Miles,
My apologies. I understood your point and appreciated your
restrained and polite response. Others joined in, some less
politely, and I didn't get my point across at all, and then the many
more emails from other subscribers who supported my position started
coming... I appreciated your post and will say that we are in heated
agreement on several points. And if we were not, I'd still defend
your right to have an opinion, post and not be accused of being a
sour grape, etc. =-O
I still carry a spinning and baitcasting rig in my kayak (for those
windy days or when I just need to "find the fish"). I am sensitive
to the perceived arrogance fly anglers project. I believe it's
becoming much more of a "common person" sport/recreation, but there
are still many snobs. It is a wicked expensive sport too and that
contributes to the division between angling styles. By son and I
both spin fish, as do most of my fishing buddies. I prefer to fly
fish most of the time, but not always.
To the others:
The point I was trying to make, and it wasn't initially intended to
be provocative and draw attention, is that there are consequences to
reporting specific locations not just for other anglers, but for the
river and the delicate balance between man and wild on it's
fringes. Until recently, the members mostly posted on areas above
the Wilson Bridge, many being very urban. I personally don't care
about the obvious ones, but many of us are exploring the whole
river and discovering that by kayak and canoe our options have
expanded. When we find ones that provide good foot access, they are
really special to us. In some cases, they are protected areas that
are still pretty wild; we could lose them if those that manage them
feel we are pressuring the wildlife too heavily (it's not just about
the fish, or the angler). Then we come home, and read about it on
TPFR. We're fishing the same spots, but anglers like myself are
becoming more restrained about reporting them now. I admit, I used
to talk about them more openly. Wading and tromping through
protected wetlands has much more of a negative impact than, say, a
kayak or canoe. So, when we see other generous posters reporting
their weekend accomplishments and divulging exact locations of areas
we've worked hard to discover and preserve, alarm bells go off for
some of us.
Another point to be made is that the very few who really post here,
those that dominate the forum, set the tone. So, I respectfully
enjoin all to consider the longer term impact their fishing report
will have, as well as their self-imposed rules and overall tone
online, which sometimes appears intolerant. It is possible to point
out general locations and still present a nice fishing story. I
won't claim to be speaking for others, they can speak up as well.
Frankly though, it can be an intimidating venue and subscribers are
not always eager to post.
While TPFR is a generous group, that generosity can also have a
negative impact on the river, as well other anglers. I keep hearing
that there are "750 members", but the reality is it's probably more
like 750 with a google account who've subscribed to the google
group. My perception is that there are far fewer who are
active members in the FFF-sponsored club. I met a guy at Dulles
airport who uses the google group to find fishing sites, but doesn't
subscribe. Others do the same. Maybe TPFR should follow other
fishing related forums and offer "private areas" for "members".
The point is that any of the TPFR posts can have a very large
audience (good and bad).
Someone asked what the point of all this was. TPFR should be
cautious about posting data that results in the swarming of sites,
increased pressure on the wildlife, as well as spoiling the journey
of other free anglers who just don't think it's cool. I have been
guilty of it, too. I think I read where someone said that ALL TPFR
members were committed to conserving the fishery and that's why they
practice catch and release. OK, but that's not an extremely
effective conservation technique. Do more. Your posts matter. By
the way the best shore lunch I ever had was largemouth bass tacos
(just saying). Carbon Fiber production at a facility in China isn't
exactly a environmentally sound process, nor is the use of toxic
epoxies used to make the fiber sheets into rod blanks. That three
hour drive in your SUV didn't help. I'm not suggesting giving up
carbon fiber rods for sustainable bamboo, or buying a hybrid (I have
neither), just one small little detail that has a huge impact - a
modicum of discretion.
I'm pretty done with this topic now, at least on this venue. I
promise.
Oh, incidentally. I misspoke. I am not a TPFR member. I do not
have FFF membership. I've been a TPFR google group subscriber, not
an actual club member all these years and didn't know it. I think
there is a difference but not sure.
The forum needs more humor - it's pretty sterile and uptight in my
opinion. So, can we go kill snakeheads and eat fish tacos now? :-D
cheers,
-Dubble Haul
For those who are packing VHF radios on the water, I'm on channel 71
- call sign is "Dubble Haul". That goes for you unsubscribed
snoopers too - need water, another fly, a band-aid...