Patch 7.3.1243

100 views
Skip to first unread message

Bram Moolenaar

unread,
Jun 26, 2013, 6:43:06 AM6/26/13
to vim...@googlegroups.com

Patch 7.3.1243
Problem: New regexp engine: back references in look-behind match don't
work. (Lech Lorens)
Solution: Copy the submatches before a recursive match. Also fix
function prototypes.
Files: src/regexp_nfa.c, src/testdir/test64.in, src/testdir/test64.ok


*** ../vim-7.3.1242/src/regexp_nfa.c 2013-06-21 18:31:16.000000000 +0200
--- src/regexp_nfa.c 2013-06-26 12:32:19.000000000 +0200
***************
*** 290,299 ****
#endif
static int *re2post __ARGS((void));
static nfa_state_T *alloc_state __ARGS((int c, nfa_state_T *out, nfa_state_T *out1));
static nfa_state_T *post2nfa __ARGS((int *postfix, int *end, int nfa_calc_size));
static void nfa_postprocess __ARGS((nfa_regprog_T *prog));
static int check_char_class __ARGS((int class, int c));
- static void st_error __ARGS((int *postfix, int *end, int *p));
static void nfa_save_listids __ARGS((nfa_regprog_T *prog, int *list));
static void nfa_restore_listids __ARGS((nfa_regprog_T *prog, int *list));
static int nfa_re_num_cmp __ARGS((long_u val, int op, long_u pos));
--- 290,300 ----
#endif
static int *re2post __ARGS((void));
static nfa_state_T *alloc_state __ARGS((int c, nfa_state_T *out, nfa_state_T *out1));
+ static void st_error __ARGS((int *postfix, int *end, int *p));
+ static int nfa_max_width __ARGS((nfa_state_T *startstate, int depth));
static nfa_state_T *post2nfa __ARGS((int *postfix, int *end, int nfa_calc_size));
static void nfa_postprocess __ARGS((nfa_regprog_T *prog));
static int check_char_class __ARGS((int class, int c));
static void nfa_save_listids __ARGS((nfa_regprog_T *prog, int *list));
static void nfa_restore_listids __ARGS((nfa_regprog_T *prog, int *list));
static int nfa_re_num_cmp __ARGS((long_u val, int op, long_u pos));
***************
*** 3469,3474 ****
--- 3470,3476 ----
#ifdef ENABLE_LOG
static void log_subsexpr __ARGS((regsubs_T *subs));
static void log_subexpr __ARGS((regsub_T *sub));
+ static char *pim_info __ARGS((nfa_pim_T *pim));

static void
log_subsexpr(subs)
***************
*** 3508,3514 ****
}

static char *
! pim_info(nfa_pim_T *pim)
{
static char buf[30];

--- 3510,3517 ----
}

static char *
! pim_info(pim)
! nfa_pim_T *pim;
{
static char buf[30];

***************
*** 3532,3537 ****
--- 3535,3541 ----
static void copy_sub __ARGS((regsub_T *to, regsub_T *from));
static void copy_sub_off __ARGS((regsub_T *to, regsub_T *from));
static int sub_equal __ARGS((regsub_T *sub1, regsub_T *sub2));
+ static int match_backref __ARGS((regsub_T *sub, int subidx, int *bytelen));
static int has_state_with_pos __ARGS((nfa_list_T *l, nfa_state_T *state, regsubs_T *subs));
static int state_in_list __ARGS((nfa_list_T *l, nfa_state_T *state, regsubs_T *subs));
static void addstate __ARGS((nfa_list_T *l, nfa_state_T *state, regsubs_T *subs, nfa_pim_T *pim, int off));
***************
*** 4319,4326 ****
return FAIL;
}

- static int match_backref __ARGS((regsub_T *sub, int subidx, int *bytelen));
-
/*
* Check for a match with subexpression "subidx".
* Return TRUE if it matches.
--- 4323,4328 ----
***************
*** 5195,5200 ****
--- 5197,5206 ----
|| t->state->c == NFA_START_INVISIBLE_BEFORE_FIRST
|| t->state->c == NFA_START_INVISIBLE_BEFORE_NEG_FIRST)
{
+ /* Copy submatch info for the recursive call, so that
+ * \1 can be matched. */
+ copy_sub_off(&m->norm, &t->subs.norm);
+
/*
* First try matching the invisible match, then what
* follows.
*** ../vim-7.3.1242/src/testdir/test64.in 2013-06-17 22:04:34.000000000 +0200
--- src/testdir/test64.in 2013-06-26 12:31:31.000000000 +0200
***************
*** 380,385 ****
--- 380,388 ----
:call add(tl, [2, '\(a\)\(b\)\(c\)\(dd\)\(e\)\(f\)\(g\)\(h\)\(i\)\1\2\3\4\5\6\7\8\9', 'xabcddefghiabcddefghix', 'abcddefghiabcddefghi', 'a', 'b', 'c', 'dd', 'e', 'f', 'g', 'h', 'i'])
:call add(tl, [2, '\(\d*\)a \1b', ' a b ', 'a b', ''])
:call add(tl, [2, '^.\(.\).\_..\1.', "aaa\naaa\nb", "aaa\naaa", 'a'])
+ :call add(tl, [2, '^.*\.\(.*\)/.\+\(\1\)\@<!$', 'foo.bat/foo.com', 'foo.bat/foo.com', 'bat'])
+ :call add(tl, [2, '^.*\.\(.*\)/.\+\(\1\)\@<!$', 'foo.bat/foo.bat'])
+ :call add(tl, [2, '^.*\.\(.*\)/.\+\(\1\)\@<=$', 'foo.bat/foo.bat', 'foo.bat/foo.bat', 'bat', 'bat'])
:"
:"""" Look-behind with limit
:call add(tl, [2, '<\@<=span.', 'xxspanxx<spanyyy', 'spany'])
*** ../vim-7.3.1242/src/testdir/test64.ok 2013-06-17 22:04:34.000000000 +0200
--- src/testdir/test64.ok 2013-06-26 12:31:36.000000000 +0200
***************
*** 866,871 ****
--- 866,880 ----
OK 0 - ^.\(.\).\_..\1.
OK 1 - ^.\(.\).\_..\1.
OK 2 - ^.\(.\).\_..\1.
+ OK 0 - ^.*\.\(.*\)/.\+\(\1\)\@<!$
+ OK 1 - ^.*\.\(.*\)/.\+\(\1\)\@<!$
+ OK 2 - ^.*\.\(.*\)/.\+\(\1\)\@<!$
+ OK 0 - ^.*\.\(.*\)/.\+\(\1\)\@<!$
+ OK 1 - ^.*\.\(.*\)/.\+\(\1\)\@<!$
+ OK 2 - ^.*\.\(.*\)/.\+\(\1\)\@<!$
+ OK 0 - ^.*\.\(.*\)/.\+\(\1\)\@<=$
+ OK 1 - ^.*\.\(.*\)/.\+\(\1\)\@<=$
+ OK 2 - ^.*\.\(.*\)/.\+\(\1\)\@<=$
OK 0 - <\@<=span.
OK 1 - <\@<=span.
OK 2 - <\@<=span.
*** ../vim-7.3.1242/src/version.c 2013-06-24 22:33:26.000000000 +0200
--- src/version.c 2013-06-26 12:41:02.000000000 +0200
***************
*** 730,731 ****
--- 730,733 ----
{ /* Add new patch number below this line */
+ /**/
+ 1243,
/**/

--
You cannot propel yourself forward by patting yourself on the back.

/// Bram Moolenaar -- Br...@Moolenaar.net -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///

mattn

unread,
Jun 27, 2013, 8:51:20 PM6/27/13
to vim...@googlegroups.com
This break sub-match references.

echomsg substitute('2013-06-27${0}', '\%#=0\\\@<!\${\(\d\+\%(:.\{-}\)\?\\\@<!\)}', ' \1 ', 'g')
E43: Damaged match string
2013-06-27 0}

echomsg substitute('2013-06-27${0}', '\%#=1\\\@<!\${\(\d\+\%(:.\{-}\)\?\\\@<!\)}', ' \1 ', 'g')
2013-06-27 0

mattn

unread,
Jun 27, 2013, 9:00:59 PM6/27/13
to vim...@googlegroups.com

After applying this patch

echomsg substitute('2013-06-27${0}', '\%#=0\\\@<!\${\(\d\+\%(:.\{-}\)\?\\\@<!\)}', ' \1 ', 'g')

2013-06-27

Bram Moolenaar

unread,
Jun 28, 2013, 5:13:05 PM6/28/13
to mattn, vim...@googlegroups.com
Looks like patch 7.3.1258 fixes this one as well.

--
GUARD #1: What -- a swallow carrying a coconut?
ARTHUR: It could grip it by the husk!
GUARD #1: It's not a question of where he grips it! It's a simple question
of weight ratios! A five ounce bird could not carry a 1 pound
coconut.
The Quest for the Holy Grail (Monty Python)
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages