. To wit, Gov. Leland Stanford's, one of the
appointment of the railroad's chief counsel to the state's supreme court. (Book recommendation:
We have a state legislature that is hamstrung by a
110 page state constitution (one of the longest in the world) laden with the residue of referendums—which don't have
sunset provisions and which cannot be undone by the legislature even if they turn how to have unforeseen and/or
deleterious consequences. A lot of effort is spent by our judicial system disentangling conflicting referenda—when its jurists are not otherwise engaged in running for reelection. And our elections are now clogged with referenda, often in
dueling pairs, and they're getting
crazier and
crazier (okay, so this one almost certainly never stood a chance of actually making it on to the ballot), which primarily serve to confuse and overwhelm the electorate. Many referenda are initiated by
well financed, self-interested corporations and organizations, who carefully word their campaigns to hide their true goals to all but the most semantically astute. In other words, the initiative process's has been largely coopted by the very forces it was created to counteract.
I used to be for direct democracy.