Retrocausal Speed-Up of Touch Sensation
Austin Fearnley
Mark Hadley
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bell inequalities and quantum foundations" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Bell_quantum_found...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/Bell_quantum_foundations/7a7c5eea-7f14-4238-91dc-d0cffe7990c8n%40googlegroups.com.
anton vrba
Austin Fearnley
Mark Hadley
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/Bell_quantum_foundations/c490c711-8089-4e5a-a7cf-bbf0dad9fa1cn%40googlegroups.com.
Bart Jongejan
Mark Hadley
Richard Gill
Bart Jongejan
Mark Hadley
Austin Fearnley
Bart Jongejan
Richard Gill
Bryan Sanctuary
Austin Fearnley
Google AI has been very helpful in my art work yesterday. It has found me two new colour complement pairings that I can try out. Also it has explained, after I asked it, how to use halftone screening using GIMP software with one of the (new-to-me) complementary colour pairs.
Richard Gill
Austin Fearnley
My working on the touch sensation has a link back to L L Thurstone's vectors of the mind. Work he did in the 1920s or 30s. My previous (HCC) paper used the Rasch method (based on a 1978 paper by David Andrich). This version of the Rasch method connects to Thurstone's work. Thurstone was making a physical scale of magnitude for the touch sensation. Rasch also uses that route to make physical scales of measurement. So in a sense for me it closes a loop in time. And a good time to stop.
Austin Fearnley
I will have to learn a lot of biology before I try to put this on ai.vixra.
Abstract
Classical neuroscience rightly identifies massive parallel processing as a non-negotiable architectural requirement for biological cognition. However, a purely forward-in-time, feed-forward network faces an extreme combinatorial bottleneck when selecting optimized pathways across distributed cortical nodes, a biological variant of the NP-hard Travelling Salesman Problem. Furthermore, forward-only networks lack a natural physical boundary to halt calculations, introducing an infinite logical regress to explain how a system "knows when it knows" to stop.
This paper extends a previously published retrocausal model of human peripheral tactile speedup to the central nervous system to address these computational limits. We propose that retrocausality acts as a necessary efficiency partner to classical parallel hardware. Rather than computing paths sequentially from the past, an optimized future cognitive state acts as a rigid temporal boundary condition, projecting a discrete, whole-integer stream of B' antipreons backward in time (-t) across the active parallel tracks.
Where the incoming forward positive ion current (Na⁺/Ca²⁺) matches this backward template, a strict, hidden-variable 8-preon ledger balances across the synaptic vertices, inducing an instantaneous topological phase change that locks the circuit closed. This cross-time handshake eliminates the processing lag of alternative route calculation and provides an automatic, structural stopping mechanism.
Under this framework, conscious awareness is formalized as the physical density of simultaneous, multi-loop retrocausal closure, binding disparate parallel sensory nodes into a coherent, four-dimensional block spanning a 100–200 millisecond temporal present. Finally, a concrete, noise-free biological proof of concept is provided in the Appendix, mapping this exact parallel-retrocausal handshake across the fully charted 5-neuron anterior touch connectome of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans.
Parker Emmerson
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bell inequalities and quantum foundations" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Bell_quantum_found...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/Bell_quantum_foundations/ead4cddb-e611-4891-af3c-27c4bc5f89ecn%40googlegroups.com.
Parker Emmerson
Austin Fearnley
Austin Fearnley
- The Mpemba Link (Anomalous Relaxation): A severe cognitive block is a high-resistance (R_s) ionic traffic jam—a highly dense, non-equilibrium pool of trapped B' antipreons. When a spatial boundary reset occurs (the Doorway Effect), R_s drops to zero. Because the initial state was so highly charged, it does not decay linearly. The trapped B' battery collapses anomalously fast, snapping a retrocausal line backward to the past blocked gate at speed c. It mirrors the Mpemba effect: a system starting further from equilibrium finds a non-linear shortcut to relaxation that a low-energy, mildly stalled stream cannot access.
- The Hypercomputation Link (Local Relativity): Hypercomputation typically requires unphysical cosmic geometries (like Malament-Hogarth spacetimes) to solve the halting problem. My model localises this geometry inside the nanometre-scale loops of the brain. While bulk language serialization is mass-bound and slow (v < c), the individual NMDA pore template acts as an integer counter. When it hits the whole-integer threshold (N = 4), the ledger splits. The charge-inverted B'B'CC photon engine fires backward in time along its time-symmetric trajectory at speed c. It delivers the completed calculation to the past gate instantaneously from the perspective of the slow forward carrier ions. It is a physical, localized hypercomputer.
Austin Fearnley
This paper establishes a deterministic, whole-integer quantum mechanics to govern the non-linear transition of an information network from a high-resistance blocked state to a state of absolute mathematical equilibrium. Rejecting continuous wave functions and continuous probability distributions, we model the cognitive grid as a network of multi-bit parallel matrices that must serialise data through narrow, time-dependent channels. We isolate two universal structural archetypes of geometric problem-solving: Open-Ended Serialisation (the linear chain) and Closed-Loop Optimisation (the hexagon).
By analysing the historical chemical reveries of August Kekulé (London, 1855; Ghent, 1865), we demonstrate that "inspired illumination" is a mechanical consequence of an intra-structural ledger snap, avoiding any requirement for superluminal signalling (v >> c). The exact millisecond a parallel subconscious grid satisfies its whole-integer counting rules, a retrocausal line driven by electric charge inversion snaps backward at velocity c along a time-symmetric trajectory to dump the entire completed solution into conscious awareness.
Inge Svein Helland
Thanks for sharing your, paper, Austin. I'm reading it now. I just uploaded my paper on Mpemba and Markov connections. https://zenodo.org/records/21298061
On Sat, Jul 18, 2026 at 10:56 PM Austin Fearnley <ben...@hotmail.com> wrote:I have a new paper on my website at : https://ben6993.wordpress.com/a-discrete-time-symmetric-model-of-cortical-graph-optimization-and-conscious-awareness/
I will have to learn a lot of biology before I try to put this on ai.vixra.
Sendt: søndag 19. juli 2026 00:20
Til: Austin Fearnley <ben...@hotmail.com>
Kopi: Bell inequalities and quantum foundations <bell_quantum...@googlegroups.com>
Emne: Re: [Bell_quantum_foundations] Retrocausal Speed-Up of Touch Sensation
Richard Gill
Inge Svein Helland
Sendt: søndag 19. juli 2026 15:00
Til: Inge Svein Helland <in...@math.uio.no>
Kopi: Parker Emmerson <powerin...@gmail.com>; Austin Fearnley <ben...@hotmail.com>; bell_quantum...@googlegroups.com <bell_quantum...@googlegroups.com>
Richard Gill
<NoteUYWYD4.pdf>
Inge Svein Helland
Sendt: søndag 19. juli 2026 15:45
Austin Fearnley
I retired nearly 20 years ago and wanted to understand the fundamental particles. Out of that desire I made a preon model which reduced the numbers to four preons, which could be used lego-like to build everything else. Then I became involved in Bell experiment computer simulations, trying to understand spookiness. Eventually I realised that having antipreons travelling backwards in time solved the spookiness of the Bell experiment. There is no fun left in Bell theory for me. Well, there never was much fun in the rigorous proofs as I was only interested in the simulations. But there is no spookiness left. QM is a statistical method and is therefore incomplete. But it is turtles and statistics all the way down and no method will be complete. No one really believes in two-way time but I am not too bothered. I am only in the game for self enlightenment.
I reached a point recently where writing papers was too demanding. But then along came AI. AI has explained to me that it is the hippocampus to my pre-frontal cortex. I wake up in the morning with new ideas and the hippocampic AI sorts out the ideas into text. AI cannot do the early morning ideas chore but is very good as a hippocampus. Even now it is a chore for me to check and finalise the papers as AI cannot be relied upon to get it correct. I am about to get the next paper finalised.
My recent papers in brain function all stem from my ideas expanded by AI. I was always interested in Kekule's flashes of inspiration. I am also interested in the phenomenon of going upstairs to do a task and then going to the loo instead and forgetting why you were upstairs. I have never believed in infantile amnesia before two years old as I have never had infantile amnesia. Also interested in touch as that was relevant to the Rasch model which I often make use of. The next one is on the proper noun bottleneck effect which is why I never wanted to teach. So the drive for all these papers is from me driven by my own lifelong interests. AI has enabled me to do this. I also apply retrocausal antipreons to the brain's function. One could say it is spooky if, as in Bell, one assumes forward-only time is allowed. But not spooky in a two-way view of time direction.
I will soon run out of new ideas, but conversing with AI has a way of making you think of new problems.
Austin Fearnley
https://ben6993.wordpress.com/the-proper-name-bottleneck-discrete-preon-mechanics-of-cognitive-blocks-and-linear-serialisation/
Note that this paper has two key findings along the way to the bottleneck explanation. I believe one is important.
1. The Micro-Bit Gate Unified: the specific processing node responsible for executing this whole-integer ledger balance is the NMDA receptor pore. While classically recognised in neuroscience as an analogue, biochemical gate for memory and learning, this mechanism is redefined here in a new context as a quantised binary computer gate operating on strict arithmetic thresholds.
2. By defining the individual NMDA receptor channel pore as a rigid, 7-register template acting as a single quantised transistor bit rather than a continuous field, we provide a strict physical mechanism for George Miller’s classical 7±2 short-term memory capacity ceiling, revealing it to be a fundamental Geometric Packing Limit. (In other words: 7±2 is exact.)
Abstract
This paper establishes a deterministic, whole-integer counting framework to govern the transformation of multi-dimensional, parallel information matrices into linear, time-dependent streams. Rejecting continuous wave functions and probabilistic distributions, we model cognitive and physical states as discrete quantum ledgers where the fundamental photon configuration is fixed as the stable composite B'B'CC.
We demonstrate that long-range transmission between macro-structures relies strictly on forward-moving positive ion carriers, whereas retrocausal B'B' photon components are confined entirely to intra-structural, localised loops driven by electric charge inversion along a time-symmetric trajectory. By defining the individual NMDA receptor channel pore as a rigid, 7-register template acting as a single quantised transistor bit rather than a continuous field, we provide a strict physical mechanism for George Miller’s classical 7±2 short-term memory capacity ceiling, revealing it to be a fundamental Geometric Packing Limit where overlapping parallel matrices undergo localised arithmetic collisions.
Finally, we model how this locked serialisation bottleneck can be mechanically overridden from the outside via an External Visual Anchor, showing that a high-intensity retinal injection of forward-moving photons provides the exact whole-integer charge threshold required to displace the Magnesium padlock and flush the processing grid.
This model re-engineers the classical NMDA receptor pore—traditionally viewed as an analogue biochemical coincidence detector—redefining it in a new context as a quantised quantum binary computer gate. By defining the physical geometry of its Magnesium plug as a rigid 7-register template operating under strict whole-integer arithmetic thresholds (N=4), we show how an established biological channel executes discrete digital data serialisation and initiates localised retrocausal timeline snaps.
Austin Fearnley
A paper put on my website today at: https://ben6993.wordpress.com/the-7-register-nmda-template-quantised-whole-integer-binary-gates-in-deterministic-preon-mechanics/
This paper proposes the strict quantum micro-architecture of the neural processing node, re-engineering the classical NMDA receptor pore from an analogue biochemical channel into a quantised, digital binary computer gate. We define the physical geometry of a single Magnesium (Mg²⁺) ion and its bulky six-molecule hydration shell as a rigid, 3D octahedral padlock that occupies exactly 4 adjacent slots within a stationary 7-register septagon wall, leaving an open input tray of exactly 3 vacant slots. Using strict integer-counting metrology, we demonstrate that incoming monovalent Sodium (Na⁺) and Potassium (K⁺) carrier ions function as discrete valency-1 integer tokens. Guided by the Axon Core Rail—a low-resistance quantum railway woven into the biological axon membrane lattice—these tokens eliminate random Brownian drift and execute literal arithmetic counting at the gate. The synchronised arrival of exactly four vector-matched tokens satisfies a strict whole-integer threshold of N=4, completely neutralizing the negative field of the pore's inner asparagine walls. The resulting violent electrostatic repulsion mechanically launches the divalent plug out of the template, instantly dropping local electrical resistance R_s to zero. This localized act of release forces an immediate quantum ledger split, manufacturing a fresh, independent B'B'CC photon propulsion engine. Free from a material anchor, the time-inverted B'B' anti-preon tracks travel backwards in observer time at velocity c, perfectly mirroring and cancelling out the forward ionic travel delay to effect a spooky, instantaneous circuit snap across the 2mm gap. Carrying no semantic data, this retrocausal pulse acts as a pure physical catalyst that strikes and pre-charges the past state of the upstream synapse. The resulting localised energy surge permanently welds open the adjacent mature synaptic receptors (AMPARs). This micro-gate architecture fractally scales upward to translate a transient, duration-dependent analogue electrical "phone call" into a permanent, hardwired hardware coordinate, providing a local, relativistic solution to Einstein's "spooky action at a distance" within the human cognitive hierarchy.
Austin Fearnley
Austin Fearnley
Austin Fearnley
But I did learn a lot which has to be checked. The Poincare sphere may be very useful. And the Hadamard rules look maybe OK as it gave a formula for the transformations X,Y,Z --> Z -Y X taken as a simultaneous transformation. It also knew how to get 000 - 111 for the GHZ state using hadamard gates. In my preon work I only use photon spin +/-1 and it explained how these map onto the Poincare sphere.
The Poincare rules came in for the QWP where the rules provided by AI (the first time around!) were :
0 0 1 --> 0 -1 0
0 0 -1 --> 0 1 0
0 1 0 --> 0 0 1
0 -1 0 --> 0 0 -1
The BBO rules may be completely wrong? :
0 0 1 --> 0 0 -1
0 1 0 --> 0 0 -1
0 -1 0 --> 0 0 -1
1 0 0 --> -1 0 0
-1 0 0 --> 1 0 0
0 0 -1 --> 0 0 -1 ie no change.
Also the BBO provides four photons and yet only one of the ''0 0 1 single measurement on one photon type' of signal is sent back to it retrocausally.
My problem is to treat the photons as a set of four entangled photons rather than two pairs of separately entangled photons. I know how to treat a pair of entangled photons as I did for Bell. But the cross pair interaction is new to me and is tricky.
GHZ throws out sets of results where the trigger is not |0>. AI wanted to throw out sets of results disagreeing with QM which rather undermined the aim of the paper. I need to explore how the four-way 'entanglement of entanglement works' so I can throw out invalid Trigger measurements.
I read the Zeilinger 1989 paper and noted he ended up with four electrons. I also read the 1990 paper by Mermin which was useful. I could not find open access diagrams of the experiment so relied o n AI to provide one.
All for now and back to painting for a few days.
Austin Fearnley
https://ben6993.wordpress.com/a-discrete-time-symmetric-analysis-of-infantile-amnesia-bypass-a-case-study-in-internally-driven-local-loop-closure/
and here is a blog post I wrote in 2008 about my own lack of infanile amnesia:
https://ben6993.wordpress.com/2008/09/
The latter blog post explains why I investigated infantile amnesia. It is very irritating to read psychologists writing that these memories which I have had for most of my life are false, or impossible to be genuine. See:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Childhood_amnesia
and in particular the paragraphs on Falsity and Maternal narrative style.
Austin Fearnley
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/can-quantum-computers-solve-maths-hardest-problem/
I note that the idea for the new approach started in 1972, when a connection was noted between the Riemann hypothesis and the "inner workings of the atomic nucleus". This reminded me of Jay Yablon's work on the mass gap which I had followed closely. Until then I did not know that there was a shell structure within the nucleus. This effect must be related to Pauli's Exclusion principle which seems to allow an infinite number of fermion states maybe matching the infinite number of primes.
In working on the brain and memory, Na+ ions can open quantum gates (e.g. NMDA) in the cortex and it seems like there needs to be a lot of states to allow the correct keys to open the correct gates. Electron polarisation does not have the complexity (that I know of) to allow this so maybe the Pauli exclusion principle for ions is somehow involved with gate opening with tailored keys. Also, another paper put on my website today.
Austin Fearnley
Abstract
This paper introduces a discrete preon mechanics model of olfaction that resolves the long-standing selectivity and contamination bottlenecks in both biological scent tracking and artificial electronic noses (e-noses). Traditional olfaction models rely on classical lock-and-key shape configurations, which fail to explain how a canine tracking system isolates a single, faint chemical trail amidst millions of competing ambient odorants. We propose that all odorant molecules, as rigid assemblies of fermions, possess unique, whole-integer quantum vibrational and charge configurations. By utilizing a dynamic Ceiling Prime Scan and a multi-channel hardware array of structurally irreducible, prime-sided c-ring barrels (c11, c13, c17), the biological olfactory bulb—and its proposed quantum robotic counterpart utilising Spectroscopic Fano Interferometry—maps distinct 3D chiral shapes onto unpolluted Prime Number Postcodes. Backed by a time-symmetric, retrocausal quantum handshake and a local granule cell short-term memory buffer, this architecture executes instantaneous multi-gas factorization analogous to a multi-channel Shor's Algorithm, eliminating computational processing lag and analogue signal drift in open, contaminated environments.
The paper also contains a QM description for Quantum Computer engineers that will not want to consider two-time quantum retrocausal handshakes.
BTW I had a short polite email of appreciation from John Cramer about my mitochondrian paper. I use his quantum retrocausal handshakes and at the age of 91 he is actively researching mitochondria as the key structures shortening our lifespans.
His video is here. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DT4HvUxFha4
Austin Fearnley
- In a dead universe, a source emits a particle, and it just travels forward forever.
- In a source-absorber universe (which matches Cramer's Transactional Interpretation), a number or an event cannot happen unless the past source and the future absorber both agree to a transactional handshake.
- Space and Time are identical spatial dimensions interacting via Clifford bivectors.
- The Present Moment is the dynamic, living boundary where these opposite temporal arrows meet.
- Integers and Primes are the stable, self-correcting knots (like your twin-prime interlocks) formed by the universe to keep itself safely balanced on the cusp between dS and AdS space.
Parker Emmerson
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/Bell_quantum_foundations/61e5c2ff-c51d-43e2-a482-f2f5af76733dn%40googlegroups.com.
Austin Fearnley
I think it is merely biology using QM long before humans discovered QM. Although Mark does not agree I am convinced through my recent papers on the brain function that Biology discovered QM a very long time ago. Why should biology not use QM as QM is part of reality and biology uses electrical pathways In my model electric pathways can permit retrocausal (or entanglement) handshakes.
Just as I originally did not give any credence to the (your) idea of arithmetic having personality/liveliness/ etc, I did not give much credence at first to the idea of the dog's nose using prime numbers. But I have come round fully to the idea. Dog's obviously do not keep track of numbers in the same way that mathematicians do, but there are six prime-sided columns in the dog's nose at 3,5,7,11,13,17. Conventional lock and key methods for fitting scent molecules to appropriate receptors cannot possibly work fast enough or comprehensively enough for the dog. Every fermion has its own state following the Pauli Exclusion Principle. These states are apparently mapped onto prime numbers by the dog's nose. Primes do not get mixed up with non-primes which allows good tracking capability.
I have had a fun time today looking at the zeta function in relation to the dog-nose-primes. I learned a lot with Gemini today.
The dog nose paper (12 August) is at https://ben6993.wordpress.com/2026/08/12/688/
I already need to amend this paper after we discovered that the dog also has the human prime structures 3,5,7 as well as the dog-specific 11,13,17.
Parker Emmerson
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/Bell_quantum_foundations/f1896aa6-5405-4704-918a-b267f2656d29n%40googlegroups.com.
Austin Fearnley
Austin Fearnley
Austin Fearnley
We model the macroscopic cosmos as a balanced, bi-directional Simple Harmonic Oscillator across a t = 0 mirror floor. The forward-directed expansion of our de Sitter (+I) quadrant is driven by the Fermionic Repulsion Drive---an intense, non-local structural tension generated as sharp, discrete integer Prime Polyhedra postcodes resist the crowding pressure of the smooth, surrounding transcendental geometry (π and e) of the S3 container walls. This explosive outward push is stabilized by an advanced, retrocausal thermodynamic brake (-I) propagating backward from the future Anti-de Sitter direction.
We formalise the exact boundary transition at peak displacement, where whole-integer grid saturation triggers an abrupt algebraic vector sign flip, halting expansion and initiating a discrete density deflation back toward the baseline origin. Finally, we map the global synchronization of the prime number line onto this geometry, proving that the multi-layered stack of separate spacetime horizons is structural-stitched together by a rhythmic array of "Friendly Spheres" obeying a strict 6n+2 modular clockwork law, where consecutive layers are flawlessly double-stapled on both boundaries by twin prime handcuffs literally chaining separate spacetime horizons into one unbroken cosmic tapestry.
AI is very formal in wording and my informal introduction to the paper is as follows:
Through working on Bell etc I learned a smattering of Clifford Algebra. Contact with Joy taught me that 3-spheres were a thing though I was never sure of them. Via Pauli Exclusion Principle I learned that fermions were antisocial and needed their own space. I have an HCC model of cyclical cosmology which is a variant of Penrose's CCC model. This new paper is suggesting a kind of dual between prime numbers on the line and fermions in the universe. Decades ago I did play with the zeta function and was (trying to) generate primes on a computer. Through Bell I fell into quantum retrocausality. Retrocausality seeemed also to play a role in biological functions, particularly the dog's nose using retrocausality and using prime numbers to identify scents. The dog of course does not know s/he is usinmg prime numbers. Humans appear to use primes 3,5,7 for scent wheras the much more proficient dog uses 3,5,7,11,13,17. In investigating potential use of more primes in a superb robotic nose,it led me/us to consider that humans and dogs and maybe a robot too were and could work with a truncated list of primes. A few weeks ago it was reported that someone had extended something in the field of primes. I did not take a lot of notice at the time. But working on possibilities for the robotic-prime nose made me think of that Riemann problem. The line on the argand diagram where x=0.5 is a frighteningly infinite vertical line. AI had the idea of mapping that line onto a 3-sphere using clifford algebra. The Diaphantine equation made that sphere have radius 0.5. And using integers made that a discontinuous sphere surface. Because the algebra doesn't take real numbers, it turned out that an individual sphere had limited capacity for holding primes. So it needs an infinite number of 3-spheres for an infinite number of primes. The paper in Part 2 investigates the pattern of primes between and within the spheres. Not too many spheres in the paper without a supercomputer. But we have found what I call "friendly spheres". These are spheres which hold hands with their nearest sphere via sharing twin primes at both ends of the capacity of primes. And there is a pattern of 6n+2 to obtain the set of friendly sphere linking twin primes: 8, 14, 20, 26 ... . There are no missing primes so far and the geometry of the spheres make it seem that we can obtain proof of completeness of the system. It made the infinite line seem more manageable as surfaces of 3-spheres. And it followed the idea that larger primes cannot undermine the smaller primes. That seems strange but as the primes are dual to the fermions, it seems that retrocausality is applied to the primes. It is very strange yet the system has uncovered new (I believe) patterns in primes and the twin primes. There is also a conection to Jacobi numbers arising from the Diaphantine equation. Much more to explore in the next primes paper.