Hi Danielo,
thanks for your feedback. To have some initial content on the site I
restructured some of the answers I previously gave here on the list that
I thought could be be useful to others and were sizable enough to
deserve their own writeup. So the fact that I mentioned your tiddlyspot
is because it was the starting point for the original answer.
I would really like to include more plugins in the customizer,
especially ones like yours that are already deemed very useful by others
(e.g. the context search). However a few people made me aware that there
should be a very clear and explicit licensing structure for the plugins
that also fits to the BSD-style license of the core.
Also I believe some of your plugins are not compatible with TW5.1 yet,
but the bottom line is: Yes I would very much like to include some of
your plugins into the customizer once they're 5.1 compatible and if you
need any assistance to make them 5.1 ready, I would be honored to help.
@Jeremy:
I've heard that you're planning something like the Customizer and I
think it really should be integrated into
tiddlywiki.com
since it very much belongs there and maybe it doesn't have to be limited
to just the core plugins (you talked about having third party editions
maintained on
tw.com yesterday, so I don't think it would be
unreasonable to have a plugin library too .. of course there are a lot
of details involved).
For now the customizer.html is pretty much a proof of concept and a
workable solution for the time being which I myself use pretty much all
the time to grab a wiki with CodeMirror.
However I don't feel particularly great about having such a strong
connection to the core and I would like to focus more on third party
plugins that aren't as accessible as the core plugins.
/Andreas