousness >enthusiast who all
> agree, in various ways, that qualia and feelings > existed before life. .
> [S.P.] First. There is nothing like &quot;mainstream scientists and
> philosophers&quot;. The case is that comprehensive paradigm in the field of
> consciousness studies is not established yet. By &quot;mainstream
> scientists&quot; in this field we must understand those who do have their own
> solutions to how the objective events (like physical sensory signals) become
> transformed into subjective events (like appearance of new elements of
> experience, new elements of knowledge, new information, and suchlike). .
> Second, as to &quot;increasing number&quot;. Consciousness studies is a field
> where the quantity does not automatically change into quality. I mean that the
> increasing number of those who do not understand how consciousness works will
> never result in the effective version of the theory which explains how
> consciousness works. I have mentioned this fact yet in my reply to David
> Chalmers on Psyche-D forum on Oct 26, 2007. In his post on Oct 25, 2007 David
> wrote: . &quot;We are pleased to announce the launch of MindPapers, a new
> website with a bibliography covering around 18000 published papers and online
> papers in the philosophy of mind and the science of consciousness.&quot; . As I
> see, nothing has changed in understanding of the problem among Arizona guys for
> the last decade -- a stagnation concerning new ideas continues. The mainstream
> cognitive environment in the field of consciousness studies must be
> constituted by the thinkers who do have their versions of the theory of
> consciousness, even if there will be just a few of them. . [Stuart Hameroff]
> wrote: >Which came first, consciousness or the brain? . [S.P.] As I hold, the
> possession of consciousness is indispensable for life. I use the term
> &quot;consciousness&quot; to stand for a natural ability of the living organism
> to reduce own overall entropy by processing the physical sensory signals and
> transforming them into elements of experience. I mean that to have an adequate
> model of the outer world (due to activity of consciousness) is as important for
> the organism as to consume food and to take part in energetic interactions.
> Here, by &quot;living organism&quot; I mean as unicellular, so multicellular
> organisms. My principle is: one organism -- one exemplar of consciousness. . In
> so doing, every living organism has such a brain&#43;nervous system&#43;sense
> organs (or whatever stands for these in the given organism) as is required by
> normal functioning of its exemplar of consciousness. So, possession of such a
> body organ as a brain is secondary in reference to possessing the exemplar of
> consciousness. . [Stuart Hameroff] wrote: > And I dont agree that consciousness
> is necessarily complex. . [S.P.] The adult and serious thinker must understand
> that this problem is extremely complex, and we can hardly expect to get easy
> solutions to it. Many those, who, as thinkers, are not still adult and serious,
> start directly from trying to explain consciousness. They naively expect that
> since they can explain how the wall-clock works (they have all the necessary
> methods and models to explain this), they can explain how consciousness works
> as well. . But my solution is much more complex. This is because that, before
> to start talking about consciousness, I think it is necessary first to
> construct a special meta-theory (which would make room for the activity of
> informational factor in general and consciousness in particular) together with
> several important concomitant applied theories. . A good analogy is as
> follows. Somebody may start from copying files to the flash drive -- this
> corresponds to start talking about consciousness immediately, or having used
> the traditional methods and models, like those we use in Physics. But, in
> fact, we have first to consider some operation system to make our computer to
> work -- this corresponds to constructing a special meta-theory. Then we have to
> install the drivers necessary for the flash drive to be &quot;seen&quot; or
> accessible by operation system, and then to format our flash drive under FAT32
> or NTFS -- this corresponds to constructing the concomitant applied theories.
> And only then we may start copying files to the flash drive -- this corresponds
> to start constructing the required applied theory of consciousness. . The
> effective theory of consciousness cannot be constructed within the limits of
> the existing meta-theory called the Modern Materialistic (Physical) Picture of
> the World. By analogy, the MS Word program cannot be launched under DOS
> operation system -- it requires a special operation system, like MSWindows or
> iOS. So, to construct a special meta-theory and a set of concomitant applied
> theories is an objective necessity before we can start explaining how
> consciousness produces experience. In other words, the problem of
> consciousness is objectively irreducibly complex. . [Stuart Hameroff] wrote:
> >What's complex about a toothache? . [S.P.] To be honest, I have no interest in
> spending time on playing with children in a sandbox. I patiently await for an
> adult and serious discussion of the problem. . With respect, Serge Patlavskiy
>
> From: &quot;Hameroff, Stuart R - (hameroff)&quot;
> To: &quot;Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com&quot;
> Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 8:43 PM
> Subject: [Sadhu Sanga] Which came first, consciousness or the brain?
>
> Which came first, consciousness or the brain? The notion that
> consciousness emerged from complex brain computation is belied by the
> increasing number of mainstream scientists and philosophers who resort to
> panpsychism, not to mention Eastern philosophers and quantum consciousness
> enthusiast who all agree, in various ways, that qualia and feelings existed
> before life. If so, feelings (e.g. due to Penrose OR events) in the
> primordial soup may have prompted the origin of life, and driven its
> evolution. Behavior is based on reward (feelings, not gene survival),
> including not only hedonism, but altruism and spirituality. And I dont
> agree that consciousness is necessarily complex. What's complex about a
> toothache? cheers Stuart Hameroff
>
> --
> ----------------------------
> Fifth International Conference
> Science and Scientist - 2017
> August 18&#8212;19, 2017
> Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
> http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
>
> Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
> (All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions
> under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
>
> Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
>
> Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?:
> http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
>
> Life and consciousness &#8211; The Ved&#257;ntic view:
> http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
>
> Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
>
> Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
>
> Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
>
> Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
>
> Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
>
> Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> &quot;Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja,
> Ph.D.&quot; group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
> to Online_Sadhu_Sanga&#43;unsub...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at MailScanner has detected definite fraud in the website at
> "groups.google.com". Do not trust this website:
> https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.
> To view this discussion on the web visit MailScanner has detected definite
> fraud in the website at "groups.google.com". Do not trust this website:
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/Online_Sadhu_Sanga/2024491950.144856.1498103081045%40mail.yahoo.com.
> For more options, visit MailScanner has detected definite fraud in the website
> at "groups.google.com". Do not trust this website:
> https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
> --
> ----------------------------
> Fifth International Conference
> Science and Scientist - 2017
> August 18—19, 2017
> Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
> http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
>
> Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
> (All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions
> under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
>
> Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
>
> Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?:
> http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
>
> Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view:
> http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
>
> Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
>
> Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
>
> Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
>
> Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
>
> Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
>
> Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> &quot;Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja,
> Ph.D.&quot; group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
> to Online_Sadhu_Sa...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at MailScanner has detected definite fraud in the website at
> "groups.google.com". Do not trust this website:
> https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.
> To view this discussion on the web visit MailScanner has detected definite
> fraud in the website at "groups.google.com". Do not trust this website:
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/Online_Sadhu_Sanga/1498124084097.74606%40iitm.ac.in.
> For more options, visit MailScanner has detected definite fraud in the website
> at "groups.google.com". Do not trust this website:
> https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>


Prof. M.R.N. Murthy
Molecular Biophysics Unit
Indian Institute of Science
Bangalore 560 012
INDIA

Vasavada, Kashyap V

unread,
Jun 22, 2017, 4:21:06 PM6/22/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com

Dear Avatar,

You have a point that there is no unique universal time. However in our reference frame (actually more precisely co-moving frame with the expansion), we can very well ask this question whether (universal) consciousness came before  or after human bodies came on the scene. This is just like our saying that big bang happened 13.8 B years ago in the co-moving frame.

Best Regards.

Kashyap

 

From: 'Asingh2384' via Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D. [mailto:Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 11:17 AM
To: Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [Sadhu Sanga] Which came first, consciousness or the brain?

 

Dear All:

Asingh2384

unread,
Jun 22, 2017, 4:21:06 PM6/22/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
The basic scientific and empirical fact that every point in space and every moment in time are spontaneously (without cause) and consciously aware of the universal laws, is evidence of a conscious universe. 
 
The need or purpose of the conscious actors (human beings) is to awaken to this fundamental reality. Ignoring it leaves the picture of reality incomplete, inconsistent, and full of paradoxes as is evident from discussions in this forum.
 
Best Regards
Avtar Singh, Sc.D.
Alumni, MIT
Author of "The Hidden Factor - An Approach for Resolving Paradoxes of Science, Cosmology, and Universal Reality"
.
-----Original Message-----
From: Srinivasa Rao Kankipati <ksra...@gmail.com>
To: Online_Sadhu_Sanga <Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Thu, Jun 22, 2017 9:44 am
Subject: Re: [Sadhu Sanga] Which came first, consciousness or the brain?

​​
I dont understand what is meant by universal consciousness. It of course is a respectable-looking phrase without any understandable meaning. Nobody cares to definite it first. If laws are there and work themselves out, then where is the need for consciousness on the part of the actors? If an apple falls to the ground, does it need to have consciousness as a precondition? So far as I can comprehend, consciousness is a faculty of the brain of a living being. I dont think inert matter has consciousness, and even less so the existence of panpsychism. No life, no brain function. No brain function, no consciousness. It is a mischievous quality of human consciousness to hypothesise that consciousness is universal, and it is even more mischievous to pretend being conscious what universal consciousness is. I have not seen two dead persons being conscious of each other or of even themselves, or two dead persons being conscious of me, nor am I conscious of what a dead person is doing, but I have enough consciousness until I die to imagine that there is universal consciousness (dead persons excepted). HaHaHa.
On 22 June 2017 at 20:46, 'Asingh2384' via Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D. <Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
Boxbe This message is eligible for Automatic Cleanup! (Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com) Add cleanup rule | More info
Dear All:
Human neuro-biological consciousness (qualia) is a subset of and powered by the eternal universal consciousness represented by the implicate order or laws of the universe.
Since, there is no unique universal clock or time, "what came first?" is an ill-posed question. Human brain experienced or qualia clock is local with a relative time that has NO relevance to the eternal universal consciousness.
Best Regards
Avtar Singh  


-----Original Message-----
From: Bruno Marchal <mar...@ulb.ac.be>
To: Online_Sadhu_Sanga <Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Thu, Jun 22, 2017 3:46 am
Subject: Re: [Sadhu Sanga] Which came first, consciousness or the brain?

Hi Stuart,


On 21 Jun 2017, at 19:01, Hameroff, Stuart R - (hameroff) wrote:

Which came first, consciousness or the brain?

I can explain that IF the brain/body (or whatever is assumed for "my" consciousness to occur) is Church-Turing emulable, THEN consciousness came first (but not necessarily human consciousness).

It is a bit like:

Number-addition-multiplication ==>
Number-3p-self-reference ==>
Number-1p-self-reference ==>
Consciousness ==>
Number's relative Dreams ==>
Coherent multi-consistent dreams ==>
Physical laws ==>
Humans ==>
Human consciousness.



The notion that consciousness emerged from complex brain computation is belied by the increasing number of mainstream scientists and philosophers who
The problem with this view is that it needs to ascribe to material object a magical ability to select a computation among an infinity which are already realized in elementary arithmetic (and arithmetic is usually postulated by all scientists). 






resort to panpsychism, not to mention Eastern philosophers and quantum consciousness enthusiast who all agree, in various ways, that qualia and feelings existed before life.

If we assume Mechanism (in cognitive science, not in physics), that is, if we assume the brain to be Turing emulable (be it quantum or not), then it is simple to show that elementary arithmetical truth realize already all computations. In that sense, qualia and feelings existed "before life", in fact even before time, and space, which we can recover as stable coherent sheaves of number dreams. A dream is the 1p view that we can associate to any computation rich enough to sustain machine or number-self-reference.





If so, feelings (e.g. due to Penrose OR events) in the primordial soup may have prompted the origin of life, and driven its evolution. Behavior is based on reward (feelings,
not gene survival), including not only hedonism, but altruism and spirituality.

OK. 


 
And I dont agree that consciousness is necessarily complex. What's complex about a toothache?

 
cheers
 
Stuart Hameroff

-- 
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference 
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org 
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/Online_Sadhu_Sanga/54567b44b5b54c25b7b55ddbb36919b5%40IN-CCI-EX03.ads.iu.edu.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference 
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org 
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference 
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org 
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
-- 
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference 
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org 
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
-- 
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference 
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org 
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/Online_Sadhu_Sanga/49B2F0F4-3A54-4398-A4EF-6F93E87A1978%40ulb.ac.be.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/Online_Sadhu_Sanga/15cd06075fe-6fbf-90fa%40webprd-a75.mail.aol.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sa...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com.

Klee Irwin

unread,
Jun 22, 2017, 4:21:06 PM6/22/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com

Actually many well established peer review level cosmological models DO have a universal time in addition to local particle clock times. Our program, emergence theory, at QGR is one such model.

JACK SARFATTI

unread,
Jun 22, 2017, 7:56:02 PM6/22/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
Yes, the standard model has both a preferred rest frame and a universal cosmic time both directly measured. There is no conflict with local symmetries of relativity dynamics - this is an example of spontaneous symmetry breaking in the vacuum of our universe. Similar thing happens in superconductors, ferromagnetic, crystals (including quasi crystals).


Soam Prakash

unread,
Jun 23, 2017, 5:02:52 AM6/23/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
My dear Stuart,
Greetings...

It is too early to jump on conclusion.
It is better to realize or self realization 
To inculcate the having Consciousness 
Fully realize and manifest in your brain
You need to have a perfect master who has Himself realized the truth.

Who came first is not the right question.
The question should have been that how and why the entire creation has been created? If I am not wrong or misunderstood.

I presume here that eastern philosophy is having numerous such exalted personalities in past or present.
Similarly there are many such incarnations in West as well.

You can yourself be one provided your
Inner self realization process is being made possible.
The man himself is being created and so is the entire universe for a purpose otherwise why all inventions and discoveries are logical sequentially arranged.
In TSC 2012-17,we have trying hard to convince that unless you make experiential science an integral part of science of consciousness science it shall be very difficult for experimental scientist to even comprehend the Reality.

Your paper with Deepak which I quote so often 'the quantum theory of soul' could lead us to truth and in my papers

1 The quantum Soul Theory......A New Theory
2. The Microcosm and Macrocosm A relationship study
Can enlighten further.
These have been scientifically been illustted by Mo's Revered Prof.P.S.Satsangi Sahab Himself in TSC 2016 .
Sincerely 
Soam Prakash

On Jun 21, 2017 11:13 PM, "Hameroff, Stuart R - (hameroff)" <hame...@email.arizona.edu> wrote:

Which came first, consciousness or the brain?

 

The notion that consciousness emerged from complex brain computation is belied by the increasing number of mainstream scientists and philosophers who

resort to panpsychism, not to mention Eastern philosophers and quantum consciousness enthusiast who all agree, in various ways, that qualia and feelings existed before life.

If so, feelings (e.g. due to Penrose OR events) in the primordial soup may have prompted the origin of life, and driven its evolution. Behavior is based on reward (feelings,

not gene survival), including not only hedonism, but altruism and spirituality.

 

And I dont agree that consciousness is necessarily complex. What's complex about a toothache?

 

cheers

 

Stuart Hameroff


Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 9:25 AM
To: Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com; 'JACK SARFATTI' via Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D.; online_sadhu_sanga@googlegroups.com

Subject: Re: Rudolph Tanzi, RE: C.s. Morrison, RE: [Sadhu Sanga] Physics and qualia

Dear Jack,  Rudy and others,

Might I offer the alternative suggestion that anyone who does not understand the implications of DARWIN's theory doesn't understand consciousness. We don't know what consciousness is.  But we do know that it is a highly complex instance of something that appears perfectly organised for some function - the encoding of sensory information (real or imagined) in a genetically evaluated way ( where by genetically evaluated I mean that situations that tend to be bad for our prospects of passing on our genes to future generations tend to give us unpleasant experiences whilst those that are good for those prospects tend to give us relatively pleasant ones (for most people most of the time)). Every example of such perfect organisation is explained as a product of positive natural selection.. The organisation in our consciousness ought therefore to be explained the same way. Each small step toward that organization must have had a beneficial effect upon our ancestors' chances of passing on their genes to future generations.

Just think what that means. Since we have no neuroscientific reason to expect visual data to be encoded in retinal-image-like forms anywhere in the human brain, the generators of colour qualia (whatever they are physically) must have been organised through natural selection to produce the colour qualia in these forms. This seems to me to imply that each point in our visual experience must be associated with a distinct output that the system we call our consciousness is generating. The effect of the different types of colour qualia that might appear there can then be understood as varying the probability of that output. For some reason it was beneficial for those colour-adjusted probabilities to vary across that space of potential outputs in a way that was more and more similar (even with colour constancy and the filled in blindspot, etc) to the patterns of light intensity variations across the retina. In my book THE BLIND MINDMAKER I have shown why such evolution would occur if we were the aspect of nature that selects the random outcomes of position measurements of a single quantum particle that the brain has adapted to introduce randomness into our attention-focussing process.

That is why my theory of Position Selecting Interactionism is likely to be the correct explanation. Only if a consciousness is positioning a physical effect at particular positions under the influence of its qualia are you ever going to explain how its colour qualia came to be organised into patterns resembling the patterns of particular wavebands of incident light interacting with the retina.

And if your theory can't explain that, no matter how much of Sutherland's maths you understand, you can't possibly have understood consciousness.

Best wishes,
Colin

If interested, my theory is detailed in my book

THE BLIND MINDMAKER: Explaining Consciousness without Magic or Misrepresentation

https://www.amazon.com/Blind-Mindmaker-Explaining-Consciousness-Misrepresentation/dp/1541283953

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Blind-Mindmaker-Explaining-Consciousness-Misrepresentation/dp/1541283953

Send from Huawei Y360

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.

-- 
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference 
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org 
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.

Sungchul Ji

unread,
Jun 23, 2017, 2:30:09 PM6/23/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
Hi Soam, Stuart, and list,

As I indicagted in several of my post on this forum in the past year or so, I have empirical and theoretical evidences (to be supplied upon request) that ITR (Irreducible Triadic Relation) first articulated and vigorously advanced by Peirce (1839-1914) in his theory of signs (i.e., semiotics) is a universal principle that appears in many disciplines ranging from physics to chemistry, biology, physics,  psychology, communication theory, philosophy, and to religion.  Hence it may not be too surprising if ITR applies to the phenomenon of human knowledge/knowing also as indicated in Figure 1:


                                                     f                                             g
             1-Person Knowledge -----> 2-Person Knowledge -----> 3-Person Knowledge
                    (Firstness)                           (Secondness)                         (Thirdness)
                               |                                                                                         ^
                               |                                                                                          |
                               |                                                                                          |
                               |_____________________________________________|
                                                                       h

Figure 1. The hypothesis that ITR applies to (or is embodied in) the phenomenon of human knowing.  f = learning; g = synthesizing; h = informaton flow or grounding in reality. 

There may be other, more relevant/interessing, ways of interpreting the nodes and naming the edges than suggested in Figure 1, within the logical constraints of ITR visualized in this diagram (called the 'ITR template') which is equivalent to the commutative triangle of category theory.

All the best.

Sung


  

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsubscri...@googlegroups.com.

-- 
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference 
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org 
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsubscri...@googlegroups.com.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--

Kalluri Rao

unread,
Jun 23, 2017, 5:03:51 PM6/23/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
My intrusion has  relevance to what has been pointed out by Stuart Hameroff  and also my limited reading into various aspects of origin of life. There is a strong argument building  up now  to propose that Stomatosites( round shaped bodies) are seen ( by theoretical calculations) at the bottom of oceans and these seem to contain Cyanobacteria  (which are capable of fixing nitrogen)-about more than 2 billion years ago at the bottom of the oceans ! These arguments complicate the issue of origin of life and communication systems at the bottom of oceans !. To day even in standard dictionaries words like sentience , cognition and consciousness are being defined and consciousness occupies top position and brain has captured it in higher organisms

KSR

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsubscri...@googlegroups.com.

-- 
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference 
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org 
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsubscri...@googlegroups.com.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--
Knowledge & Information can be communicated, but not wisdom.  

Kalluri Subba Rao, PhD.,D.Sc (IISc), FNA.
 

Srikanth R.

unread,
Jun 24, 2017, 5:55:49 PM6/24/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
Dear Prof. Stuart,

Going by Vedanta, all matter is indeed built from Consciousness (chaitanya), but lacks self-awareness (chetana), for which brain structure is needed. The brain acts as a transducer of a self-aware Consciousness.

Thanks and regards,
Srik


For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--


Dr. R. Srikanth
Assistant Professor
Dept. of Theoretical Sciences
Poornaprajna Institute of Scientific Research
Bangalore- 560 080, Karnataka, India.

Rudy Tanzi

unread,
Jun 24, 2017, 7:28:58 PM6/24/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
Self-awareness is species specific and highly variable. A cat does not recognize itself in the mirror, but will recognize its own scent rubbed off onto the mirror frame. Bacteria are attracted only to chemo-attractants that are like those released by itself. Alzheimer's eventually robs one of self-awareness by removing the ability to place sensory information in context with time and space, i.e. impaired integration.  So, self-awareness is varied in nature and fragile over time. 
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sa...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com.

Joseph McCard

unread,
Jun 25, 2017, 4:56:30 AM6/25/17
to Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D.
>Going by Vedanta, all matter is indeed built from Consciousness (chaitanya), but lacks self-awareness (chetana), for which brain structure is needed. The brain acts as a transducer of a self-aware Consciousness.Thanks and regards,
Srik

How do Consciousness (chaitanya) and mind get "transduced" through the whole body? Nadis. Science recognizes that the nerves which connect the brain with every part of the body and enable it to receive vibrational sensations of various kinds, sound, light, etc. through the jnanendriyas and karmendriyas. But the role the nadis play is more complicated and subtle then just a physical nervous system. For example, science does not know that there are invisible forces, like prana, which flow along the nerves from the mind. 

Hence, there are no real divisions to the self, which is characterized by consciousness. The body is a vehicle, through which the Self experiences the world. The Self is also the subjective “I” that is referred to, in relation to the objective universe of experience. It is the “subject” which experiences the body and mind as “objects". That portion of the self that you recognize as your usual conscious self. The inner self relates to dream reality. The body consciousness is a highly focused, precisely tuned physical self, but one that must be supported by knowledge and information that is basically independent of time and space. Indispensable, and yet knowledge that could not be allowed to distract the physical focus. The physical body must be able to react in a moment, move quickly, which you could not do if you had to consciously work all your muscles, or in speech if you had to be aware of all of speech's mechanisms. And so the inner self put a portion of its consciousness in a different parcel, a physically attuned consciousness, the ego consciousness or ego, or conscious self. 

The inner self was too aware of its own multi-dimensionality, so it gave birth to itself through the body. This is the self that lives the life of the body,  giving the Self self-aware-ness (chetana) through the physical body, not just through the brain. That self sits as in a window looking out on the physical world, but also looking inwardly to the inner self.

There is one Self, but we can say it has three parts.The individual is composed of trikaya (three parts) which are interlaced and function as one: The gross physically conscious body. The inner self, or mental body (astral body). The consciousness that you know, ego consciousness. The Self (atman) uses these three as vehicles for its self-expression. 





Serge Patlavskiy

unread,
Jun 25, 2017, 5:43:04 AM6/25/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
-
Rudy Tanzi <rudy...@gmail.com> on June 25, 2017 wrote:
>Self-awareness is species specific and highly variable.
.
[S.P.] But what does the term "self-awareness" stand for? I assume that Self always exists as being dissociated into self-subject and self-object. When applying a system of AS-DIS-DEC models, the initial Whole{Self} -- the element of AS-model, dissociates with formation of a chain of wholes: the whole{self-subject} and the whole{self-object} -- the elements of the same DIS-model. (For details on the system of AS-DIS-DEC models see my post on June 22; in case you have missed it, I attach it below). In a chain, a self-subject is a complex system which has a lower value of its entropic characteristic.
.
So, self-awareness takes place when self-subject makes sense of the self-object, and its mechanism is universal for all the organisms. In so doing, the self-object is being considered by self-subject on a par with any other "external" objects. A man (as a self-subject) may even quarrel with oneself (as a self-object). The inner dialog (or, talking to oneself), which we all sometimes experience, takes place because of interaction between self-subject and self-object too. 
.
Sometimes, when holding the inner dialog, a man swops places, and by "self-subject" he considers the CEO of some company -- he tries to foresee which questions the CEO could ask him tomorrow when deciding on his possible appointment for a job in a company. In so doing, a man plays the role of a self-object.
.
[Rudy Tanzi] wrote:
> A cat does not recognize itself in the mirror, but will recognize 
>its own scent rubbed off onto the mirror frame.
.
[S.P.] This fact tells not about specificity of the mechanisms of self-awareness, but about different ways in which consciousness creates information (or, a model of the world) for the bearer of consciousness. So, consciousness can create new information 
.
1) by processing exclusively the input of physical sensory signals -- in this case the constructed model of the outer world is mostly adequate;
2) by partly processing the input of physical sensory signals PLUS by filling up the shortage of input by processing the formerly memorized elements of experience -- in result we get what we call "an illusion";
3) by processing exclusively the formerly memorized elements of experience -- in result we may get what we call "a hallucination".
.
Every distinct model that consciousness creates must be a whole complex system. (Any element of experience, any new concept, any new knowledge, any new information, any new feeling, etc., if they do take place, they must step out as whole complex systems.) That is why, in case of shortage of sufficient input of physical sensory signals, our consciousness tries to enable wholeness at any cost, even when the enabling of wholeness would require consciousness to do "tricks" in result of which we receive illusions and hallucinations. 
.
Also, as I assume, consciousness keeps under control all the physiological processes in the organism. So, in case one sense organ becomes impaired, the other sense organs become exacerbated. That is why the congenitally blind person has his other sense organs abnormally sensitive. Therefore, if some cat's sense organs are not good, its other sense organs are more evolved. In either case, whatever quality of sense organs the different (healthy) organisms may have, every given organism, to stay alive, must have the model of the world of required adequacy. 
.
[Rudy Tanzi] wrote:
>Alzheimer's eventually robs one of self-awareness by removing
> the ability to place sensory information in context with time and 
>space, i.e. impaired integration.
.
[S.P.] Sorry, but there is nothing like "sensory information". The sense organs do not yield information themselves. It is consciousness that creates information for the organism in three ways (see above). So, the causes of Alzheimer disease are a bit different. The different causes require different ways of curing.
.
With respect,
Serge Patlavskiy




From: Rudy Tanzi <rudy...@gmail.com>
To: Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sunday, June 25, 2017 3:02 AM
Subject: Re: [Sadhu Sanga] Which came first, consciousness or the brain?

Self-awareness is species specific and highly variable. A cat does not recognize itself in the mirror, but will recognize its own scent rubbed off onto the mirror frame. Bacteria are attracted only to chemo-attractants that are like those released by itself. Alzheimer's eventually robs one of self-awareness by removing the ability to place sensory information in context with time and space, i.e. impaired integration.  So, self-awareness is varied in nature and fragile over time. 

Sent from Rudy's iPhone 



Вірусів немає. www.avast.com
Sadhu_Sanga-post2_22-06-2017.txt

Bruno Marchal

unread,
Jun 25, 2017, 6:58:23 AM6/25/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
Dear Avtar,

On 22 Jun 2017, at 17:16, 'Asingh2384' via Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D. wrote:

Dear All:
Human neuro-biological consciousness (qualia) is a subset of and powered by the eternal universal consciousness represented by the implicate order or laws of the universe.
Since, there is no unique universal clock or time, "what came first?" is an ill-posed question.

I agree if you mean, with "first" some ordering in time, or physical causality. But we can still ask for the "first principle(s)", where the ordering is logical, or arithmetico-logical. The question is what we assume, and what we derive from the assumption. I do not assume the existence of a *primary* physical universe.
I explain and derive (very partially) its appearance from the introspection of numbers.


Human brain experienced or qualia clock is local with a relative time that has NO relevance to the eternal universal consciousness.

OK. But the eternal (actually "out-of-time") universal consciousness (which I take currently as being the dissociative consciousness of the universal person attached to any unprogrammed universal machine/number) is relevant for the local relative experiences of the human being. OK?

Best regards,

Bruno Marchal



For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Srikanth R.

unread,
Jun 25, 2017, 10:57:21 AM6/25/17
to VINOD KUMAR SEHGAL, Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
Dear Vinod-ji,

I think that our views are convergent, except for a matter of terminology. I meant that matter is derived from Consciousness (chaitanya), but with the cognitive functions not being expressed on the physical plane, whereas in humans and animals, Consciousness (chaitanya) is transduced at the physical plane to "biological consciousness" (chetna), with the transduction mechanism provided through the central nervous system (supported on the astral plane by the nadi-system). In more advanced animals, including human beings, biological consciousness manifests as self-awareness of some sort.

Thanks and regards,
Srik

On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 1:28 PM, VINOD KUMAR SEHGAL <vinodse...@gmail.com> wrote:
SRK,

If consciousness lacks awareness ( Chetna), how will it be consciousness since awareness ( chetna) is an integral intrinsic nature of the consciousness,  I think as per Vedanta, consciousness in its pure form has infinite awareness and powers. The brain limits infinite awareness and powers by localizing consciousness at the biological level.

Vinod Sehgal

--


Dr. R. Srikanth
Assistant Professor
Dept. of Theoretical Sciences
Poornaprajna Institute of Scientific Research
Bangalore- 560 080, Karnataka, India.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Bruno Marchal

unread,
Jun 28, 2017, 10:55:39 AM6/28/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
Hi Vinod,


Bruno wrote to Avtar Singh:

"OK. But the eternal (actually "out-of-time") universal consciousness (which I take currently as being the dissociative consciousness of the universal person attached to any unprogrammed universal machine/number) is relevant for the local relative experiences of the human being. OK?"

Universal machine/number operate within the ambit of time/and space--  whether programmed or unprogrammed one.

You are talking on the physical implementation of universal number, but all universal number can be proved to bbe implemented

in arithmetic. 

>Right. I agree that all the universal numbers can be implemented in arithmetics.

OK

But I can't conceive any universal number
without consciousness ( or conscious minds) 

I can't conceive any universal number without consciousness.


....and discrete ontology of matter

Matter is purely phenomenological, but then I agree that it cannot be discrete. If a person's mind/consciousness/soul is invariant for a digital transplant, it can be explained that matter *appearances* cannot be discrete, at least not purely discrete. 


Because I believe in 2+2=4 and similar, which implies 

   1) the existence of the universal number (in arithmetic),

    2) the existence of the computations made by those universal numbers, in arithmetic too!. 

The physical will be explained by a relative statistic. The first person experience involves the infinitely many computations going through below our substitution level (which exists by the digital mechanist assumption).


>Here I disagree with you. I propose that it is the universal numbers which emerge as a dream state from the eternal and
 universal consciousness.


Why? It is a theorem in very elementary arithmetic that the universal numbers exist, a bit like the prime numbers (except that being universal is an intensional or relational property; but this does not change anything fundamental about their independent existence).

Maybe you mean that all numbers and numbers relations emerge from the eternal consciousness? In that case, we indeed disagree, because, as a scientist, I have to assume something conceptually simple to explain the (much more difficult) notion of mind and matter. Assuming consciousness is like assuming God, which is like assuming what we want to explain. I tend personally  to believe in the eternal consciousness, but this is what I want to explain to people who disbelieve it, so I prefer to start from the natural numbers that everyone are familiar with. 

Then, the link with the universal consciousness is provided by the mathematics of self-reference + the assumption that my particular consciousness is invariant for a digital transplant (when done at the right substitution level).

We might still agree yet at the non communicable or justifiable level. Indeed, eventually we get a possible identification between God or the One, perhaps the eternal consciousness, with the notion of "Arithmetical Truth", but that identification is not accessible to us (the machine/number) except by purely private personal experience which *cannot* be used in any public discourse (it belongs to the true but non justifiable truth of the machine).  The machine can justify this but only indirectly and assuming explicitly that she is a consistent machine, at the meta-level (but we have to be very cautious here, or we fall in a sort of theological dogma/trap, or in inconsistency).

Bruno

Mukho Ak

unread,
Jun 29, 2017, 4:25:50 AM6/29/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
I will start with Stu's opening letter. Consciousness is simple.
Our brain has made it complex and created the ladder of cognition. 
Within the brain, or even in a single cell, there are five players; consciousness, self, life, mind and information.  Their relationship and operations are important for consciousness research.
All of consciousness, self, life, mind and information are nonlocal. However, within  systems cell or systems brain their operations could be placed hierarchically in an abstract plane, which constitute the cognitive organ or what we call psyche.

 

Consciousness is simple, when we start from what is known to us as doctors.

 

Functions of consciousness could be easily understood from behaviour of unconscious patients. There is no volition (will), no feelings (emotion) and no cognition in unconscious patients. Cognition, emotion/feelings and volition are three textbook functions of consciousness.

 

When consciousness is 'out' of the loop in  the systems brain, autonomous mind keeps on working as long as, biochemically, Ca++ ion channels are functional. The patient does not soil the bed. The patient retains his mind and sphincter control. Ca++ wave in astrocytes of brain keeps mind active within the brain. Information processing goes on. Whenever there is no ‘thinking’, no mind function, no information, but only signal processing, astrocytes are not needed at all as in peripheral ganglion, and even in complicated papillary reflex pathway.

 

Mind is sterile without consciousness. Therefore, if consciousness is not regained, mind cannot continue its autonomous activity for long. There are exceptions for all rules. Mind operation eventually ceases and there is no control of sphincters. The patient soils the bed. 


When both consciousness and mind are out of loop from the systems brain, the self in the brain continues its work with the support of proton pump within the cells. Autonomous function of self, bereft of consciousness and mind can continue as long as supporting Na+/K+ pump continues.

 

With the failure of 'self' functioning within the systems brain, the patient develops endothelial leakage resulting in oedema, not manageable by diuretics, steroids or mannitol. Intracellular oedema of astrocytes and neuron makes ‘life’ impossible to continue its work within the brain. ‘Life’ eventually has to leave the systems body.

 

Consciousness, self, life, mind and information together constitute our cognitive organ what we call psyche.

 

From signal to 'will' and from the 'will' back to signal, from the neural firing to conscious behaviour and from conscious behaviour to appropriate signalling are layered hierarchically. There is no 'hard problem' in consciousness research. Hard problem is created by mind.


There are hierarchical operations of mind, self, life and consciousness in this ladder. 


For details, you may like to read the paper.

 

The Ladder of Cognition:  Abstract operation, Molecular Biology and Systems Science.

Ann Psychiatry Ment Health (2017), 5 (4): 1107, p. 1-15.

https://www.jscimedcentral.com/Psychiatry/psychiatry-5-1107.pdf

https://www.jscimedcentral.com/Psychiatry/vol5issue4.php



Best regards



--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.

To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--
A.K.Mukhopadhyay, MD.
Prof. & Head
Department of Laboratory Medicine
Po. Box. No. 4938
All India Institute of Medical Sciences
New Delhi 110 029
Fax: 91-11-26588641
Tel. 26594407(o), 09868397270 (m)
Website: http://www.akmukhopadhyayconsciousness.com

Bruno Marchal

unread,
Jul 3, 2017, 6:11:18 AM7/3/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com

Vinod,



On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 9:35 PM, VINOD KUMAR SEHGAL <vinodse...@gmail.com
> wrote:
Bruno,

Vinod <<My only point behind sending my past two messages to you has
been to draw your attention to the fact that

i) The existence of anything is derived by virtue of ontology of
"anything"">>


BM <<Just in arithmetic, I would introduce different kinds of
"existence".
What exists most primitively, which really means that we assume this,
is the number zero.

Then, we assume a law of succession, all numbers have their own unique
successor.

So what exists; is zero, often denoted by 0, and the successor of
zero, s(0), and the successor of the successor of zero, s(s(0)), etc.

The addition laws and the multiplication laws are still not derivable,
so we assume them too:

for all x, x + 0 = x
for all x, for all y, x + s(y) = s(x + y)

for all x, x * 0 = 0
for all x, x*s(y) = x + (x*y)


But then we can *define* a prime number, by defining divisibility (x
divides y) = it exists z such that (x*z) = y.

(x is prime) is then defined by "if z divides x then z = s(0) or z =
x, and not(x = s(0))".

Similarly, we can define a universal number u, but by a more longer
definition.

Most humans agree with elementary arithmetic, so it is wonderful that
things as marvelous as prime numbers and universal numbers can be
proved to result on the elementary assumption above.

Especially that not only the universal numbers can be proved to exist,
(assuming Church-thesis/definition), but the existence of each of
their dreams can to.
>>

Vinod "No, above basics of arithmetics are not existing without any
ontology. These are not coming out
of "Nothing". "

BM: It seems that you assume a primary physical ontology. I do not.
Also, I don't believe that something can come from nothing, and that
is why I *assume* the numbers and the addition and multiplication laws.
I can prove that we cannot derive this from less than an universal
system. I could use combinators in place of numbers, but that is
Turing equivalent.






Vinod <<Since you have an ontology of some consciousness or conscious
mind,
that is why these 'existences" are coming out of your consciousness
or mind. Had you been
an inert rock, could these numbers or basics of arithmetics emerge
out and exist?
I tthink answer is obvious and clear No. >>

BM: I agree. I explain the illusion of rock from the numbers.


Vinod <<So numbers though devoid of any ontology in itself remain
dependent upon the ontology of the consciousness or conscious minds
for their "resting"
and emergence.>>

BM: Here I disagree. No human thought of numbers would exist, but the
numbers themselves would. Even if there were no physical universe at
all, the primes would still be existing. The concept of number is
easier to grasp than consciousness and matter.



Vinod <<Numbers derive their existence and meaning Only when some
consciousness or conscious
observer is in their vicinity to appreciate as to what is meant by
1+1=2?

Had there been only inert matter in the universe devoid of any
consciousness, neither there
was any place from which numbers could take birth nor there was anyone
to appreciate
as to what 1 and 1+1=2 stand for?>>

BM: Nobody would know that 1+1=2 , but that does not entail that 1+1=2
would not be true. Numbers does not depend on human. Only the human
understanding of the numbers depends on human.





ii) If there is no ontology of anything, we can safely and logically
infer that that thing has no existence.

I completely agree. That is why I put clearly my card on the table. I
assume the number 0, and its successor, and the successor of the
successor, etc.

Vinod <<But then how do you propose that numbers are fundamental
existing out of space/time
in the absence of any ontology?>>

BM: I do not understand. Once we *assume* the numbers, we do have an
ontology. The appearance of time and space will be explain in term of
number's dreams, which are provably executed through number relation
(that is not entirely obvious, but the idea are already in Gödel's
1931 paper).




iii) If anything has no ontology of its own for its existence, it
should rest in the ontology of "something" else.


Either it is the building of a new molecules, atoms exchanged,
electron sharing, etc. Keeping the same ontological level, or it is
dreamed, getting a phenomenological reality.

No numbers can't "rest' in the ontology of inert matter composed out
of molecules/atoms/
electrons or any inert physicality whether at the phenomenal level or
at noumenal level
below the phenomenology of the matter and physical energy.

There are 3 aspects of numbers which need to be completed

i) Some "resting" ontology

ii) Manifestation out or emergence from that ontology

iii) Some "thing" to appreciate and recognize a number as a number.

Vinod <<Inert matter is incapable of performing above 3 functions. For
example, a rock can't
appreciate and recognize a number 2. All these functions are
accomplished by consciousness
or conscious mind only.>>

BM: I agree. But there is no ontological rocks at all, nor time, nor
space. Those are only appearance in the number's dreams.


Vinod:

iv) Universal numbers have no ontology of their own, therefore, they
can't have the existence on their own.
In view of this universal numbers can't exist as MOST
FUNDAMENTAL out of space and time.

I tend to believe more that it exists a number x such that x + 2 = 3,
than in Schroedinger
or Dirac equation, or even in the moon.

I can conceive waking up in a world without a moon, or with two moons.
It is harder to
imagine I could conceive being wrong with 1 + 2 = 3.

Since when you wake up, the first very existence, you become aware of
is your own conscious
self. Moon, Sun and numbers come afterward. Moon and Sun don't come
out of your
consciousness. They are placed outside. Numbers are fundamentally
embedded in your
consciousness as some universal Law. Therefore, with the manifestation
of the consciousness,
Law of numbers retain its universality and comes first than Moon and
Sun,

I would even say that I feel to lie to myself when trying to doubt the
formula above, although
I do doubt them slightly more than the consciousness-here-and-now.
Yet the universal number can already explains that phenomenon

If you will doubt your consciousness here and there, who will feel to
lie and who will .doubt
the above formula?

BM: The point is that consciousness is not doubtable, yet "0=0" is
very slightly more doubtable. Who am I? A door through which truth
looks at itself.








v) However, if we assume that some eternal universal consciousness,
with its own ontology, existed out of space-time, then
we can make some room for numbers also

a) We can say that universal numbers existed in the universal
consciousness.


I think that the universal consciousness might be the consciousness of
the universal number(s). Before they differentiate

Cosmic, eternal and universal consciousness has some ontology of
itself but numbers per se
don't have any ontology. A non-ontological entity can't lead to an
ontological entity.

Vinod: Just like so many thoughts, epistemological tools emerge out
from the ontology of the
consciousness, similar numbers as some unique and universal
epistemological tool
emerge out of the universal consciousness.Presence or absence of
consciousness always
is relevant in the context of some entity having the ontology of
matter.


BM: OK. Here is where we disagree the most I guess. With mechanism, we
need only the numbers as primary, and all the rest belongs to the
phenomenology internal to the number relations (including the non
computable one).




Vinod: <<
For example, we say
that dog is having consciousness and a rock is not having
consciousness. But we never say
that thoughts are conscious since it is implied that they are
conscious since they are emerging
out directly from the consciousness. So we can't say "the
consciousness of thoughts or for
that purpose consciousness of numbers" All thoughts or numbers are
the encoded messages
from the consciousness, therefore, consciousness is implicit >>


BM: With computer science, which is embedded in arithmetic (thanks to
the digitalness) we explain the complex thought from the numbers'
relations, which are conceptually simpler.




Technically, it is a bit more difficult to explain, especially that
the explanation belongs to G* \ G.
It is where we have to stay silent, or present the deduction from the
mechanist hypothesis, as it needs to be understood only, never asserted.

Vinod: <<Yes, it is quite difficult to express in words, it has to be
felt and experienced. Yet, we don't have
any other means to express but to use words and language. That is
what have tried above
but not succeeded fully. >>

BM: Mathematical logic provides helping tools. And with mechanism, we
get a theology associated to the (universal) number. As it includes
physics, we can test it.




b) As the creation of the universe commenced with the manifestation
of matter/energy at the discrete levels,

I don't really believe in universe, time, space, or energy. I assume
only 0, s(0), s(s(0)), .

Vinod <<But had you not been having consciousness or conscious minds,
from where the above
assumption of 0, s(0) and s(s(0)) come out?. And who would have
appreciated and provided
recognition/existence to this assumption?>>

I think you confuse human's idea of numbers, and the numbers
themselves. I believe that the numbers exists independently of
consciousness and humans. Indeed, I explain how the number relations
explains the illusion of "humans and rocks". It is the relative
numbers who appreciates the recognition/existence of the numbers. The
arithmetical reality emulates, out of time and space (a bit like a
bloc universe) all computations.



Vinod: For establishing the existence of numbers and its arithmetics,
some consciousness should
establish, recognize and assert, yes these are numbers and arithmetic.
universal numbers also unfolded out from the womb of the universal
consciousness to account for the "discreteness"
of the universe.

BM: Why? Who will recognize that consciousness? I prefer to assume the
conceptually simple number, and explain the reality of cosmic
consciousness from the numbers, than using consciousness to explain
them. The point is that the explanation is testable (and tested in the
sense that the quantum logic is already explained).



The physical reality is somehow the border of the universal mind.
Plotinus would say that
matter is a creation of the souls, which can use it to return to the
One, but can also get
lost in it.

Vinod <<
Like Plotinus, there is one view in Advaita Vedanta also which states
that all
the matter is the creation of the consciousness which can return to
and get lost in ONE
( universal consciousness). But then numbers also can't get escape
from this process
'of returning and getting lost in than one.

Further, all the numbers will become redundant and lost the existence,
once discrete
ontology gets dissolved in that ONE or otherwise.

All numbers come into existence due to the INTERFACE between the
consciousness and
discrete ontology of matter. The way consciousness has an innate and
universal attribute of
awareness -- of self or/and environment, it has also an innate and
universal attribute
of "identification and manipulation" of the discreteness of matter.


When the above "innate and universal" attribute of "identification
and manipulation" of the
consciousness has an interface with discreteness of matter or any
other discrete thing,
numbers come into existence.

"Identification and manipulation attribute of consciousness" -----
Interface ---- Discreteness
of matter or any other thing = Numbers.

If anyone of the above will disappear, numbers will also lost their
existence.

In view of above, existence of some consciousness having its own
ontology & and
some discreteness of matter or any other thing having its own
ontology or from that ONE
( universal consciousness) are a priori for the numbers to manifest
>>

BM: I am not sure if that is consistent with the digital mechanist
hypothesis. You will need to assume actual infinities, and some magic
operating in the brain. Why not, but I think this is premature, given
that arithmetic plus mechanism do provide a testable (and tested)
account of both quanta and qualia.

You seem to make the assumption that there is a primary physical
universe. With mechanism, the universal consciousness is the
consciousness of the universal number relatively to the arithmetical
truth, and matter appearances emerges from some "dream statistics".
Consciousness is a sort of semantic fixed point, that can be shown
undoubtable by all universal numbers, and it produces the illusion of
matter and physical laws, with enough details so that we can compare
with nature and refute digital mechanism or not.

You seem to say: CONSCIOUSNESS ==> PHYSICS ==> HUMANS ==> NUMBERS

But Digital Mechanism entails:

NUMBERS ==> CONSCIOUSNESS ==> PHYSICS ==> HUMANS


Bruno


> vi) In case of localized consciousness also, we do observe that
>
> a) Numbers and computations exist in our mind or some computer/
> machine, in which our partial mind is transposed.
>
> b) We use numbers and computations for identifying and
> manipulation of the discreteness of our day to day worldly
> affairs whether directly or thru computer/AI/some machine.
>
> viii) I appreciate that as a mathematician, it may be difficult for
> you to subscribe to the above framework of numbers since,
> as you have also said, that you have to start with some
> assumption which may be easy to comprehend for self and others.
> But if you agree to the aforesaid framework from the logical
> point of view, will it be worthwhile to compromise with
> reality, truth, and logic for the sake of easiness?
>
>
> The problem is that the humans will not wait for an answer and
> accept the digital transplant, not for immortality,
> but for seeing the next soccer cup, or to see their grandchildren
> growing up.
>
> We can argue that "nature" already bet on mechanism, through the DNA
> coding machinery, and tat we are already immaterial, and living in
> arithmetic.
> We have just some difficulty to remember who we are.
>
> I agree to the above practical difficulties.
>
> The practical question will be "to you accept that job on Mars,
> where you are asked to use calssical teleportation (which assume a
> digitalozation level of the body)?
>
> Or just "do you accept that your daughter marry a man who did accept
> that job"?
>
> We don't need to understand the brain to bet on some level of
> substitution, and copy it at that level. Indeed, it is a theorem of
> machine's theology that they cannot know in any public way which
> machine they are, and they already know that their soul are not a
> machine.
>
> To accept the digital transplant will be a question of right, not of
> truth.
>
> Then, all what I say, is that if this is true, if such level exist,
> then the physical laws have a reason, as they become an emerging
> invariant of the universal number observation of what is below their
> substitution level. And that this can be tested (modulo some
> technical nuances which I don't want bore anyone, but I can give
> references).
>
> Vinod Sehgal


http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/



Bruno Marchal

unread,
Jul 5, 2017, 4:05:17 PM7/5/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
Dear Vinod,




Since interacting with you on numbers and arithmetic since the past 5-6 months, I have been constantly contemplating on the issue of the genesis, nature, and function of numbers.

Nice!



I don't find that numbers have any fundamental or Godly status from which the entire ontology of the universe may appear like a dream state.

OK. Logically, this will entail that you have to say "no" to the doctor who would propose you an artificial digital brain, copying the elementary operation of your brain at any level of description. You will need to postulate some actual infinity, which I prefer to do only at some meta-level, like mechanism will allow.

The reason for this is that, since Gödel, Kleene and other mathematical logicians, it is "well known" (by logicians) that a tiny part of the arithmetical reality (the natural numbers structured by the law of addition and multiplication) does emulate, in the precise sense given by Turing and Church and others independently, all the computations, and if we can survive through a physical, yet digital substitution, we can no more be aware of any difference between a physical reality and an arithmetical reality (emulating us at, or below, our substitution level.






I find that cosmic consciousness is Most Fundamental entity which is self-contained.


The same for me. But "cosmic" and "consciousness" are two very complicate notions, even if we have direct 1p notion of it, which are typically ineffable and beyond words.

So I prefer to start on simple thing we can agree on, and simple but reasonable principle, and see where we are lead, in particular, see if it is contradicted by the visible reality, and if it contradicted by our personal acquaintance with that thing/person without name out there and in here.







The observed phenomenal reality of the physical universe comes out from some primordial physicality.

Hmm...

So, in the Vedânta, you are closer to Ramanuja than Sankara ?

I will not tell you my personal opinion, which is really that I inquire, and have no definite view. What I can explain and justify rationally is that Digital Mechanism is incompatible with a primordial physicality.

With digital mechanism, the physical reality is the product of a deeper, invisible, reality, which will be the arithmetical reality "seen from inside", in some 1p way enforced to the machine by incompleteness.





The primordial physicality either emerges out from the Cosmic Consciousness


Ah? 

OK then.

I interpreted "primordial" as meaning that it cannot emerge from some other reality.

So, up to here, you are again consistent with mechanism.




or it is as fundamental as the cosmic consciousness except that it lacks any knowledge ( consciousness) and propulsion power for the creation of the universe.

Hmm... That would lead to dualism. Like, according to somebooks, Madhva. The Vedânta is rich, but there are few chance I follow a dualist explanation.




This primordial physicality manifests into various layered structures in the universe with the lowermost structure being our physical universe.

Again, this is consistent with mechanism, but there, we can see how, and why, the primordial physicality appears, and there are indeed layers, and get very big (multi-multiverse, deep computations, linearity and symmetries at the bottom, and *some* continuum.

A machine is 3p duplicable, and no universal machine can predict a result of self-localization in a self)duplicating experience. We belong to an infinity of computations, and below our substitution level, the sum are infinite, but, well, since Ramanujan, we know that 1+2+3+4+5+6+... = -1/12. (!). It means physics comes from a sort perpetual self-normalization. In fact, the modal logic of the 1p justifies the use of a quantum logic.




In between the physical structure of the universe and the primordial physicality lies various subtle structures called Astral Realm and Causal Realm about which current physical sciences have almost NIL awareness and knowledge.

That can make sense with mechanism. The physical science focuses on the visible. The theological science, like mathematics, focuses on the invisible. 

You can distinguish three great part of the invisible in mathematics. 
1) the part that we can justify and communicate
2) the part that we know well, but cannot justify
3) the part which is beyond.

With mechanism, the visible is itself an invisible relation between numbers, which can still, be lived, indexically, by the person supported by the relevant machine.




Now let me come to numbers since that was the main topic of the discussions.

As the primordial physicality start unfolding into different layered structures in some sequential order, at one stage, "discreteness"  starts manifesting in nature and discrete layers of the structures start appearing. When consciousness thru the agency of Mind interacts with the 'discreteness' of nature ( irrespective of the nature of the ontology), a perceptual mathematical thought process starts appearing in the Mind.

That appears too.

But conceptually, it is easier, and justifiable (computer science) to start from the numbers, to get a communicable theory, explaining what you say above, without *assuming* matter, nor consciousness.

There is, the (tiny) arithmetical reality something like

Numbers ==> Consciousness ==> Matter ==> humans ==> Numbers ==> Consciousness => Matter ==> ...



This mathematical perceptual ( it could be even cognitive) thought the process is unique, universal irrespective of the nature of the ontology, but definitely arising from the 'discreteness" of nature, invariant under time and persons.

Yes, and with mechanism, the physics is "only" a mode of self-reference of the universal person (which is again implied by incompleteness).





it is from this unique and universal mathematical thought process arising in Mind that numbers take birth in our Minds. All the subsequent operations of the mathematics also arise as part of the mathematical thought process.

Yes, but that is what happen in infinitely many computations which exists once you agree that for all x x + 0 = x (etc.).

My point is that all universal machines have physics in their head, so we can test mechanism by comparing that physics with what we observe.

Then the theology of the (Gödel-Löbian) machine is close to Sankara, Plotinus, ... (the monist idealist), but with a zest of Pythagorism. 



Discreteness in nature is associated with the description of nature in form of "unique distinct identities of Ones". For example, a mango, though in the phenomenal form, has a 'unique distinct identity of One:. But an emotion of love, hate has no such identity

Nor does the map of where we will find an electron in our most probable (computational) histories. With mechanism, we can explain why the finite beings eventually get the illusion of the infinite and the continuum, even lawful and thus testable illusion, a bit like a rainbow.





So the condition for the manifestation of the discreteness in nature is that in that realm nature should be describable in terms of identities of the unique distinct Ones. Though discreteness in nature is not related to the type of the ontology it definitely contingent upon unique distinct identities of Ones.

One is discrete. Ones is continuum. (to be short, and again assuming my favorite assumption).



When consciousness thru the agency of the Mind has an interface with discreteness
 of the Unique distinct Identities of Ones, either perceptually or even cognitively, this leads to a unique universal mathematical thought process in the Mind in which numbers 1,2,3 and so on appear as  part of the mathematical thought process.

That is correct, but "primordial physics" was assumed, and you don't need to assume it. Assuming elementary arithmetic is enough, and is much less than assuming a physical reality and physical laws.

It seems a bit sad, to me, because, when following the path saying that the "primordial physics" is fundamental, you need to say no to your daughter wanting to marry a man having a digital brain. Yet, those "zombies" will be the one exploring the galaxy.




Now why 0, 1, 1+1, 1+1= in mathematics?

You place any one unique distinct identity of Ones say 1 apple on the table.

Keep in mind that one of my goal consists in explaining where tables, or illusion of tables, are coming from.

OK, though, as I can conceive an apple on a table. I can see it.




On the table, there is one and only one apple.

Oops! No more. An imaginary Monkey ate it. There is zero table on the table. Sorry.




when our consciousness will interact with this One apple thru Mind, a mathematical 1 will manifest in the mathematical thought process. Therefore, 1 of mathematics.  Now I also place an apple on the table along with the apple as placed by you.

OK. (I keep my eyes on the monkey).




So we have one more apple on the table, therefore one more 1 of arithmetic in our thought process. Now suppose, consciousness interacts with both the apples. so on the table, it sees two apples ( neither 3 nor 1 nor zero), therefore an arithmetic of 1+1 appear in the mathematical thought process. But these two apples when seen separately are 1 and 1  apples and when seen jointly are 2 apples ( not more than 2 or less than 2), therefore, a mathematical relation of 1+1=2 appear in the mathematical thought process in the Mind.


OK. 

With the digital mechanist hypothesis, it is arguably an important example how universal numbers mirror all themselves. 

You could have described as well how a robot count the number of apple on the table, and the functionning of the robot is expressible in term of number relation. All the dream layers exists in the arithmetical reality, and some class of dreams are sharable (the "physical realities", notably).



Now suppose both the apples are removed away from the table, no apple remains on the table.

I just need to close my imaginary eyes for a second. The monkey will have eaten the apples.


This leads to the manifestation of ZERO in the mathematical thought process.

Right. But even a monkey unable to count up to zero will starve if given zero food. 

I mean, it is not because the humans can discover the numbers by abstracting from those number incarnated or implemented in many everyday siutation, that, conceptually, they are easier to grasp and assume, than "primary matter", or "cosmic consciousness".

We might agree on the theology, but have different methodology.

My feeling is that you could change your mind if you knew more about the universal machine self-reference theory, and theoretical computer science. The universal machine which observe itself is not predictible, and conventional computing is a sort of art of preventing the machine to explore itself (somehow, with a grain of salt). 





But what about numbers and arithmetics when there were no sentient living beings possessing consciousness?

When there where no sentient beings, 

Universal consciousness and (sigma) Arithmetical Truth are  concomiitant in the mechanist theory. 

Once you have the numbers, and enough laws, like addition and multiplication, you get "instantaneously" an infinite, web of *all* number/machine dreams, and it is structured differently by the eight (main) intensional (modal) variant of self-reference. 






In the first place, there had been no period when the universal fundamental consciousness was not present.


Yes. It is "out of time". Consciousness is not a physical object, but a psychological and indeed even theological object of study, a priori. Then, when assuling Matter (primitive matter), we can try a physical theory of consciousness, but usually, I am not statisfy, as it uses some strong infinity axioms. 




Secondly, mathematical numbers and their relation appear as the unique mathematical thought process in the Minds. and the consciousness. The mind is not consciousness.

OK.



So in the absence of the sentient living beings, though discreteness of the unique distinct identities of Ones, Twos, Threes existed in some realm of nature, there was no mathematics of 1, 2, 3  or 1+1=2 due to the absence of the mathematical thought process.

That is circular, and directly refutes by the theorem which says that all computations are emulated in arithmetic, and thus, in particular all humans experiences. 

Here, you are just assuming that Mechanism is false, in which case you can search for a physical explanation, but it will work only by invoking some very special infinities, different from those infinities which are already related to the machines from their own points of view.







Then why arithmetics appear to give birth to different ontologies as some dream states?

By the arithmetization of metamathematics, which embeds the mathematician in the arithmetical reality.





Arithmetic, in fact, does give birth to any ontology and they exist by virtue of their existence or as a result of the cause-eefect relation between different ontologies.  Arithmetic is a unique and universal thought process in Mind due to the interface with "discreteness" of nature in form of unique discrete identities of Ones. So there is a relation of correspondence between "discreteness" as existing outside in nature and arithmetics as existing in Mind as the mathematical thought process. The external "discreteness" is universally related to all the ontologies, irrespective of the type, provided the ontology is describable in some Unique Distinct Identities of Ones. So when mathematics in the thought process describes something, it also describes the "discreteness of nature" ( since mathematics had manifested from discreteness) and since discreteness being universally linked to all the ontologies, provided nature in that realm is describable thru Unique Distinct Identities of Ones, therefore, it appears to give a universal description of different ontologies but ontologies  neither appear to take birth from arithmetics as part of the dreams not it is that they have  no real existence in the universe.


Assuming a physical universe. But then you assume the answers it seems to me. I am much more ignorant. I guess there is a physical reality, but all the evidences and experiences make me think the physical reality is some kind of border of the universal person imposed by incompleteness to all sufficiently rich (Gödel-Löbian) systems.

Normally, that is testable. With respect to Vedânta, I am closer to Sankara. The physical reality is an arithmetical Maya. 



From the above analysis, one can infer that neither numbers have any existence outside space/time


What could that mean? The numbers do not belong to a category of concept to which time and space can be applied. 
On the contray, like with Kant, time and space will belong to the mind of the numbers who explore themselves, when distributed in the infinitely many computable and non computable relations.




nor they have any Godly status at part with God or cosmic consciousness.


Seen from outside, I understand the feeling, but that might be too a sort of illusion, explainable by the fact that all machine too will agree that their 1p experience are different from all 3p description. But, in effect, you are just excluding a large number of beings of the possibility of being conscious, so you might harbor some pre-Gödel prejudice on numbers and (digital) machines. 

We will digitalized ourselves in the future. I don't know if it will happen in 500 years or 5000 years, but we will do it, if only to expand in the galaxy. With mechanism, "we" have many (terrestrial) futures, and I am talking about some most probable one. 
The physical reality is not an illusion. What is an illusion, is simply the belief that it explains all, and that it cannot be explained by simpler ideas. Eventually, it is not that simple, but it gives the math and the physical means to make some test. 

I am searching the most plausible explanation for the 1p experience and the possible 3p sharable reality. I have no definite opinion. 


Kind regards,

Bruno




Vinod Sehgal

On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 11:20 PM, Bruno Marchal <mar...@ulb.ac.be> wrote:
Dear Vinod,


On 03 Jul 2017, at 11:57, VINOD KUMAR SEHGAL wrote:

Bruno Marchal

unread,
Jul 10, 2017, 7:39:39 AM7/10/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
Dear Vinod,



On 08 Jul 2017, at 14:54, VINOD KUMAR SEHGAL wrote:

Dear Bruno,

Thanks for your elaborate response. Even if I may not be in complete agreement with your views but this helps to understand correctly your views as well as examine my views. My comments are given in blue font text.




Since interacting with you on numbers and arithmetic since the past 5-6 months, I have been constantly contemplating on the issue of the genesis, nature, and function of numbers.

Nice!

OK



I don't find that numbers have any fundamental or Godly status from which the entire ontology of the universe may appear like a dream state.

OK. Logically, this will entail that you have to say "no" to the doctor who would propose you an artificial digital brain, copying the elementary operation of your brain at any level of description.

I think there is some basic difference in saying No to a doctor proposing an artificial digital brain  copying the elementary operation and denying the Godly and Fundamental status to numbers. Then currently saying "NO" to a doctor is a hypothetical issue.

Saying "yes" is a simple way to explain what exactly is assumed in the digital mechanist, or computationalist, assumption/theory.

Of course you can say "no" (to a digital brain/body transplant, and still believe in computationalism, because you don't trust the competence of the doctor, or the machine trademark, or because you fear that someone will consider that you are a zombie-machine, etc.

Similarly, you can say "yes" without really thinking on the issue, by trusting the shaman or the doctor.

I do not try to defend any truth. As a scientist I propose only a theory, and test of validation. The advantage of Mechanism is that it makes possible to use theoretical computer science to get testable consequences. Then it happens that mechanism entails a sort of coming back to Plato, where the fundamental reality is not what we observe, but something immaterial (and mathematical) behind, and is closer to Shankara than to Ramanuja, when compared, as I try here, with Vedanta. 







 You will need to postulate some actual infinity, which I prefer to do only at some meta-level, like mechanism will allow.

If 1, 2, 3 and zero have some existence, infinities should also have some existence but not within our normal cognitive domain. Advaita Vedanta speaks of the infinity of the Cosmic Consciousness and Saankhya philosophy speaks of the infinity of the primordial physicality. No wonder, in number system also, there may be the existence of the infinity corresponding to primordial physicality where it appears in the discrete nature

Mechanism presupposes at the meta-level only the finite numbers, but the finite numbers, even for just understand themselves will need to invoke an infinity of infinities. Some of those infinities are nameable by the relative number/machine, like the set of all (natural) numbers (the set {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ...}, or many others. But some infinities are not nameable, nor computable, but still play a role in the way the numbers can figure out "what happens".

The physical is indeed most plausibly infinite, beyond the fact that it does not exist and is only the border of the universal mind/cosmic consciousness, which is infinite too, but not ontological (I guess you will disagree here).







The reason for this is that, since Gödel, Kleene and other mathematical logicians, it is "well known" (by logicians) that a tiny part of the arithmetical reality (the natural numbers structured by the law of addition and multiplication) does emulate,

I think it should not be "emulation" but description" Emulation gives a connotation of the absence of any ontology but ontology as an appearance but description gives a connotation of the pre-existence of some ontology

But there is an ontology. We accept the elementary theory of numbers. We agree on:

0 ≠ s(x)                     (= 0 is not the successor of a number)
s(x) = s(y) -> x = y     (different numbers have different successors)
x = 0 v Ey(x = s(y))    (except for 0, all numbers have a predecessor)
x+0 = x                      (if you add zero to a number, you get that number)
x+s(y) = s(x+y)  (if you add a number x to the successor of a number y, you get the successor of x added to y)
x*0=0                   (if you multiply a number by 0, you get 0)
x*s(y)=(x*y)+x    (if you multiply a number x by the successor of y, you get the number x added to the multiplication of the number x with y)

The basic ontology is very simple. Nothing else will be assume, except, at the metalevel, the digital mechanist hypothesis.

The simple theory above is already Turing universal. The theory emulates the computations, in the sense that, not only it describes the computations, but justify that they are computation, in virtue of the trueness of some number relation, like we can prove that a physical computer emulates a computation in virtue of the trueness of some physical relations.

An emulation is not just a "description" (a static notion), but a relatively dynamical true number relation. When we do the math, we needs to take the distinction between description and the "real thing" (here the arithmetical reality) into account. The body and the beliefs will have a representational theory, but the soul and knowledge, nor consciousness, will ever be representational, and will never have nay description (but still arise from the arithmetical *reality*, which will appear to be itself out of the possible complete description.




 in the precise sense given by Turing and Church and others independently, all the computations, and if we can survive through a physical, yet digital substitution,

Above is a hypothetical situation. First,  "We" can't be fully digitalized.

Something like that happen. No machine can believe rationally that its body/brain is fully digitalized, and no machine can know which computations support her soul. But she can do bet, and "not knowing" does not imply falsity (on the contrary, we are warn of many non provable truth by any machine.




Second, "We" can't be fully emulatable.

"fully" is ambiguous. My body matter is not emulable, but that can be shown to be a consequence of assuming that our consciousness "surivives" a digital transplant. In that case, the physical has to be derived from a statistic on *all* computations (we need to extend Everett on arithmetic, somehow).





So there is no question of our survival thru any physical and digital substitution. Our "I-ness" or "we-ness" of each individual of is unique, non-digitizable, non-emulatable by any digital or physical mechanism. All these are fantasies.

In which theory? In the Mechanist theory, the soul of the machine cannot justify rationally "mechanism", but they can understand that Mechanism implies this, and somehow makes the soul right when she asserts that she is not a machine. You need to take into account that a machine is globally related to the whole of the arithmetical reality.

This is hard to explain shortly? It is a bit like understanding well the difference between Brahman and Atman to better appreciate the advaita which identify them, at some level.

With the notable exception of the collapse of the wave, we have not found in Nature something not emulable by a computer. Even quantum computer can be emulated by a non quantum computer, and they are provably emulated in arithmetic (and I suspect that the distribution of the prime number is close to emulate a quantum computer all by itself but here I speculate). 









 we can no more be aware of any difference between a physical reality and an arithmetical reality (emulating us at, or below, our substitution level.

The question of the difference or not difference will arise only if we could really be substitutable by any physical or digital mechanism

Which is what I assume. It is my working hypothesis, and the consequences, in a nutshell, is that Plato's theology is correct (the fundamental reality is not the physical reality, which is only the wall of the cave). 










I find that cosmic consciousness is Most Fundamental entity which is self-contained.


The same for me. But "cosmic" and "consciousness" are two very complicate notion, even if we have direct 1p notion of it, which are typically ineffable and beyond words.

Agreed. But they are non-cognitive notions since  both are infinite and "infiniteness" does not fall within our cognitive domain

The big infinite does not fall in our cognitive domain, but most infinities does fall within our domain. If not, I am not sure why you could say that they do not fall in our cognitive domain. I should only ask what you are talking about.





So I prefer to start on simple thing we can agree on, and simple but reasonable principle, and see where we are lead, in particular, see if it is contradicted by the visible reality, and if it contradicts our personal acquaintance with that thing/person without name.

No, it is not as simple and reasonable. you start with Numbers being most fundamental existing out of space/time particularly when numbers per se lack any ontology.

I do not understand why you say that the numbers lacks ontology, unless you work in a theory which assumes some other ontology. from logic alone, we cannot derive the numbers existence, and so, as we need them to just define "digital" and "mechanism", I have to assume them (or anything Turing equivalent).








It is quite difficult ( almost impossible)  to comprehend this level of fundamentality of the universe which does not entail any real ontology to the universe.

You mean the physical universe? yes, that is the price of the mechanist assumption. It becomes a special and important dream by the mind of the universal machine(s). 





In the notion of the cosmic consciousness, at least, it has its own ontology from which all the ontologies manifest in the view of Advaita Vedanta.

I think arithmetic provides a model (in the logician sense of "mathematical reality") of the advaita vedanta.

Even the term "arithmetical truth" will appear to be a nickname only pointing on something quite beyond us.











The observed phenomenal reality of the physical universe comes out from some primordial physicality.

Hmm...

So, in the Vedânta, you are closer to Ramanuja than Sankara ?

Shankara believed in the fundamentality of the Cosmic Consciousness and nothing else than the Cosmic consciousness. But either way, he did not deny the primordial physicality. He agreed to the existence of the primordial physicality, in form of MAYA, and as derivable from the consciousness.

OK. That is roughly the position that the universal machine find when searching "her name", or introspecting itself. The primordial reality is a sort of Maya, and is derivable from "cosmic consciousness", or the "One" (that the machine will distinguish, wrongly, from Arithmetical Truth).



In Saankhya's system of philosophy, there is the primordial physicality in form of the Moola and as fundamental in Prakriti but it is as fundamental as Cosmic Consciousness and called Purusha but both being entirely different in nature. In view of this, there is the provision of some primordial physicality in both systems -- as Moola Prakriti  in Saankhya with as fundamental as Purusha and as MAYA as derivable from cosmic consciousness

This seems to departs from neoplatonism and from the (toy) theology of the sound universal machine/number. Of course, this tocuhes deep complex issues, and further studies are called to progress.




I will not tell you my personal opinion, which is really that I inquire, and have no definite view. What I can explain and justify rationally is that Digital Mechanism is incompatible with a primordial physicality.

But why it is incompatible?

This is what I intuited in my youth, and took 30 years to justify precisely in the context of the mechanist hypothesis. I guess I will perhaps have opportunity to say more, if people are interested, but I have given references. With digital mechanism, shortly, our bodies belongs to infinities of computations, and our soul belongs on classes of computations, and structured them differently according to the points of view adopted, the first person consciousness will obey to some intuitionist logic, but the observable obey to quantum logic, and the sensible to an intuiyionist quantum logic, etc.

A primordial physicality cannot select the computations which support us, only the cosmic consciousness can do that.




If there is the pre-existence of some primordial physicality, what makes digital mechanism invalid if you conform to my notion of numbers that numbers manifest in our mathematical thought system when the interface between consciousness thru our Mind take place with the discreteness in nature.

Because the set of discrete histories is a itself a continuum, and the continuation must be given by a measure on computations. If a god or a physical universe could select my consciousness out of arithmetic, my brain will need some actual infinities to keep that connection. Let us do the testing, before doing a so strong ontological commitment in a primitive primordial physicality.





Of course, you will be required.to forego pan-Godly staus to Numbers that they existed outside space/time at the most fundamental status but perplexingly without any ontology of their own

With digital mechanism, the physical reality is the product of a deeper, invisible, reality, which will be the arithmetical reality "seen from inside", in some 1p way enforced to the machine by incompleteness.

The above notion rests on the assumption that i) there is no real existence of the physicality

Not really. It is part of the conclusion of a reasoning. But I assume mechanism. If you disbelieve in mechanism at the start, or judge it unconceivable, then it will not easy to do the reasoning, except that the consequences can be judged absurd enough, but here, the problem is that the absurdity look technically quite similar to the quantum weirdness. 




ii) Numbers existed outside space/time as the most fundamental but without any ontology of their own.

This I really do not understand. Numbers have no physical ontology, but can be incarnated in the physical reality, with pebbles, or brains, or computers, etc. But they have a mathematical ontology, at least in the theories which assume them.  Why would the number 24 not have an ontology of its own? It is the successors of the successors of ... of the successor of zero.






I want to reiterate that both the above assumptions are illogical since this will entail the start of the universe from NIL ontology meaning non-existence of anything.


Non existence of anything physical. But we still get the existence of the machines, the gods, (nameable and non nameable) and their dreams, includuing a class of dreams which are sharable by many universal machine.

That is not obvious, but follow from standard theorem in mathematical computer science.




Numbers will also be engulfed in this non-existence of anything.

I am not sure why.









The primordial physicality either emerges out from the Cosmic Consciousness


Ah? 

OK then.

I interpreted "primordial" as meaning that it cannot emerge from some other reality.

So, up to here, you are again consistent with mechanism.

No by primordial, I meant the ultimate state of the physicality from which all the matter and energy of our observable universe emerges out. This ultimate  ultimate state may further emerge out from Cosmic Consciousness ( Brahma) of Shankara in form of Maya.

Yes. That is what the truth that the numbers observing themselves close enough get out.




No this will not be consistent with digital mechanism since Cosmic consciousness has its intrinsic ontology but numbers lack any ontology.

I will identify "cosmic consciousness", "arithmetical truth" with Brahma.

I will identify "singular consciousness" with sigma-arithmetical truth, and with the Atman.

Enlightenment will be explained by an identification between "arithmetical truth" and "sigma arithmetical truth", which is wrong if the machine asserts the identification, but correct if she only hope it, and never impose to any other. That is part of machine theology (and I insist that I am not claiming it is true!).

What I do claim, is that it could be refuted, and show how.









or it is as fundamental as the cosmic consciousness except that it lacks any knowledge ( consciousness) and propulsion power for the creation of the universe.

Hmm... That would lead to dualism. Like, according to somebooks, Madhva. The Vedânta is rich, but there are few chance I follow a dualist explanation.

Yes, this is the dualism of Saankhya of  Kaplia Muni. But what are reasons for you not to follow dualism?

It seems to me that it makes the search for an explanation hopeless.






This primordial physicality manifests into various layered structures in the universe with the lowermost structure being our physical universe.

Again, this is consistent with mechanism,

No this not consistent with digital mechanism since in digital mechanism, there is no place for the real ontology of the physicality either at the primordial stage or at the intermediate layered structures. But what I have been speaking is for the real ontological status of the primordial physicality which manifests into the real ontological layered structures and NOT AS some appearances in the digital mechanism,

OK. I was saying that some dualism are explained phenomenologically. But I agree that it is not consistent with Sankhya.

(Apology if I miss-write an Indian Name, as my books on Indian philosophy are most old and in french, with different spellings. feel free to point on mistake).




 but there, we can see how, and why, the primordial physicality appears, and there are indeed layers, and get very big (multi-multiverse, deep computations, linearity and symmetries at the bottom, and *some* continuum.

In the state of Samaadhi, these intermediate layered structures can be viewed and known as Astral and the Causal Worlds with each world having a no of sub-sections and elements. This will be a too different subject to elaborate on this here.

OK. 



Current Physics being unaware of the ontological reality of these intermediate layered structures speculates on these being some "parallel" realities and want to know thru some deep computations involving issues of linear or non-linear, symmetries and continuum. But Current science is unable to state anything with certainty unless it can "fix" these structures thro some empirical experimentation.

I would say that science, by construction, is never able to assert anything with certainty. Science is by construction humble, modest and open only to refutation. Whatever is the domain. It is doubt all along the many public path. In private, we can try to say more, but it is always with some grain of salt. We can make report of (mystical) experience, but we can interpret them publicly only through theories. Certainty can exist, though, but is not publicly invokable.




Likelihood of any empirical experimentation succeeding in fixing these intermediate layered structures does no seem quite high to me as our physical world and the Astral/causal world have a set of Laws, space and time. Nevertheless, the existence of these intermediate layered structural realities as the Astral and Causal world is verifiable thru the 1pp methodology of Samaadhi.

I use dreams, mainly, to visit alternate consciousness state or realities, or to quite my body or my bodies, but since 8 years, I use salvia divinorum, which can be quite efficacious, but i have to stay mute (to avoid trouble at the next experience). I do not express anyting related to those experience, but they can help to better listen to the machines.

The theology of the machine leads to three main type of physical realities. Up to now, they seem to all obey to the quantum principle, and all describes a sort of multi-dreams. I suspect many intermediate realities, and here the machine's theology looks a bit like some tibetan doctrine, but it is hard to really evaluate this.



A machine is 3p duplicable, and no universal machine can predict a result of self-localization in a self)duplicating experience.

Yes, I agree that no machine can't predict a result for the self-localization duplicate experiences.in fact,  all  the experiences can't be digitalized and emulatable and transposed in a 3pp machine


No experience can be digitalized, but that does not entail that an infinity of digital relations cannot allow experiences to be locally supported in physical and non physical realm. 




 We belong to an infinity of computations, and below our substitution level, the sum are infinite, but, well, since Ramanujan, we know that 1+2+3+4+5+6+... = -1/12. (!). It means physics comes from a sort perpetual self-normalization. In fact, the modal logic of the 1p justifies the use of a quantum logic.

We can view our "we-ness" or "I-ness" from two perspectives and both are right.

We are a  complex bundle of very large no of experiences/thoughts which have manifested since the time of our birth. These experiences/thoughts constitute the epistemic aspect of our "I-ness" which is variable. As Bruno, your epistemic "I-ness" rests upon these large no of experiences. These experiences are ver very large BUT NOT INFINITE since time span since you have been accumulating these experiences is NOT INFINITE.

The infinite does not come from the experience, nor the bodies, but from the infinity of close experience, with non distinguishable bodies. I am aware it is very counter-intuitive.




This epistemic "I" is not due to the result of infinity of the computations

In the machine theology it is due to the conjuntion of belief and truth, available in *some* computations.



but it has its own ontological reality as grounded in the ontological reality of the physicality

Well, physicality is what I doubt the most. I would not ground something on it. All theories, except quantum physics, have not lasted a long time. Here I guess we differ. I want to ground physics on the number. I doubt less that 24 is even, than F=ma, or Schroedinger equation. Physics is the best tool to predict local happenings, but it is almost  a distraction from the reality behind. 




since all the experiences arise in Mind and Mind is a part of the physicality

Mind is part of physicality? If you take this as axiom, you need non-computationalism. 


though at the intermediate layered structure of the Astral Body, as indicated in the aforesaid. Some part of this epistemic  "I-ness" is digitizable and emulatable in a 3pp machine thru  a LARGE No of computation BUT NOT INFINITE COMPUTATIONS.

Apart from our epistemic "I-ness" we have our ontic "I-ness" which is grounded in the cosmic consciousness. Our epistemic "I-ness"  survives till we have our ontic "I-ness". None of the part of our Ontic "I-ness" is digitizable, emulatable and transposable in a 3pp machine

I am aware this might seem paradoxical, but the sound universal machine agree with this from its first person singular point of view. It is an open problem for the first person plural view, where the physicality resides.









In between the physical structure of the universe and the primordial physicality lies various subtle structures called Astral Realm and Causal Realm about which current physical sciences have almost NIL awareness and knowledge.

That can make sense with mechanism. The physical science focuses on the visible. The theological science, like mathematics, focuses on the invisible. 

You can distinguish three great part of the invisible in mathematics. 
1) the part that we can justify and communicate
2) the part that we know well, but cannot justify
3) the part which is beyond.

With mechanism, the visible is itself an invisible relation between numbers, which can still, be lived, indexically, by the person supported by the relevant machine.

But this is not consistent with Mechanism since, in the mechanism, there is no place for the real ontological structures of The Astral and Causal realms.

You are right, but we get a "real" phenomenological account of them. I am not sure why you want them to be ontological. The phenomenological is not less real than the ontological.



But I am indicating of the real ontological structures, lying between our physical world and Moola Prakriti, the state of the Primordial physicality.




Now let me come to numbers since that was the main topic of the discussions.

As the primordial physicality start unfolding into different layered structures in some sequential order, at one stage, "discreteness"  starts manifesting in nature and discrete layers of the structures start appearing. When consciousness thru the agency of Mind interacts with the 'discreteness' of nature ( irrespective of the nature of the ontology), a perceptual mathematical thought process starts appearing in the Mind.

That appears too.

OK

But conceptually, it is easier, and justifiable (computer science) to start from the numbers, to get a communicable theory, explaining what you say above, without *assuming* matter, nor consciousness.

There is, the (tiny) arithmetical reality something like

Numbers ==> Consciousness ==> Matter ==> humans ==> Numbers ==> Consciousness => Matter ==> ...

I disagree. Conceptually, it is very difficult ( almost impossible) to visualize the existence of any numbers WITHOUT consciousness, mind, and  discreteness of the matter  or any ontology i.e the part as highlighted in red font text above

We can only agree that we disagree on this. The "number ==> consciousness" is derivable from mechanism, and a theorem showing that elementary arithmetic is Turing universal. It describes and emulates, through the laws of addition and multiplication, *all* computations.












This mathematical perceptual ( it could be even cognitive) thought the process is unique, universal irrespective of the nature of the ontology, but definitely arising from the 'discreteness" of nature, invariant under time and persons.

Yes, and with mechanism, the physics is "only" a mode of self-reference of the universal person (which is again implied by incompleteness)

From where and how universal person of the Mechanism emerges out?.

From the numbers axioms that I gave earlier. I do not claim that this is obvious. It relies on the Turing Universality of elementary arithmetic. That is proved in most good textbook on computer science. It takes easily a dozen of pages. We can perhaps come back on this later.









it is from this unique and universal mathematical thought process arising in Mind that numbers take birth in our Minds. All the subsequent operations of the mathematics also arise as part of the mathematical thought process.

Yes, but that is what happen in infinitely many computations which exists once you agree that for all x x + 0 = x (etc.).

In our mind though very very large but NOT infinite thoughts arise. Out of these many many large thoughts, some thoughts pertain to the unique mathematical thought category viz numbers and their operations. So there can't be infinitely many computations.

There is infinitely many programs, and many among them are non stopping programs. Some leads to infinite complexity, and our total inability to predict if they will stop or not, and on which we can only remain forever undecided. 
We cannot have an infinite thought, but we can have thought on the infinite. Most people agree that there is an infinity of prime number, and that is less easy to prove than the proof of the infinitely many computations. The space or set of all computations is highly structured, notably by the points of view (1p, 3p, 1pp, etc.) which can be defined using the logic of self-reference.






My point is that all universal machines have physics in their head, so we can test mechanism by comparing that physics with what we observe.

Yes, I agree but this should not imply one to infer that Physics, its Laws and ontology have come into existence by virtue of Numbers and mechanism. On the contrary, the converse of this could be true since numbers took birth in our Minds when consciousness interacted with the discreteness of nature.

Why assume Nature (metaphysical naturalism) if we don't need it once we deduce a phenomenological physics from numbers? When doing physics, we do already assume the numbers. I use Occam razor here, but why not? If you assume nature, you need some actual infinities in the mind, for which there is no evidences.



had there been no discreteness and consciousness and minds, numbers could not have come into existence.

We cannot deduce anything from nothing. I prefer to assume natural numbers, which admits clear axioms on which everyone agree, than assuming Primitive Matter, or a Cosmic Consciousness, on which few people agree, and which are more complex and vague notion. I use numbers (simple) to explain Matter and Consciousness, which are more complex notion. When we teach addition to young people, we don't need to invoke cosmic consciousness, nor matter, as the theory given illustrates.






Then the theology of the (Gödel-Löbian) machine is close to Sankara, Plotinus, ... (the monist idealist), but with a zest of Pythagorism. 



Discreteness in nature is associated with the description of nature in form of "unique distinct identities of Ones". For example, a mango, though in the phenomenal form, has a 'unique distinct identity of One:. But an emotion of love, hate has no such identity

Nor does the map of where we will find an electron in our most probable (computational) histories. With mechanism, we can explain why the finite beings eventually get the illusion of the infinite and the continuum, even lawful and thus testable illusion, a bit like a rainbow.

I have not followed your above quote properly. Can you give any example we may be perceiving finite beings as an illusion of infinite and a continuum?

I allude to my work. A readable (I hope) summary is given here:



The key is that no universal numbers can recognize itself among the numbers, and its future experiences are given by a statistics on all computations going through their actual state (defined indexically). Without Quantum Mechanics (without collapse) confirming that astonishing feature, I would plausibly believed that I have refuted Mechanism. That is still not the case.






So the condition for the manifestation of the discreteness in nature is that in that realm nature should be describable in terms of identities of the unique distinct Ones. Though discreteness in nature is not related to the type of the ontology it definitely contingent upon unique distinct identities of Ones.

One is discrete. Ones is continuum. (to be short, and again assuming my favorite assumption).

One as a continuum will be also infinite and beyond our cognitive domain. Therefore, numbers and mechanism will fail to describe One as a continuum. Cosmic consciousness is One as a continuum and infinite

Yes, they will fail, as the One does not admit a description, neither finite, nor infinite. But they will live it, and explain their failure to describe it by understanding intuitively that "It" has no description at all. The tao which has a name is not the Tao, said Lao-Ze.






When consciousness thru the agency of the Mind has an interface with discreteness
 of the Unique distinct Identities of Ones, either perceptually or even cognitively, this leads to a unique universal mathematical thought process in the Mind in which numbers 1,2,3 and so on appear as  part of the mathematical thought process.

That is correct, but "primordial physics" was assumed, and you don't need to assume it. Assuming elementary arithmetic is enough, and is much less than assuming a physical reality and physical laws.

But that leaves no space for numbers to exist at the primordial level before the manifestation of the Mind and the discreteness of nature in some realms.

Why would numbers needs space? Arithmetic is not geometry, but contains the seeds of geometry, like the arithmetization of analysis and geometry illustrates. 




The mind is a derivative of Moola Prakriti and appears at the scene much after some fundamental process taking place in nature. In view of this, Physics before the manifestation of the Mind should be indescribable in terms of numbers and mechanism. The mind is fundamentally much lower than that of Cosmic Consciousness and Primordial Physicality in form of Moola Prakriti. A lower fundamental is unable to understand and describe a higher fundamental.

Numbers being a mathematical product arising in Mind,

Assuming Non-Mechanism, and thus actual infinities. But that leads to an insolvable mind-body problem. With mechanism, we understand that if we assume primitive matter, the mind and the body becomes quasi magical entities based on actual infinities. That might be true, but I need much more evidences. My motto would be to not assume more than what we need when we get the phenomenology consistent with the senses.






therefore, thru numbers and mind, it is not plausible to understand/comprehend and describe the cosmic consciousness and primordial physicality, both of which are more fundamental than Mind/numbers and also Infinite. This could be the intuitive reason behind Godel Incompleteness theorem. Otherwise also, whether Godel's theorem or any other theorem or any logic are the products of our finite Mind. How thru the product of our finite Mind, we can understand/comprehend and describe the infiniteness of the primordial physicality and of the cosmic consciousness?

But that is what Gödel's theorem explain to the machine, when they discover it in the public communicable way (after living its consequences first). That is the object of my research. The universal (Gödel-Löbian) machine is already quite clever and thoughtful. But we are at the beginning, and to "interview" the machine, we still need to do some amount of mathematics.





It seems a bit sad, to me, because, when following the path saying that the "primordial physics" is fundamental, you need to say no to your daughter wanting to marry a man having a digital brain. Yet, those "zombies" will be the one exploring the galaxy.

What sort of physics take place at the primordial level is not known to Physicists? All are their unverfied speculations.

? It follows from mechanism.







Now why 0, 1, 1+1, 1+1= in mathematics?

You place any one unique distinct identity of Ones say 1 apple on the table.

Keep in mind that one of my goal consists in explaining where tables, or illusion of tables, are coming from.

If you will treat table and apple as an illusion then  1 of mathematics will also become illusion.

I can see a table, and one apple on it, and then wake up. The table and the apple was an illusion, but the number of apple and table in that illusion was not. I am not sure in which sense a number can be an illusion. 




For the practical purpose, let us take the phenomenal reality of the table and apple as real one, even though it might be an illusion from some level.

The phenomenology is real. That a table is an object of dreams does not make it unreal as a table, only unreal as a bunch of primitive atoms.




One thing more. Even though the phenomenal reality of our physical world might be unreal ( some illusion) but that is not from the perspective of our present consciousness level. From the perspective of our current consciousness level, physical world, matter, our bodies, our minds, our thoughts, unique mathematical thought in form of numbers are quite real and concrete.

OK.




If from the current perspective, all will be unreal, our current debate, numbers, logic -- ever thing which falls within our perceptual and cognitive domain will become an illusion. It is from the perspective of the cosmic consciousness that matter, minds, our thoughts, theorems, logic, numbers, digital mechanism become an illusion. We are sitting at the base of a mountain and talk of the perspective as viewable from the peak of the mountain.

OK, though, as I can conceive an apple on a table. I can see it.




On the table, there is one and only one apple.

Oops! No more. An imaginary Monkey ate it. There is zero table on the table. Sorry.

Again, you are talking about the perspective as observable from a mountain ( which you have never experienced)  while you are sitting at the base of the mountain.

In your above quote monkey is also imaginary and your argument will become imaginary.

Only the stuff is imaginary. You forget that with Mechanism, we assume 0, 1, 2, ... + the laws. Whatever is explained from that does not need to be imaginary. Immaterial does not mean imaginary. Our discussion is not an illusion. What is an illusion is that our conversation is brought by a physical universe, when it is brought by the universal consciousness. With mechanism, we see the details of that production, and that make the theory testable. 






Imagination does not imply non-existence, as is normally interpreted in the current science and philosophy.

I agree.


But that is a separate topic to be discussed on some other day

OK.







when our consciousness will interact with this One apple thru Mind, a mathematical 1 will manifest in the mathematical thought process. Therefore, 1 of mathematics.  Now I also place an apple on the table along with the apple as placed by you.

OK. (I keep my eyes on the monkey).

If you keep an eyes on monkey , you and your eyes will also be imaginary. So how can you keep your eyes on the monkey since you have no real eyes?

When I sleep, and dream, my eyes are close, but that does not prevent me to have the experience of seing. mechanism explain this by the fact that my brain emulates the relevant (similar to what happens when awake) mechanist activity.





Your mind making the above statement shall also become imaginary.

That is why I will hope for peer reviewing, and verification of the validity of the reasoning.








So we have one more apple on the table, therefore one more 1 of arithmetic in our thought process. Now suppose, consciousness interacts with both the apples. so on the table, it sees two apples ( neither 3 nor 1 nor zero), therefore an arithmetic of 1+1 appear in the mathematical thought process. But these two apples when seen separately are 1 and 1  apples and when seen jointly are 2 apples ( not more than 2 or less than 2), therefore, a mathematical relation of 1+1=2 appear in the mathematical thought process in the Mind.


OK. 

With the digital mechanist hypothesis, it is arguably an important example how universal numbers mirror all themselves. 

You could have described as well how a robot count the number of apple on the table,

But a robot can't count the number of apples unless it is programmed by a consciousness possessing programmer.

In arithmetic, there is a program which generates and emulates all programs. Programs, like numbers does not need to be written by a human to exist. It needs a human only to be manifested with respect to a human.





So consciousness is  a priori for counting apples on the table whether directly by a consciousness possessing person Or by a robot where consciousness has an indirect role in programming the robot for counting apples.

I think this comes form your rejection that 1+1=2 independently of time, space and humans. You are just assuming a different theory.



 

 and the functionning of the robot is expressible in term of number relation.

But you can't overlook the role of the consciousness in building number relations

Yes, but it is not human consciousness, it is the consciousness intrinsic to the arithmetical truth (when we assume mechanism). It is the consciousness of the universal machine, before we make it stupider by installing some applications.








 All the dream layers exists in the arithmetical reality, and some class of dreams are sharable (the "physical realities", notably).

I don't treat those layers as dreams. Both the ontological reality of the physical entities and numbers are real   and part of the phenomenal reality as observable from our current state of the consciousness -- the base of the mountain.  From the peak of the mountain-- cosmic consciousness, both the phenomenal reality of the physical entities and numbers will turn out be an illusion.

An illusion cannot be itself an illusion. That is why we cannot doubt consciousness. Only an ontology can appear as illusory, like when awakening.







Now suppose both the apples are removed away from the table, no apple remains on the table.

I just need to close my imaginary eyes for a second. The monkey will have eaten the apples.

If you treat apples as imaginary, monkey, your eyes, your above statement/logic will also turn out be imaginary. If you want to have your above statement real, table and apple will be real

The apple is not an illusion. Only its stuffy aspect is.






This leads to the manifestation of ZERO in the mathematical thought process.

Right. But even a monkey unable to count up to zero will starve if given zero food.

You forgot the basic fact that monkey will also become zero since you will have also the zero mind to imagine any monkey.

Therefore, while dealing with the phenomenal reality take it as real as the logic of your mind

I do. The phenomenal reality of the numbers, and of the physical reality seen by the numbers, is real. The ontological matter is not real. It is a convenient fiction to find prey and avoid predators, but in fine, those are like actors in a dream having the right statistics. 






I mean, it is not because the humans can discover the numbers by abstracting from those number incarnated or implemented in many everyday siutation,

In the absence of aforesaid situations, neither there is the existence of numbers nor human can discover the same

You seem to infer non-existence from phenomenal. I don't see why, unless you want machine and numbers not being able to think or to be enlightened. Is it not a form of "number-segregation"? 




 that, conceptually, they are easier to grasp and assume, than "primary matter", or "cosmic consciousness".

This conception is culture -centric and education centric. In some Eastern culture, some pople may not be able to count fingers on their hands but may be able to  conceptualize God as the creator of the world.

The conception of numb.ers without consciousness, mind, and discreteness is almost impossible.

Why should that be more difficult than to conceive a *primitive* primordial physicality? The conception of anything beyond us is impossible, at least in public ways.




Without mind and consciousness where conception will take birth & without some discreteness of nature, to what this conception will pertain to? Please examine with an open Mind from the perspective of a normal  person while getting rid of the "mathematician" within you for the time being

I have discovered Mechanism in Molecular Biology, and I was about to decide to become a biologist when I discovered the work of the logician, which shows that Mechanism was grounded in arithmetic, and that is why I decided to become a mathematician. The arithmetical realm is what I feel to be the most real thing. I have few doubt that even if the "Big Bang" did not occur, the number 17 would still be a prime number. That means that the line 

                            *****************
cannot be broken and put in any rectangular form. That is a property of 17 which does not depend on the existence of atoms or energy, or mind. We need a mind only to assess some understanding of that property, but the property itself is far more simple than the property of a universal number understanding the concept of primeness.








We might agree on the theology, but have different methodology.

My feeling is that you could change your mind if you knew more about the universal machine self-reference theory, and theoretical computer science. The universal machine which observe itself is not predictible, and conventional computing is a sort of art of preventing the machine to explore itself (somehow, with a grain of salt). 

From where the self-referenced theories, theoretical computer sciences emerged out?

From the first elementary principle of arithmetic. x + 0 = 0, etc. provably so, in a testable manner.





As a product of our mind which produced these theories when acted upon by the consciousness.

You might be confusing the arithmetical reality with the human theorization of that arithmetical reality. Since Gödel, we know that the arithmetical reality is far beyond any theory, be them built by human, aliens, or the universal numbers themselves.






So consciousness and mind are the priories for all theories and theorems including that for the manifestation of numbers. Numbers and computationalism are a very powerful tool but as epistemological tools and as bounded within the limitations of the mind. Our mind can't visualize infinities, therefore,  this led to Godel's incomplete theorem, Godel's mind like any other person's mind and logic was also limited by the finiteness of the mind.

OK. But Gödel realized quickly that the formal theories, machine/numbers, have discovered his theorem "before", so to speak. They are part of the arithmetization of meta-arithmetic. The numbers are aware of their limitations, like we can be.









But what about numbers and arithmetics when there were no sentient living beings possessing consciousness?

When there where no sentient beings, 

Universal consciousness and (sigma) Arithmetical Truth are  concomiitant in the mechanist theory. 

But unless mind will not manifest and nature will not exhibit any "discreteness" at some realms, the conception of numbers is meaningless and redundant. Therefore, the concept of the concommittment of numbers and arithmetic truth is superfluous.

I agree, but I was talking of the concomitantness of Universal consciousness and arithmetical truth.




Once you have the numbers, and enough laws, like addition and multiplication, you get "instantaneously" an infinite, web of *all* number/machine dreams, and it is structured differently by the eight (main) intensional (modal) variant of self-reference. 

But that is the whole issue.

That is my whole thesis.



How the mathematical concept of numbers may originate in the absence of consciousness, mind and "discreteness" ( pertaining to any ontology}. Any concept can't take birth in the vacuum. It always takes birth in our mind in the presence of our consciousness while thinking of any ontology perceptually or cognitively. And manifestation of mathematical numbers is a concept in our mind, though a special, unique and universal one but it not more than a concept.

But a concept of a number is a different thing than a number. you need human to have a human concept of number, but that does not make a number into a necessarily human concept. Human would not have been there, 17 would still be impossible to be made into a rectangle (a product of numbers different from 1 and 17). We don't have to invoke a concept of human when we defined the concept of numbers. We need only to assume 0 and its successor. 











In the first place, there had been no period when the universal fundamental consciousness was not present.


Yes. It is "out of time". Consciousness is not a physical object, but a psychological 

If it is "out of time:, how it can be psychological pertaining to mind since mind never stayed out of time?

The universal consciousness, and arithmetical truth, is out of time. It makes no sense to say that 17 has been prime for a long time. 




and indeed even theological object of study, a priori. Then, when assuling Matter (primitive matter), we can try a physical theory of consciousness, but usually, I am not statisfy, as it uses some strong infinity axioms

I am also not speaking of consciousness arising out of the physical theories of consciousness. But indicating of the consciousness as Most Fundamental, self contained, beyond causation.


That is the important point where we do agree.







Secondly, mathematical numbers and their relation appear as the unique mathematical thought process in the Minds. and the consciousness. The mind is not consciousness.

OK.

OK



So in the absence of the sentient living beings, though discreteness of the unique distinct identities of Ones, Twos, Threes existed in some realm of nature, there was no mathematics of 1, 2, 3  or 1+1=2 due to the absence of the mathematical thought process.

That is circular, and directly refutes by the theorem which says that all computations are emulated in arithmetic, and thus, in particular all humans experiences. 

I don't find how it is circular? A simple thing, Cosmic consciousness and "discreteness" were there but mind in which all the concepts including that of the mirroring of numbers as mathematical thought process was not present. I am not refuting emulation of mathematical numbers but I am refuting the mechanism of the existence and manifestation of numbers as has been advocated by you.

Here, you are just assuming that Mechanism is false, in which case you can search for a physical explanation, but it will work only by invoking some very special infinities, different from those infinities which are already related to the machines from their own points of view.

No, I am not assuming numbers and mechanism to be false but bringing them down from the Godly fundamental status, as existing out of space/time, to the  mundane level of a concept  in our mind, regardless of the fact that this concept is unique, universal and special one compared to other thoughts/concepts in our mind. But I am admitting that numbers, arithmetic nd mechanism can emulate any ontology provided the ontology is either discrete or reducible to discrete one. But I am placing a rider that ontology should have a pre-existing real status. I am not supporting the conception that all the ontologies including physical one may evolve out of arithmetics as part of some dreams.

Kindly don't forget that in our dream conscious state, dream don't emerge out of Nothing or Nil ontology. Dreams arise out from the ontology of memory and imagination

OK. But the theorem, or argument, is that with Mechanism, it is a logical consequence of artithmetic that they develop memory and imagination, including sharable physical-looking types of dreams, that we wrongly (assuming mechanism) take for ontologically real, when they are phenomenological real.














Then why arithmetics appear to give birth to different ontologies as some dream states?

By the arithmetization of metamathematics, which embeds the mathematician in the arithmetical reality.

But without the consciousness, mind, and "discreteness", none of the metamathemtics can exist?


If you assume x + 0 = 0; etc. the arithmetization of metamathematics follows. 






Without "discreteness" of nature and consciousness/mind, the concept of any metamathematics is redundant.

Meta-mathematics is part of mathematics, indeed, with mechanism, it is part of arithmetic. nature is only one mode through which arithmetic and arithmetical creature see itself and themselves.










Arithmetic, in fact, does give birth to any ontology and they exist by virtue of their existence or as a result of the cause-eefect relation between different ontologies.  Arithmetic is a unique and universal thought process in Mind due to the interface with "discreteness" of nature in form of unique discrete identities of Ones. So there is a relation of correspondence between "discreteness" as existing outside in nature and arithmetics as existing in Mind as the mathematical thought process. The external "discreteness" is universally related to all the ontologies, irrespective of the type, provided the ontology is describable in some Unique Distinct Identities of Ones. So when mathematics in the thought process describes something, it also describes the "discreteness of nature" ( since mathematics had manifested from discreteness) and since discreteness being universally linked to all the ontologies, provided nature in that realm is describable thru Unique Distinct Identities of Ones, therefore, it appears to give a universal description of different ontologies but ontologies  neither appear to take birth from arithmetics as part of the dreams not it is that they have  no real existence in the universe.


Assuming a physical universe. But then you assume the answers it seems to me. I am much more ignorant. I guess there is a physical reality, but all the evidences and experiences make me think the physical reality is some kind of border of the universal person imposed by incompleteness to all sufficiently rich (Gödel-Löbian) systems.

Normally, that is testable. With respect to Vedânta, I am closer to Sankara. The physical reality is an arithmetical Maya.

Here, I admit, we have the difference of views and that too quite sharp one. I treat comic Consciousness ( Brahma of Shankar) as the most fundamental one.

OK. And I agree with this, even if that agreement might have a different roots in each of us.




Primordial physicality has also its existence -- if fundamental like Moola Prakriti of saankhya or as drivable from Brahma as Maya. Here Maya does not imply that derivation of physicality itself is an illusion. It means it has no fundamental status but otherwise, the derivation is an actual real phenomenon. when we see dreams, during the dreams, all experiences are equally real as we perceive our experiences of the wakeful conscious state in the wakeful conscious state.

OK.



When our revert back to the wakeful conscious state on awakening, the we realize that dream state experiences were illusion but it does not mean that "act of the dream taking place' was an illusion.

Absolutely. The illusion of matter is real. Only matter is unreal. That is the key.




Had the "act of taking dream taking place" been an illusion, how could we recall dreams on our awakening and realize that those experiences were illusions.

Because I assume that x + 0 = x is absolutely true, and this entails, with Mechanism, that the taking place of the dream in arithmetic is real. The dreams are real. Only the interpretation of the dreams can be false, not he dream themselves.






Similarly, all the experiences in our Physical, Astral world and causal worlds might be illusions ( not from the current perspective of the consciousness but from  the level of the cosmic consciousness)

Right (and consistent with Mechanism).



but the " act of derivation of primordial physicality from the cosmic consciousness( Brahma) and  'acts of the happening of different phenomena: is a real phenomenon ( from our current perspective of conscious one)

OK.



When physicality unfolds from Brahma and it continues further and manifests in different layered structures, at one realm discreteness manifests. But this in itself can't  give birth to mathematical numbers since mathematical numbers  will take birth as some mathematical concept in minds only.

Then you are using the complex to explain the simple. 






From the above analysis, one can infer that neither numbers have any existence outside space/time


What could that mean? The numbers do not belong to a category of concept to which time and space can be applied. 
On the contray, like with Kant, time and space will belong to the mind of the numbers who explore themselves, when distributed in the infinitely many computable and non computable relations.




nor they have any Godly status at part with God or cosmic consciousness.


Seen from outside, I understand the feeling, but that might be too a sort of illusion, explainable by the fact that all machine too will agree that their 1p experience are different from all 3p description.

What is the 1pp experience of a machine? say a computer. A machine lacks any intinsic consciousness, therefore, it can't have any 1pp experience

Of course, when you say that a machine lacks consciousness, you just tell me that you will not been happy if your daughter marry a man who has a digital brain. But that might be considered as a form of segregation, a bit like with the woman, or the black people (humans are often discriminating already themselves). What you say is that Mechanism is false, which I doubt. I have no certainty here. My point is that IF mechanism is true, the, physics must be derived from arithmetic in a precise way, and by doing this, we can refute Mechanism, so let us do the test before concluding. The test, alas, confims the theory. Scientist learns only when their theories are refuted. 







 But, in effect, you are just excluding a large number of beings of the possibility of being conscious,

Any being will not become conscious merely by the fact that it can be described/identified in terms of numbers and arithmetics. There is a large no of AI systems, robots which have emulated the discrete aspects of our mind but they are not conscious since consciousness can neither be created nor transposed from one system to other,

I hope you will be less sure when digging more on the relation between number, computation and self-reference.



Consciousness of each of us is unique to ourselves. It was never created and never can be transposed to any external system. The thing which can be transposed is the discrete aspect of our Mind, mostly in the form of intelligence, and that too by the intervention of a consciousness possessing programmer. And the physical system in which intelligence has been transposed will lacxk any consciousness.

Arithmetic contains, in some sense, all programs, and all execution of programs, in a non temporal manner, like the block universe of general relativity. Time is an internal indexical, and typically a real and persistent illusion.




 so you might harbor some pre-Gödel prejudice on numbers and (digital) machines.

I am not aware of the pre-Godel prejudice  on numbers


Before Gödel, the mathematicians thought that arithmetic was conceptually simple and amenable to a decidable theory. The same for machine, it was thought that they were predictible, and that complete theories about them could be made. That was in essence the program of Hilbert: to justify the consistency of the use of the infinite in mathematics by formal means using only finite things. But Gödel shows the impossibility of that programs. Worse, he showed that even by using string infinities, we still cannot predict the behavior of the finite things. Our intuition that numbers are stupid/simple was just wrong. Today, we know that the arithmetical reality is big, and contains infinitely many surprises.
The universal machine could have been an explanation, but it appears to be more questions. It is an Unknown which invites Itself at the table of discussion.






We will digitalized ourselves in the future. I don't know if it will happen in 500 years or 5000 years, but we will do it, if only to expand in the galaxy.

Had this to happen, it would have happened by now.

Why? Planes are recent, and computer science is just beginning.




After all, the universe is 13.8 billion years old which is not a small period. Further, why to invoke digitization for our expansion?

To travel at the speed of light, to handle billiard of billiard of humans. In one word: for economical reason.




Our Milky Way galaxy itself is a very large place and about 200-400 billion galaxies are estimated by cosmologists in the observable universe. Life might have already existed at many places but we might be unaware due to our inability to fathom  MW galaxy even in our neighborhood

OK.



Even a protozoa can't be digitalized and emulated in a physical system since a protozoa has also a consciousness, which is unique to itself, and it is non-digitizable and non--transposable to any physical system. Intelligence, of course, can be digitized and transposable to any physical system. So possibilities is of the expansion of zombies ( without consciousness) and not "we: as conscious human beings.

We agree that we disagree on this.




 With mechanism, "we" have many (terrestrial) futures, and I am talking about some most probable one. 
The physical reality is not an illusion.

But you have been stating under different messages under this group that physicality has no real ontological status and that it evolves out of arithmetic as some dreams

The physical reality is a quite real and important illusion. The ontological stuff is the illusion. You have agreed above that phenomenological does not mean unreal.






 What is an illusion, is simply the belief that it explains all, and that it cannot be explained by simpler ideas.

I agree. All the phenomenon can't be explained by any methodology whether of the physicality or numbers/arithmetic since, after all, all the methodologies are the products of mind and used by the mind. Mind though has very large power to explain but not the infinite powers. Cosmic consciousness, primordial physicality and some phenomenon occurring at the primordial level are infinite, therefore, beyond the grasp of the mind particularly in the 3pp domain. Rishis of the Upanishadic period had realized long ago that ultimate reality is not realizable thru 3pp methodologies,

Yes, but the whole point of my thesis is that the machine/numbers already claim this. I got the explanation from them, actually.




therefore, they delved deep inwards thru 1pp methodology of Samaadhi which involved transcendence of mind and body. Once our localized biological consciousness transcendence finiteness of the body/mind, its finiteness gets replaced by the infiniteness of the cosmic consciousness. For realizing infiniteness, realizing agency should also be infinite.

Yes, that is right. But the numbers never stop to talk and be intrigued by the infinite. They cannot justify it rationally, but they cannot miss it in their experiences. I guess I might need to one day provide more details, but see the reference above. 




. Eventually, it is not that simple, but it gives the math and the physical means to make some test. 

That is what I have also been dwelling since the time I have been interacting with you that merely by assuming that Numbers have some Pan Godly Fundamental status outside space/time ( which itself is a prima facia illogical proposition),  does not solve the problems

I think it does better than most other theories. I predicted quantum computation, before even knowing anything about the empirical quantum mechanics. Indeed, I said that mechanism entails many world/dreams, and their observable feature below our substitution level, and as we don't see that Mechanism is false ... until I read the Einstein Podolski Rosen paper, and realize that nature *do* conform to Mechanism, after all.

That post was long, and maybe we could try to sum up ourselves in one paragraph, to ease the discussion. I think we differ only on 

"number ===> consciousness"

We have to distinguish two things: the truth of that statement, and the derivability of this from Mechanism. I am not a professional philosopher, so I am not defending any truth. I have chose to study mechanism, because it allows mathematical reasoning. That is like searching our key under the lamp. I don't know if Mechanism is true or not, but I know that if Mechanism is true, then Plato is correct: what we see is only he border or shadow of something else, like the One of Plotinus, or the Brahma of Shankara.



I am searching the most plausible explanation for the 1p experience and the possible 3p sharable reality. I have no definite opinion.

I wish you all the best.

Thanks and regards.


Thank you, and I wish all the best too, 

Bruno Marchal




Vinod Sehgal





--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Jasleen Bal

unread,
Jul 10, 2017, 4:06:30 PM7/10/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
Dear Stuart
Definitely consciousness came first. Mind is a very little unit of this consciousness which has somehow retained a copy of the same in some form. The entire cosmos is itself a living entity having one consiousness. The union you may call it spiritual  awakening/yoga is referred as a process of getting awaken towards this consciousness. 
Regards
Kanwaljeet  singh 

more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
-- 
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference 
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org 
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.

To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
-- 
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference 
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org 
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.

To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.

To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.

To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.

To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

Sungchul Ji

unread,
Jul 10, 2017, 6:18:28 PM7/10/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
Hi,

Another possibility is that Everything (including consciousness, matter, energy, life, information, numbers, etc.) was there in the beginning in a form that is unknowable to us humans, except that we can recognize them only when they are reified as (or become) phenomena we call energy, matter, life, consciousness, information, numbers, God, Brahman, the Tao, etc., in some chronological order determined by scientific evidence:


                                         f                                            g
      Everything in an     ----------->    Everything in      ------------>      Theory of 
      Unkowable State                     Knowable State                          Everything    
             (Object)                                    (Sign)                                (Interpretant)
 [Cosmic Consciousness]       [Lived Consciousness]         [Theorized Consciousnes]  
         <Possibility>                           <Actuality>                              <Regularity>            
                  |                                                                                               ^
                  |                                                                                                |
                  |                                                                                                |
                  |                                                                                                |
                  |________________________________________________|
                                                              h

Figure 1.  The ITR (Irreducible Triadic Relation)-based Representation of  the Theory of Everything.  f = Natural process; g = Mental process; h = Grounding of Information Flow.

According to this view,  God, Consciousness, numbers, Brahman, etc. are just Signs which we interpret as referring to one or other aspects of the Ultimate Reality whose truth value is to be determined by empirical observations.  If this view is right, to understand the proper relations among all these basic concepts intensely discussed on this forum, it may be necessary to understand and utilize the principles of semiotics (ITR being one of the key principles of semiotics according to C. S. Peirce (1839-1914) [1, Chapter 9]).  This conclusion may be viewed as a corollary of the so-called the Josephson conjecture [1, p. 175; 2]:

"“Semiotics will eventually overtake quantum mechanics in the 
same way as quantum mechanics overtook classical physics.”

With all the best.

Sung

Reference:
   [1] Ji, S. (2017). The Cell Language Theory: Connecting Mind and Matter.  World Scientific, New Jersey, in press.
   [2] Josephson, B. (2016). Biological Organisation as the True Foundation of Reality. Lindau Nobel Laureate Meetings.  https://sms.cam.ac.uk/media/2277379.
   




To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsubscri...@googlegroups.com.

-- 
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference 
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org 
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsubscri...@googlegroups.com.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--

Bruno Marchal

unread,
Jul 11, 2017, 7:10:33 AM7/11/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
On 10 Jul 2017, at 23:44, Sungchul Ji wrote:

Hi,

Another possibility is that Everything (including consciousness, matter, energy, life, information, numbers, etc.) was there in the beginning in a form that is unknowable to us humans, except that we can recognize them only when they are reified as (or become) phenomena we call energy, matter, life, consciousness, information, numbers, God, Brahman, the Tao, etc., in some chronological order determined by scientific evidence:


                                         f                                            g
      Everything in an     ----------->    Everything in      ------------>      Theory of 
      Unkowable State                     Knowable State                          Everything    
             (Object)                                    (Sign)                                (Interpretant)
 [Cosmic Consciousness]       [Lived Consciousness]         [Theorized Consciousnes]  
         <Possibility>                           <Actuality>                              <Regularity>            
                  |                                                                                               ^
                  |                                                                                                |
                  |                                                                                                |
                  |                                                                                                |
                  |________________________________________________|
                                                              h

Figure 1.  The ITR (Irreducible Triadic Relation)-based Representation of  the Theory of Everything.  f = Natural process; g = Mental process; h = Grounding of Information Flow.

According to this view,  God, Consciousness, numbers, Brahman, etc. are just Signs

Consciousness (1p notion) does not seem to be a sign to me (a sign is a 3p notion).

Number are not sign, also. That is the common confusion between the sign "1" and the number 1.




which we interpret as referring to one or other aspects of the Ultimate Reality whose truth value is to be determined by empirical observations.

Empirical observation can refute a theory (well, almost), but cannot determine the truth value, in case it is true.


Bruno Marchal



To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sa...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Alex Hankey

unread,
Jul 11, 2017, 7:10:33 AM7/11/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
RE: I don't find that numbers have any fundamental or Godly status from which the entire ontology of the universe may appear like a dream state.

ME: That is QUITE RIGHT both Subjectively and Objectively.

Objectively, the world is populated by quantum fields, which are QUALITATIVELY distinguishable from each other by their associated quantum properties - scales like Lepton Number, Electric Charge, Isotopic Spin, Strangeness etc. (The quantitative aspects of these are secondary, compared to their Qualitative Aspects.) 

Interactions between these fields define space and time, and Fourier transformed measures like momentum, energy, mass, etc. 

As professional physicists (or whatever) we are not trained to think this way, but if you think it through carefully, you will see that even in the physical world, qualitative differences have to be understood, BEFORE you can set up the experiments to define the quantities. 
1. Archimedes defined his Law of the Balance to Measure accuracy of weight comparisons - if the two balance arms are not equal you are screwed. 
2. His Law of displacement was they to easily determining relative densities (first of gold vs gold alloyed with silver). 
3. Galileo had to define Acceleration as a physical, kinematic, concept, before he could explain how gravity functions..

Defining qualitative concepts has to be primary, and measurement then follows from it. 
In this sense (if you get it), quantitative physics depending on measurement is secondary. 

Subjectively, the mind functions primarily on 'ideas'. Ideas are registered in the mind before words expressing them. 
A person who speaks two or three (or more) languages fluently has the choice of which language to use to communicate what she wants to say - i.e. the ideas (s)he wants to express. 

Ideas rise up in the mind so we know want we want to say. We then choose the language in which to express it - English, Spanish, French German, Hindi etc. etc. The words of that language then form in our minds. 

Animal communication can be used to show how this is valid. 
Some animals use a few words of language known to humans. 
The occasional parrot may become quite fluent, BUT 
even here, the case of the famous African Gray Parrot, 'Nkosi, 
who knew 1,200 or more words, and could construct sentences, 
was able to show that even in those with bird-brains, ideas are primary.
Most animals do not get to the stage of verbal communication. 
Sheep dogs mostly train on dog whistles.  

Alex Hankey 


--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--
Alex Hankey M.A. (Cantab.) PhD (M.I.T.)
Distinguished Professor of Yoga and Physical Science,
SVYASA, Eknath Bhavan, 19 Gavipuram Circle
Bangalore 560019, Karnataka, India 
Mobile (Intn'l): +44 7710 534195 
Mobile (India) +91 900 800 8789

David Jenkins

unread,
Jul 12, 2017, 6:15:57 PM7/12/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
In Vedanta, as I understand it.  Everything starts as seed form in the Causal Body (synonymous with deep sleep).  It takes its subtle form in terms of pure energy in the Subtle Body (synonymous with the dream state) and finally it manifests in the Gross Body as physical objects (synonymous with the waking state).

Both human beings (Jivas) and the creator (Isvara) consist of these 3 bodies.  Although in the ultimate non-dual reality (Brahman) both Jiva and Isvara are of the same consciousness.

It is that one overriding awareness that animates and gives form to all objects.  Although it does not depend on objects as the materialists tend to think. Objects depend on it.  So yes, you can say objects did exist before we could experience them in the form of a seed state prior to being manifested.




Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 9:25 AM
To: Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroup s.com; 'JACK SARFATTI' via Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D.; online_sadhu_sanga@googlegroup s.com

Subject: Re: Rudolph Tanzi, RE: C.s. Morrison, RE: [Sadhu Sanga] Physics and qualia

Dear Jack,  Rudy and others,

Might I offer the alternative suggestion that anyone who does not understand the implications of DARWIN's theory doesn't understand consciousness. We don't know what consciousness is.  But we do know that it is a highly complex instance of something that appears perfectly organised for some function - the encoding of sensory information (real or imagined) in a genetically evaluated way ( where by genetically evaluated I mean that situations that tend to be bad for our prospects of passing on our genes to future generations tend to give us unpleasant experiences whilst those that are good for those prospects tend to give us relatively pleasant ones (for most people most of the time)). Every example of such perfect organisation is explained as a product of positive natural selection.. The organisation in our consciousness ought therefore to be explained the same way. Each small step toward that organization must have had a beneficial effect upon our ancestors' chances of passing on their genes to future generations.

Just think what that means. Since we have no neuroscientific reason to expect visual data to be encoded in retinal-image-like forms anywhere in the human brain, the generators of colour qualia (whatever they are physically) must have been organised through natural selection to produce the colour qualia in these forms. This seems to me to imply that each point in our visual experience must be associated with a distinct output that the system we call our consciousness is generating. The effect of the different types of colour qualia that might appear there can then be understood as varying the probability of that output. For some reason it was beneficial for those colour-adjusted probabilities to vary across that space of potential outputs in a way that was more and more similar (even with colour constancy and the filled in blindspot, etc) to the patterns of light intensity variations across the retina. In my book THE BLIND MINDMAKER I have shown why such evolution would occur if we were the aspect of nature that selects the random outcomes of position measurements of a single quantum particle that the brain has adapted to introduce randomness into our attention-focussing process.

That is why my theory of Position Selecting Interactionism is likely to be the correct explanation. Only if a consciousness is positioning a physical effect at particular positions under the influence of its qualia are you ever going to explain how its colour qualia came to be organised into patterns resembling the patterns of particular wavebands of incident light interacting with the retina.

And if your theory can't explain that, no matter how much of Sutherland's maths you understand, you can't possibly have understood consciousness.

Best wishes,
Colin

If interested, my theory is detailed in my book

THE BLIND MINDMAKER: Explaining Consciousness without Magic or Misrepresentation

https://www.amazon.com/Blind-M indmaker-Explaining-Consciousn ess-Misrepresentation/dp/15412 83953

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Blind -Mindmaker-Explaining-Consciou sness-Misrepresentation/dp/154 1283953

Send from Huawei Y360


For more options, visit https://groups.google.co m/d/optout.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/ scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org /donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.al s.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1942 0889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org /harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org /Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsubscribe @googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/op tout.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/ scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org /donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.al s.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1942 0889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org /harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org /Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsubscribe @googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/op tout.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/ scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org /donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.al s.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1942 0889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org /harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org /Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsubscribe @googlegroups.com.

To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroup s.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/grou p/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/op tout.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/ scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist. org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j. als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist. org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist. org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+ unsub...@googlegroups.com.

To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@ googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/ group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/ optout.

--
Sungchul Ji, Ph.D.

Associate Professor of Pharmacology and Toxicology
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology
Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy
Rutgers University
Piscataway, N.J. 08855
609-240-4833

www.conformon.net

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sa...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com.

Serge Patlavskiy

unread,
Jul 13, 2017, 7:03:06 AM7/13/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
-
Sungchul Ji <sji.co...@gmail.com> on July 11, 2017 wrote:
> Everything in an Unkowable State -----------> Everything in 
>Knowable State ------------>  Theory of Everything
.
[S.P.] I hold that the very idea of "Everything in an Unknowable/Knowable State" is senseless. The case is that the elements of Noumenal Reality exist objectively and independently of the activity of consciousness. Whether we know about some object or we do not know about this object -- this, by no means, changes the state of this object. 
.
[Sungchul Ji] wrote:
> Another possibility is that Everything (including consciousness, 
>matter, energy, life, information, numbers, etc.) was there in the 
>beginning in a form that is unknowable to us humans, ...
.
[S.P.] Please, read my post on June 28, 2017 where I wrote: " In fact, in the beginning, there was nothing. Nothing means NOTHING. Why nothing? Because it was the beginning. There was no consciousness, no subjective world, no desire to become objective world, no dream world, no divine creativity and intent, no world of ideas, no mental actions, no inner mind, no history, no time, no events, no actions, no space -- nothing!  Nothing yet.
.
There was no consciousness-possessing observer who could witness anything."
.
In case you have missed my post, I attach it below as Sadhu_Sanga-post_28-06-2017.txt
.
Best,
Serge Patlavskiy



From: Sungchul Ji <sji.co...@gmail.com>
To: Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 1:18 AM
Subject: Re: [Sadhu Sanga] Which came first, consciousness or the brain?

Hi,

Another possibility is that Everything (including consciousness, matter, energy, life, information, numbers, etc.) was there in the beginning in a form that is unknowable to us humans, except that we can recognize them only when they are reified as (or become) phenomena we call energy, matter, life, consciousness, information, numbers, God, Brahman, the Tao, etc., in some chronological order determined by scientific evidence:


                                         f                                            g
      Everything in an     ----------->    Everything in      ------------>      Theory of 
      Unkowable State                     Knowable State                          Everything    
             (Object)                                    (Sign)                                (Interpretant)
 [Cosmic Consciousness]       [Lived Consciousness]         [Theorized Consciousnes]  
         <Possibility>                           <Actuality>                              <Regularity>            
                  |                                                                                               ^
                  |                                                                                                |
                  |                                                                                                |
                  |                                                                                                |
                  |________________________________________________|
                                                              h

Figure 1.  The ITR (Irreducible Triadic Relation)-based Representation of  the Theory of Everything.  f = Natural process; g = Mental process; h = Grounding of Information Flow.

According to this view,  God, Consciousness, numbers, Brahman, etc. are just Signs which we interpret as referring to one or other aspects of the Ultimate Reality whose truth value is to be determined by empirical observations.  If this view is right, to understand the proper relations among all these basic concepts intensely discussed on this forum, it may be necessary to understand and utilize the principles of semiotics (ITR being one of the key principles of semiotics according to C. S. Peirce (1839-1914) [1, Chapter 9]).  This conclusion may be viewed as a corollary of the so-called the Josephson conjecture [1, p. 175; 2]:

"“Semiotics will eventually overtake quantum mechanics in the 
same way as quantum mechanics overtook classical physics.”

With all the best.

Sung

Reference:
   [1] Ji, S. (2017). The Cell Language Theory: Connecting Mind and Matter.  World Scientific, New Jersey, in press.
   [2] Josephson, B. (2016). Biological Organisation as the True Foundation of Reality. Lindau Nobel Laureate Meetings.  https://sms.cam.ac.uk/media/2277379.
   




Вірусів немає. www.avast.com
Sadhu_Sanga-post_28-06-2017.txt

jim kowall

unread,
Jul 13, 2017, 6:25:16 PM7/13/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com

This conversation is absurd and ridiculous. Consciousness is the primordial nature of existence that exists before the world is created. The world is only created with the expenditure of energy as all theories of the big bang assume. Consciousness is what exists before any form of energy is expended and before any kind of world is created. In its undifferentiated state, consciousness is what physicists call the void. In its differentiated state, consciousness is what physicists call an observer, which is only the central point of view of an accelerated reference frame that arises from the void as energy is expended. This is the basic Advaita (non-dual) distinction between Brahman and Atman. Since Atman is only a differentiated state of Brahman, ultimately when energy is no longer expended and the world is no longer created, Atman is no different than Brahman. The mistaken assumption that consciousness somehow arises in some complex way from the complexity of actions implies that the existence of consciousness depends on the expenditure of energy, which is absurd since it's based on a paradox of self-reference, and so makes any such theory logically inconsistent as the consciousness of Kurt Godel was well aware. Even the Penrose argument about the non-computational origin of consciousness is mistaken, since the second law of thermodynamics in the context of the holographic principle and the kind of de Sitter cosmic horizon that arises with the expenditure of dark energy (the accelerated expansion of space) tells us that the observable world is composed of a finite number of bits of information (finite entropy), and therefore everything in the observable world is computational. The only logically consistent answer is that the expenditure of any form of energy, and therefore the creation of any kind of world, depends on the independent existence of consciousness, which is the void or true vacuum state.



On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Hameroff, Stuart R - (hameroff) <hame...@email.arizona.edu> wrote:

Which came first, consciousness or the brain?

 

The notion that consciousness emerged from complex brain computation is belied by the increasing number of mainstream scientists and philosophers who

resort to panpsychism, not to mention Eastern philosophers and quantum consciousness enthusiast who all agree, in various ways, that qualia and feelings existed before life.

If so, feelings (e.g. due to Penrose OR events) in the primordial soup may have prompted the origin of life, and driven its evolution. Behavior is based on reward (feelings,

not gene survival), including not only hedonism, but altruism and spirituality.

 

And I dont agree that consciousness is necessarily complex. What's complex about a toothache?

 

cheers

 

Stuart Hameroff


Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 9:25 AM
To: Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com; 'JACK SARFATTI' via Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D.; online_sadhu_sanga@googlegroups.com

Subject: Re: Rudolph Tanzi, RE: C.s. Morrison, RE: [Sadhu Sanga] Physics and qualia

Dear Jack,  Rudy and others,

Might I offer the alternative suggestion that anyone who does not understand the implications of DARWIN's theory doesn't understand consciousness. We don't know what consciousness is.  But we do know that it is a highly complex instance of something that appears perfectly organised for some function - the encoding of sensory information (real or imagined) in a genetically evaluated way ( where by genetically evaluated I mean that situations that tend to be bad for our prospects of passing on our genes to future generations tend to give us unpleasant experiences whilst those that are good for those prospects tend to give us relatively pleasant ones (for most people most of the time)). Every example of such perfect organisation is explained as a product of positive natural selection.. The organisation in our consciousness ought therefore to be explained the same way. Each small step toward that organization must have had a beneficial effect upon our ancestors' chances of passing on their genes to future generations.

Just think what that means. Since we have no neuroscientific reason to expect visual data to be encoded in retinal-image-like forms anywhere in the human brain, the generators of colour qualia (whatever they are physically) must have been organised through natural selection to produce the colour qualia in these forms. This seems to me to imply that each point in our visual experience must be associated with a distinct output that the system we call our consciousness is generating. The effect of the different types of colour qualia that might appear there can then be understood as varying the probability of that output. For some reason it was beneficial for those colour-adjusted probabilities to vary across that space of potential outputs in a way that was more and more similar (even with colour constancy and the filled in blindspot, etc) to the patterns of light intensity variations across the retina. In my book THE BLIND MINDMAKER I have shown why such evolution would occur if we were the aspect of nature that selects the random outcomes of position measurements of a single quantum particle that the brain has adapted to introduce randomness into our attention-focussing process.

That is why my theory of Position Selecting Interactionism is likely to be the correct explanation. Only if a consciousness is positioning a physical effect at particular positions under the influence of its qualia are you ever going to explain how its colour qualia came to be organised into patterns resembling the patterns of particular wavebands of incident light interacting with the retina.

And if your theory can't explain that, no matter how much of Sutherland's maths you understand, you can't possibly have understood consciousness.

Best wishes,
Colin

If interested, my theory is detailed in my book

THE BLIND MINDMAKER: Explaining Consciousness without Magic or Misrepresentation

https://www.amazon.com/Blind-Mindmaker-Explaining-Consciousness-Misrepresentation/dp/1541283953

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Blind-Mindmaker-Explaining-Consciousness-Misrepresentation/dp/1541283953

Send from Huawei Y360

On 20 Jun 2017 21:08, "'JACK SARFATTI' via Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." <Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com> wrote:
NO RUDY!

there is no action-reaction in the case of a single particle!!
you do not seem to have understood anything I have said about that or what John Walker clearly wrote about that.

Anyone who cannot understand the math in Sutherland's papers will never really understand consciousness as a physical phenomenon.

On Jun 20, 2017, at 10:15 AM, Rudy Tanzi <rudy...@gmail.com> wrote:

I meant where do we draw the line between our perception interpreting the universe that we participate in experientially in consciousness and the interactions of a single particle in which action-reaction likewise creates an experiential event? Is that not also a form of consciousness?

Sent from Rudy's iPhone 





On Jun 20, 2017, at 1:58 AM, Vasavada, Kashyap V <vasa...@iupui.edu> wrote:

Dear Rudy,
At the moment I am open to all ideas about quantum mechanics, sentient observation and particle interactions. Perhaps you can elaborate what you mean by “fine line” .
With regards.
Kashyap
 
From: online_sadhu_sanga@googlegroups.com [mailto:online_sadhu_sanga@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Rudolph Tanzi
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 6:34 PM
To: Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com
Cc: C. S. Morrison <cs...@hotmail.co.uk>
Subject: Re: C.s. Morrison, RE: [Sadhu Sanga] Physics and qualia
 
Dear Kashyap,
 
I would think there may be a fine line between “sentient observation” of a human and “reaction to an interaction” of a particle in considering experiences that define realties.
 
Rudy
 
 
 
more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference 
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org 
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.

To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
-- 
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference 
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org 
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.

To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.

To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.

To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.

To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.

jim kowall

unread,
Jul 14, 2017, 5:36:39 PM7/14/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
Dear Vinod

I base this conclusion on the logical consistency of science and the testimony of truth-realized beings, like Nisargadatta, as they try to explain their experience of the truth with the concepts of Advaita. Unfortunately, not everything can be explained. The true nature of what I am, what you are, and what everything is, is not explainable. It can only be described as primordial nothingness, which is inherently infinite, undifferentiated, energyless, timeless and spaceless. We can call it undifferentiated consciousness or the void, but that's just a name. Its true nature is formless and nameless. It is the source of all forms and concepts since it is the source of all energy and all observations, which always occur in the triad of an observer observing observable forms. It is the beginning and the end since all observations arise with the expenditure of the energy that allows for the creation of an observable projected and animated world. It is the end of time since it is the end of animation and it is the end of space since it is the end of projection. You cannot explain the true nature of what you are, but you can do an experiment of one, awaken to the true nature of what you are, and see for yourself. When the dreamer awakens from its dream, its dream-world disappears and only the true nature of the dreamer remains. You can directly experience that true nature. Nisargadatta says "to know the source is to be the source". As all truth-realized beings tell us, the only way to have that direct experience is becomes desireless or energyless. The source truly has nil energy, but it has the potential to create energy out of its own nature, and thereby create an observable projected and animated world, which is its dream.

Andris Heks

unread,
Jul 14, 2017, 9:04:54 PM7/14/17
to online_sa...@googlegroups.com

Dear Jim,


I believe your perception, which is largely correct, is distorted by the 'consciousness fundamentalism' of certain schools of the Vedas. So, below is my humble criticism of aspects of your position. I insert them into your text in capital letters below. 

I would appreciate a reply from you.

Kind regards,


Andris Heks 

a.h...@hotmail.com




From: online_sa...@googlegroups.com <online_sa...@googlegroups.com> on behalf of jim kowall <jkowa...@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, 15 July 2017 6:47 AM
To: Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [Sadhu Sanga] Which came first, consciousness or the brain?
 
Dear Vinod

I base this conclusion on the logical consistency of science and the testimony of truth-realized beings,

ARE THEY REALLY TRUTH REALISED BEINGS, OR IS THIS MERELY AN ASSUMPTION ON YOUR PART? 

like Nisargadatta, as they try to explain their experience of the truth with the concepts of Advaita. Unfortunately, not everything can be explained. The true nature of what I am, what you are, and what everything is, is not explainable. It can only be described as primordial nothingness, which is inherently infinite, undifferentiated, energyless, timeless and spaceless. 
PRIMORDIAL NOTHINGNESS MAY MERELY BE PRIMORDIAL NO-THINGNESS WHICH IS NOT ONLY NOT NOTHING BUT IT IS ACTUALLY ALL NO-THING AND ALL THINGS!!!
IT ACTUALLY MAY TEAM WITH INFINITE LIVING ENERGY. THIS IS SOMETHING THAT PATRIARCHAL SCHOOLS OF THE VEDAS AS DISTINCT FROM TANTRA TEND TO DISCOUNT! 
We can call it undifferentiated consciousness or the void, but that's just a name. 

NO, WE SHOULD CALL THIS UNMANIFEST STATE, IN MY HUMBLE VIEW, A SEAMLESS UNION OF UNDIFFERENTIATED CONSCIOUSNESS AND LIVING LIFE FORCE. 
Its true nature is formless and nameless. It is the source of all forms and concepts since it is the source of all energy 

CONSCIOUSNESS MAY NOT BE THE SOURCE OF ALL ENERGY. THIS IS THE PATRIARCHAL VEDIC BIAS.THE ONE UNITED SOURCE IS THE PRIMORDIAL UNION OF LIVING ENERGY AND CONSCIOUSNESS. THIS IS WHAT I WOULD TERM THE HOLY, THAT IS, THE WHOLE OR HOLISTIC SPIRIT OF ETERNALLY LIVING AND INFINITELY CONSCIOUS, COSMIC UNCONDITIONAL LOVER! 

and all observations, which always occur in the triad of an observer observing observable forms. It is the beginning and the end since all observations arise with the expenditure of the energy that allows for the creation of an observable projected and animated world.
SO, WHERE DOES THIS 'OBSERVABLE PROJECTED AND ANIMATED WORLD' COMES FROM IF NOT FROM THE ABOVE UNION? 
It is the end of time since it is the end of animation and it is the end of space since it is the end of projection. You cannot explain the true nature of what you are, but you can do an experiment of one, awaken to the true nature of what you are, and see for yourself. When the dreamer awakens from its dream, its dream-world disappears and only the true nature of the dreamer remains. You can directly experience that true nature.

Nisargadatta says "to know the source is to be the source". 

NOT AT ALL! TO KNOW IS TO HAVE AN EXPERIENCE OF SOMETHING, IN THIS CASE THE SOURCE. IT MAY NOT BE THE SOURCE ITSELF. WHEN I TASTE HUNGARIAN GULASH, I HAVE SOME SORT OF EXPERIENTIAL IDEA OF IT, BUT I AM NOT THE GOULASH ITSELF!!! 

As all truth-realized beings tell us, the only way to have that direct experience is becomes desireless or energy less. WE DO NOT KNOW FOR CERTAIN THAT THE SO CALLED TRUTH REALISED BEINGS ARE ACTUALLY TRUTH REALISED. WE ONLY ASSUME THIS, AS WE OURSELVES ARE NOT TRUTH REALISED. 

DESIRELESSNESS IS A BUDDHIST BIAS WHICH RIGHTLY POINTS TO THE NEED TO BE DETACHED FROM ILLUSIONS, BUT WRONGLY REJECTS PRIMORDIAL DESIRE WHICH MAY IN FACT BE A MOST FUNDAMENTAL DRIVE INHERENT IN THE METAPHYSICAL LOVE-SPIRIT LIVING SOURCE OF THE ENTIRE COSMOS! IT IS FAR FROM ENERGYLESS; IT ETERNALLY TEAMS WITH IT!

The source truly has nil energy, but it has the potential to create energy out of its own nature, and thereby create an observable projected and animated world, which is its dream.

THE SOURCE IS FULL OF LIVING AND CONSCIOUS ENERGY; IT IS SIMPLY POTENTIAL AND UNMANIFESTED. ITS 'DREAM' IS MORE THAN A DREAM: IT IS ITS MATERIALISED ETERNALLY TRANSIENT AND CHANGING FORMS.

I am looking forward to replies in this forum or also on:

a.h...@hotmail.com

Best,

Andris


To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sa...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com.

Shafiq Khan

unread,
Jul 15, 2017, 4:51:58 AM7/15/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
Dear All,
            Consciousness preceded the creation of brain. Because it is consciousness which could conceive the existence of brain to have the physical consciousness in so far as the humans & animals are concerned. Consciousness cannot be only the physical activity and it has nothing to do with the Quantum Mechanics.

With Best Regards
Mohammad Shafiq Khan

On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 5:06 AM, Andris Heks <a.h...@hotmail.com> wrote:

Dear Jim,


I believe your perception, which is largely correct, is distorted by the 'consciousness fundamentalism' of certain schools of the Vedas. So, below is my humble criticism of aspects of your position. I insert them into your text in capital letters below. 

I would appreciate a reply from you.

Kind regards,


Andris Heks 

a.h...@hotmail.com




Sent: Saturday, 15 July 2017 6:47 AM
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsubscri...@googlegroups.com.

-- 
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference 
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org 
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsubscri...@googlegroups.com.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.

To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

Tina LIndhard

unread,
Jul 15, 2017, 5:29:45 PM7/15/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
Dear Andris, 

 "ITS 'DREAM' IS MORE THAN A DREAM: IT IS ITS MATERIALISED ETERNALLY TRANSIENT AND CHANGING FORMS".

Yes I am in agreement with your statement - this is the eternal play of consciousness.  I also add (once again) this definition of consciousness by the philosopher Srinivas Arka.

Consciousness manifests itself through physical matter. Similar to bacteria that are able to survive with a complete lack of oxygen and in high temperatures, consciousness lacks boundaries, can take any form or shape and can emerge under challenging life conditions. In spirituality, consciousness is mainly a non-physical yet powerful entity that is the pivotal point of all life and activates the senses in every living being. It is highly responsive and expressive and activates many levels, especially in humans. (Arka, 2013, p. 37)

My thesis was about testing the third level of consciousness Arka mentions in his theory of the Six Main Levels of Consciousness. I obtained very interesting and significant results. By recognising the expression of different levels of consciousness in humans, Arka cuts through many of the problems Westerners usually have with “consciousness". The first or outer level he names is "thinking mind consciousness”- a level of consciousness most people experience if they do not undertake a meditative practice or explore the deeper levels.  As my thesis also involved the  role of the heart in meditation practices. it was also about how the living organism (living being) takes form and the role of the heart during somatogenesis (development of form).  Looked at from a certain perspective, the humble embryo has a lot to teach us. I only really grasped this as the study progressed. 

Warm regards Tina 

Tina Lindhard
PhD Consciousness Studies (IUPS)
President CCAEspaña
CICA: Chair of Consciousness Research
conso...@gmail.com

On 15 Jul 2017, at 08:15, Shafiq Khan <shaf...@gmail.com> wrote:

Boxbe This message is eligible for Automatic Cleanup! (shaf...@gmail.com) Add cleanup rule | More info
Dear All,
            Consciousness preceded the creation of brain. Because it is consciousness which could conceive the existence of brain to have the physical consciousness in so far as the humans & animals are concerned. Consciousness cannot be only the physical activity and it has nothing to do with the Quantum Mechanics.

With Best Regards
Mohammad Shafiq Khan
On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 5:06 AM, Andris Heks <a.h...@hotmail.com> wrote:

Dear Jim,


I believe your perception, which is largely correct, is distorted by the 'consciousness fundamentalism' of certain schools of the Vedas. So, below is my humble criticism of aspects of your position. I insert them into your text in capital letters below. 

I would appreciate a reply from you.

Kind regards,


Andris Heks 

a.h...@hotmail.com




Sent: Saturday, 15 July 2017 6:47 AM
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsubscri...@googlegroups.com.

-- 
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference 
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org 
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsubscri...@googlegroups.com.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.

To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.
--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sa...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

jim kowall

unread,
Jul 15, 2017, 5:29:45 PM7/15/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
Hi Andris

I agree with a lot of what you say, and find that our only real difference in "the saying of things" is a problem of semantics. What do words really mean? I tend to agree with the recent findings of neuroscience (see for example the books by Antonio Damasio) that all meaning is established in an emotional context, which implies an energetic context. Without emotions (energy) what can anything mean? By the way, this is also what truth-realized beings like Nisargadatta or Jed McKenna say about the nature of meaning. The idea of becoming desireless (energyless) as the way to become truth-realized is not just a Buddhist idea, but is also a concept expressed in the Tao and in Advaita. I'd recommend you take a look at the writings of Nisargadatta, Osho or Jed McKenna to confirm this basic principle. In terms of semantics, whether we say the source contains all energy in an unmanifested way or is the potential to create all energy out of its own nature is only a problem about the meaning of words. Isn't unmanifested the same as potential? The energy is always there in an unmanifested (potential) way until it's expressed (manifested) in an observable world. An observable world only becomes manifested because energy (desire) is expressed. If the energy (desire) remains unmanifested, there is no observable world, and so the source exists in and of itself as nothing observable (nothingness, void or undifferentiated consciousness). To have the direct experience of this nothingness requires that one becomes desireless (energyless). That is what all truth-realized beings like Nisargadatta and McKenna say.


By the way, this idea of an energyless source (the true vacuum state or void) is inherent in modern physics based on the holographic principle, which supersedes quantum field theory. The idea of a vacuum state based on QFT is not trustworthy, since QFT is at best a low energy approximation or an effective field theory like a thermal average or a thermodynamic equation of state. This is what the holographic principle tells us about all field theories as Ted Jacobson has so eloquently shown for Einstein's field equations for the space-time metric. To truly understand the nature of the true vacuum state (in contradistinction to all false vacuum states, which as Leonard Susskind has argued are always metastable states characterized by a non-zero value for dark energy as we currently find in the observable universe) we would need a trustworthy theory of quantum gravity, but there is no such theory, just the holographic principle as a guide. The only reason the observable universe is observable is because it is characterized by a non-zero value for dark energy (the exponential expansion of space) and a false vacuum state that gives rise to a cosmic horizon that encodes all the bits of information that characterize all the possible configuration states for every observable thing in the universe. The cosmic horizon acts as a holographic screen that projects all the observable images of things to the central point of view (singularity) of the observer, and those observable forms are animated over a sequence of screen outputs (quantum state reductions) that occur in the flow of energy. The true vacuum state has no energy (dark or otherwise), no projection, no animation and nothing observable. It is the source of all observation, which can only occur as energy is expended in a false vacuum state.


To make the connection to Advaita, it's only necessary to identity this projected and animated observable world (that the observer observes) with the dreamstate of the source. I fully agree with you that "THE SOURCE IS FULL OF LIVING AND CONSCIOUS ENERGY; IT IS SIMPLY POTENTIAL AND UNMANIFESTED. ITS 'DREAM' IS MORE THAN A DREAM: IT IS ITS MATERIALISED ETERNALLY TRANSIENT AND CHANGING FORMS". OK, but it's still a dreamstate. Maybe it's better to describe it as a virtual reality. It's the only game in town, but as McKenna says, it's a game without stakes. As McKenna says, every possible experience in the world is another ride in the amusement park. To give it more significance indicates emotional attachment, and that makes you a prisoner of fear living in a state of bondage. The only possible freedom is freedom from emotional attachment and self-identification. There is nothing wrong with love, but once love becomes possessive and conditional it leads to a state of bondage. To live in a state of freedom (free from emotional attachment and self-identification) is to be an "ETERNALLY LIVING AND INFINITELY CONSCIOUS, COSMIC UNCONDITIONAL LOVER".


Aren't we saying the same thing? The only point of difference I'd make is the distinction of fully awakening from the dream (truth-realization) and living a life fully lucid and awake within the dream, which can be called ascended consciousness (as Plato described it) and is what I find that you're describing.


Best wishes

Jim

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.

To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

-- 
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference 
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org 
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.

To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

Prof.Dr.Daya Shankar Kulshreshtha

unread,
Jul 16, 2017, 1:36:54 PM7/16/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com, Prof. Dr. Daya Shankar Kulshreshtha
Dear Jim,

Your interpretations presented here look very impressive and immediately acceptable to mind.
Best regards,
Daya Shankar Kulshreshtha
Physics Dept, Delhi Univ.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsubscri...@googlegroups.com.

-- 
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference 
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org 
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsubscri...@googlegroups.com.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--
Prof. Dr. Daya Shankar Kulshreshtha
​ (Retd.)
Department of Physics and Astrophysics
University of Delhi, Delhi - 110007, India
Skype ID: dskulsh1 Email: dsk...@gmail.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Multisense Realism

unread,
Jul 16, 2017, 5:15:57 PM7/16/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
Matter is a sense organ.


--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

Andris Heks

unread,
Jul 17, 2017, 5:12:41 AM7/17/17
to online_sa...@googlegroups.com

Dear Tina,


I am humbled, grateful and delighted by your interesting reply-comments.

You inspired me to more fully state my position for the first time here.

I would love to have your and anyone else's comments.


TOWARDS AN INTEGRAL SCIENCE OF LIVING CONSCIOUSNESS OR CONSCIOUS LIVING.            ©  Andris Heks 17.7.2017

 

Oh, what an auspicious date to write on this critically important topic, that inludes seven, three times; the number for transcendence in Sahasrara, the highest humanly glimpsable  superhuman chakra!

 

So, can we then transcend our perhaps futile attempts to talk about consciousness on its own rather than attempting to experience and then to describe the seamless union of primal eternal consciousness and primal eternal life as the united aspects of the most primal cosmic cause of all: the Eternal Being of Love, the ‘I AM’, that is both the One eternally unmanifest potential whole and His-Her eternally changing, transient material forms.

 

At this point I must declare my own biases: I come from a Hungarian youth, blessed with intimacy with arguably the most ancient, holistic and perhaps a Golden Age derived, incredibly wise mother tongue: Hungarian.

 

I am nearly 71 and I have lived in Australia since the age of 18 and for the last forty years I immersed myself in Psycho- and Yoga therapies as a Social Worker, in particular, simultaneously in the arguably most powerful experiential Western psychotherapy, Dr Jacob Moreno’s Psychodrama and the most powerful holistic Eastern experiential spiritual discipline in Integral Yoga.

Having tried to integrate the two, the last few years I have also been working on integrating Yoga with Faith.

 

Having been a sworn materialist atheist for thirty years, since a few years ago, I have come to the experiential realisation of the nonsense of my atheistic position and the absolute necessity of unshakable Faith if I was ever gain a glimpse of the truth.


I am impressed by the claim that reason and faith are like two wings on which the human spirit rises to contemplate the truth.

Amen to this!

 

In particular, I have been working lately on integrating the Yogic and Christian takes on the nature of truth.


By constantly referring back to the ancient wisdom in my advaitic (non-dualistic) Hungarian mother tongue and attempting to articulate it in English, I may be in the position to make a humble contribution towards trying to gain a verifiable glimpse of Transcendental Love; the very essence of Living Consciousness.

 

The Hungarian has a word for such love, that is absent in English.


That word is the extraordinarily wise word of ‘SZERELEM’.

 

The equivalent word in Hungarian to the English word ‘Love’ is ‘Szeretet’.


But while the Hungarian word ‘Szerelem’ subsumes ‘Szeretet’, the English concept of love, it is far more comprehensive, deeper, and it is primordially fundamental.

 

It is a combination of Eros, Filial love, Agape and Caritas; transcendental and human love, in a stunning claim to be the Logos of all!


Let me present to you some of the linguistic evidence that I deciphered over the years, about why this may be so.

 

First, it is important to understand about the holistic Hungarian language, that it derives from the perception of the Whole and the words then depict aspects of this whole in a causal entanglement and cause effect fashion. As if they were constituting interconnected pieces of a pre-existing but infinitely expanding  jigsaw puzzle.

 

So, in the word ‘Szerelem’ we have a number of fundamental and causally related etymons in a stunning unfolding of meaningful explanation.

 

The first syllable is ‘szer’.


Szer is in turn constitutes the first three letters of ‘szerv’ from which the ‘serv’ word itself and its further extention ‘szervezet’ clearly derive. 


Now, ‘szerv’ means ‘organ’ and ‘szervezet’ means ‘organisation.’ 

The former: ‘organ’ clearly stems from the latter: ‘organisation.’


So now we have a stunning insight here about the Hungarian ‘szerelem’, i.e. the ‘primordal love’ concept, that begins to point to its fundamentally primal nature.

 

It tells us already in the first syllable that ‘love’ organises


And once we have deciphered the rest of this word, it becomes crystal clear that love is the primal living organising principle of all!!!


So, let’s go on analysing the word ‘szerelem’, because a number of amazing meanings emerge from such analysis, all pointing to the absolute primacy of  ‘Szerelem’;  the notion of its being the essence of a Living, Loving, Cosmically and Personally Conscious Being.

 

So, within the first syllable of ‘szer’ we have a smaller irreducible etymon: ‘er’.


Now, ‘er’ in turn is the first syllable of ‘eredet’, that is ‘origin’ in English.

Vow, now we are getting further!

 

So, we learn here that szerelem is not only organising but it is also the originally, and therefore, arguably, the eternally organising factor.

 

This is also stunningly confirmed in the Sanskrit term for love: ‘prem’.


That is, because ‘prem’ is also also the etymon of ‘premium’, primal and therefore the very first!


In case you are still not convinced, lets go to the next critical part of the word 'szerelem'.

 

It is, of course, ‘elem’. 

And elem is the Hungarian word for the English ‘element’! 

Hoopla!

 

So, what do we have learnt so far is the ancient Hungarian claim, that szerelem (Love)

is the primal organising element of the Cosmos!


I rest my case!

 

O.K. But what does this have to do, even if true, with consciousness and life?

Lets go back to the word szerelem, because we might just find our trump cards in it.

(Unpolluted by President Trump).

 

So, szerELem, also have the critical etymon, ‘el’ in it.

 

It is the root of both ‘ELeven=lively and ‘ELme’=mind or consciousness. 

‘Lively’ (eleven) is the root element of Life (‘ÉLet’).

 

So, what we have here in szerelem is:  the primally original element of all organising love with its two intrinsic aspects of life and consciousness seamlessly present as constituents of His-Her One Being!

 

Why ‘being’? Because it, or HShe (I coined this term as English lacks it as the ‘union of he and she) is living and is conscious.

 

Can I now rest my case?!

 

Of course, this is the beginning and not the end of the story, because Hungarian also teaches us how such Loving Spirit materialises and manifests itself in the human Soul and how such Soul derives, is sustained by and returns to such eternally living and organising Loving Spirit.

 

I WOULD APPRECIATE YOUR COMMENTS.

 

 Kind regards,


Andris




From: online_sa...@googlegroups.com <online_sa...@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Multisense Realism <multisen...@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, 17 July 2017 6:44 AM
To: Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sa...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com.

Andris Heks

unread,
Jul 17, 2017, 11:48:54 AM7/17/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com

Dear Tina,

 

Many thanks for continuing the dialogue; you indeed point to issues close to my heart.

 

You write:

 

'In the Vedic tradition, the highest  state of consciousness is said to be SatChitAnanada- pure being, pure knowledge and pure bliss'

 

My reply:

 

Is not Sat, the pure being, the same as Szerelem, the existential truth which is there with Chit-mind (or Consciousness) and Ananda= Bliss? 

 

I see bliss as a benediction that emanates from the Cosmic Unconditional Lover, in my view, from the Szerelem that I wrote about. 

So in Szerelem we have the seamless integration of the Eternal Unmanifest (Shakti Prana) or cosmic life force and Eternal Consciousness (Shiva)

 

That is, bliss may be the manifest experience stemming from the union of Shiva (Consciousness) and (Prana Shakti) the Cosmic Life force in Szerelem. 

This bliss is experienced in the awakening of the Kundalini when Shiva and Shakti unite in a person at Sahasrara in the experience of Samadhi. 

So amazingly, causally, the human experience mimics or reflects the cosmic unmanifest experience of union. 

 

That is the experience of 'coming home' into a sense of returning to the the Cosmic Union from which we derive, yet  which, in a non-Samadhi state we fail to experience.

Hence we have the experiential maya or illusion of separation in the little ego, when in fact, the emanation (bliss) of the Uncoditional Lover is ever-present in and around us but we tend to block out its experience most of the time. 

So the union is there in Sat, the existential reality but it is mostly not identified with, in our alienated experiential reality, because we block it out through identifying with the manifest gross material reality. 

 

You write:

'In the Vedic tradition, the highest  state of consciousness is said to be SatChitAnanada- pure being, pure knowledge and pure bliss. It is a quality of the experiencing  consciousness - what I refer to as God Consciousness. Bhakti or love is one of the means of getting there (there are other means).  

 

My reply:

I am aware of various types of Yoga. I concede that for example Gyana Yoga gets one  to experience 'consciousness' but in my experience not to bliss. 

In my experience, in bliss there is Szerelem, that is the seamless causal union of consciousness and the life force.

 

In my experience, Bhakti is the only way to such union.

Unless I am mistaken, this was also emphasised by the great Prabhu Nitananda, who could beat scholars in intellectual contests yet he resolutely chose Kirtan chanting as the Bhakti expressway to God-not just to God-consciousness, but the Holy or holistic or whole experience of God that prominently includes Prana Shakti integrating with the Shiva of consciousness. Does not, A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada  whose spirit inspired this blog in the first place, also stood for Bhakti of Kirtan for such union? Is Christ not saying the same thing when he says that I AM the only way; that narrow path? Is this not the Faith that I emphasized as an absolute necessity to get to the holistic experience of God-realisation, not just to God-consciousness, but to the union in God, of Shiva and Shakti?

Paul, in 1 Corinthians 13 refers to ‘Faith, hope and love. These three, but the greatest of these is love.’ Yes, but the bridge to love is faith.

 

You write:

‘it seems that love can be what brings one to union - but it does not talk of the experiencing consciousness  itself.’

 

My reply: Love in the sense of szerelem: the Being of Love very much experiences consciousness as its integral aspect fused with life.  

 

You write:

The bliss for me arises from the love but they are qualitatively different states.’ 

 

My reply:

 

Are they?

To me bliss is as I wrote at the outset:  a benediction that emanates from the Cosmic Unconditional Lover, in my view, from the Szerelem that I wrote about earlier.

Bliss to the Being of Love is like in the metaphor, the sunrays are to the Sun. They are the emanations experienced by us from the Source. We can’t experience the whole power of the Sun directly because it would vaporize us with its might or look at the Sun directly because it would blind us. But we can enjoy and be solarly charged by the sunrays (bliss). So is this a qualitative difference or merely a mild doze of the One Being’s quality?

 

You sent a wonderful quote in the email you wrote to me:

 

‘I am in the Universe is a scientific reality.

The universe is within me is a spiritual experience

I am the universe is a mystical reality.” Srinivas Arka’

 

My reply: Yes, to the first two lines.

I doubt the third line: It does not follow that just because I am in the Universe and it is within me, that I am actually the universe even in mystical reality.

I, the drop, can be in the sea and the sea is in me as a drop, but I as a drop are certainly not the sea itself.

I can be ‘fulfilled’ by it, but the sea is a stupendous macro power whereas I am just a tiny micro constituent of it.

 

You write:

 

‘this is about the personal mystical experience of Union between the little self and the greater Self however one wants to phrase it. In the end “that" is the only doer. Of course being Hungarian you will express it in your unique way and your mother was certainly wise!  I have added something about differences between the Vedic tradition and the Christian tradition on the forum itself - and I would value your input . either privately or there.’

 

My reply:

Do you mean that the greater Self is the only doer ‘that’?

If by the greater Self I mean Szerelem, the ‘that’ as I do, then my answer to the claim that it is the only doer is yes and no.

It is the ultimate transcendental doer in that HShe enters us through our conscience in our Soul, so this is the yes, but we also have free will to disobey it.

And even when we are conscientious and obey ‘that, the unmanifest ‘that’ needs all the little ‘these’ of us to make Szerelem manifest in the material world precisely through our little transient beings.

So the ultimate and immortal ‘that’ needs the multitude of ‘this’ to manifest the unembodied Ghost ‘that’, in the materialized ‘this’ world.

Only then shall be ‘Thy will, done on Earth like in Heaven.’




From: Tina LIndhard <conso...@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, 17 July 2017 6:54 PM
To: Andris Heks
Cc: multisen...@gmail.com

Subject: Re: [Sadhu Sanga] Which came first, consciousness or the brain?
 
"So, can we then transcend our perhaps futile attempts to talk about consciousness on its own rather than attempting to experience and then to describe the seamless union of primal eternal consciousness and primal eternal life as the united aspects of the most primal cosmic cause of all: the Eternal Being of Love, the ‘I AM’, that is both the One eternally unmanifest potential whole and His-Her eternally changing, transient material forms”.

Dear Andris,

Thank you too for coming back to my reply.  I also  feel that to discuss consciousness on its own will not get us too far and that it is from the mystical union of the small self with the Self (or however you want to name it)  that one can have a real understanding of “Consciousness”. However we can discuss the insights of  others who have arrived at this state. 

One of the differences I see  between the Christian tradition and the Vedic tradition is the regarding “LOve”. In the Vedic tradition, the highest  state of consciousness is said to be SatChitAnanada- pure being, pure knowledge and pure bliss. It is a quality of the experiencing  consciousness - what I refer to as God Consciousness. Bhakti or love is one of the means of getting there (there are other means).  I have tried to fit this into your account of following the Hungarian ‘szerelem” - that which organizes - and it seems that love can be what brings one to union - but it does not talk of the experiencing consciousness  itself. The bliss for me arises from the love but they are qualitatively different states. But I am not Hungarian so you would have to assess what I am saying in light of the etymology of the words. 

 What I do find interesting is that you find consciousness imminent in all creation ie  IT IS ITS MATERIALISED ETERNALLY TRANSIENT AND CHANGING FORMS”. This is also not so obvious in the Christian tradition (at least how I understand it).  I like the word form and I use it in my work on embryology. This for me  this is very Platonic  - when we can recognise this we can then go beyond the forms and start looking for the principles behind them. This is when I feel science will really advance. 

Warm regards - Tina 

Tina Lindhard
PhD Consciousness Studies (IUPS)
President CCAEspaña
CICA: Chair of Consciousness Research
conso...@gmail.com

Tina LIndhard

unread,
Jul 17, 2017, 12:55:21 PM7/17/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
Dear Andris, 

Do you mean that the greater Self is the only doer ‘that’?

No we are given a certain amount of free will - most of the time it is our ego that is a acting - however when we have ceded our ego to do what is our highest good and the highest good of all and humbled the ego, then we can let the Self act through us. 

Warm regards - Tina 

Tina Lindhard
PhD Consciousness Studies (IUPS)
President CCAEspaña
CICA: Chair of Consciousness Research
conso...@gmail.com

Joseph McCard

unread,
Jul 17, 2017, 8:46:13 PM7/17/17
to Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D.


Jim (jkowall137)'

Re: your post, especially  jul 15 -very perceptive comments IM-not-so-HO. Thank-you for that,

joe

Andris Heks

unread,
Jul 17, 2017, 8:46:13 PM7/17/17
to online_sa...@googlegroups.com

Dear Tina,


Absolutely!


Amen to that.


Hence: Humillimus servus,


Andris




From: online_sa...@googlegroups.com <online_sa...@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Tina LIndhard <conso...@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, 18 July 2017 2:10 AM
To: Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com

Subject: Re: [Sadhu Sanga] Which came first, consciousness or the brain?
--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sa...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

Dr. Pramendra Dev

unread,
Jul 18, 2017, 4:59:27 AM7/18/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com, Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com


Sent from my iPad
--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sa...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

jim kowall

unread,
Jul 18, 2017, 3:20:20 PM7/18/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
Dear Tina

You wrote: "that it is from the mystical union of the small self with the Self (or however you want to name it)  that one can have a real understanding of “Consciousness”. However we can discuss the insights of  others who have arrived at this state." You also wrote: "when we can recognize this we can then go beyond the forms and start looking for the principles behind them. This is when I feel science will really advance."


The reunion of which you speak with the greater Self can be easily understood in terms of the holographic principle and the concept of differentiated and undifferentiated consciousness. The observer's observable world only comes into existence because energy is expended (dark energy in the sense of the big bang event), which allows all observable images (forms) of the world to become projected from the observer's holographic screen (event horizon) to its central point of view (singularity). All the bits of information that describe the configuration states of every observable thing in the observer's world are encoded on its holographic screen. All observable images of the observer's world are projected from the screen to the observer's central point of view and are animated over a sequence of screen outputs (quantum state reductions) in the flow of energy. When the flow of all energy comes to an end (as it eventually must), this holographic process of projection and animation comes to an end and the observer's world disappears from existence, but the true nature of existence does not stop existing. The differentiated consciousness of the observer returns to and reunites itself with the undifferentiated consciousness of the void. This reunion is describes as a dissolution, like a drop of water that dissolves back into the ocean. This reunion is called truth-realization, like a dreamer that awakens from its dream and realizes the true nature of what it really is.


Awakening is really only about the focus of attention of consciousness. If the observer's focus of attention is focused on the survival and welfare of its character in its world in an emotionally biased, self-defensive, controlling, interfering, and character favored way, the observer feels self-limited to the form of its character as it perceives emotional body feelings expressed by its character and mistakenly identifies itself with the animated form of its character, even though that emotionally animated form is no more real than an animated image projected from a screen to the observer's central point of view. If the observer surrenders and puts its trust in the normal flow of things to sort out what is for the best, stops trying to defend its character or control or interfere with the normal flow of things, and just allows the actions of its character to come into alignment with the normal flow of things, the observer enters into the integrated state with its feelings of connection and expressions of creativity. If the observer turns the focus of its attention away from its world and character and shifts its focus of attention onto its own sense of being present as a presence of consciousness at the central point of view of its world, and thereby ultimately de-animates its world, as the withdrawal of the observer's focus of attention away from its world is the withdrawal of its investment of animating emotional energy in its world, the observer awakens to the true nature of what it really is. Only the desireless state can lead to awakening since that is the only way the observer can withdraw all energy away from its world, which is inherently a state of the observer's focus of attention withdrawn away from its world. With full awakening, when the dreamer awakens from its dream, everything in the dreamer's dream-world disappears and only the true nature of the dreamer remains. Nothing remains. Only the ultimate, underlying reality remains. The differentiated consciousness of the observer ultimately returns to and reunites itself with the undifferentiated consciousness of the void.


As Shankara wrote long ago: Brahman (the undifferentiated consciousness of the void) is the only truth, the world is an illusion (an animation of images projected from a holographic screen to the central focal point of an observer), and there is ultimately no difference between Atman (the central point of differentiated consciousness of the observer) and Brahman (the undifferentiated consciousness of the void).


Jim Kowall

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

Andris Heks

unread,
Jul 19, 2017, 7:22:21 AM7/19/17
to online_sa...@googlegroups.com

Dear Tina and Jim,

 

Jim wrote:

 

Dear Tina

 

You wrote: "that it is from the mystical union of the small self with the Self (or however you want to name it)  that one can have a real understanding of “Consciousness”. However we can discuss the insights of others who have arrived at this state." You also wrote: "when we can recognize this we can then go beyond the forms and start looking for the principles behind them. This is when I feel science will really advance."

 

Jim:  

The reunion of which you speak with the greater Self

can be easily understood in terms of the holographic principle and the concept of differentiated and undifferentiated consciousness.’

 

Andris:

 

Brilliant staff Jim!

Can I zoom in, what seems to me the central point of all this debate?

 

Tina wrote:

 

"I am in the Universe is a scientific reality.

The universe is within me is a spiritual experience

I am the universe is a mystical reality.” Srinivas Arka

 

My (Andris) take on this central claim is:

 

"I am in the Universe is a scientific reality.

The universe is within me is a spiritual experience

I am in total love with the Universal Lover (I AM) is a mystical reality.”

 

I set out below the relevant part of my detailed discussion of this, a less developed version of which, I recently had published on this blog:

 

TOWARDS AN INTEGRAL SCIENCE OF LIVING CONSCIOUSNESS OR CONSCIOUS LIVING.           

 

©  Andris Heks 19.7.2017

 

Maybe we can transcend our perhaps futile attempts to talk about consciousness on its own, rather than attempting to experience and then to describe the seamless union of primal eternal consciousness and primal eternal life as the united aspects of the most primal cosmic cause of all: the Eternal Being of Love, the ‘I AM’, that is both the One eternally unmanifest potential whole and the One source of His-Her eternally changing, transient material forms?

 

I am impressed by the proposition that reason and faith are like two wings on which the human spirit rises to contemplate the truth.

 

By constantly referring back to the ancient wisdom in my advaitic (non-dualistic) Hungarian mother tongue and attempting to articulate it in English, I may be in the position to make a humble contribution towards trying to gain a verifiable glimpse of  the Being of Transcendental Love; perhaps the very essence of Living Consciousness.

 

The Hungarian has a word for such love, that is absent in English.

 

That word is the extraordinarily wise word of ‘SZERELEM’.

 

The equivalent word in Hungarian to the English word ‘Love’ is ‘Szeretet’.

But while the Hungarian word ‘Szerelem’ subsumes ‘Szeretet’, the English concept of love, it seems to me to be far more comprehensive, deeper, and is primordially fundamental.

 

It is a combination of Eros, Filial love, Agape and Caritas; transcendental and human and any other forms of love. To me, it seems to offer a stunning claim to be the Logos, the untimate Cause, of all!

 

And HSe (a term I needed to coin, because it is absent in English to denote the union of He and She) is intrinsically relational. Like, it is literally, Being in Love!

 

HSe is in love innerly between unmanifest life (She) and unmanifest consciousness (He) and HSe is in love outwardly with His-Her material manifestations.

 

The She and He within Szerelem make love and She as MATER gives birth to MATtER. (Or, MA to MATERial).  So we learn that matter has Mother in it and also Father, because it was their union that led to matter. The Ma-matter connection is also confirmed by Hungarian:

ANYA (mother) gives birth to SZerelem’s material manifestations in ANYAg.

 

Let me present to you some of the linguistic evidence that I deciphered over the years, as to why Szerelem may be the primal cause of Cosmos.

 

First, it is important to understand about the holistic ancient Hungarian language that it derives from the perception of the Cosmic Whole and the words it offers depict aspects of this whole in a causal entanglement and cause-effect fashion.

 

As if the ancient-wisdom-derived Hungarian words were interrelated pieces of a pre-existing but infinitely expanding jigsaw puzzle.

 

So, in the word ‘Szerelem’ we have a number of fundamental and causally related etymons in a stunningly interweaving and unfolding meaningful explanation.

 

The first syllable is ‘szer’.

 

Szer, in turn, constitutes the first three letters of ‘szerv’ from which the word ‘szerv’ and its further extension ‘szervezet’ clearly derive.

 

Now, ‘szerv’ means ‘organ’ and ‘szervezet’ means ‘organisation.’

‘Organ’, clearly stems from ‘organisation,’ (i.e. the part from the whole)                     

 

So now we have a stunning insight here about the Hungarian ‘szerelem’, i.e. the ‘primordial being of love’ concept, that begins to point to its fundamentally primal nature.

 

It tells us already in the first syllable that ‘love’ organises!

 

And once we have deciphered the rest of this word, it becomes crystal clear that this being of love is the primal living organising principle of all!!!

 

So, let’s go on analysing the word ‘szerelem’, because a number of amazing

meanings emerge from such analysis, all pointing to the absolute primacy of  ‘szerelem’;  the notion of its being the essence of a Living, Loving, Cosmically and Personally Conscious Being.

 

So, within the first syllable of ‘szer’ we have a smaller irreducible etymon: ‘er’.

 

Now, ‘er’ in turn is the first syllable of ‘eredet’, that is ‘origin’ in English.

Vow, now we are getting further!

 

So, we learn here that szerelem is not only organising but it is also the originally, and therefore, arguably, the eternally organising factor.

 

This is also stunningly confirmed in the Sanskrit word for love: ‘prem’.

That is, because ‘prem’ is also the etymon of ‘premium’, primal and therefore the very first!

 

In case you are still not convinced, lets go to the next critical part of the word of szerelem.

 

It is, of course, ‘elem’.

And elem is the Hungarian word for the English ‘element’!

 

Hoopla!

 

So, what we have learnt so far is that here may be an ancient Hungarian claim; namely, szerelem (Love) is the primally original, organising element of the Cosmos!

 

I rest my case!

 

O.K. But what does this have to do, even if true, with consciousness and life?

 

Lets go back to the word szerelem, because we might just find our trump cards in it.

(Unpolluted by President Trump).

 

So, szerELem, also have the critical etymon, ‘el’ in it.

 

It is the root of both ‘ELeven=lively and ‘ELme’=mind or consciousness. 

‘Lively’ (eleven) is the root element of Life (‘ÉLet’)

 

So, what we have here now in szerelem is: 

 

The primally original element of all-organising love with its two intrinsic aspects of life and consciousness seamlessly present as constituents of His-Her One Being!

 

Why ‘being’?

Because it, or rather, HShe (He and She in One) is living and is conscious.

 

Can I now rest my case?!

 

Of course, this is the beginning and not the end of the story, because Hungarian also teaches us how such Loving Spirit materialises and manifests itself in the human Soul and body and how such Soul and body derive, are sustained by and return to such eternally living and organising Being of Cosmic yet Personally Loving Spirit.

 

I WOULD APPRECIATE YOUR COMMENTS.

 

Jim writes:

The differentiated consciousness of the observer returns to and reunites itself with the undifferentiated consciousness of the void. This reunion is described as a dissolution, like a drop of water that dissolves back into the ocean. This reunion is called truth-realization, like a dreamer that awakens from its dream and realizes the true nature of what it really is.

 

Andris’ reply:

 

I do not think the analogy is quite correct and this is where mystical truth might come into play.

It seems to me that the ‘drop’ of water experiences him or herself dissolving back into water and in doing so it senses or glimpses the majestic wholeness of the almighty ocean but it does not become the ocean His-Herself, nor do I lose my unique drop identity. I call this a unicentric experience in which I simultaneously experience my uniqueness and being of and in the Universal Being of Love, even if this almighty Lover will always be far beyond me, in spite of containing me. Is this my awakening to truth?

 

Jim writes:

 

Only the desireless state can lead to awakening since that is the only way the observer can withdraw all energy away from its world, which is inherently a state of the observer's focus of attention withdrawn away from its world. With full awakening, when the dreamer awakens from its dream, everything in the dreamer's dream-world disappears and only the true nature of the dreamer remains. Nothing remains. Only the ultimate, underlying reality remains. The differentiated consciousness of the observer ultimately returns to and reunites itself with the undifferentiated consciousness of the void.

 

Andris: Beautifully put Jim but I do not quite agree.

The undifferentiated consiousness of the void is not nothing nor does it, in itself constitutes the wholeness of the void. It is no-thing and the other inseparable aspect of this ‘no-thing’ is the ‘undifferentiated’ life potential.

Their fusion constitutes the One Unmanifest Cosmic Lover.

 

Pratyahara, Dharana and Dhyana are necessary steps to Nirvana but not sufficient for the true Samadhi that you describe as the Nirvana of the void.

In my experience, true Samadhi goes beyond the Sunyata state of Nirvana.

To me that unified state in Turiya is not just the void: it is the void experienced as the all fulfilling Ultimate Lover or Loving Being; the essence of the Cosmos!

It is true that all egocentric desires need to be absent in that state, but the state itself is quite contrary to being desireless.

It is burning with love in the relationship of all my love with Truth:

The ultimate, eternal, cosmic yet personal unconditional lover!

 

Jim:

As Shankara wrote long ago: Brahman (the undifferentiated consciousness of the void) is the only truth, the world is an illusion (an animation of images projected from a holographic screen to the central focal point of an observer), and there is ultimately no difference between Atman (the central point of differentiated consciousness of the observer) and Brahman (the undifferentiated consciousness of the void).’

 

Andris:

In my humble opinion, it is not just the undifferentiated consciousness of the void, but it is the unconditionally loving, living consciousness of the void and His-Her correctly experienced manifested world, that is the only truth.

 

So in the ultimate unmanifest Lover (void), there is the fusion of unmanifest consciousness and unmanifest life.

This void then manifests His-Her loving dream in the truly understood material world. The maya is our misperception of the true nature of this manifestation.

 

The maya is not the materialization in manifestation as such, in itself, but its distorted perception. The true ‘dream’ comes from the unmanifest lover which HShe attemps to manifest in His-Her materialized dream, which is the ever changing world.

Hungarian points to this: ‘VILÁGOSSÁG’ is ‘light’ and ‘VILÁG’ is the world.

So, the world is the offspring of light and intrinsically it is also the light.

The problem, therefore, is not the world in itself, but that we have been misconstructing it now for very long, hence we have failed ‘to see the light’, intrinsic in the materialized world, alas veiled by our ignorance!  

 

The world is transient and ever-changing until it will truly manifest the eternal love of the eternal Lover through itself. The eternal lover keeps Being eternally and unconditionally loving to bring about the matching of His-Her unmanifest dream with its materialization. The problem is not that we are dreaming in this dream but that we do not get the true Lover’s dream and hence we fail to live for its realization!   

 

To my humble self, there is unmanifest almighty animation within Brahman.  My soul in my worldly being and through my soul, my mind-body, part-take in such Brahman, but Atman as Soul, as I described above in my take on the ocean and its drop analogy, to me, is not the same as Brahman.

My Atman derives from Brahman, is sustained and is taken away from my earthly husk and perhaps returns to the realm of the unmanifest Brahman when I die.

Qualitatively, to use another imperfect analogy, my Atman, the sunray, is an emanation from the Sun of suns and hence there is a qualitative affinity between the two, but all the billions of sunrays, atmans, are not the same as their ONE source: the Sun of suns, Brahman.

Amen!

 

I am looking forward to replies!

Kind regards,

 

Andris




From: online_sa...@googlegroups.com <online_sa...@googlegroups.com> on behalf of jim kowall <jkowa...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, 19 July 2017 4:17 AM
To: Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com

Subject: Re: [Sadhu Sanga] Which came first, consciousness or the brain?
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sa...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com.

jim kowall

unread,
Jul 19, 2017, 5:44:21 PM7/19/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
Dear Andris

Nisargadatta wrote "The Ultimate should be experienced and not discussed". We are tying to discuss That which is beyond concepts, and so words must inevitably fail. Joseph Campbell liked to say (quoting the Upanishads) "It is beyond names and forms". Beyond space and time. Beyond matter and energy. Beyond all thoughts and concepts. Beyond cause and effect. Beyond being and not being. Words fail, and yet we have a very deep need to discuss it before we can experience it.


Nisargadatta also wrote "Concepts first, then experience". A paradox, or maybe a catch-22. This kind of catch-22 paradox seems to be characteristic of the awakening process. Nisargadatta, like Jed McKenna and Osho, liked to say surrender must happen before you can awaken to your true nature, but you only become willing to give up and surrender after you realize the true nature of what you are. "Surrender cannot be done. It happens when you realize your true nature". McKenna puts it this way: "Surrender follows naturally from seeing what is". "To surrender is to relinquish the illusion of control, which initiates the death part of the death/rebirth transformation". Osho is even more blunt: "You cannot surrender. You are the hindrance. Surrender happens when you are not". This is another way to say the awakening process is a process with many steps that must be taken, but you have to take the first step (a journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step), and the first step requires concepts. These are concepts that raise doubts about our customary and common sense concept of a personal self-identity by which we go about living our ordinary lives. This first step in the awakening process is always an identity crisis. "Who or what am I in reality?" As McKenna likes to describe it, this is "Thought destroying thought". Thought used as a weapon in a "Search and destroy mission". This is the self-destructive aspect of thought, which is always the antidote to our concept of a personal self-identity. The cure is in the poison. These self-destructive concepts always seem to be necessary to initiate the process of an identity crisis that is the first step in the awakening process.


Anyway, that's my take on the usefulness of concepts. Anything else we can say is probably just a stalling tactic that slows down the awakening process. Even the ascension of consciousness (in Plato's terminology) is not the Ultimate, but it seems to me the ascension of consciousness and the integrated state are what you're describing. The divine love you describe is characteristic of the integrated state. You describe the "Light of consciousness" of Atman as emanating from Brahman or "the Sun of Suns", but in all non-dual traditions, the Ultimate Source is described as "Darkness, darkness within darkness, the gate to all mystery", as the Tao describes it. Nisargadatta describes it as "Deep and dark, mystery beyond mystery". The Rig-Veda says "Darkness was hidden by darkness in the beginning. All that existed then was void and formless". The book of Genesis says "Darkness was on the face of the deep" and "God divided the light from the darkness". The experience of Atman (the light of consciousness and the ascension of consciousness) is not the Ultimate. As the Zen koan says: "When you reach the top, keep climbing", until (in the words of the machines in the Matrix)..."It is Done".


Here are some relevant quotes from Nisargadatta:


Only the onlooker is real, call him Self or Atman.


That which makes you think that you are a human is not human.


It is a dimensionless point of consciousness, a conscious nothing.


All you can say about yourself is ‘I am’.


You are and I am only as points in consciousness.


You are the source of reality-a dimensionless center of perception that imparts reality to whatever it perceives-a pure witness that watches what is going on and remains unaffected.


It is only imagination and self-identification with the imagined that encloses and converts the inner watcher into a person.


In reality there is no person, only the watcher identifying itself.


At the root of my being is pure awareness, a speck of intense light.


This speck, by its nature, radiates and creates pictures in space and events in time, effortlessly and spontaneously.


I see only consciousness, and know everything to be but consciousness, as you know the pictures on the cinema screen to be but light.


Once you realize that there is nothing in this world which you can call your own you look at it from the outside as you look at a play on the stage or a picture on the screen.


To know the picture as the play of light on the screen gives freedom from the idea that the picture is real.


In reality I only look.


Whatever is done is done on the stage.


Joy and sorrow, life and death, they are real to the man in bondage.


To me they are all in the show, as unreal as the show itself.


It is enough to shift attention from the screen onto oneself to break the spell.


The Supreme state neither comes nor goes. It is.


It is a timeless state, ever present.


Before the mind happens, I am.


Before all beginnings, after all endings, I am.


All has its being in the ‘I am’ that shines in every living being.


In pure being consciousness arises.


In consciousness the world appears and disappears.


Consciousness is on contact, a reflection against a surface, a state of duality.


The center is a point of void and the witness a point of pure awareness; they know themselves to be as nothing.


But the void is full to the brim.


It is the eternal potential as consciousness is the eternal actual.


Awareness is beyond all.


Awareness is primordial; it is the original state.


Awareness is undivided-aware of itself.


Awareness comes as if from a higher dimension.


The witness that stands aloof-is the watchtower of the real-the point at which awareness, inherent in the unmanifested, contacts the manifested.


For the path of return naughting oneself is necessary.


My stand I take where nothing is.


To the mind it is all darkness and silence.


It is deep and dark, mystery beyond mystery.


It is, while all else merely happens.


The totality of all mental projections is the Great Illusion.


When I look beyond the mind I see the witness.


Beyond the witness is infinite emptiness and silence.


Jim

Sent: Wednesday, 19 July 2017 4:17 AM
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

Andris Heks

unread,
Jul 20, 2017, 6:25:47 AM7/20/17
to online_sa...@googlegroups.com

Dear Jim,

 

Many thanks for your generous reply below.

 

I am going away for a week for my third residential Kriya Yoga course in an Ashram so that I’ll be incommunicado for a week from Saturday. I have a lot to do till then, so let me just reply briefly.

I do have my own views about dear Nisagatta’s position which I see as an idealist one and I won’t go into it now.

What I would appreciate is, if you and/or others addressed the specific points I made in response to your specific points in my previous reply to you to which you kindly replied now in general.


But you do begin to reply specifically to a specific point of mine when you wrote:

 

Jim:    

 

‘The book of Genesis says "Darkness was on the face of the deep" and "God divided the light from the darkness".

 

Andris’ reply to Jim:

 

Here you clearly refer to an agent that is beyond darkness and light, in referring to the Creator God.

 

That is exactly what I mean by the Being of Szerelem i.e. The cosmic and personal Unconditional Lover.

 

John in the New Testament confirms this, by calling God ‘love’.

That, John in turn names as the ‘Word’, who is the unmanifest lover in Christ before the creation who will then materialize the world and its creator as Jesus Christ through the Word.

 

That in the Christ God, who is referred to, is ‘living’-‘word’, -that is the synthesis of life and consciousness-, is confirmed by the meaning of ‘Word’ in Hungarian.

 

The ‘Word’ is ‘Ige’.


One meaning of ‘Ige’ is divine wisdom, i.e. consciousness.

But its other meaning is ‘being’ and/or ‘doing’-which in the Word context is –divine life.


Hence, the One Word unites both divine consciousness and divine life as binary components (of equal value) within the Being of the Divine Lover, the One Creator.


With respect, but both dear Deepar Chopra and dear Menas Kafatos seem to conflate life and consciousness. 


As if consciousness was the source of life, rather than the Divine Lover being the Source, that incorporates both, in His-Her One Being. 


In their new book: You Are The Universe, they write (p 255):


'Life has always existed as pure consciousness.'


Pure consciousness only?


Kind regards,

 

Andris

 

 

 




From: online_sa...@googlegroups.com <online_sa...@googlegroups.com> on behalf of jim kowall <jkowa...@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, 20 July 2017 7:07 AM
To: Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sa...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com.

jim kowall

unread,
Jul 20, 2017, 4:38:49 PM7/20/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
Dear Andris

There's a big mystery here (the mystery of how the creative energy that gives rise to the manifestation of a world) is created out of the potentiality of the unmanifested. The best name I know for that unmanifested potentiality is the undifferentiated consciousness of the void. Don't ask me to give a better explanation. I can't. Somehow, in some mysterious way, creative energy or desire is expressed, and that desire leads to the manifestation of a world. Who's desire is it? Is it the desire of the differentiated consciousness of the observer at the central point of view of that world (Atman) or the desire of the undifferentiated consciousness of the void (Brahman)? Awakening (truth-realization) tells us that ultimately there is no difference between Atman and Brahman, so the question is probably meaningless. In some mysterious way creative energy (desire) is expressed, a world is manifested, and an observer (Atman) is always present at the central point of view of that world, as all the animated images of that world are projected from a holographic screen (an event horizon) to the central point of view (the singularity) of that world. In my simple reductionistic way of thinking, I'd say Brahman expresses that desire (through the accelerated expansion of space, which we call dark energy that gives rise to a cosmic horizon), and then Brahman differentiates itself into Atman (the observer at the central point of view of the horizon) in order to observe all the projected and animated images of that world. In this simple way of thinking, Brahman divides the light from the darkness.


By the way, the awakening process of Atman returning to (reuniting itself with) Brahman, which is understood as dissolution, as the differentiated consciousness of Atman dissolves back into the undifferentiated consciousness of Brahman, can be understood as an ultimate state of free-fall. The principle of equivalence tells us the expression of energy always occurs in an accelerated frame of reference. The end of the expression of energy can be understood as an ultimate freely falling frame of reference. In all the descriptions of truth-realization (dissolution) that I know about, the experience of falling into the void is described. This is how Osho describes it:


You fall into an abyss and the abyss is bottomless: you go on falling.

That is why Buddha has called this nothingness emptiness.

There is no end to it.

Once you know it, you also have become endless.

At this point Being is revealed.

Then you know who you are, what is your real being, what is your authentic existence.

That Being is void.


Jim


Sent: Thursday, 20 July 2017 7:07 AM

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

Andris Heks

unread,
Jul 20, 2017, 6:58:10 PM7/20/17
to online_sa...@googlegroups.com

Many thanks dear Jim.


Absolutely beautiful!


Jim writes:


'By the way, the awakening process of Atman returning to (reuniting itself with) Brahman, which is understood as dissolution, as the differentiated consciousness of Atman dissolves back into the undifferentiated consciousness of Brahman, can be understood as an ultimate state of free-fall.'


Andris' reply:


I, the little i=Atman, the besotted lover, return to my Substance, my Cosmic and Personal, inconceivably loving, Eternal Lover, (Brahman).


Amen


Humillimus Servus,


Andris




From: online_sa...@googlegroups.com <online_sa...@googlegroups.com> on behalf of jim kowall <jkowa...@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, 21 July 2017 6:17 AM
To: Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sa...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com.

Alex Hankey

unread,
Jul 21, 2017, 5:18:10 AM7/21/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
Jim, when you place the creative energy at an Instability
Many Things Become Clear! 

The Universe starts in an Instability -  
the singularity at the beginning of the Inflationary Process. 
That means that the Inflationary Process (in whichever form is fashionable) 
can explain how 'The Conscious Void' can create Space-Time-Matter. 

Alex 


--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--

Joseph McCard

unread,
Jul 21, 2017, 7:45:28 AM7/21/17
to Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D.
Jim, Alex

"There's a big mystery here (the mystery of how the creative energy that gives rise to the manifestation of a world) is created out of the potentiality of the unmanifested." (Jim)

" when you place the creative energy at an Instability Many Things Become Clear! " (Alex)

Alex is right. No mystery. The unmanifest, out of the desire  to manifest itself completely, and its inability to do so, created consciousness, a dynamic instability between action and identity. Consciousness then creates form. 

joe


jim kowall

unread,
Jul 21, 2017, 4:16:41 PM7/21/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
Dear Andris

Nonduality means "One, not two". Brahman is the only conscious entity in existence. Everything else is a big illusion, like in a dream. Brahman is the dreamer. Everything that appears in the dream is only Brahman in disguise, like in a costume party. Brahman wears all the costumes. All costumes are part of the illusion. The experience of a personal self-identity is part of the illusion. The experience of Atman and the experiences of divine love and the light of consciousness are part of the illusion. When Brahman awakens from its dream, everything in its dream disappears. All the disguises and the costumes disappear, and only the true nature of Brahman remains. That's what truth-realization is: Brahman experiencing its true nature without any costume or disguise; the true nature of the dreamer as it remains when the dreamer awakens from its dream.


Jim

On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Andris Heks <a.h...@hotmail.com> wrote:

Many thanks dear Jim.


Absolutely beautiful!


Jim writes:


'By the way, the awakening process of Atman returning to (reuniting itself with) Brahman, which is understood as dissolution, as the differentiated consciousness of Atman dissolves back into the undifferentiated consciousness of Brahman, can be understood as an ultimate state of free-fall.'


Andris' reply:


I, the little i=Atman, the besotted lover, return to my Substance, my Cosmic and Personal, inconceivably loving, Eternal Lover, (Brahman).


Amen


Humillimus Servus,


Andris



Sent: Friday, 21 July 2017 6:17 AM

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

jim kowall

unread,
Jul 21, 2017, 5:00:55 PM7/21/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
Dear Vinod

The instability in creative energy is inherent in the holographic principle as we understand it in the context of dark energy (the accelerated or exponential expansion of space that always expands relative to the central point of view of an observer, which is a point of singularity relative to a cosmic horizon that encodes all the bits of information that describe the configuration states for every observable thing the observer can observe in its world). As Leonard Susskind has argued, all state of the observer's world are characterized by a non-zero of dark energy. That's what gives rise to the observer's cosmic horizon and allows the observer's world to become observable in the sense of projection from a holographic screen. All of these observable states of the observer's world are characterized by a non-zero value of dark energy and are inherently metastable states like a false vacuum state. Only the true vacuum state with a zero value of dark energy has absolute stability, but the true vacuum state has no cosmic horizon and so it has nothing observable. It doesn't even have an observer. It can only be described in physical terms as undifferentiated, infinite nothingness. This is what we can't possibly comprehend, since in this absolutely stable true vacuum state there is no distinction between zero, one and infinity. My preference is to refer to this absolutely stable true vacuum state as the infinite undifferentiated consciousness of the void.


Jim

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

Andris Heks

unread,
Jul 22, 2017, 3:52:16 AM7/22/17
to online_sa...@googlegroups.com

Dear Jim,

 

You are saying that when Brahman awakens from its dream the experience of divine love also disappears.

 

I beg to disagree.

 

To me, the awakening is  Brahman's


(who is the Union of the eternal unmanifest He of pure Consciousness and the She of eternal Life)


realisation that HShe,  the Being of 'Szerelem',


(the united He and She)


is the primal Unconditional Lover, who seamlessly unites within His-Her non-dualistic but binary ONE-self, divine pure consciousness and divine life. 


To me, this is the clear meaning of sat, chit, ananda in which sat is the union of chit and ananda.

 

It seems to me that there is a perhaps inherent ambiguity within the Vedanta or is it ‘a lost in translation' problem’?

In one breath, the Vedas seem to be in agreement with my position.

Eknath Easwaran in his book 'The Upanishads' writes:

 

'Nothing can satisfy us but reunion with our real Self, which the Upanishads say is 'sat-chit-ananda' : absolute reality, pure awareness,unconditioned joy.'


So therefore, if there is to be non-duality, advaita, then the One absolute reality of Sat, which I call the Unconditional Eternal Lover, (the Being of Szerelem) must have within His-Her Oneself, His-Her two aspects, consciousness= chit and joyful life= ananda.


(in Hungarian I do not have to use 'His-Her' which the genderised English forces me to use as it has not got the universal third person, the Hungarian Õ, that can combine he and she in one word.)

 

The trump card in confirming the position I take comes from the below statement from Easwaran.


He says that the Upanishads 'remind us that love is the first and last commandment of this realisation (my italics for highlight),

for the same Self dwells in all:

 

But now watch below the conceptual confusion in this translation of Katha two.2.9 in which the non-dual third person, the equivalent of the Hungarian Õ, Easwaran translates as the dualistic He in English.


(Is this because Sanskrit itself is intrinsically dualistic or because of the absence of HSe in English vocabulary and thinking forces one to translate any living third person as the dualistic either 'he' or 'she'?!

Sanskrit scholars please comment!)

 

So, Easwaran follows up 'the same Self dwells in all:' (with)

 

'As the same fire assumes different shapes

When it consumes objects differing in shape,

So does the one Self take the shape 

Of every creature in whom he is present.'    

(the underlining and italics are my emphasis)

 

So, for crying out loud!


Can I beseech you all to realise, if I happen to be right, that if we perceive the One Self as he, then it is NOT one, it is truncated into its half, which you call as pure consciousness. To talk about One we must include She, the other half, which is the Eternal Life of She.


That is why the one self I perceive as the one HShe of the Eternal Lover (the Being of Szerelem), that subsumes He and She in the one Õ, the ‘that’!

 

But with respect, it seems to me, that most Vedic scholars, perhaps because of an unconscious patriarchal bias, do not seem to get this point.

With respect, it seems to me that, you dear Jim, dear Menas Kafatos and dear Deepak Chopra and even the brilliant Eknath Easwaran in his book 'The Upanishads' seem to display this patriarchal misunderstanding. 


(I.e. Easwaran translating the 'one' as 'he'.)


(And this partialised Patriarchal view  tends to be present, more all less in all world religions, (e.g. The Lord or Father seen as the one God, rather than HSe) except perhaps the ancient pure Tantra and Tao)

 

 

And this is how, with great respect, Deepak Chopra and Menas Kafatos also display this confusion in their co-authored new book:

 

'You are the Universe'

(p 255, hard cover):

 

‘Life has always existed as pure consciousness’.

 

No! I would say:

 

Life has always existed in union with pure consciousness.

(This union to me is the Eternal Lover!)

 

So dear Jim, are you all wrong and me right?


If I posed the confusion this way I would be on an ego trip.


Rather, I, like you all, try to be a conscientious ‘truth sleuth.’


So, if I am wrong, would you kindly show, how?

 

Kind regards,

 

Andris Heks

 

 

 





From: online_sa...@googlegroups.com <online_sa...@googlegroups.com> on behalf of jim kowall <jkowa...@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, 22 July 2017 6:07 AM
To: Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sa...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com.

Alex Hankey

unread,
Jul 22, 2017, 3:52:16 AM7/22/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
Jim, In my approach, a pure quantum state has no foundation for awareness. 
However, some physicists have theorized about a 'degenerate vacuum state', 
and as far as I can tell, this MAY have the potential to support awareness, 
though it is not a kind of state normally considered part of quantum field theory.
Best wishes, 
Alex 
 

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.

To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--

jim kowall

unread,
Jul 22, 2017, 5:24:43 PM7/22/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
Dear Andris

Divine love always implies an I-Thou relationship and so by its nature is firmly rooted in the illusion of duality, but divine love must have an origin in nondual awareness. The divine love manifested in a dualistic world in an I-Thou relationship must exist in the unmanifested nondual awareness as potentiality. If you can accept that divine love (maybe better referred to as love of Self) has a primordial existence as unmanifested potentiality, then we have no disagreement.


What I've described is the theory of nonduality. Take it for what it is-a theory. The experience of nondual awareness is something completely different. As Jed McKenna says: "Come see for yourself".


Until we actually experience nondual awareness we really don't know what we're talking about, but the irony is this experience can never be adequately explained in words or concepts. Words fail. So let's agree to stop talking about it.


Jim

Sent: Saturday, 22 July 2017 6:07 AM

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

jim kowall

unread,
Jul 22, 2017, 5:24:43 PM7/22/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
Dear Vinod

Your question is really "why is there something rather than nothing?" I have no good answer to this question except for symmetry breaking. The expression of creative energy (desire) that gives rise to the manifestation of an observable world is always an example of the breaking of the symmetry of empty space. If the symmetry of empty space remains unbroken, nothing is ever observable nor is there ever an observer. Only the unbroken symmetry of undifferentiated infinite nothingness remains for eternity. In order to turn nothingness into somethingness, the symmetry of empty space has to be broken, which requires the expenditure of creative energy.


The basic reason for all instability is symmetry breaking, like the spontaneous magnetization of a magnet or the formation of a carbohydrate molecule. States of broken symmetry always arise in a metastable state, which is a false vacuum state of non-zero energy. The true vacuum state always has zero energy, which gives it absolute stability. That's why a carbohydrate molecule can burn away as it transitions to a state of lower energy. This is basic thermodynamics 101. Symmetry breaking always occurs in a metastable state of non-zero energy. There is always the potentiality for burning to occur as the system of broken symmetry transitions to a state of lower energy. The most fundamental kind of symmetry breaking we know about (which gives rise to the creation of a world in the sense of the big bang event) is the expression of dark energy (the exponentially accelerated expansion of space) that gives rise to the construction of a cosmic horizon (that arises relative to the central point of view of an observer) and breaks the symmetry of empty space. Even the holographic principle is fundamentally understood in the sense of symmetry breaking. All the bits of information encoded on the horizon (the holographic screen) arise as broken symmetries (in the sense of non-commutative geometry). That's why an observable world always is characterized by a non-zero value of dark energy, which inherently makes it an unstable (metastable) state.


I haven't really answered your question, but I have given a mechanism (a geometric mechanism) by which an observable world is manifested. To ask "why" is probably a meaningless question. Maybe the void manifests an observable world just because it can. That's its potentiality. The basic rule is: if it can happen, it will happen. Don't ask me to explain where that potentiality comes from (except for the potentiality of geometry). Somethings are just mysteries.


Jim

Sent: Saturday, 22 July 2017 6:07 AM

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

Bruno Marchal

unread,
Jul 22, 2017, 5:24:43 PM7/22/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
Dear Jim,


On 21 Jul 2017, at 22:07, jim kowall wrote:

Dear Andris

Nonduality means "One, not two". Brahman is the only conscious entity in existence. Everything else is a big illusion, like in a dream. Brahman is the dreamer. Everything that appears in the dream is only Brahman in disguise, like in a costume party. Brahman wears all the costumes. All costumes are part of the illusion. The experience of a personal self-identity is part of the illusion. The experience of Atman and the experiences of divine love and the light of consciousness are part of the illusion. When Brahman awakens from its dream, everything in its dream disappears. All the disguises and the costumes disappear, and only the true nature of Brahman remains. That's what truth-realization is: Brahman experiencing its true nature without any costume or disguise; the true nature of the dreamer as it remains when the dreamer awakens from its dream.


Nice sum up, and very close to what the universal machine tell us (when we listen to them). But the machine explains constructively (in part) how the dreams of the One without a Name can cohere so that the One can say Hello to itself, and recognize itself, or not (dream sharing)

But from this, invoking any laws infer from observation is a bit like cheating. It is of course the wise thing to do to act and react in a changing world, but it is a distraction in the meditation and extraction of physics from "our head" needed to test the theory. The physical laws are the 1p-statistics on the infinitely many relative computational states.

Also, with Mechanism, although there is some notion of absolute awakening, there are also relative awakenings, and a complex structure of intermediate realities/dreams. There is a sort of arithmetical "Bardo Thodol". With Mechanism, clinical (3p) death is not a promise of absolute 1p awakening, there might be some works to do and contingencies to support on some path before, apparently. 

Bruno



To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sa...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Asingh2384

unread,
Jul 23, 2017, 12:07:06 PM7/23/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
Dear Jim/Vinod:

The straight answer to the the question - "why is there something rather than nothing?" is that –“Nothing never existed, nor exists, nor will exist. 

“Nothing” by definition is “Non-existence”. It is a fundamental mistake to assign any ontological status to Nothingness or Void. 

The above logic and understanding follows from the fundamental scientific law of conservation.

Best Regards
Avtar Singh, Sc.D.
Alumni, MIT
Author of "The Hidden Factor - An Approach for Resolving Paradoxes of Science, Cosmology, and Universal Reality"


To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sa...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com.

Joseph McCard

unread,
Jul 23, 2017, 3:58:20 PM7/23/17
to Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D.
Avtar Singh,

You wrote the following, but I think the comment may be refined.

"The straight answer to the the question - "why is there something rather than nothing?" is that –“Nothing never existed, nor exists, nor will exist.  “Nothing” by definition is “Non-existence”. It is a fundamental mistake to assign any ontological status to Nothingness or Void. The above logic and understanding follows from the fundamental scientific law of conservation."(Avtar)

There is no beginning, and there is no end. We cannot address this issue in terms of time and space. What you are talking about is the beginning of the beginning; that which Is is all there was, and there was nothing else. Yet All That Is could not know itself—because All That Is is all there was, and there was nothing else. And so, All That Is… was not. For in the absence of something else, All That Is, is not.

Now this nothing which holds the beginning of the everything is what some people call God. Yet that is not accurate, either, for it suggests that there is something God is not—namely, everything that is not “nothing.” But God—seen and unseen—so this description of God as the Great Unseen—the No-Thing, or the Space Between, an essentially Eastern mystical definition of God, is no more accurate than the essentially Western practical description of God as all that is seen. Those who believe that God is All That Is and All That Is Not, are those whose understanding is correct.
 
From the No-Thing thus sprang the Everything—a spiritual event entirely consistent, incidentally, with what scientists call The Big Bang theory. As the elements of all raced forth, time was created, for a thing was first here, then it was there—and the period it took to get from here to there was measurable.
 
Just as the parts of Itself which are seen began to define themselves, “relative” to each other, so, too, did the parts which are unseen. God knew that for love to exist—and to know itself as pure love—its exact opposite had to exist as well. So God voluntarily created the great polarity—the absolute opposite of love—everything that love is not—what is now called fear. In the moment fear existed, love could exist as a thing that could be experienced.
 
It is this creation of duality between love and its opposite which we refer to in our various mythologies as the birth of evil, the fall of Adam, the rebellion of Satan, and so forth.
 
This mythology has been mankind’s early attempt to understand, and tell others in a way they could understand, a cosmic occurrence of which the human soul is deeply aware, but of which the mind can barely conceive.
 
In rendering the universe as a divided version of Itself, God produced, from pure energy, all that now exists—both seen and unseen. In other words, not only was the physical universe thus created, but the metaphysical universe as well. The part of God which forms the second half of the Am/Not Am equation also exploded into an infinite number of units smaller than the whole. These energy units, consciousness units or monads, are what you might call spirits. In some of our religious mythologies it is stated that “God the Father” had many spirit children. This parallel to the human experiences of life multiplying Itself seems to be the only way the masses could be made to hold in reality the idea of the sudden appearance—the sudden existence—of countless spirits in the “Kingdom of Heaven.”
 
In this instance, our mythical tales and stories are not so far from ultimate reality—for the endless spirits comprising the totality of God are, in a cosmic sense, God's offspring.

joe : )
 

jim kowall

unread,
Jul 23, 2017, 4:33:00 PM7/23/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
Dear Avtar, Bruno and Vinod

One last point. Implicit in the holographic principle (as the observer's world arises from the void through the expression of dark energy) is that the total energy of that observable world is exactly zero. This is possible in modern cosmology since the negative potential energy of gravitational attraction can exactly cancel out all dark energy and any other forms of positive energy, like mass and kinetic energy, and so the conservation of energy is never violated. The remarkable observational fact of modern cosmology (other than the observed effects of dark energy in an exponentially expanding universe) is that the total energy of that observable universe is exactly zero (the observed curvature of space-time geometry is asymptotically flat). If we add in the effects of gravity, then everything adds up to nothing.


So it would seem that something isn't really created out of nothing, but rather that everything is really nothing in disguise.


Jim

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.
--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

Asingh2384

unread,
Jul 24, 2017, 4:10:51 AM7/24/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
Dear Jim:
 
Just as to cover one untruth, one has to commit to several untruths, the untruth of zero total energy of the universe in standard model cosmology has to be covered with several ridiculous and nonsensical untruths known as the unresolved paradoxes of the universe which have paralyzed the standard model from predicting 96% of the universe. These paradoxes include dark energy, dark matter, parallel universes, multiple dimensions, superluminous inflation (violating C), quantum gravity, measurement paradox, anthropic principle, fine-tuning etc etc. The combined knowledge of the current standard model, FR, QM, Qft, Q…, Q…., and Q…… predicts only 4% of the universe; hence, there is something fundamental missing from the current theories.
 
The absurdity of negative GPE is further proven by the Hubble data that shows accelerated universe expansion in the far-field (Large R) wherein the large expansive (dark) antigravity kinetic energy dominates while GPE is almost zero. But a negative GPE (meaning zero total energy) would mandate a zero expansive energy at large R, which is totally absurd. Similarly, at R=0, negative GPE would mandate an infinite expansive anti-gravity energy with V=C while the observed Hubble V=0, which is also absurd. Hence, standard model negative GPE predicts a totally absurd universe filled with inconsistencies, singularities, and paradoxes………not a surprise. The fact that the standard model is accepted by mainstream does not alter the universal reality and standard model’s absurdities. The castle of standard model is built upon the sands of allusive particles wherein the governing physics is missing or misunderstood.
 
Hence, the statement that universe is born with big bang from a void is no more than 4% correct and 96% incorrect.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sa...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com.

Bruno Marchal

unread,
Jul 24, 2017, 5:47:33 AM7/24/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
Dear Asingh,


On 23 Jul 2017, at 17:34, 'Asingh2384' via Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D. wrote:

Dear Jim/Vinod:

The straight answer to the the question - "why is there something rather than nothing?" is that –“Nothing never existed, nor exists, nor will exist. 

Not even the illusion that I got this mail?

We cannot derive anything from nothing.

But we can derive the reality of consciousness and of the illusion of a material world from the laws of addition and multiplication.
And if we assume Mechanism in cognitive science, we *have to* derive everything from the laws of addition and multiplication.



“Nothing” by definition is “Non-existence”. It is a fundamental mistake to assign any ontological status to Nothingness or Void. 

The above logic and understanding follows from the fundamental scientific law of conservation.

I think we should make clear what we assume, and what we try to derive from what we assume. If you are willing to believe in a law of conservation, you do assume already a lot of things, including the numbers.

Bruno






For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

jim kowall

unread,
Jul 24, 2017, 6:54:07 PM7/24/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
Dear Bruno, Vinod and Avtar

The only answers I have about the creation of the observable world are the holographic principle and symmetry breaking. This is not the standard "big bang model" of physics (to answer Avtar's objections), but it is the kind of idea Amanda Gefter puts forward in her recent book Trespassing on Einstein's Lawn, and it's the kind of stuff Tom Banks is working on. The only new thing I've done is to discuss it in the non-dual terms of Advaita, as I've identified the nothingness of the void with the undifferentiated consciousness of Brahman and the differentiated consciousness of the observer at the central point of view of the observable world with Atman. I know this is a controversial thing to do, but it does solve many of the "paradoxes" that Avtar mentions, which as I see them, are all paradoxes of self-reference.


The holographic principle is the most fundamental scientific concept we have. This isn't just me talking, but the opinion of many highly regarded theoretical physicists, like Leonard Susskind, Tom Banks, Raphael Bousso, Joseph Polchinski, and nobel-prize winner Gerard 't Hooft. This isn't just a string theory thing; 't Hooft can't stand string theory but he accepts the holographic principle as a fundamental principle.


Let me summarize (in terms of the holographic principle) how the observable world is created. In the true vacuum state (the void), by some mysterious process, dark energy is expressed. The void has zero dark energy, but it has the potential to express a non-zero value of dark energy in a false vacuum state, which gives rise to the creation of an observable world along the lines of the big bang event. The conservation of energy is never violated since the negative potential energy of gravitational attraction exactly cancels out the dark energy in that world, which has a total energy of zero. The expression of dark energy, which is the accelerated expansion of space that expands relative to the central point of view of an observer, gives rise to a cosmic horizon that limits the observations of the observer at the central point of view (the singularity) of that world. In some mysterious way, the differentiated (individual) consciousness of the observer also must arise from the void as dark energy is expressed. The void must have the potential not only to express dark energy but also to differentiate the consciousness of the observer. Hence, the void must be undifferentiated consciousness. That's what it really is.


If Vinod wants to call the expression of dark energy by the void the "desire" of the void to create an observable world for itself, I've no problem with that idea. I guess this idea is sort of like the anthropic principle, but it has the advantage of being free of all paradoxes of self-reference. The symmetry broken with the expression of dark energy and the construction of a cosmic horizon is the symmetry of empty space (the symmetry of infinite undifferentiated nothingness or emptiness).


If we apply non-commutative geometry to the observer's cosmic horizon, then the holographic principle is automatically in effect. The horizon acts as a holographic screen, with each pixel on the screen (about the size of a Planck area) encoding a fundamental bit of information in a binary code of 1's and 0's. This is mathematically formalized as the n eigenvalues of an SU(n) matrix, where n=A/4(Planck area), and A is the surface area of the horizon. The horizon also has an absolute temperature given in terms of the radius R of the horizon as kT=ħc/2πR. The horizon acts as a holographic screen and projects the observable space-time geometry of the observer's world to the observer's central point of view over an animated sequence of screen outputs. As Ted Jacobson has shown, this observable space-time geometry is described by Einstein's field equations for the space-time metric, but this description is only valid as a low energy limit or thermal average (a thermodynamic equation of state) that is valid near thermal equilibrium.


If we apply the usual unification mechanisms of super-symmetry and the Kaluza-Klein mechanism of extra compactified dimensions of space to Einstein's field equations, we end up with something that looks like 11-dimensional super-gravity, which includes all the quantum fields of the standard model of particle physics. A so-called fundamental (point) particle is then understood as a localized (quantized) excitation of energy and momentum of a quantum field (a wave packet) in the extended dimensions of space and time, while the internal structure of the point particle (like electric and nuclear charges) arises from momentum quantized in extra compactified dimensions of space. Since this description is at best a thermal average or low energy limit valid only near thermal equilibrium, there really is no such thing as fundamental particles. A photon or electron is no more fundamental than a phonon of sound waves.


Avtar objects that this description of an observable world requires a false vacuum state of non-zero dark energy to arise from the true vacuum state, but this assumption is exactly the same assumption made in inflationary cosmology, which is our best theory of the big bang event. The false vacuum state is a metastable state in the sense of symmetry breaking. As inflationary cosmology assumes, dark energy is what puts the "bang" in the big bang event, but since it arises in a metastable false vacuum state, dark energy can burn away and transition to a more stable state of lower dark energy, which explains the early accelerated expansion of the universe shortly after the big bang occurred. The only problem with inflationary cosmology is it's based on quantum field theory, and assumes that as dark energy burns away a "bubble" of false vacuum (characterized by a lower but still non-zero value of dark energy) is created, which is our universe. The problem with these "bubble universes" is that quantum field theory is only valid near thermal equilibrium, but the transition to a lower value of dark energy (the inflationary phase of the universe) is not even close to thermal equilibrium. It's a phase transition. Only the holographic principle solves this problem. What inflates in size as dark energy burns away is not a "bubble universe", but the observer's cosmic horizon. The answer to Avtar's objection about a multiverse is there's no such thing, only an observer and its observable world. There is no measurement paradox since there is only a single observer observing its own world. Since the observer's cosmic horizon acts as a holographic screen that projects all the animated images of the observer's world to the observer's central point of view, it is the observer's world that inflates in size as dark energy burns away and transitions to a lower value. As the cosmic horizon inflates in size, it cools in temperature. In this burning process, heat is radiated away to infinity. The thermal gradient created as the cosmic horizon inflates in size and cools in temperature and the radiation of heat to infinity is what thermodynamically drives the normal flow of energy through the observer's world.

Say what you will about my assumptions, but there is nothing unscientific or paradoxical about this description of the observable world, which is to the primordial nature of consciousness the same way a dream is to a dreamer.

Jim

Dear Asingh,


--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.
--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

Bruno Marchal

unread,
Jul 25, 2017, 4:14:09 AM7/25/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
Dear Jim,


On 25 Jul 2017, at 00:37, jim kowall wrote:

Dear Bruno, Vinod and Avtar

The only answers I have about the creation of the observable world are the holographic principle and symmetry breaking. This is not the standard "big bang model" of physics (to answer Avtar's objections), but it is the kind of idea Amanda Gefter puts forward in her recent book Trespassing on Einstein's Lawn, and it's the kind of stuff Tom Banks is working on. The only new thing I've done is to discuss it in the non-dual terms of Advaita, as I've identified the nothingness of the void with the undifferentiated consciousness of Brahman and the differentiated consciousness of the observer at the central point of view of the observable world with Atman. I know this is a controversial thing to do, but it does solve many of the "paradoxes" that Avtar mentions, which as I see them, are all paradoxes of self-reference.

The holographic principle is the most fundamental scientific concept we have. This isn't just me talking, but the opinion of many highly regarded theoretical physicists, like Leonard Susskind, Tom Banks, Raphael Bousso, Joseph Polchinski, and nobel-prize winner Gerard 't Hooft. This isn't just a string theory thing; 't Hooft can't stand string theory but he accepts the holographic principle as a fundamental principle.

Let me summarize (in terms of the holographic principle) how the observable world is created. In the true vacuum state (the void), by some mysterious process, dark energy is expressed. The void has zero dark energy, but it has the potential to express a non-zero value of dark energy in a false vacuum state, which gives rise to the creation of an observable world along the lines of the big bang event. The conservation of energy is never violated since the negative potential energy of gravitational attraction exactly cancels out the dark energy in that world, which has a total energy of zero. The expression of dark energy, which is the accelerated expansion of space that expands relative to the central point of view of an observer, gives rise to a cosmic horizon that limits the observations of the observer at the central point of view (the singularity) of that world. In some mysterious way, the differentiated (individual) consciousness of the observer also must arise from the void as dark energy is expressed. The void must have the potential not only to express dark energy but also to differentiate the consciousness of the observer. Hence, the void must be undifferentiated consciousness. That's what it really is.

If Vinod wants to call the expression of dark energy by the void the "desire" of the void to create an observable world for itself, I've no problem with that idea. I guess this idea is sort of like the anthropic principle, but it has the advantage of being free of all paradoxes of self-reference. The symmetry broken with the expression of dark energy and the construction of a cosmic horizon is the symmetry of empty space (the symmetry of infinite undifferentiated nothingness or emptiness).

If we apply non-commutative geometry to the observer's cosmic horizon, then the holographic principle is automatically in effect.

Interesting. Do you have a reference on this? I have the book by Alain Conne on non-commutative geometry, but it is not simple material!





The horizon acts as a holographic screen, with each pixel on the screen (about the size of a Planck area) encoding a fundamental bit of information in a binary code of 1's and 0's. This is mathematically formalized as the n eigenvalues of an SU(n) matrix, where n=A/4(Planck area), and A is the surface area of the horizon. The horizon also has an absolute temperature given in terms of the radius R of the horizon as kT=ħc/2πR. The horizon acts as a holographic screen and projects the observable space-time geometry of the observer's world to the observer's central point of view over an animated sequence of screen outputs. As Ted Jacobson has shown, this observable space-time geometry is described by Einstein's field equations for the space-time metric, but this description is only valid as a low energy limit or thermal average (a thermodynamic equation of state) that is valid near thermal equilibrium.

If we apply the usual unification mechanisms of super-symmetry and the Kaluza-Klein mechanism of extra compactified dimensions of space to Einstein's field equations, we end up with something that looks like 11-dimensional super-gravity, which includes all the quantum fields of the standard model of particle physics. A so-called fundamental (point) particle is then understood as a localized (quantized) excitation of energy and momentum of a quantum field (a wave packet) in the extended dimensions of space and time, while the internal structure of the point particle (like electric and nuclear charges) arises from momentum quantized in extra compactified dimensions of space. Since this description is at best a thermal average or low energy limit valid only near thermal equilibrium, there really is no such thing as fundamental particles. A photon or electron is no more fundamental than a phonon of sound waves.

Avtar objects that this description of an observable world requires a false vacuum state of non-zero dark energy to arise from the true vacuum state, but this assumption is exactly the same assumption made in inflationary cosmology, which is our best theory of the big bang event. The false vacuum state is a metastable state in the sense of symmetry breaking. As inflationary cosmology assumes, dark energy is what puts the "bang" in the big bang event, but since it arises in a metastable false vacuum state, dark energy can burn away and transition to a more stable state of lower dark energy, which explains the early accelerated expansion of the universe shortly after the big bang occurred. The only problem with inflationary cosmology is it's based on quantum field theory, and assumes that as dark energy burns away a "bubble" of false vacuum (characterized by a lower but still non-zero value of dark energy) is created, which is our universe. The problem with these "bubble universes" is that quantum field theory is only valid near thermal equilibrium, but the transition to a lower value of dark energy (the inflationary phase of the universe) is not even close to thermal equilibrium. It's a phase transition. Only the holographic principle solves this problem. What inflates in size as dark energy burns away is not a "bubble universe", but the observer's cosmic horizon.

Nice (and coherent up to here with computationalism).



The answer to Avtar's objection about a multiverse is there's no such thing, only an observer and its observable world. There is no measurement paradox since there is only a single observer observing its own world. Since the observer's cosmic horizon acts as a holographic screen that projects all the animated images of the observer's world to the observer's central point of view, it is the observer's world that inflates in size as dark energy burns away and transitions to a lower value. As the cosmic horizon inflates in size, it cools in temperature. In this burning process, heat is radiated away to infinity. The thermal gradient created as the cosmic horizon inflates in size and cools in temperature and the radiation of heat to infinity is what thermodynamically drives the normal flow of energy through the observer's world.


Interesting. But seems to depart from "digital mechanism" (alias computationalism).



Say what you will about my assumptions, but there is nothing unscientific or paradoxical about this description of the observable world,

It describes well the observable world, but I am less sure for the "real", non-observable reality. It is in any case too much advanced to be tested with Mechanism today.




which is to the primordial nature of consciousness the same way a dream is to a dreamer.

That is what you should elaborate, because here you are quite quick. Despite mechanism suggests also that there is only one person, the dreams are multiple, and do interfere statistically. In the Mechanist theory, there is only one person, but that person becomes a many, and this is a genuine phenomenon in arithmetic at the origin of the (infinitely) many "physical illusions".

Bruno







To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sa...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

jim kowall

unread,
Jul 25, 2017, 9:43:18 PM7/25/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
Dear Bruno

See Noncommutative Geometry for Pedestrians by J Madore at


https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9906059


The article is a bit technical, but you only need to grasp the first few pages leading up to where he discusses the holographic principle in terms of non-commuting variables. This is the 't Hooft idea of the entropy of a black hole encoded on the horizon.


Also take a look at Amanda Gefter's book Trespassing on Einstein's Lawn, especially the chapter where she interviews Tom Banks. The entire book is well worth reading, but if you don't have the time, at least read the chapter where she interviews Banks and the final chapter where she sums everything up. You can find it cheaply at Amazon as a kindle book and read it online with their cloud reader.


Here's my answer your other comments:


There are two concepts that help explain a lot about life in a holographic world. The first is the idea of a consensual reality and information sharing. Each observer has it own world defined on its own holographic screen (cosmic horizon), but many observers can share a consensual reality to the degree their respective horizons overlap and share information in the sense of a Venn diagram, like the kind of information sharing we see in a network of screens (like the internet).


The second idea is bias in the focus of attention of consciousness. The observer's holographic screen only encodes bits of information, and there is always a state of potentiality defined by all possible ways in which information can become encoded on the screen. A screen output must choose a particular configuration state of information. This choice is somehow influenced by the focus of attention of the consciousness of the observer. The only way the laws of physics can have any predictability is if these choices are made in an unbiased or random way, which is what quantum theory assumes with the idea of a quantum state reduction as the basis for an observational event. If bias arises in the way choices are made, then all bets are off and the laws of physics lose their predictability, which must be the case if the focus of attention of the consciousness of the observer becomes biased. Bias in the observer's focus of attention not only influences what the observer observes in its world, but also which path the observer appears to follow through its world. The quantum state of potentiality is a sum over all possible configuration states of information, but it is also a sum over all possible paths the observer can appear to follow. As the observer observes events projected from its holographic screen over an animated sequence of screen outputs, the observer appears to follow the path of an accelerated world-line through the projected and animated space-time geometry of its world. Quantum theory tells us the most likely path in the sense of quantum probability is the path of least action, which is like the shortest distance between two points in a curved space-time geometry. This is the path the observer tends to follow as long as choices are made in an unbiased way, but when bias is expressed, the observer's path can deviate from the path of least action in unpredictable ways. This kind of bias in observation is an interference in the normal flow of things, which tends to follow the path of least action since it arises with unbiased choice. This is an interference in the sense of the interference pattern inherent in the state of potentiality and the unpredictable path the observer follows when bias is expressed in choice. When the observer's focus of attention becomes biased, the choices made become biased and so observations also become biased.


Emotional bias in the observer's focus of attention leads to the expression of biased emotions in a kind of emotional feedback loop, which leads the observer to emotionally (falsely) identify itself with its character and attach itself to things in its world. Once the observer emotionally identifies itself with its character and attaches itself to things, it feels compelled to defend the form of its character and those things as though its existence depends on it. This is a state of emotional bondage, which is why Plato called a self-identified observer a prisoner. All the self-defensive craziness we see in the world can be understood in terms of the self-identification and emotional attachment that arises with emotional bias in the observer's focus of attention. In reality, the observer is only watching animated images of the world projected from a holographic screen. Those images are no more real than images perceived in a dream. The true source of the observer's existence is not the world, but the undifferentiated consciousness of the void (the dreamer).


Jim


...

[Message clipped]  

Bruno Marchal

unread,
Jul 26, 2017, 1:36:28 PM7/26/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
Dear Jim,


On 25 Jul 2017, at 23:47, jim kowall wrote:



See Noncommutative Geometry for Pedestrians by J Madore at



Very interesting. It is the type of work which makes me fear that the Number theorists will find the "physical object" before the theologians of number, which could lead to the "arithmeticalist error", and still missing the qualia.

My approach start from the fact that the self-observing machine discover its lilmitation, and quickly bet on something transcendent, having, at the propositional level, a decidable theory. All the views split then into the communicable and the non communicable part, and quanta are particular qualia (the first person plural sharable one). That gives a quantum logic, but an infinity of work remains to be done.





The article is a bit technical, but you only need to grasp the first few pages leading up to where he discusses the holographic principle in terms of non-commuting variables. This is the 't Hooft idea of the entropy of a black hole encoded on the horizon.

Also take a look at Amanda Gefter's book Trespassing on Einstein's Lawn, especially the chapter where she interviews Tom Banks. The entire book is well worth reading, but if you don't have the time, at least read the chapter where she interviews Banks and the final chapter where she sums everything up. You can find it cheaply at Amazon as a kindle book and read it online with their cloud reader.



I will take a look. Keep in mind that I do not assume the existence of a physical universe. I appreciate 't Hooft idea in physics, but I am not sure of its metaphysics, and lifting physics to metaphysics is perilous without making precise the theory of mind used. 

Most materialists assumes a one-one identity between mind and brain, or between conscious person and brain, but computer science shows this is invalid when we assume mechanism. We can still ascribe a mind to a machine/number, but the machine/number itself can only ascribe its own mind to an infinity of machine/numbers. And that minds can differentiate on different paths.






Here's my answer your other comments:

There are two concepts that help explain a lot about life in a holographic world. The first is the idea of a consensual reality and information sharing. Each observer has it own world defined on its own holographic screen (cosmic horizon), but many observers can share a consensual reality to the degree their respective horizons overlap and share information in the sense of a Venn diagram, like the kind of information sharing we see in a network of screens (like the internet).

Wow! Interesting.

That might be along the way.

I see the physicists as digging on the mind-body-problem wall, and the neoplatonic logician digging staring from the other side of the wall.

If we are both correct, we can only meet.





The second idea is bias in the focus of attention of consciousness. The observer's holographic screen only encodes bits of information, and there is always a state of potentiality defined by all possible ways in which information can become encoded on the screen. A screen output must choose a particular configuration state of information. This choice is somehow influenced by the focus of attention of the consciousness of the observer.


With Mechanism, the n-dimensional reduces to the n-1 dimensional, up to 0. What you say here might apply at a different level. It is hard for me to judge if it is fundamental or not, and that might be related to our mechanist substitution level.

Are you aware of Moonshine? and vertex operator algebra? I like to say that the physical reality is a symphony played by e, pi, i, 1, 0 and the number 24. (The favorite number of Ramanujan).






The only way the laws of physics can have any predictability is if these choices are made in an unbiased or random way, which is what quantum theory assumes with the idea of a quantum state reduction as the basis for an observational event.


Which, without collapse of the wave packet, is more a selection than a reduction. With Mechanism, this is provided by the first person indeterminacy in self-multiplication experience, or in the form of the many preparation (in arithmetic, the universal wave, cosmic consciousness ... from inside its main feature are not nameable).




If bias arises in the way choices are made, then all bets are off and the laws of physics lose their predictability,

This depends of the level. Nature said that the human can't fly, yet they fly, without disobeying to the physical laws. But I am obvious here.





which must be the case if the focus of attention of the consciousness of the observer becomes biased. Bias in the observer's focus of attention not only influences what the observer observes in its world, but also which path the observer appears to follow through its world. The quantum state of potentiality is a sum over all possible configuration states of information, but it is also a sum over all possible paths the observer can appear to follow.


I can make sense of this (in (meta)-arithmetic).




As the observer observes events projected from its holographic screen over an animated sequence of screen outputs, the observer appears to follow the path of an accelerated world-line through the projected and animated space-time geometry of its world.

That would made consciousness equal to gravitation, the ultimate mover. May be. That would provide a non-collapse phenomenology of some ideas of Penrose, but that is very speculative.






Quantum theory tells us the most likely path in the sense of quantum probability is the path of least action, which is like the shortest distance between two points in a curved space-time geometry.

OK. That follows from Feynman formulation of QM. (In which the collapse makes no-sense).



This is the path the observer tends to follow as long as choices are made in an unbiased way,

Yes, By the randomization of the phase of the many aberrant path which leads to close to zero probabilities. This is what is still proposed but lacking with Mechanism.



but when bias is expressed, the observer's path can deviate from the path of least action in unpredictable ways.


What expresses the bias?




This kind of bias in observation is an interference in the normal flow of things, which tends to follow the path of least action since it arises with unbiased choice. This is an interference in the sense of the interference pattern inherent in the state of potentiality and the unpredictable path the observer follows when bias is expressed in choice. When the observer's focus of attention becomes biased, the choices made become biased and so observations also become biased.

Emotional bias in the observer's focus of attention leads to the expression of biased emotions in a kind of emotional feedback loop, which leads the observer to emotionally (falsely) identify itself with its character and attach itself to things in its world. Once the observer emotionally identifies itself with its character and attaches itself to things, it feels compelled to defend the form of its character and those things as though its existence depends on it. This is a state of emotional bondage, which is why Plato called a self-identified observer a prisoner.

OK. Good.



All the self-defensive craziness we see in the world can be understood in terms of the self-identification and emotional attachment that arises with emotional bias in the observer's focus of attention. In reality, the observer is only watching animated images of the world projected from a holographic screen. Those images are no more real than images perceived in a dream. The true source of the observer's existence is not the world, but the undifferentiated consciousness of the void (the dreamer).


I will think about this. Thanks for the explanations.

I have discovered the entry on Neoplatonism of the Standford Library(*). It provides a very nice and clear introduction. In my opinion, the resemblance with the Vedanta (the Advaita Vedanta) strikes the eyes, and so it is also very close to the literal theology of the (Gödel-Löbian) universal machine. The true source of all phenomenological existence is the undifferentiated consciousness of the ... universal machine (I think), and the first person indeterminacy is on some abstract limit of all the dreams, which might be like an hologram. My dialog with the universal machine has not yet gone that far! though.

Best,

Bruno






--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sa...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

jim kowall

unread,
Jul 27, 2017, 8:27:16 PM7/27/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
Hi Bruno

"Why chatter about delusion and enlightenment?"-Ryokan


Thank you for your detailed and interesting reply. I need to learn more about your approach before I can comment about it, but I'd like to discuss bias in the focus of attention of consciousness. As I see it, without the possibility of bias in the focus of attention there's no possibility of either delusion or enlightenment. Bias in the focus of attention is what gives us the possibility of "free will", but as Nisargadatta says "There is no such thing as free will. Will is bondage". The irony is emotional bias in the focus of attention of consciousness, which is the expression of free will, is what leads the observer to emotionally (falsely) identify itself with its character in its observable world, which is a state of emotional bondage. The willingness to relinquish this expression of free will (the illusion of control) is what leads to enlightenment. Without emotional bias in the observer's focus of attention it's not possible for the observer to emotionally identify itself with its character, since only the expression of biased emotions (as perceived by the observer) can make the observer feel self-limited to the form of its character.


Two things about the focus of attention are worth mentioning. The first is the experience of the "light of consciousness" with enlightenment. The observer is only a focal point of consciousness (which in terms of the holographic principle arises in relation to a holographic screen at the central point of view), but the light of consciousness emanates from that focal point. In the sense of holographic projection, the light of consciousness is what projects images of the observer's world from the screen to the observer's central point of view in a sequence of screen outputs, much like the light of a laser projects images from a physical hologram or the light of a movie projector projects movie images from a movie screen. The focus of attention of consciousness is directed by the way the light of consciousness is directed. The second thing is the connection between emotional bias in the focus of attention and the expression of biased emotional energy in a kind of emotional feedback loop. This connection has to do with how the focus of attention can lead to choice in the sense of what configuration state of information is chosen from the quantum state of potentiality in a screen output, or which path (world-line) through the projected space-time geometry of the observer's world the observer appears to follow over a sequence of screen outputs. The observer cannot really control the flow of energy through its world (anymore than holding up a hand can stop a tsunami), but the observer can interfere with the normal flow of energy through its world when its focus of attention becomes emotionally biased, and that can lead to the expression of biased emotions by its character, which is the only way the observer can feel self-limited to (and emotionally identify itself with) the emotionally animated form of its character.


Jim

Dear Jim,


To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.

Bruno Marchal

unread,
Jul 30, 2017, 1:41:02 PM7/30/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
On 28 Jul 2017, at 01:57, jim kowall wrote:

Hi Bruno

"Why chatter about delusion and enlightenment?"-Ryokan

Thank you for your detailed and interesting reply. I need to learn more about your approach before I can comment about it, but I'd like to discuss bias in the focus of attention of consciousness. As I see it, without the possibility of bias in the focus of attention there's no possibility of either delusion or enlightenment. Bias in the focus of attention is what gives us the possibility of "free will", but as Nisargadatta says "There is no such thing as free will. Will is bondage".


I certainly do not believe in many theories of free-will, which I find quite absurd. But I think that *some* theory of free-will are compatible with the Mechanist Hypothesis (in cognitive science), which is my (biased) focus of interest.





The irony is emotional bias in the focus of attention of consciousness, which is the expression of free will, is what leads the observer to emotionally (falsely) identify itself with its character in its observable world, which is a state of emotional bondage.

I am not entirely sure of this, but the issue might concern more the vocabulary than the idea. I would say that the more enlightening an experience is, the more "free-will" we have. With the absolute enlightening, the free-will is infinite. It is were we get the unconceivable freedom talked about in the VimalakirtiNirdesa. But "infinite freedom" is a bit a metaphor.

Note that some enlightenment technics are fake, and makes the student into a slave, and the Master into an exploiter of others.





The willingness to relinquish this expression of free will (the illusion of control) is what leads to enlightenment.

I am not sure. The willingness itself might be an handicap. That too needs to be relinquished ... without control.




Without emotional bias in the observer's focus of attention it's not possible for the observer to emotionally identify itself with its character, since only the expression of biased emotions (as perceived by the observer) can make the observer feel self-limited to the form of its character.

I think I see what you mean. The "character" is oftej called the Little Ego, and that one must go away, if one want to remind the higher self we are.




Two things about the focus of attention are worth mentioning. The first is the experience of the "light of consciousness" with enlightenment. The observer is only a focal point of consciousness (which in terms of the holographic principle arises in relation to a holographic screen at the central point of view), but the light of consciousness emanates from that focal point. In the sense of holographic projection, the light of consciousness is what projects images of the observer's world from the screen to the observer's central point of view in a sequence of screen outputs, much like the light of a laser projects images from a physical hologram or the light of a movie projector projects movie images from a movie screen. The focus of attention of consciousness is directed by the way the light of consciousness is directed. The second thing is the connection between emotional bias in the focus of attention and the expression of biased emotional energy in a kind of emotional feedback loop. This connection has to do with how the focus of attention can lead to choice in the sense of what configuration state of information is chosen from the quantum state of potentiality in a screen output, or which path (world-line) through the projected space-time geometry of the observer's world the observer appears to follow over a sequence of screen outputs. The observer cannot really control the flow of energy through its world (anymore than holding up a hand can stop a tsunami), but the observer can interfere with the normal flow of energy through its world when its focus of attention becomes emotionally biased, and that can lead to the expression of biased emotions by its character, which is the only way the observer can feel self-limited to (and emotionally identify itself with) the emotionally animated form of its character.

Yet, when you come back from there, you need to re-build enough of the Little Ego, if only to help the others, and that is why the last step of the enlightenment is the most difficult: the coming back in the village, the coming back on the terrestrial plane. This is because "heping the others" is not possible without some bias and focus. But if done properly, some seems able to enact the little ego, without losing the higher self perspective, at least for some period of time. It is very difficult.

Thank you for the precisions, best,

Bruno






To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sa...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Whit Blauvelt

unread,
Jul 30, 2017, 4:22:00 PM7/30/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 05:39:29PM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:

> I certainly do not believe in many theories of free-will, which I find quite
> absurd. But I think that *some* theory of free-will are compatible with the
> Mechanist Hypothesis (in cognitive science), which is my (biased) focus of
> interest.
>
> The willingness to relinquish this expression of free will (the illusion of
> control) is what leads to enlightenment.
>
> I am not sure. The willingness itself might be an handicap. That too needs to
> be relinquished ... without control.

Hi Bruno,

Can you list some of the "many theories of free-will"? I ask because I'm not
quite sure there are any, as such. There are many arguments for for a
supposed illusion. But they all assume that free will is just evident to our
common sense. The counter-arguments to those theories of an illusion also,
for the most part, assume that once the supposedly falacious arguments
against free will are shown as such, common sense will prevail.

Can enlightenment of any sort depend on a theory? Or is enlightenment a
shift in common sense, so that it is our view of the world that shifts, that
is enlightened, and not just our words about it?

My claim, as a practical, pragmatic matter, is that nobody actually _sees_
the world as if they had no free will -- no one we'd account sane, at
least. Many are persuaded of the virtues of various arguments about
illusion; but virtually nobody actually shifts their vision so that,
moment-by-moment, they see the world in a congruent way that accords with
the illusion-of-will premise.

You pointing out that the will to relinquish the will is still assuming that
you have freedom of the will is appreciated, and to the point. What would it
mean to _see_ the world as if you had no free will? It would mean to stop
trying to convince yourself to freely do one thing or the other; and to stop
trying to convince anyone else, either, as such attempts presume _their_
freedom.

If I can choose to accept your argument for or against free will, then I
have free will.

Best,
Whit

N.Panchapakesan

unread,
Jul 31, 2017, 4:50:05 AM7/31/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com

N. Panchapakesan
New Delhi, India
               One could say detachment , instead of "without some bias or focus". Helping others requires giving up detachment. One could say more generally, "Coming back and living in this world (or village) requires  the little ego or giving up detachment."


> Thank you for the precisions, best,
>
> Bruno
>
>
>.      About free will, I completely agree with Whit.
>.   For the first time I understand the words in my language  which mean  same as in your language.

  I do not know if we are o the same wavelength now. If not forgive my intrusion.
>
> Panchu
>>>> From: online_sa...@googlegroups.com
>>>> <online_sa...@googlegroups.com> on behalf of jim kowall

>>>> <jkowa...@gmail.com>
>>>> Sent: Saturday, 22 July 2017 6:07 AM
>>>> From: online_sa...@googlegroups.com
>>>> <online_sa...@googlegroups.com> on behalf of jim kowall

>>>> <jkowa...@gmail.com>
>>>> Sent: Friday, 21 July 2017 6:17 AM
>>>>
>>>> From: online_sa...@googlegroups.com
>>>> <online_sa...@googlegroups.com> on behalf of jim kowall

>>>> <jkowa...@gmail.com>
>>>> Sent: Thursday, 20 July 2017 7:07 AM
>> email to Online_Sadhu_Sa...@googlegroups.com.
>> To post to this group, send email to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com.
>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit

Bruno Marchal

unread,
Jul 31, 2017, 9:11:15 AM7/31/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
Dear Whit,
I was alluding to all theories of free-will which base it on the
existence of third person indeterminacy.

Those are called (in philosophy of mind) "incompatibilist theory".

I favor the compatibilist theories, which base free-will on 3p-
determinacy. It is because we can predict the future, that we can be
aware of not being able to predict our personal decision. Free-will is
a routine of the mind, a sort of control structure, to handle self-
indeterminacy, based on self-ignorance (intrinsic for machine).





>
> Can enlightenment of any sort depend on a theory?

It depends on reality only, for which we can only propose and improve,
or refute, some theories. The theory are only lantern to put some
light on the unknown (and sometimes create shadows, not to be confused
with reality (difficult).



> Or is enlightenment a
> shift in common sense, so that it is our view of the world that
> shifts, that
> is enlightened, and not just our words about it?

We can see enlightenment in this way. I guess. The "absolute
enlightenment" might be the total shift from an Heraclitean view of
reality (where all is impermanent and dynamical) to a Parmenidian view
of reality (where there is no time, no space, no particles, no waves,
but still possibly numbers and addition and multiplication
(necessarily so in the computationalist frame).



>
> My claim, as a practical, pragmatic matter, is that nobody actually
> _sees_
> the world as if they had no free will -- no one we'd account sane, at
> least. Many are persuaded of the virtues of various arguments about
> illusion; but virtually nobody actually shifts their vision so that,
> moment-by-moment, they see the world in a congruent way that accords
> with
> the illusion-of-will premise.

30% of Salvia divinorum experiencer do this, for some short, or
longer, time after using that product. Yes, it is very difficult to
stay there and be here, although some approximation of this can be
instantiated.

I have some reason to think that we do that every night.

We don't remember it, because we are programmed to live, and this
experience is really like dying. To stay alive, some amount of
illusion is necessary. We cannot bear full clarity with the eyes open.
It would also spoil the "movie of life".
Enlightenment is easy (in that theory), indeed dying in peace with
oneself might be enough, but being enlighten, and *staying* in that
way when accomplishing terrestrial activities is the very hard task.
It is almost non sensical to do that.



>
> You pointing out that the will to relinquish the will is still
> assuming that
> you have freedom of the will is appreciated, and to the point. What
> would it
> mean to _see_ the world as if you had no free will? It would mean to
> stop
> trying to convince yourself to freely do one thing or the other; and
> to stop
> trying to convince anyone else, either, as such attempts presume
> _their_
> freedom.
>
> If I can choose to accept your argument for or against free will,
> then I
> have free will.

I like to quote Orwell on this (in 1984): freedom is the ability to
say 2+2=4.

You can't really accept or not an argument. You need to understand it,
or find a flaw. The free-will will consist in rejecting the theory, or
not, in which such an argument makes sense.

Have you heard about meta-games? Those are games where you are allowed
to change the rule of the game during a play. Of course, you need meta-
rules, to change the rules of the game in some interesting way. But
some version allows changing the meta-rules too, and so one. Free will
is a bit like that. It is limited by the constraints of life (Nature's
argument per authority!). Ultimate free-will would be like absolute
death, and absence of any rule. For the machines, even suicide does
not lead to such an absolute death, which might or not exist. Cutting
the cycle of death and life is not easy: it asks for some amount of
work, and much more so when trying to come back in the village and
help others (if that is possible).

Best,

Bruno




> --
> ----------------------------
> Fifth International Conference
> Science and Scientist - 2017
> August 18—19, 2017
> Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
> http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
>
> Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
> (All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their
> contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
>
> Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
>
> Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
>
> Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085
> 138
>
> Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
>
> Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
>
> Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
>
> Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
>
> Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
>
> Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri
> Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
> send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sa...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
> .
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/
> Online_Sadhu_Sanga.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/Online_Sadhu_Sanga/20170730200101.GA30458%40black.transpect.com
> .

Whit Blauvelt

unread,
Jul 31, 2017, 10:16:23 AM7/31/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 12:50:09PM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> Dear Whit,

> Those are called (in philosophy of mind) "incompatibilist theory".
>
> I favor the compatibilist theories, which base free-will on 3p-determinacy.
> It is because we can predict the future, that we can be aware of not being
> able to predict our personal decision. Free-will is a routine of the mind, a
> sort of control structure, to handle self-indeterminacy, based on
> self-ignorance (intrinsic for machine).

Hi Bruno,

I'm aware of the compatibilists (e.g. Dennett). However I deny they are
truly theories of free will; instead they are theories of an illusion of
free will -- that we have an illusion of free will which is compatible with
our actually having none. Yes, there are those of use who find compatiblism
incoherent. But that's not a theory about free will, that's a critique of a
theory of illusion.

> >Can enlightenment of any sort depend on a theory?
>
> It depends on reality only, for which we can only propose and improve, or
> refute, some theories. The theory are only lantern to put some light on the
> unknown (and sometimes create shadows, not to be confused with reality
> (difficult).

Agreed.

> >Or is enlightenment a shift in common sense, so that it is our view of
> >the world that shifts, that is enlightened, and not just our words about
> >it?
>
> We can see enlightenment in this way. I guess. The "absolute enlightenment"
> might be the total shift from an Heraclitean view of reality (where all is
> impermanent and dynamical) to a Parmenidian view of reality (where there is
> no time, no space, no particles, no waves, but still possibly numbers and
> addition and multiplication (necessarily so in the computationalist frame).

Jonathan Bricklin has an nice book about William James' drift towards a
Parmenidian view.

> >My claim, as a practical, pragmatic matter, is that nobody actually _sees_
> >the world as if they had no free will -- no one we'd account sane, at
> >least. Many are persuaded of the virtues of various arguments about
> >illusion; but virtually nobody actually shifts their vision so that,
> >moment-by-moment, they see the world in a congruent way that accords with
> >the illusion-of-will premise.
>
> 30% of Salvia divinorum experiencer do this, for some short, or longer, time
> after using that product. Yes, it is very difficult to stay there and be
> here, although some approximation of this can be instantiated.

Never tried that one. Bricklin claims a similar experience during a
meditation retreat. I've no doubt such experience is available. My doubt is
that anyone lives in such a state outside of monastic settings, or their
equivalent. If you're in a place and time designed to eliminate any need for
choices, yes you can give them up. The truths of more worth to me are those
which can be carried through the normal world.

> I have some reason to think that we do that every night.
>
> We don't remember it, because we are programmed to live, and this
> experience is really like dying. To stay alive, some amount of illusion is
> necessary. We cannot bear full clarity with the eyes open. It would also
> spoil the "movie of life". Enlightenment is easy (in that theory), indeed
> dying in peace with oneself might be enough, but being enlighten, and
> *staying* in that way when accomplishing terrestrial activities is the
> very hard task. It is almost non sensical to do that.

Death as part of life, I accept; death as superior to life I will not.

> >You pointing out that the will to relinquish the will is still assuming
> >that you have freedom of the will is appreciated, and to the point. What
> >would it mean to _see_ the world as if you had no free will? It would
> >mean to stop trying to convince yourself to freely do one thing or the
> >other; and to stop trying to convince anyone else, either, as such
> >attempts presume _their_ freedom.
> >
> >If I can choose to accept your argument for or against free will, then I
> >have free will.
>
> I like to quote Orwell on this (in 1984): freedom is the ability to say
> 2+2=4.
>
> You can't really accept or not an argument. You need to understand it, or
> find a flaw. The free-will will consist in rejecting the theory, or not, in
> which such an argument makes sense.

I find a serious flaw in all arguments against free will: We cannot live as
if we believed them, in this world. I do not believe, fundamentally, we're
born into a world in which we must live a lie. Freedom is the essence of the
world, of creativity, of life. I've had my own mystical experiences which
support this. They are not arguments per se. But they're convincing, for me.

> Have you heard about meta-games? Those are games where you are allowed to
> change the rule of the game during a play. Of course, you need meta-rules,
> to change the rules of the game in some interesting way. But some version
> allows changing the meta-rules too, and so one. Free will is a bit like
> that. It is limited by the constraints of life (Nature's argument per
> authority!). Ultimate free-will would be like absolute death, and absence of
> any rule. For the machines, even suicide does not lead to such an absolute
> death, which might or not exist. Cutting the cycle of death and life is not
> easy: it asks for some amount of work, and much more so when trying to come
> back in the village and help others (if that is possible).

Most slippery slope arguments are absurdities. You're presenting one: That
if we have some freedom, it's a slippery slope to where we gain so much
freedom that the laws of the universe dissolve into total anarchy. That's
also the agument of every dictator against freedom. It's total bull. The
same argument can be made in reverse: That if we have some restriction, it's
a slippery slope to where we're totally restricted. Obviously the real world
happens in the nexus, in the blend of free and determined aspects.

Best,
Whit

C. S. Morrison

unread,
Aug 1, 2017, 5:09:40 AM8/1/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com, Whit Blauvelt

Dear Whit

I have a theory of free will.  It is published in my book The Blind Mindmaker (available on Amazon). In short, it proposes that a consciousness is the aspect of nature that freely selects the position of a single quantum particle from a subjective experience where all the possible positions of that particle are represented in qualia that fully determine their probability of being selected (by making them more or less salient in the experience of that consciousness). After showing that this view of consciousness is the only one that does not demand unscientific functionalistic laws to account for the existence and organisation of our qualia,  it then reveals a set of selection pressures that would result in the adaptation of this free will by an organism's brain, and the subsequent reorganisation of the particle's experience into a form that represents the organism's sensory input and state of mind (present, past or imagined).

I believe those who so confidently claim free will to be an illusion are forgetting that the only scientific means of accounting for the organisation of any example of seemingly perfect functional design in a living organism is Darwinian natural selection. That process demands that the organised structure have some effect upon its environment that varies in different ways with all the different possible organisations.  And as my book argues,  the only known substance that has the required properties to evolve into the amazing representation of reality we experience is the wave function of a quantum particle, THE EFFECT OF WHICH IS NOT DETERMINISTIC. Although some interpretations of QM argue that this indeterminism is an illusion and that at a deeper level all is really deterministic,  that view is not supported by our experience of consciousness and the way it has evolved.  Why would nature need to give us painful experience when our body is sustaining damage if not to try to persuade us to choose non-damaging options? Why would we evolve to have enjoyable sensations with beneficial circumstances if not to encourage us to keep our body in those situations.  Why would objects that reflect more light and acoustic waves in our direction get represented by stronger,  more salient,  qualia if not to persuade us to make our organism attend to them rather than some other stimulus.  If we didn't have any free choice, such an organisation of experience would be completely unnecessary and would not therefore have evolved.

Best wishes,
Colin

 C.  S.  Morrison - Author of THE BLIND MINDMAKER: Explaining Consciousness without Magic or Misrepresentation.

https://www.amazon.com/Blind-Mindmaker-Explaining-Consciousness-Misrepresentation/dp/1541283953

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Blind-Mindmaker-Explaining-Consciousness-Misrepresentation/dp/1541283953




Send from Huawei Y360

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017

Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)

Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports

Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03

Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138

Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer

Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin

Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org

Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org

Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga

Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sa...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

Bruno Marchal

unread,
Aug 1, 2017, 7:11:15 AM8/1/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
Dear Colin,


On 01 Aug 2017, at 11:06, C. S. Morrison wrote:

Dear Whit

I have a theory of free will.  It is published in my book The Blind Mindmaker (available on Amazon). In short, it proposes that a consciousness is the aspect of nature that freely selects the position of a single quantum particle from a subjective experience where all the possible positions of that particle are represented in qualia that fully determine their probability of being selected (by making them more or less salient in the experience of that consciousness). After showing that this view of consciousness is the only one that does not demand unscientific functionalistic laws to account for the existence and organisation of our qualia,  it then reveals a set of selection pressures that would result in the adaptation of this free will by an organism's brain, and the subsequent reorganisation of the particle's experience into a form that represents the organism's sensory input and state of mind (present, past or imagined).

I believe those who so confidently claim free will to be an illusion are forgetting that the only scientific means of accounting for the organisation of any example of seemingly perfect functional design in a living organism is Darwinian natural selection. That process demands that the organised structure have some effect upon its environment that varies in different ways with all the different possible organisations.  And as my book argues,  the only known substance that has the required properties to evolve into the amazing representation of reality we experience is the wave function of a quantum particle, THE EFFECT OF WHICH IS NOT DETERMINISTIC.


How non determinism would help free-will?

I believe in free-will, but in my opinion, indeterminacy would threaten it more than sustain it.



Although some interpretations of QM argue that this indeterminism is an illusion and that at a deeper level all is really deterministic,  that view is not supported by our experience of consciousness and the way it has evolved. 


Even in a determinist reality, machines are confronted to many different form of indeterminacies, *from their points of view". That a god could predict what I will do does not throw away my free will. Like Hofstadter said once, we express often free-will by "I am determined to do this or that".




Why would nature need to give us painful experience when our body is sustaining damage if not to try to persuade us to choose non-damaging options? Why would we evolve to have enjoyable sensations with beneficial circumstances if not to encourage us to keep our body in those situations.  Why would objects that reflect more light and acoustic waves in our direction get represented by stronger,  more salient,  qualia if not to persuade us to make our organism attend to them rather than some other stimulus.  If we didn't have any free choice, such an organisation of experience would be completely unnecessary and would not therefore have evolved.

I can agree with this, but some would take this as an argument against free will. If you act to avoid a pain, you don't act freely, they would say. I disagree with them, but it is tricky to convince by them. We will have other opportunity to discuss this interesting but subtle notion.

Best,

Bruno



For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Whit Blauvelt

unread,
Aug 1, 2017, 9:50:09 AM8/1/17
to C. S. Morrison, Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
Hi Colin,

Do you differentiate your approach from Henry Stapp's invocation of the
quantum zeno effect, which seems similar?

When you say an "aspect of nature ... freely selects the position," are you
implying the aspect of nature _is_ consciousness? Or something else of which
naming is difficult?

A standard response to the wave function not being deterministic as an
argument for freedom is that randomness is not order, either. And
consciousness is ordered, so merely being nondeterministic, because random,
cannot be enough.

Most determinists come from specific backgrounds in learning, emphasizing
certain theories in physics. What I think they miss is that there are a
great many other fields of learning, particularly about humanity, which
accept freedom as a postulate, which have substantial accomplishments, and
which would be reduced to rubble if freedom were truly proven an illusion. I
have no commitment to physics being presently perfect enough to prove
determinism. On the other hand, nor am I committed to history or psychology
or sociology or economics or any of the many other substantial fields of
learning as being perfect. But I'm committed to all those fields containing
substantial insights and advances -- all dependent on the assumption of
freedom. On balance, they prove freedom works as a premise.

The evolutionary argument you make also has another response, which perhaps
you've dealt with -- Stephen Jay Gould's theory of spandrels -- that
evolution produces byproducts which are not themselves Darwinian selections.
Despite raising this, I generally agree with you: there's no Darwinian world
which includes consciousness where the advantages of consciousness are not
real enough to be selected for.

Best,
Whit

BMP

unread,
Aug 1, 2017, 9:50:09 AM8/1/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
Dear Whit and  friends

Namaste. Hegel offers that freedom [of the self volitionally, cognitionally or emotionally] conceived as whimsy/arbitrariness or basically autonomy is an abstraction from the necessity that characterizes reality.  Freedom is to recognize that necessity is what we ourselves rationally make of it. This has been expressed by the saying "we give the law unto ourselves."

Consider the laws of gravity as conceived by Newton. It is our own reason that recognizes itself in such laws in so far as we accept them as laws of Nature. Likewise it is our own reason that accepts whatever we consider necessary in whatever conception we have of the world in which we live.

The laws of the State in which we live are accepted as rational by those who follow them or else we could not follow them against our own reason without serious repercussions.  They are also created by us as rational beings so we naturally follow them. They are outward expressions of our own internal sense of rational necessity and so by following them we feel we are following our own reason - and this is freedom. Those who do not follow such laws that we have all given ourselves and to which we freely subject ourselves, are subject to loss of their freedom [i.e imprisonment/punishment] as the law that we ourselves establish, while those who do follow the law maintain their freedom. This is concrete freedom of will.

This may seem contradictory but the opposition between necessity and freedom is abstractly conceived if we don't understand the essential relation they bear to each other [we may call it an identity in difference].

Sincerely,
B Madhava Puri, Ph.D.
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute







From: Whit Blauvelt <wh...@csmind.com>
To: Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sunday, July 30, 2017 4:20 PM

Subject: Re: [Sadhu Sanga] Which came first, consciousness or the brain?

Whit Blauvelt

unread,
Aug 1, 2017, 10:25:10 AM8/1/17
to 'BMP' via Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D.
Dear Dr. Puri,

Namaste. Thanks for adding these perspectives.

Our whole notion of "determination" comes from our essential personal
experience in determining things. The infant learns cause and effect by
carefully experimenting with causing effects.

So we would have no conception of "determinism" if we were not, in our own
experience, essentially free -- free within restraints, to be sure. Ceteris
paribus we are bound by gravity, for example.

Without freedom, there would be no perspective from which to gain either the
concept of freedom, nor the concept of determinism. That we have such
concepts proves our freedom is real. Similarly there is a recently proposed
test for consciousness in machines: that to have anything like the concept
of consciousness humans have, a machine would have to be conscious itself.

Best regards,
Whit

jim kowall

unread,
Aug 1, 2017, 4:04:47 PM8/1/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
Dear Bruno and Whit

"People don't know what they don't know"-Jed McKenna


Spiritual enlightenment or truth-realization as a topic for discussion has a literature with a history extending back thousands of years, with descriptions in the Tao, Advaita, and Zen. It also has many recent descriptions. My favorite recent descriptions are those by Jed McKenna, Nisargadatta and Osho. I find the descriptions of these three fellows to be detailed, complete and logically consistent, which is important for a scientific mind like mine. The most important point to make is that spiritual enlightenment or truth-realization has the nature of awakening from the dream. When the dreamer awakens from its dream, everything in dreamer's dream disappears and only the true nature of the dreamer remains. The true nature of the dreamer can be called the underlying reality of the dream. The terms ultimate or absolute reality are also good. The dream reality isn't really real, since it's like a virtual reality that disappears when the dreamer awakens, leaving only the underlying reality of the dream to remain. The problem is spiritual enlightenment or truth-realization is often confused with experiences that occur within the dream. The experiences of cosmic consciousness and transcendental experiences of unity all occur within the dream. These are altered states of consciousness that are often drug induced, and really have nothing to do with the experience of awakening from the dream. The biggest distinction is altered states of consciousness are all transient experiences that can come and go, while spiritual enlightenment or truth-realization is abiding. Once one awakens from the dream one's consciousness is forever changed and there is no going back. Another misconception is what Jed McKenna calls the integrated state, which often has the character of awakening or becoming lucid within the dream, and so is confused with awakening from the dream. The integrated state is what mystical poets like Rumi write about. If one awakens from one's dream, one is pretty much guaranteed to enter into the integrated state and become lucid when one starts dreaming again, but the integrated state and lucid dreaming often occur without full awakening.


How is awakening from the dream even possible? The answer has to do with the true nature of consciousness. The mistake typically made is to assume that consciousness somehow arises from the world of matter, energy, space and time. That assumption is just plain wrong. It's exactly the other way around. The world of matter, energy, space and time arises from the primordial nature of consciousness. This is exactly what the holographic principle in the context of dark energy and an observer-dependent cosmic horizon tells us. The consciousness we experience in the world is an individual or differentiated kind of consciousness, but it's not the primordial nature of consciousness. The remarkable thing is the holographic principle tells us we don't need the physics of matter, energy, space and time to explain the primordial nature of consciousness. Instead, we can turn physics on its head and make it dance for us. Starting with the void we can explain all of physics thanks to the holographic principle and dark energy. The upshot is the void is the primordial nature of consciousness, which can be called nondual awareness or undifferentiated consciousness. Matter, energy, space and time all arise from the void or the true primordial nature of consciousness, not the other way around. Our individual consciousness is only differentiated from the true primordial nature of consciousness when our world is created and our dream begins.


The easiest way to understand how awakening from the dream is possible is to conceptualize the differentiated consciousness of the observer as a focal point of consciousness that arises in relation to a holographic screen that encodes all the bits of information for the observer's world and projects all the images of the observer's world to the central point of view of the observer over an animated sequence of screen outputs. This holographic projection and animation process requires energy. When the expenditure of that energy comes to an end, as the second law of thermodynamics tells us it eventually must, this holographic projection and animation process must come to an end. The dreamer's dream comes to an end and the dreamer awakens from its dream. All descriptions of awakening from the dream are described in terms of some kind of dissolution, like a drop of water that dissolves back into the ocean, as the differentiated point of consciousness of the observer returns to, rejoins and reunites itself with the undifferentiated consciousness of the void. Another common description is falling into the void, like a state of free fall that occurs when the expenditure of energy comes to an end.


How can the expenditure of energy come to an end? It has to come to an end when all energy eventually burns away and heat is radiated away to infinity. That's basic thermodynamics. Boltzmann called this the heat death of the universe. How is it possible for an individual observer to bring the expenditure of all energy in its world to an end? In all nondual discussions of truth-realization this is described as entering into the desireless state. The basic answer has to do with the observer's focus of attention. The observer cannot control the way energy flows through its world, but the observer allows energy to flow with its focus of attention on it. If the observer withdraws the focus of its attention away from its world, it also withdraws its investment of emotional energy in its world. The key step in the process of awakening is when the observer shifts the focus of its attention away from its world and turns its focus of attention onto its own sense of being present as a presence of consciousness at the central point of view of its world.


It's important to point out that only the observer's world disappears from existence when the dreamer awakens from its dream. From the point of view of other observers, their worlds go right on existing. Every observer has its own world with animated images of that world projected from its own holographic screen, which is an observer-dependent horizon. The dreamer, which is the undifferentiated consciousness of the void, awakens from its dream observer by observer.


Truth-realization is only about the true nature of the dreamer that remains when the dreamer awakens from its dream. After awakening, the dreamer can start dreaming again, but now the consciousness of the observer is forever changed. This is the part of the process that is described as spiritual enlightenment. The lucid observer can see that all the images of its world are projected from a screen like the animated images of a movie, and that it's the observer's own light of consciousness that emanates from its own focal point of consciousness that projects those images, like the light of a movie projector. The lucid observer also has the experience of the ascension of consciousness. The lucid observer perceives those images from outside the screen, which is a higher dimension in relation to the screen, and can never again identify itself with the lower dimensional animated image of its character in the movie. An ascended observer naturally stops trying to interfere with or control the normal flow of energy that animates the movie. All emotional bias in the observer's focus of attention comes to an end, and so an ascended observer enters into the integrated state as the flow of energy that animates the observer's character comes into alignment with the normal flow of energy through the observer's world.


You might think I'm making this all up, but read the references I've mentioned above, or better yet, as Jed McKenna likes to say "Come see for yourself".


Jim


Jim

Dear Jim,


To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

--
----------------------------
Fifth International Conference
Science and Scientist - 2017
August 18—19, 2017
Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
 
Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
(All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
 
Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
 
Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
 
Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
 
Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
 
Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
 
Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
 
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
 
Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
 
Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sadhu_Sanga@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

Bruno Marchal

unread,
Aug 2, 2017, 7:35:50 AM8/2/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com
On 01 Aug 2017, at 21:37, jim kowall wrote:

Dear Bruno and Whit

"People don't know what they don't know"-Jed McKenna

Spiritual enlightenment or truth-realization as a topic for discussion has a literature with a history extending back thousands of years, with descriptions in the Tao, Advaita, and Zen. It also has many recent descriptions. My favorite recent descriptions are those by Jed McKenna, Nisargadatta and Osho. I find the descriptions of these three fellows to be detailed, complete and logically consistent, which is important for a scientific mind like mine. The most important point to make is that spiritual enlightenment or truth-realization has the nature of awakening from the dream. When the dreamer awakens from its dream, everything in dreamer's dream disappears and only the true nature of the dreamer remains. The true nature of the dreamer can be called the underlying reality of the dream. The terms ultimate or absolute reality are also good. The dream reality isn't really real, since it's like a virtual reality that disappears when the dreamer awakens, leaving only the underlying reality of the dream to remain. The problem is spiritual enlightenment or truth-realization is often confused with experiences that occur within the dream. The experiences of cosmic consciousness and transcendental experiences of unity all occur within the dream. These are altered states of consciousness that are often drug induced, and really have nothing to do with the experience of awakening from the dream. The biggest distinction is altered states of consciousness are all transient experiences that can come and go, while spiritual enlightenment or truth-realization is abiding. Once one awakens from the dream one's consciousness is forever changed and there is no going back. Another misconception is what Jed McKenna calls the integrated state, which often has the character of awakening or becoming lucid within the dream, and so is confused with awakening from the dream. The integrated state is what mystical poets like Rumi write about. If one awakens from one's dream, one is pretty much guaranteed to enter into the integrated state and become lucid when one starts dreaming again, but the integrated state and lucid dreaming often occur without full awakening.

How is awakening from the dream even possible? The answer has to do with the true nature of consciousness. The mistake typically made is to assume that consciousness somehow arises from the world of matter, energy, space and time. That assumption is just plain wrong. It's exactly the other way around. The world of matter, energy, space and time arises from the primordial nature of consciousness. This is exactly what the holographic principle in the context of dark energy and an observer-dependent cosmic horizon tells us. The consciousness we experience in the world is an individual or differentiated kind of consciousness, but it's not the primordial nature of consciousness. The remarkable thing is the holographic principle tells us we don't need the physics of matter, energy, space and time to explain the primordial nature of consciousness. Instead, we can turn physics on its head and make it dance for us. Starting with the void we can explain all of physics thanks to the holographic principle and dark energy. The upshot is the void is the primordial nature of consciousness, which can be called nondual awareness or undifferentiated consciousness. Matter, energy, space and time all arise from the void or the true primordial nature of consciousness, not the other way around. Our individual consciousness is only differentiated from the true primordial nature of consciousness when our world is created and our dream begins.

The easiest way to understand how awakening from the dream is possible is to conceptualize the differentiated consciousness of the observer as a focal point of consciousness that arises in relation to a holographic screen that encodes all the bits of information for the observer's world and projects all the images of the observer's world to the central point of view of the observer over an animated sequence of screen outputs. This holographic projection and animation process requires energy. When the expenditure of that energy comes to an end, as the second law of thermodynamics tells us it eventually must, this holographic projection and animation process must come to an end. The dreamer's dream comes to an end and the dreamer awakens from its dream. All descriptions of awakening from the dream are described in terms of some kind of dissolution, like a drop of water that dissolves back into the ocean, as the differentiated point of consciousness of the observer returns to, rejoins and reunites itself with the undifferentiated consciousness of the void. Another common description is falling into the void, like a state of free fall that occurs when the expenditure of energy comes to an end.

How can the expenditure of energy come to an end? It has to come to an end when all energy eventually burns away and heat is radiated away to infinity. That's basic thermodynamics. Boltzmann called this the heat death of the universe. How is it possible for an individual observer to bring the expenditure of all energy in its world to an end? In all nondual discussions of truth-realization this is described as entering into the desireless state. The basic answer has to do with the observer's focus of attention. The observer cannot control the way energy flows through its world, but the observer allows energy to flow with its focus of attention on it. If the observer withdraws the focus of its attention away from its world, it also withdraws its investment of emotional energy in its world. The key step in the process of awakening is when the observer shifts the focus of its attention away from its world and turns its focus of attention onto its own sense of being present as a presence of consciousness at the central point of view of its world.

It's important to point out that only the observer's world disappears from existence when the dreamer awakens from its dream. From the point of view of other observers, their worlds go right on existing. Every observer has its own world with animated images of that world projected from its own holographic screen, which is an observer-dependent horizon. The dreamer, which is the undifferentiated consciousness of the void, awakens from its dream observer by observer.

Truth-realization is only about the true nature of the dreamer that remains when the dreamer awakens from its dream. After awakening, the dreamer can start dreaming again, but now the consciousness of the observer is forever changed. This is the part of the process that is described as spiritual enlightenment. The lucid observer can see that all the images of its world are projected from a screen like the animated images of a movie, and that it's the observer's own light of consciousness that emanates from its own focal point of consciousness that projects those images, like the light of a movie projector. The lucid observer also has the experience of the ascension of consciousness. The lucid observer perceives those images from outside the screen, which is a higher dimension in relation to the screen, and can never again identify itself with the lower dimensional animated image of its character in the movie. An ascended observer naturally stops trying to interfere with or control the normal flow of energy that animates the movie. All emotional bias in the observer's focus of attention comes to an end, and so an ascended observer enters into the integrated state as the flow of energy that animates the observer's character comes into alignment with the normal flow of energy through the observer's world.

You might think I'm making this all up, but read the references I've mentioned above, or better yet, as Jed McKenna likes to say "Come see for yourself".


I like to give this advise: If you want to approach God or the true spiritual enlightenment, just run away from anyone who give you advise to approach God or the true spiritual enlightenment  (it is of course a version of Epimenides paradox, so it is a joke, to be clear, but some truth is there and you just poiinted to it: "come see for yourself").

Jim, I can relate with many things you say. There are slight departure from the "machine theology", but then, the salvia experience too. Yet, both from mechanism, and salvia, I am not sure we can really make the "absolute" awakening and come back here. Yes, consciousness is changed forever, but that happens with many experience in life. With salvia (and machine), to stay and be able to act on the terrestrial plane, we have to forget something of the experience. With salvia, we can decide to NOT FORGET, but then we stay there, and the one who comes back is a new spirit, which was there since eternity, and take possession of the body to resume the life of the experiencer, but he needs to forget something from there for doing this. It makes the salvia experience a sort of "incognito suicide". I might progress on this, but from Mechanism, I have reason to doubt any certainties showed on any conception of reality which would be communicable with words, or any third person sharable notion. In fact, like with the REM lucid dream, there is a notion of "false awakening". We awaken (or thought so) and later, we awaken again, and sometimes this sequence of false awakening can be very long. Each time we awaken, we are firmly convinced that now we are "really" awaken, and this teach us that such certainty is always doubtable. With salvia, we can have similar but huge false awakening, even if from there, we get very near the holy certainty. And that is coherent with mechanism which put all certainties in the delusion, except for consciousness itself, and perhaps something else ... that I have forgotten (grin).

You lost me somehow also when using physical notions, like the hologram, despite admitting the physical belongs to the dream. If it is metaphorical, it makes sense, though. I would appreciate if you could someday make precise what you assume and what is derived. I am OK with the idea that the dreamer is the undifferentiated consciousness, but a term like "void" has not much meaning to me, or perhaps too much meaning. Is it a physical void, like the quantum vacuum? Is it the first person mind when succeeding being silencious to itself? or something else?

Best,

Bruno




To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sa...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

C. S. Morrison

unread,
Aug 3, 2017, 10:53:45 AM8/3/17
to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com, Bruno Marchal


Dear Bruno,

You wrote

'I believe in free-will, but in my opinion, indeterminacy would threaten it more than sustain it.'

How so?  As far as I can see indeterminacy or unpredictability is a consequence of free will -though of course not exclusively. Unless all the freely choosing consciousnesses all choose to act in a predictable way you are going to get unpredictability. It is important to remember that this needn't be a bad thing for an organism's ability to act rationally but only in certain very special circumstances.  The options from which the consciousness freely chooses must be suitably weighted by the brain via the qualia in which they appear in consciousness so that the consciousness is more likely to opt for more promising courses of action. The reason this situation is better than the brain just choosing what we do all the time is that the brain doesn't always know what's best.  By allowing a random choice (from its point of view) the members of a group of such free-willed creatures facing the same uncertain situation will try out different options at the same time.

You also said

'Even in a determinist reality, machines are confronted to many different form of indeterminacies, *from their points of view". That a god could predict what I will do does not throw away my free will. Like Hofstadter said once, we express often free-will by "I am determined to do this or that"

In my view, the passive structure here is merely a quirk of language.  To me the saying really means 'I am determined BY MY OWN CHOICE to do this or that'. After all,  it does not mean that I will succeed (which it ought to imply if it meant what Hofstadter is here claiming).

Anyway,  I just can't go along with your argument here for semantic reasons.  For me something has free will if it makes a choice between two or more options that is not fully determined by its internal state or situation. There has to be a free choice or it is not free will (at least the way I define it). You can have reasons for making the choice, desires and so on.  But these must only make you more likely or less likely to choose particular options. If they determine what you choose such that if you were to rewind time and go through the situation again you would always make the same choice, then you do not have free will (as I define it).

You also said

'If you act to avoid a pain, you don't act freely, they would say. I disagree with them, but it is tricky to convince them.

I'm glad we agree on something. As I have said,  if you would always act to avoid the pain in exactly the same situation (with exactly the same memories etc) then they would be right in my opinion.  However,  I don't think we would.  I think the intensity of pain makes us more likely to make certain choices and less likely to make others,  but I do not think it fully determines what we do. That is why we accept that William Wallace could possibly have defiantly shouted "FREEDOM!" despite the agony of his torture,  and Jesus Christ might genuinely have refused the anaesthetic offered him on the cross.

Best wishes, 
Colin

C.  S.  Morrison - Author of THE BLIND MINDMAKER: Explaining Consciousness without Magic or Misrepresentation.

https://www.amazon.com/Blind-Mindmaker-Explaining-Consciousness-Misrepresentation/dp/1541283953

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Blind-Mindmaker-Explaining-Consciousness-Misrepresentation/dp/1541283953



>>


>> On 30 Jul 2017 21:21, Whit Blauvelt <wh...@csmind.com> wrote:

>> On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 05:39:29PM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>

>> > I certainly do not believe in many theories of free-will, which I find quite
>> > absurd. But I think that *some* theory of free-will are compatible with the
>> > Mechanist Hypothesis (in cognitive science), which is my (biased) focus of
>> > interest.
>> > 

>> >     The willingness to relinquish this expression of free will (the illusion of
>> >     control) is what leads to enlightenment.
>> > 
>> > I am not sure. The willingness itself might be an handicap. That too needs to
>> > be relinquished ... without control.
>>

>> -- 
>> ----------------------------
>> Fifth International Conference 
>> Science and Scientist - 2017
>> August 18—19, 2017
>> Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
>> http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
>>
>> Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
>> (All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
>>
>> Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
>>
>> Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
>>
>> Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
>>
>> Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
>>
>> Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
>>
>> Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
>>
>> Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org 
>>
>> Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
>>
>> Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sa...@googlegroups.com.
>> To post to this group, send email to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com.
>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.


>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>> -- 
>> ----------------------------
>> Fifth International Conference 
>> Science and Scientist - 2017
>> August 18—19, 2017
>> Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
>> http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
>>  
>> Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
>> (All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
>>  
>> Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
>>  
>> Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
>>  
>> Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
>>  
>> Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
>>  
>> Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
>>  
>> Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
>>  
>> Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org 
>>  
>> Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
>>  
>> Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sa...@googlegroups.com.
>> To post to this group, send email to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com.
>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.


>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
> http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
>
>
>
> --
> ----------------------------
> Fifth International Conference
> Science and Scientist - 2017
> August 18—19, 2017
> Nepal Pragya Pratisthan, Kathmandu, Nepal
> http://scsiscs.org/conference/scienceandscientist/2017
>  
> Send a Donation to Support Our Services: http://scienceandscientist.org/donate
> (All Indian residents are eligible for tax benefits for their contributions under section 80G of the Income Tax Act)
>  
> Report Archives: http://bviscs.org/reports
>  
> Why Biology is Beyond Physical Sciences?: http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03
>  
> Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138
>  
> Harmonizer: http://scienceandscientist.org/harmonizer
>  
> Darwin Under Siege: http://scienceandscientist.org/Darwin
>  
> Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute: http://bviscs.org
>  
> Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute: http://scsiscs.org
>  
> Sadhu-Sanga Blog: http://mahaprabhu.net/satsanga
>  
> Contact Us: http://scsiscs.org/contact
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sadhu-Sanga Under the holy association of Spd. B.M. Puri Maharaja, Ph.D." group.

> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Online_Sadhu_Sa...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to Online_Sa...@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/Online_Sadhu_Sanga.

It is loading more messages.
0 new messages