Skip to first unread message
Brian Howell
Jun 1, 2015, 2:29:35 PM6/1/15
to Ipse-...@googlegroups.com
A 70-person start-up claims to have created a deep-learning supercomputer whose collective processing exceeds Google's capacities. And it'll get bigger yet.
jack saunders
Jun 1, 2015, 5:05:33 PM6/1/15
to Brian Howell, Ipse-...@googlegroups.com
Facial recognition and financial network applications both strike me as top tier SECURITY products. Would the users of such applications be comfortable with "much cheaper" computer power cobbled together by using off duty machines? Maybe. But there is a hitch in the expectations that will have to bridged deftly.
From: Brian Howell <bdho...@gmail.com>
To: Ipse-...@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, June 1, 2015 11:29 AM
Subject: [Ipse Dixit] Ooooh! Skynet!
A 70-person start-up claims to have created a deep-learning supercomputer whose collective processing exceeds Google's capacities. And it'll get bigger yet.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ipse Dixit" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Ipse-dixit+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/Ipse-dixit/9e88596b-01ff-47f1-ae20-5ba6e012cefd%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ipse Dixit" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Ipse-dixit+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/Ipse-dixit/9e88596b-01ff-47f1-ae20-5ba6e012cefd%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Craig Good
Jun 1, 2015, 5:20:19 PM6/1/15
to jack saunders, Brian Howell, Ipse-...@googlegroups.com
Would there not be security benefits to combining encryption (which they mention) with compartmentalization (which they only imply)? I suppose a fair amount can be learned from what’s running on a given set of servers, but it would be a fragment of the whole picture.
I can also think of some commercial uses for good facial recognition.
On Jun 1, 2015, at 14:05 PM, jack saunders <jack...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> Facial recognition and financial network applications both strike me as top tier SECURITY products. Would the users of such applications be comfortable with "much cheaper" computer power cobbled together by using off duty machines? Maybe. But there is a hitch in the expectations that will have to bridged deftly.
>
--
--Craig WWJGD?
clg...@me.com http://www.craig-good.com
Krav Maga: We do bad things to bad people.
I can also think of some commercial uses for good facial recognition.
On Jun 1, 2015, at 14:05 PM, jack saunders <jack...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> Facial recognition and financial network applications both strike me as top tier SECURITY products. Would the users of such applications be comfortable with "much cheaper" computer power cobbled together by using off duty machines? Maybe. But there is a hitch in the expectations that will have to bridged deftly.
>
--Craig WWJGD?
clg...@me.com http://www.craig-good.com
Krav Maga: We do bad things to bad people.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages