Guy Chapman - A Profile Of A Murderer
St. Michael Chapman
speed cameras. He knows full well that they kill road users. In other
words, he knowingly supports a policy which he knows is killing thousands
of people, all for the sake of his twisted car-hating socialism.
MURDERING CUNT.
He is prepared for thousands of people to die just so that he can make
motorists suffer. URCM "moderators" and anyone else who continues to
support him is AS BAD AS HIM. You know exactly what the score is but you
continue to champion his views. Do you seriously think we cannot see what
the group is for? Jackson's arrogant censorship and intolerance is coming
to an end, Clinch and Braggins too.
Here's a question you keep refusing to answer. Which would bother you
more: a cyclist being decapitated by piano wire, or a motorcyclist being
decapitated by piano wire? What if the motorcyclist was your son Michael?
Is he old enough to drive one yet? What will you tell him when you refuse
to let him learn to drive?
Do you think he knows what a murdering bastard you are? Hopefully
somebody will tell him before too long. I bet you anything that he won't
grow up supporting speed cameras, campaign for the Labour party or
believe in your fairytale invention in the sky.
Why did you post as "Lou Knee", Daddy, why?
Guy Cuthbertson
guy.c...@spamcop.net says...
Very good! Gave me a good laugh. You've obviously been paying a great
deal of attention to my posts...another member of my "fan club" who
think I talk such crap that they hang on my every word.
Here's a question for you: if what I say is so wrong (which presumably
is the lame point you're trying to make), perhaps you could try to show
*how* it's wrong? Or perhaps you can't, and that's why the only thing
you can think of is to parrot. But hey, imitation is the sincerest form
of flattery, and I'm very, very flattered.
Geoff Berrow
<gu...@nothing.invalid> wrote:
>> Do you think he knows what a murdering bastard you are? Hopefully
>> somebody will tell him before too long. I bet you anything that he won't
>> grow up supporting speed cameras, campaign for the Labour party or
>> believe in your fairytale invention in the sky.
>>
>> Why did you post as "Lou Knee", Daddy, why?
>
>Very good! Gave me a good laugh. You've obviously been paying a great
>deal of attention to my posts...another member of my "fan club" who
>think I talk such crap that they hang on my every word.
I'm getting very confused here...
I just don't know zis guy at all.
--
Geoff Berrow (Put thecat out to email)
It's only Usenet, no one dies.
My opinions, not the committee's, mine.
Simple RFDs www.4theweb.co.uk/rfdmaker
Guy Cuthbertson
<cf28b40137614ffb...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>,
m...@privacy.net says...
>
> Nuxx Bar wrote:
> > speed cameras. He knows full well that they kill road users. In other
>
Are you really stupid enough to think that the OP was me? Every time
you try to look clever by saying "What are you smoking?", it seems that
you completely miss the point, so perhaps you should ask yourself the
same question.
> If you obey the speed
> limit all the time, you don't need to worry
> about the cameras.
Looks like you are that stupid, yes. Only simple people usually spout
crap like that. (No-one ever "obeys the speed limit all the time"; even
perfect driver Simon Brooke admits that.)
I've had it with replying to your nonsense. Either you're so thick that
you're beyond help, or you're just pretending in order to be annoying.
Whichever it is, your "points" are self-evidently feeble and not worth
addressing. (And anyone who goes to such lengths to be untraceable is
very unlikely to have anything useful to say anyway.)
Guy Cuthbertson
blth...@ckdog.co.uk says...
>
> I'm getting very confused here...
>
> I just don't know zis guy at all.
The OP is attempting to take the piss out of stuff that I've said about
the loathsome Guy Chapman ("Just zis Guy, you know?"...definitely not
the same person as me) over the years. The amusing thing is that I
found it funny, whereas Chapman probably got quite annoyed, not least
because the OP forged his email address.
I know you've been on the receiving end of Chapman's obnoxiousness, but
one has to read quite a lot of his posts before they realise how truly
despicable and callous he is. I don't expect you to take my word for
that, but just because some of the things that people say about him may
seem extreme, it unfortunately doesn't mean they're not true.
Ian Smith
> In article <e36626tm5hhsniv9g...@4ax.com>,
> blth...@ckdog.co.uk says...
> >
> > I'm getting very confused here...
> >
> > I just don't know zis guy at all.
>
> The OP is attempting to take the piss out of stuff that I've said about
> the loathsome Guy Chapman ("Just zis Guy, you know?"...definitely not
> the same person as me) over the years.
Are you sure?
How do you know he's parodying your parody of Guy, rather than just
parodying Guy? Maybe he's parodying a third party parody of your
parody. You can't tell whether he's attacking you or supporting you,
and nor can anyone else. It's probably of (psychological) interest
that you assume an attack, however.
Perhaps we could get Tom Stoppard to write a play about it? (I see
from Wikipedia that I think I heard the premiere, certainly I heard it
at about the time Wikipedia reckons it was first broadcast).
--
|\ /| no .sig
|o o|
|/ \|
Guy Cuthbertson
i...@astounding.org.uk says...
>
> > The OP is attempting to take the piss out of stuff that I've said about
> > the loathsome Guy Chapman ("Just zis Guy, you know?"...definitely not
> > the same person as me) over the years.
>
> Are you sure?
Almost completely.
> How do you know he's parodying your parody of Guy, rather than just
> parodying Guy? Maybe he's parodying a third party parody of your
> parody. You can't tell whether he's attacking you or supporting you,
> and nor can anyone else. It's probably of (psychological) interest
> that you assume an attack, however.
Don't be silly. There are umpteen words and phrases which have been
lifted directly from previous posts of mine (like "Crapman", "AS BAD AS
HIM", singling out Wacko/Clinch/Bilbo as the worst URCM "moderators",
etc). Now *maybe* that person does indeed agree with what I've said and
is simply restating it, and you're right that no-one knows for sure, but
usually someone doing that would restate in their own words, to avoid
any perception that I was their actual target.
You know this of course, and you're probably just trying to continue the
piss-taking. But you know that by replying to threads like these you're
increasing the likelihood of Wacko et al killfiling you (although
they've probably done so already after you dared to criticise URCM's
"moderation", and you probably, and rightly, don't care)?
Fritz Wuehler
> On Jun 25, 3:08 pm, N Ron Hubbard <m...@privacy.net> wrote:
> > Nuxxy, when will you answer the question? Would you
> > rather decapitate a cyclist or a motorcyclist?
>
> They would both bother me equally. You? (Tumbleweed....)
the same of course