First *Real* (Large) Edition

[Diego Mesa]

All,

I think there is a lot of momentum building on creating an edition of TW that "feels finished" like Roam. Do we think this could be the first real "full" (as in not close to empty) edition we could have as an official community edition?

[Jeremy Ruston]

Hi Diego

I think there is a lot of momentum building on creating an edition of TW that "feels finished" like Roam. Do we think this could be the first real "full" (as in not close to empty) edition we could have as an official community edition? 

That sounds like something we might call a notetaking edition (we have other editions like the translators edition, and in fact we already have a “full” edition at https://tiddlywiki.com/editions/full/). 

The only constraint is that such an edition would be constrained to using the plugins from the official plugin library.

Best wishes

Jeremy

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/7dbfbe9d-ed75-484b-99b2-d589e4571561%40googlegroups.com.

[Diego Mesa]

Hey Jeremy,

Thanks for the response! My followup questions:

• Is it possible to have "community editions" that consist of non official plugins, but are still part of the "official TW editions"/listed on the main page?
  
• or, is it possible to expand the official plugin library to include something like tiddlyblink, which would support an official notetaking edition?
  

Just thinking out loud.

Diego

On Tuesday, April 14, 2020 at 10:59:30 AM UTC-5, Jeremy Ruston wrote:

Hi Diego

I think there is a lot of momentum building on creating an edition of TW that "feels finished" like Roam. Do we think this could be the first real "full" (as in not close to empty) edition we could have as an official community edition? 

That sounds like something we might call a notetaking edition (we have other editions like the translators edition, and in fact we already have a “full” edition at https://tiddlywiki.com/editions/full/). 

The only constraint is that such an edition would be constrained to using the plugins from the official plugin library.

Best wishes

Jeremy

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddl...@googlegroups.com.

[Jed Carty]

I think that this would be a good excuse to go through community plugins and determine what we want to put into the main plugin library.

[Mohammad]

I agree with Diego!

This is not only useful for newbies but also for other users.

It is really difficult to find plugins from googling or this forum!

--Mohammad

[Lin Onetwo]

Maybe it is like the Extension Packs in the VSCode.

I think the real problem behind Mohammad's word

This is not only useful for newbies but also for other users.

It is really difficult to find plugins from googling or this forum!

 

is that we don't have a centuralized marketplace like https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/ and https://ankiweb.net/shared/addons/2.1 , to browse and search plugins, and letting community to publish plugins and updates.

Its maintenance can be automated, so you won't need much time to care about it.

 

[TiddlyTweeter]

Diego Mesa wrote:

I think there is a lot of momentum building on creating an edition of TW that "feels finished" like Roam. Do we think this could be the first real "full" (as in not close to empty) edition we could have as an official community edition? 

Very interesting issue! Anything to give end users access to better "wholes", not something you need add zillions of changes to to get started.

But I'm skeptical of A "community edition" ... Rather I'd like to see a showcase of WikiS dedicated to specific objectives.

My tuppence

TT