On 04/10/2018 12:45, TMS320
> On 28/09/18 20:58, JNugent
>> On 28/09/2018 20:49, TMS320
>>> On 28/09/18 20:06, JNugent
>>>> On 28/09/2018 20:04, TMS320
>>>>> On 28/09/18 12:57, JNugent
>>>>>> On 28/09/2018 00:33, TMS320
>>>>>>> On 25/09/18 17:47, Simon Jester
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U5fhZvH6RW0
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Can Pounder or one of the other irrational bigots explain just what
>>>>>>>> the cyclist was supposed to do? Dismount, sprint past the
>>>>>>>> pedestrians
>>>>>>>> and remount? And why does there always have to be threats of
>>>>>>>> violence?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do what drivers always do near pedestrians. Get out and push.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What? They don't...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do many drivers speed past pedestrians on that narrow tow-path?
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't know. Why do you ask?
>>>>
>>>> In order to try to make sense of what you posted.
>>>>
>>>> If it can't be done, fair enough.
>>>
>>> There's nothing to stop you reading what I posted. Here are a couple
>>> of clues that might help - I inserted the word "always" and I didn't
>>> use the word "speeding".
>>
>> You seem to have forgotten the accusations made by the pedestrian
>> against cyclists.
>>> He is there on the spot.
>>
>> I am not.
>>
>> I assume that you are not on the spot either.
>>
>> Of the three of us, which is the most likely to have an accurate
>> picture of the behaviour of cyclists there?
>
> Your responses to me have nothing to do with the reply I sent to SJ.
More to the point, your response to mine has nothing to do with the
point I made in a response to one of yours.
Have a look at the attribution list above. It runs like this:
04/10/2018 12:45, TMS320
28/09/18 20:58, JNugent
28/09/2018 20:49, TMS320
28/09/18 20:06, JNugent
28/09/2018 20:04, TMS320
28/09/18 12:57, JNugent
28/09/2018 00:33, TMS320
25/09/18 17:47, Simon Jester
See? From that, it follows that you attempting to hide behind a (poor)
excuse). My reply was to you, replying to me.
Now... back to the canal boat man...
You seem to have forgotten the accusations made by the pedestrian
against cyclists.
He is there on the spot.
I am not.
I assume that you are not on the spot either.
Of the three of us, who is the most likely to have an accurate
picture of the behaviour of cyclists there?
Or is the only possible answer too "difficult" to give?