> Was curious if anyone tests xfs before or if there was higher
> probability of errors with xfs on the drives.
> Thanks you have been most helpful.
I think one of the special features of XFS is its good scalability to be
usable for large file systems, e.g. in a RAID, and the delayed
allocation. The first seems to be irrelevant while using one OSD per
disk. One of my former colleges measured that ext4 is faster under an
XtreemFS OSD than XFS, so I do not see any need to weaker consistency
that is caused by XFS' delayed allocation. Another advantage of delayed
allocation should be less fragmentation. I expect the performance
drawback you may experience by fragmentation on ext4 is negligible due
to the overhead of XtreemFS.
> I am trying to build my client on a PowerPC 32 b platform and hope it works.
We do not have PowerPC machines and never tried to build the XtreemFS
client on this platform, but I do not expect any issues. I would be
happy if you could share your experiences with PowerPC.
Kind regards,
Christoph